Review Article

Disrespect and Abuse during Childbirth in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review

Table 1

Summary results of included studies.

Author, yearStudy setting and locationStudy design and descriptionSample sizeType and characteristics of D and AResultsType of analysis doneContributing factors

Asefa et al., 2018 [33]Addis Ababa, urbanCross-sectional (interviewer-administered questionnaire)57 health professionals from the health center and hospital (convenience sampling)Slapping, hitting, unattended labor/left alone, privacy not protected, detaining at health facility25.9% reported physical abuse, 34.5% privacy was not protected, 13.2% observed unattended laborSurvey data analyzed by tabulationsNormalization of D&A as a culture, high workload, poor support from facility management, discomfort of the working environment
Wassihun and Zeleke 2018 [14]Bahir Dar, urbanCross-sectional (interviewer-administered questionnaire)Survey of 284 mothers who gave birth selected randomlyDid not support pain relief, slapped, insult, treated not friendly way30.3% with no support in pain relief, 34.5% slapped by, 31.3% insulted, 68.3% of them treated in unfriendly approachSurvey data analyzed by tabulations and logistic regressionLow family monthly income
Ukke et al., 2019 [45]Arba Minch, urbanCross-sectional (interviewer-administered questionnaire)Survey of 281 postnatal mothers selected systematicallyNondignified care, doing episiotomy without anesthesia, nonconsented care, discriminated care, abandonment of care18.8% sutured their perineum without anesthesia,36.7% nondignified care, 92.5% of nonconsented care, 18.1% perceived discriminatory careSurvey data analyzed by tabulationsNormalization, lack of support from management body, workload and dissatisfaction by the hospital staffs, low socioeconomic status
Wassihun et al., 2018 [44]Bahir Dar, urbanCross-sectional (interviewer-administered questionnaire)Survey of 422 households selected by systematic random samplingPhysical force, insult, nonconsented care, physical privacy not respected, personal info discussed with others23.2% reported physical force, 27.1% insult, 25.1% report did not obtain any consent, 8.3% reported did not use barriers for privacy, 5.4% claimed their personnel info was discussedSurvey data analyzed by tabulations and bivariate and multivariate for associationsLow maternal family income
Banks et al., 2017 [32]SNNP and AMHARA, ruralQuantitative cross-sectional direct observation (semistructured checklist)Survey of 204 mothers who gave birth and client-provider interaction was observed in 193 of them selected randomlyFundal pressure, lack of consent, auditory privacy not respected, physical privacy not respected14.1% of them fundal pressure was applied, 68.4% of them lack of consent, 21.1% of them auditory privacy was not respected, 20.7% physical privacy was not providedSurvey data analyzed by tabulation and fishers exact testNormalization of behavior and circumstances by both woman and provider, high patient flow, failing infrastructure
Bobo et al., 2019 [36]West Oromia, urban-ruralCross-sectional (interviewer-administered questionnaire)807 surveys of mothers who gave birth in the institution, systematic randomHarshly forcing leg apart, shouted at, unconsented episiotomy, and C-section, discriminate on basis of status33.8% legs apart harshly, 31.4% report shouting at, in 48.9% of them unconsented episiotomy was done; in 39% of them, physical privacy was not provided.Survey data analyzed by tabulations and bivariate and multivariate for associationsExperience with the health facility setting, lack of a companion throughout labor and delivery services
Siraj et al., 2019 [51]Jimma, urbanCross-sectional (interviewer-administered questionnaire)290 surveys of immediate postnatal mothers (convenient consecutive sampling)The right to information not protected, ill-treatment, confidentiality and privacy not protected, detention90% reported the right to info denied, 87.9% report physical harm and ill-treatment, 25.9% report detentionSurvey data analyzed by tabulationHigh patient flow and faced significant resource and staff shortage
Mekonnen et al., 2019 [37]Bale, urban-ruralCross-sectional (interviewer-administered questionnaire)565 surveys of immediate postnatal mothers, multistage then SRSVerbal abuse and physical threaten11% verbally threatened, 17.3% physically abuseSurvey data analyzed by tabulation and chi-squareNot specified
Warren et al., 2017 [52]Hadya zone, urban-ruralQualitative (focused group discussion and in-depth interview), semistructured checklist8 FGD (8 to 10 members per group) and 16 key informant interviews (purposive sampling)Bad approach, treated neglect and arrogantly, not involvement of companionshipCare providers did not show any empathy, they did not tell what is going on, physical privacy was disgraced in front many people, insultingThematic content analysisLow degree of job satisfaction, routine, and attitudinal
Mirkuzie, 2014 [46]Addis Ababa, urbanQualitative (in-depth interview), semistructured checklist11 women who gave birth at home in IDI and 28 in FGDShouting at, not treat them in a respectful way, insulting, misinformationYelling at and did not have any empathy, not treating in a women-friendly way, run out of resources, misinformation, and misdiagnosis that creates hesitationFramework and content analysisPregnant migrant women often have low education and low economy
Burrowes et al., 2107 [34]Debre Markos, urbanQualitative (in-depth interview and FGD), semistructured checklist23 women participated in FGD and 19 (4 health care provider and 15 students) in IDI, purposiveAutonomy not respected, verbal abuse, physical abuse, nonconsented care, abandonmentExacerbation of pain by shouting and insulting, pinching and slapping clients to open up their leg, restriction of fluids and food, deny to adopt preferred positionFramework and content analysisShortages of personnel, lack of supplies, heavy workload, low payment compared to effort
