BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2021 / Article
Special Issue

Applications of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology in Precision Medicine and Immuno-Oncology 2021

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 5516100 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5516100

Yingxue Lin, Yinhui Yao, Ying Wang, Lingdi Wang, Haipeng Cui, "PD-L1 and Immune Infiltration of m6A RNA Methylation Regulators and Its miRNA Regulators in Hepatocellular Carcinoma", BioMed Research International, vol. 2021, Article ID 5516100, 16 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5516100

PD-L1 and Immune Infiltration of m6A RNA Methylation Regulators and Its miRNA Regulators in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Academic Editor: Tao Huang
Received23 Jan 2021
Accepted01 May 2021
Published17 May 2021

Abstract

Background. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the relationship between the expression of m6A RNA methylation regulators and prognosis in HCC. Methods. We compared the expression of m6A methylation modulators and PD-L1 between HCC and normal in TCGA database. HCC samples were divided into two subtypes by consensus clustering of data from m6A RNA methylation regulators. The differences in PD-L1, immune infiltration, and prognosis between the two subtypes were further compared. The LASSO regression was used to build a risk score for m6A modulators. In addition, we identified miRNAs that regulate m6A regulators. Results. We found that fourteen m6A regulatory genes were significantly differentially expressed between HCC and normal. HCC samples were divided into two clusters. Of these, there are higher PD-L1 expression and poorer overall survival (OS) in cluster 1. There was a significant difference in immune cell infiltration between cluster 1 and cluster 2. Through the LASSO model, we obtained 12 m6A methylation regulators to construct a prognostic risk score. Compared with patients with a high-risk score, patients with a low-risk score had upregulated PD-L1 expression and worse prognosis. There was a significant correlation between risk score and tumor-infiltrating immune cells. Finally, we found that miR-142 may be the important regulator for m6A RNA methylation in HCC. Conclusion. Our results suggest that m6A RNA methylation modulators may affect the prognosis through PD-L1 and immune cell infiltration in HCC patients. In addition, the two clusters may be beneficial for prognostic stratification and improving immunotherapeutic efficacy.

1. Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an increasingly serious health problem with nearly 600,000 newly diagnosed patients with liver cancer [1]. The most prominent features of HCC are invasiveness and frequent recurrence [2]. Although great progress has been made in the treatment methods in recent decades, the prognosis of HCC patients is not optimistic, and the 5-year survival rate is less than 20% [3]. Most patients with advanced HCC have a high rate of recurrence and metastasis after treatment, which may be one of the reasons for poor prognosis [4].

The occurrence of liver cancer is a complex process involving multiple risk factors. It mainly includes cirrhosis, alcoholism, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome [5]. Surgical resection and liver transplantation are common effective treatments [6]. However, as most patients with advanced disease are diagnosed, only 15% of HCC patients are likely to receive effective treatment [7]. Patients with early HCC are always asymptomatic or present with nonspecific symptoms, such as abdominal pain, jaundice, and weight loss, leading to HCC being initially undetected. Therefore, exploring the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma and searching for promising biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma are helpful to provide effective therapeutic targets and improve the prognosis of patients.

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is a ubiquitous internal modification of RNA at the posttranscriptional level [8]. It plays a key role in pre-RNA splicing, translation regulation, and RNA decay [9, 10]. Studies showed that abnormal m6A modification is closely related to the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma [11, 12].

The liver tissue can stimulate immune response and prevent undesirable pathogen attack and tumorigenesis [13]. Sinusoidal endothelial cells in the liver can express programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) of immunosuppressive molecules, thereby regulating the immunogenicity of the liver microenvironment [14]. Immunotherapy has been shown effective and safe in the treatment of large numbers of solid tumors, prolonging overall survival (OS) [15, 16]. Han et al. found that YTHDF1-deficient (YTHDF 1−/−) mice exhibited an antigen-specific elevation of antitumor response [17]. Therefore, m6A regulators involved in immune pathways may be considered a target to enhance the response of tumor immunotherapy [18].

