BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2020 / Article
!A Corrigendum for this article has been published. To view the article details, please click the ‘Corrigendum’ tab above.

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 9247237 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9247237

Chengfu Li, Ji Sun, Huameng Zhao, Tingshan Dai, "Association between Frailty and Erectile Dysfunction among Chinese Elderly Men", BioMed Research International, vol. 2020, Article ID 9247237, 7 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9247237

Association between Frailty and Erectile Dysfunction among Chinese Elderly Men

Academic Editor: Margaret A. Niznikiewicz
Received21 Feb 2020
Accepted30 Jun 2020
Published08 Jul 2020

Abstract

Objective. This study is aimed at assessing association between frailty and erectile dysfunction among Chinese elderly men. Methods. This community-based study was conducted with a sample of 341 Chinese elderly men (aged 60 to 83 years old) in Fuyang City (Anhui Province, China). Each of the participants completed a standard questionnaire, including demographics (age, height, weight, yearly income, educational status, comorbidity, lifestyle factors, etc.), medical and sexual history, and the Chinese version of Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) and International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) for assessing frailty and erectile dysfunction (ED). Results. The prevalence of ED and frailty in Chinese elderly men was 77.13% and 68.04%, respectively. Compared with the non-ED group, the ED group had increased age, spouse’s age, BMI, prevalence of diabetes, and scores of TFI and lower yearly income, educational levels, and ratio of irregular intercourse (less than once per week) (all ). Multivariate analysis indicated that age (OR: 0.860, 95% CI: 0.763-0.969), diabetes (OR: 0.330, 95% CI: 0.165-0.661), irregular intercourse (OR: 3.416, 95% CI: 1.874-6.229), and scores of TFI (OR: 0.906, 95% CI: 0.846-0.970) were regarded as independent risk factors for ED (all ). And after adjusting for age, the TFI score had a negative significant association with the IIEF score (, ). Conclusion. This study confirmed the strong associations between ED and frailty among elderly men. Sexual health care for elderly men with ED should be assessed and taken addressed on the multidimensional assessments of frailty.

1. Introduction

The aging of the global population is accelerating, and the percentage of people aged 60 and over is increasing every year. Currently, Japan and Europe have the highest percentage of population aged 60 and over. From 2009 to 2019, the percentage of aging people in China increased from 12.5% to 18.1% and will exceed 30% in 2050 [1]. The whole of society has faced great challenges taken by these demographic changes. Over the past few decades, we have made great success in improving the overall health and quality of life of elderly men [24]. However, as an important component of overall health, sexual health and sexual satisfaction have been seriously neglected, which can strongly decline the well-being of life among the aging population.

Erectile dysfunction (ED), the most common sexual dysfunction among men, tends to increase with advancing age [5, 6]. Studies report that 20–40% of men have had difficulty in achieving or maintaining erections in their 60s, and this increases to 50–70% for men aged 70 or over [7, 8]. In China, this percentage could be higher, as ED is not a life-threatening condition and elderly men may refuse to look for medical support [9]. Previous studies have shown that men with sexual problems were more likely to experience lower sexual satisfaction and quality of life [10, 11]. Given the issues reported above, it is essential to diagnose and treat ED. Owing to advances in basic research, we have taken deep insights into the pathology of ED, which revealed some risk factors affecting the potency of erections. Vascular health is regarded as the most important one [12]; others include nutrition, exercise, cardiovascular disease, obesity, diabetes, smoking, and lifestyle habits [1315]. Additionally, we still face great challenges among elderly men, who have a more complex physiological and pathological status than young men. Importantly, aging, comorbidities, mental pressure, or combinations of these, as the special condition different from young men, have been proven to seriously affect erection [6, 14, 15].

Frailty is used to describe an age-related multidimensional dynamic physiological state with diminished resilience or vulnerability to stressors [16]. Frail elderly people often show a physiological decline in multiple organ systems, including the nervous, endocrine, circulatory, and immune systems, eventually leading to an increased risk of adverse health outcomes, such as falls, institutionalization, dementia, disability, and death [17]. In 2010, the Dutch scholar Gobbens proposed the integral conceptual model, which emphasized the dynamic development of physical, psychological, and social frailty. Subsequently, the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), based on the integral conceptual model, was created to provide a multidimensional assessment of frailty [18]. These adequate multidimensional frailty assessments were widely used in many countries and displayed great predictive validity and reliability [19, 20].