Tefera and Abeya, 2019 [39]Bishoftu, semiurbanMixed (cross-sectional study and FGD), interviewer-administered questionnaire351 surveys of pregnant women selected systematically and 6 FGD (8 to 10) selected purposivelyPhysical harm, prohibition of mothers informed consent, nonconfidential care, abandonment18.5% of report episiotomy was done without anesthesia and suturing without antipain, 27.4% reported prohibition of informed consent, not using of screening, scolding and hittingSurvey data analyzed by tabulation and thematic analysisLack of infrastructure, normalization, lack of good attitude of health care provider
Getachew, 2019 [40]Hossana, urban-ruralCross-sectional (interviewer-administered questionnaire)577 surveys of mothers selected by systematic random samplingNeglect and abandon, ineffective communication, loss of autonomy, lack of supportive, discrimination44.9% reported lack of informed consent, 21.2% report discussion overheard by others, 20% neglected and abandoned, 5.4% discriminated by statusSurvey data analyzed by tabulationLack of resource, lack of policy, facility culture, lack of redress mechanisms,
Sheferaw et al., 2019 [41]Oromia, SNNP, Amhara and Tigray, both urban and ruralCross-sectional (interviewer-administered questionnaire)379 surveys of postnatal mothers of selected systematicallyLack of autonomy, poor perception, not responding to questions, no explanation during labor, not allowing companionPoor rapport between patient and provider was reported in 72% of them, 28% report not allowing birth companion, 56% did not adopt the preferred choice of position during laborSurvey data analyzed by tabulation and bivariate and multivariate for associationHigh patient volume and workload
Gebremichael et al., 2018 [47]Tigray, urbanCross-sectional (interviewer-administered questionnaire)Survey of 1125 of women who gave birth within the preceding year selected by systematicallyShouted at, scolded/insulted, discouraging/become negative, restriction of movement12.5% shouted at, 10.5% scolded/insulted, 5% claimed care provider as discouraging,, movement during labor was restricted in 3.8% of themAnalyzed by tabulation and negative binomial and multivariate for associationNot specified
Mihret, 2019 [49]North West Amhara, urbanCross-sectional (interviewer-administered questionnaire)Survey of 409 postnatal mothers selected by systematicPhysical abuse, nonconsented care, nonconfidential care, discriminatory care, neglected care49.6% experience physical abuse, 63.6% reported nonconsented care, 32.3% report nonconfidential careAnalyzed by tabulation and negative binomial and multivariate for associationLow educational status and residing rural
Sheferaw et al., 2017 [31]Nationwide, urban and ruralCross-sectional direct observation(semistructured checklist)240 of women during labor and delivery were observedPhysical abuse, verbal abuse, privacy violated, abandonment/left alone9% experience physical abuse, 8% experience mistreatment of verbal abuse, in 17% of them, privacy was violated and 19% of the mothers were left aloneChi-square, bivariate and multivariate, tabulationInsufficient in-service training and preservice education, unavailability of redress mechanism,
Bante et al., 2020 [48]Harar, urbanCross-sectional (interviewer-administered questionnaire)Survey of 425 women nominated by systematic random sampling methodUntimed care, unfriendly care, abused care, discriminatory care40.2% claimed that the care was unfriendly, 42.1% mothers experience abuse care either physically or verbally, 54.6% of them respond the care was discriminatory on statusSurvey data analyzed by tabulationCongestion of patient with less concentrating of service delivery
Asefa and Bekele, 2015 [43]Addis Ababa, urbanCross-sectional (interviewer-administered questionnaire)Survey of 173 women nominated by systematic random samplingDid not receive pain relief on request, uncaring in a culturally acceptable way, did not obtain consent23.7% of them did not receive pain relief upon request, 9.2% of them did not demonstrate culturally acceptable way, 48% did not obtain informed consentSurvey data analyzed by tabulationFacilities being as teaching hospital, normalization of care
Gebremichael et al., 2017 [42]Tigray, both urban and ruralQualitative (focused group discussion) (semistructured checklist)8 FGD (8 to 10 members per group) which accompanies A total of 62 women who gave birth in the year prior to the studyDid not explain the findings, detention without their will, lack of support for basic physiologic needsPerform PV multiple times but did not explain the findings, women complain about detention at the health facility for the fear of home delivery, pain was not managedThematic and content analysisNegligent and incompetent providers, scarcity of resources
Molla et al. 2017 [35]SNNP and Amhara, urban and ruralQualitative (IDI and FGD), semistructured discussion checklistIDI with 4 midwives and 42 women gave birth at home and institutions, 8 FGD with 63 family members accompanying labor womenInsulting, pushing/hitting, consent not obtained, discrimination based on residence, no physical privacyYelled when out of bed, slapping in denying, clenching of legs apart, doing instrumental delivery without consent, differentials in care for urban and rural womenThematic and content analysisDisempowerment and loss of autonomy, normalization
Bekele et al., 2020 [50]Oromia, urbanCross-sectional (interviewer-administered semistructured questionnaire)Survey of 321 women selected by systematic random samplingForcing leg apart, physical and auditory privacy not respected, did not introduce, shouting, ignored when needed13.9% report legs harshly apart, 33.5% physical privacy disgraced, 72.2% did not introduce themselves, 13.3% ignored when the care is neededSurvey data analyzed by tabulationNot specified