It is well known that carcinogenesis is a multistep process that triggers the accumulation of genetic alteration [19]. Like other solid cancers, this also occurs in the development of HCC. With the advancement of HCC biology and molecular classification, it led to the discovery of different phenotypes of HCC and the discovery of significant molecular markers for treatment [20]. Therefore, molecular subtype-related features provide valuable information for treatment and prognosis. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the relationship between the expression of m6A RNA methylation regulators and prognosis in HCC.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Dataset

We obtained RNA-Seq transcriptome data and relevant clinical data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database for patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma. This included 374 tumor specimens of hepatocellular carcinoma and 50 normal tissues. We downloaded transcript per million mapped read (FPKM) data which had been normalized by using Perl. All data are open; therefore, approval from the Ethics Committee is not required. GSE147889 included microRNA (miRNA) profiling of liver tissue specimens from ninety-seven samples of HCC tumor tissue, with corresponding samples of surrounding tissue.

2.2. Difference Analysis

The FTO, YTHDC2, YTHDC1, ZC3H13, METTL14, METTL3, HNRNPA2B1, HNRNPC, YTHDF1, METTL13, WTAP, RBM15, YTHDF2, ALKBH5, KIAA1429, and YTHDF3 are m6A methylation regulators. Differential expression analysis of m6A regulators and PD-L1 between HCC samples and normal was analyzed through the EdgeR R package [21]. A was significant [2224]. The immunoscore for each HCC patient was calculated through the estimate R package.

2.3. Consensus Clustering Analysis

The consensus clustering analysis of m6A RNA methylation regulators based on the expression in HCC samples was performed through the ConsensusClusterPlus package [25]. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted using survival R package. was considered statistically significant. The Hallmark gene set for different HCC subtypes was analyzed through GSEA software. The enrichment pathway was determined by value < 0.05 and NES.

2.4. Risk Score and Prognosis

Cox regression analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) were performed to evaluate the impact of m6A methylation regulators on the prognosis of HCC, which is a regression analysis method that performs both variable selection and regularization in order to enhance the prediction accuracy and interpretability of the resulting statistical model. HCC samples were divided into different groups through the median risk score based on the coefficients of LASSO and the expression of m6A regulators.

3. Results

3.1. m6A RNA Methylation Regulator Levels in HCC

We compared the expression of sixteen m6A regulators between HCC and normal (Figure 1(a)). In addition to YTHDF3 and RBM15, the expression of these genes was significantly different in HCC compared with normal tissues (Figure 1(b)). This suggested that m6A RNA methylation regulators played an important role in the development of HCC.

was determined based on consensus clustering analysis, and HCC samples were divided into two subtypes according to the expression of m6A methylation regulators, namely, cluster 1 and cluster 2 (Figure 1(c)). The expression of FTO, YTHDC2, YTHDC1, ZC3H13, and METTL14 in cluster 1 was significantly lower than that in cluster 2 (Figure 1(d)). The overall survival (OS) of cluster 2 was longer than that of cluster 1 (Figure 1(e)). The results showed that the subtypes of expression clustering in the m6A regulator were associated with the prognosis of HCC.

3.2. m6A RNA Methylation Affected PD-L1

We then evaluated the correlation between m6A methylation regulators and PD-L1. Compared with normal, the expression level of PD-L1 in HCC tissues was significantly higher (Figure 2(a)). As well as compared with cluster 2, PD-L1 was significantly higher in cluster 1 (Figure 2(b)). The results of correlation analysis showed that the expression of PD-L1 was positively correlated with the expression of METTL14, RBM15, YTHDF2, FTO, YTHDC1, WTAP, YTHDC2, and ZC3H13 and negatively correlated with the expression of METTL13 and KIAA1429 (Figure 2(c)).

