Biological Efficacy of Essential Oils and Plant Extracts of Cultivated and Wild Ecotypes of Origanum vulgare L.
Table 9
Comparative antioxidant potential of ethanolic and methanolic plant extracts of cultivated and wild accessions of Origanum vulgare as revealed by ABTS and FRAP assay.
FRAP (Fe2+g−1 of sample)
ABTS free radical scavenging (%)
Places
EO
ETH
METH
METH
ETH
EO
Tangmarg
14.50 ± 0.30
10.60 ± 0.19
4.80 ± 0.11
8 ± 0.16
37 ± 0.92
15 ± 0.31
Bonera
11.09 ± 0.22
8.60 ± 0.11
2.70 ± 0.05
15 ± 0.31
23 ± 0.47
18 ± 0.37
Sanatnagar
10.30 ± 0.21
5.60 ± 0.09
1.90 ± 0.06
25 ± 0.60
12 ± 0.25
49 ± 1.02
Chorwan
12.03 ± 0.25
10.80 ± 0.24
6.46 ± 0.14
37.25 ± 0.86
55.87 ± 1.29
265.50 ± 5.52
Kanzalwan
23.50 ± 0.48
11.85 ± 0.23
14.28 ± 0.31
89.02 ± 1.94
127.64 ± 2.64
424.20 ± 8.83
Markoot
7.80 ± 0.16
17.67 ± 0.36
11.02 ± 0.23
67.45 ± 1.40
120.00 ± 2.49
245.10 ± 5.10
Izmarg
6.78 ± 0.14
13.97 ± 0.29
10.37 ± 0.21
58.82 ± 1.23
104.70 ± 2.18
284.90 ± 5.93
Dachigam
19.20 ± 0.40
16.08 ± 0.34
12.97 ± 0.25
80.39 ± 1.67
120.59 ± 2.45
384.40 ± 8.00
Yusmarg
20.90 ± 0.41
11.98 ± 0.25
11.98 ± 0.0.27
64.87 ± 1.47
81.76 ± 1.70
192.40 ± 4.00
Uri
10.09 ± 0.20
10.98 ± 0.22
9.70 ± 0.20
50.19 ± 1.04
68.81 ± 1.43
205.30 ± 4.27
CD
7.22
2.86
2.84
18.76
23.5
78.67
SE (d)
3.44
1.36
1.35
8.93
11.19
37.45
SE (M)
2.45
0.96
0.96
6.31
7.9
26.48
CV
33.10
13.25
20.47
23.39
18.27
23.07
CD, CV, and SE represent critical difference, coefficient of variation, and standard error.