Despite both ED and frailty being connected with the aging process, there is little knowledge about the associations between frailty and ED, especially how frailty interrelates with erections among elderly men. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between frailty and ED among elderly men. We also examine the independent risk factors for ED and expect to provide elderly men with better medical support for ED.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population and Data Collection

This community-based cross-sectional study was performed in Fuyang City (Anhui Province, China) from July 2019 to October 2019. A total of consecutive 341 local men aged 60 or over were recruited in four communities who attended to community hospitals for health physical care. All subjects underwent routine examinations and assessment by a specific specialist on sexual medicine with five years of clinical experience, including sexual history and physical examination of the reproductive system. Subsequently, each participant who agreed to participate in this study would be guided by a specialized nurse into another consulting room to complete a written questionnaire, including the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5), the TFI, medical and sexual histories, and conditions and demographic characteristics of spouses (such as age, height, weight, yearly income, educational status, comorbidity, lifestyle factors).

To be enrolled in this study, the participants must attempt sexual intercourse at least once per month with a stable partner for at least 6 months. Participants would be excluded if they suffered from serious psychiatric or somatic disorders or were addicted to any drug that could affect erectile function and/or psychological status. Men who had premature ejaculation or delayed ejaculation were also excluded.

This study was approved by the local ethics committee. All individuals who agreed to participate in this study signed written informed consent forms.

2.2. Frailty Assessment

Frailty, which is multidimensional, was assessed using the TFI questionnaire, which was divided into 3 domains and 15 items, including physical frailty (8 items), psychological frailty (4 items), and social frailty (3 items). Each item represented a score of 1, with the total score ranging from 0 to 15. A higher TFI score correlates with increasing levels of frailty. A total was diagnosed as frailty [18].

2.3. ED Assessment

The IIEF-5, which has been widely used to evaluate whether elderly men experienced ED in the past 4 weeks, is composed of 5 questions related to ED. Participants choose a score of 0 to 5 for each question, with the total score of the IIEF being 0 to 25 and lower scores referring to more severe ED. A total indicated the occurrence of ED [21].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

IBM SPSS Statistics 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Quantitative data were expressed as , and the two-tailed unpaired Student’s -test was used to compare differences. Differences of proportions expressed as percentages were performed by the chi-squared test. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the risk factors associated with ED. Linear correlation models were used to illuminate the association between the IIEF-5 and TFI scores. In order to eliminate the effect of age on the association, partial correlation was used to adjust for age. A was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Basic Characteristics of Participants and Comparison between Elderly Men with and without ED

This study enrolled 341 elderly men with a mean age of years, and the mean age of their spouses was years. According to the IIEF-5 and TFI, the prevalence of ED and frailty was 77.13% and 68.04%, respectively. The common comorbidities of participants were hypertension (58.7%) and diabetes (33.7%). In addition, the mean IIEF-5 and TFI scores were and , respectively. Almost half of the participants had regular intercourse.

Statistical analyses suggested that the ED group had higher age and lower IIEF-5 score (age: vs. , ), indicating elderly men suffered from worse erections. It was also revealed that the ED group had higher mean age of the spouse and BMI and lower yearly income and educational level as compared to the non-ED group (all ). No statistical differences were found between ED and residence, smoking, drinking, and healthy status of spouses (). In regard to the difference in the prevalence of comorbidities between the two groups, the results showed that the ED group was more likely to suffer from diabetes (), and no significant difference was found in the prevalence of hypertension (). Additionally, compared with the non-ED group, the ED group had a significantly higher TFI score ( vs. , ) and a higher ratio of regular intercourse (66.7% vs. 38.8%, ). The detailed information is shown in Table 1.