3.3. Association of Immune Cell Infiltration with m6A RNA Methylation

Next, we calculated the infiltration levels of 22 immune cell types between the two subgroups (Figure 3(a)). Cluster 1 showed higher levels of T cell follicular helper, NK cell activated, T cell regulatory (Tregs), and macrophage M0 (Figure 3(b)). Cluster 2 showed higher levels of B cell nave, T cell CD4+ memory resting, and macrophage M2. GSEA was used to elucidate the biological functional differences between the two subtypes. The results showed that TGF-beta signaling and Hedgehog signaling were dynamically correlated with cluster 2 (Figure 3(C)). Therefore, TGF-beta and Hedgehog signaling may be related to the tumor microenvironment of cluster 1/2.

3.4. Prognosis of HCC Affected by m6A RNA Methylation Regulators

We performed LASSO regression analysis to identify the clinical significance of m6A regulators in HCC (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)). Twelve m6A regulators, namely, ZC3H13, KIAA1429, YTHDC2, HNRNPA2B1, ALKBH5, YTHDC1, WTAP, METTL3, FTO, METTL13, RBM15, and YTHDF2, were identified. Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that ZC3H13 may be a protective factor for HCC, while METTL13 and YTHDF2 are risk factors for HCC (Figure 4(c)). Nomogram results showed that increased expression of ZC3H13 was associated with longer OS of HCC (Figure 4(d)). Decreased expression of YTHDF2, METTL13, and METTL3 is beneficial to OS of HCC.

3.5. Risk Scores of m6A Methylation Regulators

The risk scores were calculated through the coefficients from the results of LASSO. . The median risk score was used to divide HCC patients into the high-risk and low-risk groups (Figure 5(a)). Compared to the high-risk group, the levels of FTO, ZC3H13, YTHDC2, and YTHDC1 were lower in low risk. The mortality rate gradually decreased with the increase of the risk score (Figure 5(b)). The OS was longer, and the PD-L1 expression was lower in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group (Figures 5(c) and 5(d)). In addition, the risk score was significantly positively correlated with the level of T cell CD4+ memory resting and negatively correlated with infiltration level of Tregs and T cell follicular helper (Figure 5(e)). This result confirmed that the risk scores of m6A methylation regulator were associated with the immune microenvironment of HCC.

3.6. miRNAs Regulating m6A Regulators

By comparing differentially expressed miRNAs between HCC and control in GSE147889, we identified 37 miRNAs that may be involved in the regulation of HCC (Figures 6(a) and 6(b)). To identify the miRNAs that regulate m6A regulators, we predicted 531 miRNAs with targeted regulatory relationships through miRtarget. Among them, 30 miRNAs and differentially expressed miRNAs intersect and were considered regulators of m6A regulators related to HCC (Figure 6(c)), because hsa-miR-142-5p may be an important regulator as it regulated more m6A regulators (Figure 6(d)).

4. Discussion

The m6A methylation has many important biological functions and participates in the process of cancer [26, 27]. Herein, we found that the expression of m6A regulator is related to the prognosis of HCC and to the immune microenvironment. We have also attempted to elucidate some potential molecular mechanisms that may help make early diagnosis and develop molecular targeted therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma. In addition, we used the selected twelve m6A regulator to obtain a prognostic risk score.

At present, many evidences showed that m6A regulator is related to the progression of HCC [28]. In this study, compared with normal, YTHDF1 expression in HCC tissues was significantly increased, while YTHDF2 expression was significantly decreased. Elevated YTHDF1 promotes poor prognosis in HCC patients and is involved in regulating the metabolism and cell cycle progression of HCC cells [29]. A study reported that overexpression of YTHDF2 inhibits the proliferation and growth of HCC cells and promotes the apoptosis of HCC cells [30]. Studies have shown that YTHDC2 and METTL3 can promote the development of hepatocellular carcinoma [31, 32]. METTL13 promotes the growth and metastasis of HCC and is related to the survival status [33]. Consistent with our analysis results, the expression of METTL14 in HCC tissues was lower than that in normal tissues [34]. Contrary to our analysis, WTAP was significantly elevated in HCC, which was associated with poor survival outcomes [35]. ZC3H13 was downregulated in HCC and was a protective gene, which was also confirmed by other studies [36, 37]. The Cox risk score and clinical characteristic analysis confirmed that ZC3H13, METTL13, and YTHDF2 could be used as prognostic indicators and even as targets for new treatment of liver cancer.