Total subjects ()With ED ()Without ED ()

Age5.843<0.001
BMI2.4430.015
Residence1.2540.300
 Urban291 (85.4%)143 (54.4%)48 (61.5%)
 Rural150 (14.6%)120 (45.6%)30 (38.5%)
Income/year5.2110.033
 >10,000 CNY44 (12.9%)28 (10.6%)16 (20.5%)
 ≤10,000 CNY297 (87.1%)235 (89.4%)62 (79.5%)
Education level6.4800.039
 Primary school248 (72.7%)200 (76.0%)48 (72.7%)
 Middle school57 (16.7%)38 (14.4%)19 (16.7%)
 University36 (10.6%)25 (9.5%)11 (10.6%)
Smoking0.5670.518
 Yes157 (46.0%)124 (47.1%)33 (42.3%)
 No184 (54.0%)139 (52.9%)45 (57.7%)
Drinking1.0500.357
 Yes136 (39.9%)101 (38.4%)35 (44.9%)
 No205 (60.1%)162 (61.6%)43 (55.1%)
Diabetes9.5050.002
 Yes115 (33.7%)100 (38.0%)15 (19.2%)
 No226 (66.3%)163 (62.0%)63 (80.8%)
Hypertension0.5180.514
 Yes200 (58.7%)157 (59.7%)43 (55.1%)
 No141 (41.3%)106 (40.3%)35 (44.9%)
Regular intercourse18.886<0.001
 Yes154 (45.2%)102 (38.8%)52 (66.7%)
 No187 (54.8%)161 (61.2%)26 (33.3%)
Spouse age4.684<0.001
Health status of spouse0.9370.626
 Good105 (30.8%)84 (31.9%)21 (26.9%)
 Fair114 (33.4%)88 (33.5%)26 (33.3%)
 Poor122 (35.8%)91 (34.6%)31 (39.7%)
TFI4.798<0.001
IIEF-519.794<0.001

Differences between elderly men with and without ED were assessed by -test or chi-squared test, as appropriate. ED: erectile dysfunction; BMI: body mass index; CNY: Chinese yuan; TFI: Tilburg Frailty Indicator. Regular intercourse is defined as sexual per week.
3.2. Frailty Is an Independent Risk Factor for ED in Elderly Men

Bivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for ED. The results showed that age (OR: 0.860, 95% CI: 0.763 to 0.969), diabetes (OR: 0.330, 95% CI: 0.165 to 0.661), irregular intercourse (OR: 3.416, 95% CI: 1.874 to 6.229), and TFI score (OR: 0.906, 95% CI: 0.846 to 0.970) were regarded as independent risk factors for ED (all ). The detailed information is presented in Table 2. Moreover, to illuminate the association between the IIEF-5 and TFI scores, a linear regression analysis was performed, indicating the TFI score had a significantly negative association with the IIEF-5 score (, ). Considering the potential effect of age on the association, a partial correlation analysis was applied, and after adjusting for age, it was also found that the TFI score was negatively correlated with the IIEF-5 score (, ).


SEWalsOR95% CI for OR
LowerUpper

Constant9.6172.51914.576<0.001
Age-0.1510.0616.1320.0130.8600.7630.969
BMI-0.0770.0443.0160.0820.9260.8481.010
Income/year
 >10,000 CNY-0.1430.4410.1050.7460.8670.3652.057
 ≤10,000 CNY1.000
Education
 Primary school1.000
 Middle school-0.1390.4650.0890.7660.8710.3502.167
 University-0.2090.5180.1620.6870.8120.2942.240
Diabetes
 Yes1.000
 No-1.1090.3559.7820.0020.3300.1650.661
Regular intercourse
 Yes1.000
 No1.2290.30616.074<0.0013.4161.8746.229
Spouse age0.0290.0560.2690.6041.0290.9231.147
TFI-0.0980.0357.9440.0050.9060.8460.970

Independent risks of ED were assessed by logistic regression analysis. ED: erectile dysfunction; BMI: body mass index; TFI: Tilburg Frailty Indicator.

4. Discussion

Currently, sexual health plays an important role in the overall health of elderly people. Because of the advanced aging process, the population of elderly people has risen rapidly. To improve their quality of life, great efforts have been made toward physical and mental health, while the sexual aspects have been ignored, with the most common sexual problem among elderly men being ED. Poor erections act importantly among elderly men with higher life expectancy.

Our study was conducted with a sample of 341 elderly Chinese men aged 60 to 83 years, with an ED prevalence of 77.13%. According to the Massachusetts Male Aging Study, 52% of men aged 40–70 years suffered from ED [22]. The Cologne Male Study reported an overall ED prevalence of 19.2% in men aged 30–80 years, with a steep age-related increase from 2.3% to 53.4% [23]. The differences in ED occurrence in these studies can be explained by differences in age, race, definition, methodology, and socioeconomic and cultural statuses of the study population.