Our results suggested that m6A methylation was associated with the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. OS and PD-L1 expression in cluster 2 was significantly different from that in cluster 1. The better prognosis of cluster 2 patients may be related to the lower expression level of PD-L1 [38]. GSEA results showed that TGF-β signaling and Hedgehog signaling were significantly enriched in cluster 2. Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) inhibits the occurrence of early HCC by inducing cell arrest and apoptosis but promotes the malignant progression of advanced HCC by promoting the survival, metastasis, migration, and invasion of tumor cells [39]. In HCC, aberrantly activated Hedgehog signaling promotes the development and invasion of HCC [40, 41]. This seems controversial with the good prognosis of patients with cluster 2. m6A methylation is complex in tumors, and its prognostic value in HCC needs further study.

In addition, the risk score was correlated with the expression of PD-L1. In the high-risk group, the PD-L1 expression was lower and had a good prognosis. Cluster 2 is in the high-risk score subtype of HCC. These findings suggested that m6A methylation regulation participated in the regulation of the immune microenvironment of HCC to some extent. Overexpression of miR-142 inhibits the invasion and angiogenesis of HCC cells and may be a potential therapeutic target for HCC [42]. Our results suggest that miR-142 may have a regulatory effect on m6A regulator. Interestingly, it was found that miR-142 was modified by methylation in tumor patients and cell lines and participated in the growth of HCC [43].

However, this study has some limitations. Firstly, our analytical data were from public databases; there may be some deviations. Secondly, more data, as well as large numbers of clinical and experimental data, are needed to verify the accuracy and reliability of our analysis results. In addition, whether the classification based on consistent clustering has clinical significance for HCC needs further confirmation.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the results suggested that the levels of m6A methylation regulator were related to the OS and immunity in HCC. This study has important proof value for demonstrating the impact of m6A methylation in HCC. Furthermore, ZC3H13, METTL13, and YTHDF2 may be potential predictors and therapeutic targets for HCC. miR-142 may regulate m6A methylation and participate in HCC.

Data Availability

We obtained RNA-Seq transcriptome data and relevant clinical data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database for patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma. GSE147889 included microRNA (miRNA) profiling of liver tissue specimens from ninety-seven samples of HCC tumor tissue, with corresponding samples of surrounding tissue.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Youth Science and Technology Research Project of Health and Family Planning Commission in Hebei Province (20200183).