Considering the higher prevalence of ED among elderly men, it is crucial to identify the risk factors for ED. Our study showed that the ED group had an increased age as compared with the non-ED group, and subsequent logistic regression analysis indicated age was regarded as an independent risk factor for ED. The studies by Ahn et al. and Yu et al. similarly confirmed the influence of increased age on ED, and each year of increase in age caused a decrease in the IIEF-5 score, meaning a more difficult erection condition [24, 25]. The decreases in coital frequency, physical activity, vascular function, and testosterone levels and increases in oxidative stress, inflammation, and glucose metabolic abnormalities with age played a vital role in the development of ED [26, 27]. Despite educational level and yearly income not being recognized as independent risk factors for ED, our study implied the ED group had lower educational level and yearly income. These could be attributed to higher educational level and income providing the elderly men with a better understanding of ED and effective medical support for ED treatment. Previous studies have highlighted a lack of knowledge and confidence for ED treatment in aged men. Moreover, they were afraid to involve doctors in their sexual problems or just neglected them because of the embarrassment and insufficient income, which were more common among elderly Chinese men [2831]. Besides, our results showed that hypertension, smoking, and alcohol consumption were not found to be associated with ED, which was inconsistent with the results of previous studies [3234]. This conclusion may be due to differences in methodology, sample scale, and socioeconomic and cultural factors. Given the comorbidities, the meta-analysis showed that diabetes was positively related to ED [15]. The observational results of our study were in line with the above. Good metabolic control acted importantly in vascular health, which was strongly associated with ED. Therefore, for aged men with diabetes, the control of blood sugar is essential. Interestingly, our study also found that having regular intercourse was important to decrease the occurrence of ED in elderly men. Similarly, a study by Koskimaki and colleagues also suggested that regular intercourse protected elderly men against the development of ED. The most likely explanation for this may be that the regular sexual activity protects vascular function and prevents cavernous fibrosis [35].

There are also some other factors associated with age that were also considered to be related to ED, such as the female partner’s sexual dysfunction and mental disorders. Female sexual dysfunction is a common disease, which was associated with various demographic characteristics, including age. And it has been considered to be related to the male partner’s erectile dysfunction. The research conducted by Nelson et al. in America found that there was a statistical correlation between female sexual function index and their partners’ IIEF scores in 121 couples [36]. Even though the female partner’s sexual function was not investigated in this study, it was also found that the partner’s age in the ED group was higher compared with the group without ED. The increased age might be related to higher prevalence of female sexual dysfunction, which might be related to male erectile dysfunction. Additionally, psychological disorders were also regarded as risk factors of ED. Korfage et al. conducted a survey to examine the association between ED and mental health in healthy elderly men. And it was found that men with ED had poor mental health scores than subjects without ED [37].

Both frailty and ED could be recognized as a result of multisystem dysfunction with increasing age. However, there is little evidence on how frailty interrelates with ED. A study by Lee and colleagues suggested that frailty was associated with impaired overall sexual function, sex-related distress, and ED among older European men. In order to make deep insights into the association between frailty and ED, the multidimensional TFI was applied to detect frailty. Instead of the previous diagnostic tools, which only focused on physical frailty, the TFI emphasizes the multidimensional aspects of frailty and takes all three domains (physical, psychological, and social) into account. Several studies have stated that a multidimensional tool may be better to detect adverse outcomes [3840]. Therefore, the prevalence of frailty in our study was 68.04% among elderly men, based on the total TFI scores. Compared with the non-ED group, the ED group showed high TFI scores, which was regarded as an independent risk for ED. Further linear regression analysis indicated the TFI scores had a significantly negative association with the IIEF-5 scores. Therefore, the TFI score may be of great predictive value for ED assessment. Importantly, sexual health care for ED should particularly pay more attention to the multidimensional insights of frailty, instead of focusing only on the physical aspect.

The study has several limitations including the following: firstly, this study was conducted in a single center with a tiny sample; secondly, difficulty in understanding the questionnaire (especially the IIEF-5 and TFI) may lead to the occurrence of information bias; thirdly, the evaluation of frailty in the sexual partner of elderly men was ignored; fourthly, sexual hormone was not tested for subjects in this study, and it may have an important effect on male erectile function. We will perform this test in the further study.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, this cross-sectional study confirmed the strong associations between ED and frailty among elderly men, emphasizing the importance of a multidimensional assessment of frailty for elderly men suffering from ED. Medical support for ED should pay more attention to multidimensional aspects.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Review Board of the Second Hospital of Fuyang People’s Hospital.