References

  1. J. Zhang and W. Lou, “A key mRNA-miRNA-lncRNA competing endogenous RNA triple sub-network linked to diagnosis and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma,” Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 10, p. 340, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. R. M. Critelli, N. De Maria, and E. Villa, “Biology of hepatocellular carcinoma,” Digestive Diseases, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 635–641, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. W. Lou, J. Liu, Y. Gao et al., “MicroRNA regulation of liver cancer stem cells,” American Journal of Cancer Research, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 1126–1141, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  4. J. H. Zhong, X. Xiang, Y. Y. Wang et al., “The lncRNA SNHG16 affects prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma by regulating p62 expression,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 235, no. 2, pp. 1090–1102, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. X. Zhao, J. Dou, J. Cao et al., “Uncovering the potential differentially expressed miRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma based on machine learning in The Cancer Genome Atlas database,” Oncology Reports, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1771–1784, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. H. Liu, X. Wang, B. Feng et al., “Golgi phosphoprotein 3 (GOLPH3) promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression by activating mTOR signaling pathway,” BMC Cancer, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 661, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. P. Roxburgh and T. R. Evans, “Systemic therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma: are we making progress?” Advances in Therapy, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1089–1104, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. Y. Fu, D. Dominissini, G. Rechavi, and C. He, “Gene expression regulation mediated through reversible m6A RNA methylation,” Nature Reviews. Genetics, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 293–306, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. Y. Roignant and M. Soller, “m6A in mRNA: an ancient mechanism for fine-tuning gene expression,” Trends in Genetics, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 380–390, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. C. Gu, X. Shi, C. Dai et al., “RNA m6A modification in cancers: molecular mechanisms and potential clinical applications,” The Innovation., vol. 1, no. 3, p. 100066, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. N. Qu, S. Qin, X. Zhang et al., “Multiple m6A RNA methylation modulators promote the malignant progression of hepatocellular carcinoma and affect its clinical prognosis,” BMC Cancer, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 165, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. W. Liu, C. Zhong, D. Lv, M. Tang, and F. Xie, “N6-methyladenosine RNA methylation regulators have clinical prognostic values in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Frontiers in Genetics, vol. 11, p. 863, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. Y. Fu, S. Liu, S. Zeng, and H. Shen, “From bench to bed: the tumor immune microenvironment and current immunotherapeutic strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma,” Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 38, no. 1, p. 396, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. C. Kole, N. Charalampakis, S. Tsakatikas et al., “Immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2021 update,” Cancers (Basel), vol. 12, no. 10, p. 2859, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. D. Schizas, N. Charalampakis, C. Kole et al., “Immunotherapy for pancreatic cancer: a 2020 update,” Cancer Treatment Reviews, vol. 86, p. 102016, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. D. Schizas, N. Charalampakis, C. Kole et al., “Immunotherapy for esophageal cancer: a 2019 update,” Immunotherapy, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 203–218, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. D. Han, J. Liu, C. Chen et al., “Anti-tumour immunity controlled through mRNA m6A methylation and YTHDF1 in dendritic cells,” Nature, vol. 566, no. 7743, pp. 270–274, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. L. Yi, G. Wu, L. Guo, X. Zou, and P. Huang, “Comprehensive analysis of the PD-L1 and immune infiltrates of m6A RNA methylation regulators in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma,” Molecular Therapy--Nucleic Acids, vol. 21, pp. 299–314, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. Z. S. Niu, X. J. Niu, and W. H. Wang, “Genetic alterations in hepatocellular carcinoma: an update,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 22, no. 41, pp. 9069–9095, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. A. Rastogi, “Changing role of histopathology in the diagnosis and management of hepatocellular carcinoma,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 24, no. 35, pp. 4000–4013, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. C. Gu, X. Shi, X. Dang et al., “Identification of common genes and pathways in eight fibrosis diseases,” Frontiers in Genetics, vol. 11, article 627396, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. C. Gu, Z. Huang, X. Chen et al., “TEAD4 promotes tumor development in patients with lung adenocarcinoma via ERK signaling pathway,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1866, no. 12, article 165921, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. L. Zhang, X. Shi, C. Gu et al., “Identification of cell-to-cell interactions by ligand-receptor pairs