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ Contributions

CL and TD designed the study. CL, JS, HZ, and TD collected the data. CL and JS analyzed the data. CL and TD wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We thank all subjects who participated in this study.

References

  1. United Nations, World Population Prospects 2019 Highlights, Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division, UN, New York, 2019.
  2. A. Chan, Y. Saito, and J. M. Robine, “International perspectives on summary measures of population health in an aging world,” Journal of Aging and Health, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1119–1123, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. Curtis, L. Gibson, M. O'Brien, and B. Roe, “Systematic review of the impact of arts for health activities on health, wellbeing and quality of life of older people living in care homes,” Dementia, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 645–669, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. T. Pedersen, J. Vorup, A. Nistrup et al., “Effect of team sports and resistance training on physical function, quality of life, and motivation in older adults,” Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 852–864, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. A. B. Araujo, B. A. Mohr, and J. B. McKinlay, “Changes in sexual function in middle-aged and older men: longitudinal data from the Massachusetts Male Aging Study,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 1502–1509, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. Stranne, U. G. H. Malmsten, B. Areskoug, I. Milsom, U. Molander, and R. Peeker, “The rate of deterioration of erectile function increases with age: results from a longitudinal population based survey,” Scandinavian Journal of Urology, vol. 53, no. 2-3, pp. 161–165, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. E. O. Laumann and L. J. Waite, “Sexual dysfunction among older adults: prevalence and risk factors from a nationally representative U.S. probability sample of men and women 57-85 years of age,” The Journal of Sexual Medicine, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 2300–2311, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. P. Mulhall, X. Luo, K. H. Zou, V. Stecher, and A. Galaznik, “Relationship between age and erectile dysfunction diagnosis or treatment using real-world observational data in the USA,” International Journal of Clinical Practice, vol. 70, no. 12, pp. 1012–1018, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. X. Zhang, B. Yang, N. Li, and H. Li, “Prevalence and risk factors for erectile dysfunction in Chinese adult males,” The Journal of Sexual Medicine, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1201–1208, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. E. Jackson, J. Firth, N. Veronese et al., “Decline in sexuality and wellbeing in older adults: a population-based study,” Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 245, pp. 912–917, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. C. Kaminetsky, A. J. Depko, P. Ströberg, J. Buvat, L. J. Tseng, and V. J. Stecher, “In men with erectile dysfunction, satisfaction with quality of erections correlates with erection hardness, treatment satisfaction, and emotional well-being,” The Journal of Sexual Medicine, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 800–808, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. D. R. Meldrum, A. L. Burnett, G. Dorey, K. Esposito, and L. J. Ignarro, “Erectile hydraulics: maximizing inflow while minimizing outflow,” The Journal of Sexual Medicine, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1208–1220, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. H. Besiroglu, A. Otunctemur, and E. Ozbek, “The relationship between metabolic syndrome, its components, and erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and a meta-analysis of observational studies,” The Journal of Sexual Medicine, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1309–1318, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. G. Jackson, P. Montorsi, M. A. Adams et al., “Cardiovascular aspects of sexual medicine,” The Journal of Sexual Medicine, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1608–1626, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. Y. Kouidrat, D. Pizzol, T. Cosco et al., “High prevalence of erectile dysfunction in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 145 studies,” Diabetic Medicine, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 1185–1192, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. E. Morley, B. Vellas, G. A. van Kan et al., “Frailty consensus: a call to action,” Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 392–397, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. L. P. Fried, C. M. Tangen, J. Walston et al., “Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype,” The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. M146–M157, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. R. J. Gobbens, M. A. van Assen, K. G. Luijkx, M. T. Wijnen-Sponselee, and J. M. G. A. Schols, “The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: psychometric properties,” Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 344–355, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. E. Dent, P. Kowal, and E. O. Hoogendijk, “Frailty measurement in research and clinical practice: a review,” European Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 31, pp. 3–10, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. L. Dong, N. Liu, X. Tian et al., “Reliability and validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) among Chinese community-dwelling older people,” Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, vol. 73, pp. 21–28, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. E. L. Rhoden, C. Telöken, P. R. Sogari, and C. A. Vargas Souto, “The