in human fetal heart,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1866, no. 12, p. 165917, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. X. Shi, X. Shao, B. Liu et al., “Genome-wide screening of functional long noncoding RNAs in the epicardial adipose tissues of atrial fibrillation,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1866, no. 7, p. 165757, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. C. Gu, X. Shi, Z. Huang et al., “A comprehensive study of construction and analysis of competitive endogenous RNA networks in lung adenocarcinoma,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, Proteins and Proteomics, vol. 1868, no. 8, article 140444, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. X. Deng, R. Su, X. Feng, M. Wei, and J. Chen, “Role of _N_ 6-methyladenosine modification in cancer,” Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, vol. 48, pp. 1–7, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. C. Gu, X. Shi, W. Qiu et al., “Comprehensive analysis of the prognostic role and mutational characteristics of m6A-related genes in lung squamous cell carcinoma,” vol. 9, no. 559, p. 140444, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. Lu, J. Qian, S. Yin, L. Zhou, S. Zheng, and W. Zhang, “Mechanisms of RNA N6-methyladenosine in hepatocellular carcinoma: from the perspectives of etiology,” Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 10, p. 1105, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. X. Zhao, Y. Chen, Q. Mao et al., “Overexpression of YTHDF1 is associated with poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma,” Cancer Biomarkers, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 859–868, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. L. Zhong, D. Liao, M. Zhang et al., “YTHDF2 suppresses cell proliferation and growth via destabilizing the EGFR mRNA in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Cancer Letters, vol. 442, pp. 252–261, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. Tanabe, J. Konno, K. Tanikawa, and H. Sahara, “Transcriptional machinery of TNF-α-inducible YTH domain containing 2 (YTHDC2) gene,” Gene, vol. 535, no. 1, pp. 24–32, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. Chen, L. Wei, C. T. Law et al., “RNA N6-methyladenosine methyltransferase-like 3 promotes liver cancer progression through YTHDF2-dependent posttranscriptional silencing of SOCS2,” Hepatology, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 2254–2270, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. L. Li, Y. L. Zheng, C. Jiang et al., “HN1L-mediated transcriptional axis AP-2γ/METTL13/TCF3-ZEB1 drives tumor growth and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 2268–2283, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. J. Z. Ma, F. Yang, C. C. Zhou et al., “METTL14 suppresses the metastatic potential of hepatocellular carcinoma by modulatingN6‐methyladenosine‐dependent primary microRNA processing,” Hepatology, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 529–543, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. Y. Chen, C. Peng, J. Chen et al., “WTAP facilitates progression of hepatocellular carcinoma via m6A-HuR-dependent epigenetic silencing of ETS1,” Molecular Cancer, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 127, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. Z. Li, F. Li, Y. Peng, J. Fang, and J. Zhou, “Identification of three m6A-related mRNAs signature and risk score for the prognostication of hepatocellular carcinoma,” Cancer Medicine, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1877–1889, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. W. Li, Q. F. Chen, T. Huang, L. Shen, Z. L. Huang, and P. Wu, “Profiles of m<sup>6</sup>A RNA methylation regulators for the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma,” Oncology Letters, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 3296–3306, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. L. Chen, X. Huang, W. Zhang et al., “Correlation of PD-L1 and SOCS3 co-expression with the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients,” Journal of Cancer, vol. 11, no. 18, pp. 5440–5448, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. S. Tu, W. Huang, C. Huang, Z. Luo, and X. Yan, “Contextual regulation of TGF-β signaling in liver cancer,” Cell, vol. 8, no. 10, p. 1235, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. M. Dimri and A. Satyanarayana, “Molecular signaling pathways and therapeutic targets in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Cancers (Basel), vol. 12, no. 2, p. 491, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. K. S. Jeng, C. J. Jeng, W. J. Jeng et al., “Sonic Hedgehog signaling pathway as a potential target to inhibit the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (Review),” Oncology Letters, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 4377–4384, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. F. Su, J. Zhao, S. Qin et al., “Over-expression of thrombospondin 4 correlates with loss of miR-142 and contributes to migration and vascular invasion of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma,” Oncotarget, vol. 8, no. 14, pp. 23277–23288, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. Q. Yu, L. Xiang, L. Yin, X. Liu, D. Yang, and J. Zhou, “Loss-of-function of miR-142 by hypermethylation promotes TGF-beta-mediated tumour growth and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Cell Proliferation, vol. 50, no. 6, article e12384, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Yingxue Lin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views221
Downloads670
Citations

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.