use of the simplified International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool to study the prevalence of erectile dysfunction,” International Journal of Impotence Research, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 245–250, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. H. A. Feldman, I. Goldstein, D. G. Hatzichristou, R. J. Krane, and J. B. McKinlay, “Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates: results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 151, no. 1, pp. 54–61, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. Braun, G. Wassmer, T. Klotz, B. Reifenrath, M. Mathers, and U. Engelmann, “Epidemiology of erectile dysfunction: results of the 'Cologne Male Survey',” International Journal of Impotence Research, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 305–311, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. T. Y. Ahn, J. K. Park, S. W. Lee et al., “Prevalence and risk factors for erectile dysfunction in Korean men: results of an epidemiological study,” The Journal of Sexual Medicine, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 1269–1276, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. X. H. Yu, J. Zhao, S. C. Zhang et al., “The impact of age, BMI and sex hormone on aging males' symptoms and the international index of erectile function scores,” The Aging Male, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 235–240, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. L. Eisenberg and D. Meldrum, “Effects of age on fertility and sexual function,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 301–304, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. L. C. Agostini, J. M. Netto, M. V. Miranda Jr., and A. A. Figueiredo, “Erectile dysfunction association with physical activity level and physical fitness in men aged 40-75 years,” International Journal of Impotence Research, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 115–121, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. A. Salonia, F. Abdollah, A. Gallina et al., “Does educational status affect a patient's behavior toward erectile dysfunction?” The Journal of Sexual Medicine, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 1941–1948, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. I. Goldstein, A. Goren, R. Liebert, W. Y. Tang, and T. A. Hassan, “National Health and Wellness Survey exploratory cluster analysis of males 40-70 years old focused on erectile dysfunction and associated risk factors across the USA, Italy, Brazil and China,” International Journal of Clinical Practice, vol. 73, no. 9, pp. 1–15, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. E. Haesler, M. Bauer, and D. Fetherstonhaugh, “Sexuality, sexual health and older people: a systematic review of research on the knowledge and attitudes of health professionals,” Nurse Education Today, vol. 40, pp. 57–71, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. Gledhill and R. D. Schweitzer, “Sexual desire, erectile dysfunction and the biomedicalization of sex in older heterosexual men,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 894–903, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. C. Millett, L. M. Wen, C. Rissel et al., “Smoking and erectile dysfunction: findings from a representative sample of Australian men,” Tobacco Control, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 136–139, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. X. Y. Wang, W. Huang, and Y. Zhang, “Relation between hypertension and erectile dysfunction: a meta-analysisof cross-section studies,” International Journal of Impotence Research, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 141–146, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. G. Dachille, M. Lamuraglia, M. Leone et al., “Erectile dysfunction and alcohol intake,” Urologia, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 170–176, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. Koskimäki, R. Shiri, T. Tammela, J. Häkkinen, M. Hakama, and A. Auvinen, “Regular intercourse protects against erectile dysfunction: Tampere Aging Male Urologic Study,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 121, no. 7, pp. 592–596, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. C. J. Nelson, A. W. Shindel, C. K. Naughton, M. Ohebshalom, and J. P. Mulhall, “Prevalence and predictors of sexual problems, relationship stress, and depression in female partners of infertile couples,” The Journal of Sexual Medicine, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 1907–1914, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. I. J. Korfage, S. Pluijm, M. Roobol, G. R. Dohle, F. H. Schröder, and M. L. Essink-Bot, “Erectile dysfunction and mental health in a general population of older men,” The Journal of Sexual Medicine, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 505–512, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. N. G. Niederstrasser, N. T. Rogers, and S. Bandelow, “Determinants of frailty development and progression using a multidimensional frailty index: evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing,” PLoS One, vol. 14, no. 10, article e0223799, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. M. Roppolo, A. Mulasso, R. J. Gobbens, C. O. Mosso, and E. Rabaglietti, “A comparison between uni- and multidimensional frailty measures: prevalence, functional status, and relationships with disability,” Clinical Interventions in Aging, vol. 10, pp. 1669–1678, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. R. J. Gobbens, J. M. Schols, and M. A. van Assen, “Exploring the efficiency of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator: a review,” Clinical Interventions in Aging, vol. 12, pp. 1739–1752, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Chengfu Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views445
Downloads298
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.