BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2021 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 5535578 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5535578

Zhong Zheng, Xinyi Zheng, Yiwen Zhu, Zhixian Yao, Weiguang Zhao, Youjia Zhu, Feng Sun, Xingyu Mu, Yong Wang, Wanqing He, Zhihong Liu, Ke Wu, Junhua Zheng, "IL-6 Promotes the Proliferation and Immunosuppressive Function of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells via the MAPK Signaling Pathway in Bladder Cancer", BioMed Research International, vol. 2021, Article ID 5535578, 18 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5535578

IL-6 Promotes the Proliferation and Immunosuppressive Function of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells via the MAPK Signaling Pathway in Bladder Cancer

Academic Editor: Fu-Ming Tsai
Received27 Jan 2021
Revised27 Mar 2021
Accepted08 Apr 2021
Published24 Apr 2021

Abstract

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is characterized by a highly complex immune environment, which is not well understood. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is generated and secreted by multifarious types of cells, including tumor cells. This study was aimed at demonstrating that the levels of IL-6 and the number of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), with a positive correlation between them, increased in MIBC tissues, promoting MIBC cell proliferation, especially in patients with recurrence. In coculture analysis, MDSCs, with the stimulation of IL-6, could significantly lower the proliferation ability of CD4+ or CD8+ T lymphocytes. Further, this study demonstrated that IL-6 could upregulate the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway in MDSCs. The MAPK signaling inhibitor, aloesin, partially reversed the effects of IL-6 on MDSCs. These data suggested that IL-6 promoted MIBC progression by not only accelerating proliferation but also improving the immune suppression ability of MDSCs through activating the MAPK signaling pathway.

1. Introduction

Bladder cancer (BC) has the 14th and 9th highest rates of mortality and incidence among all types of cancers [1], accounting for approximately 900,000 newly diagnosed cases each year, with 250,000 deaths occurring during the same time span [2]. Nearly 75% of patients are diagnosed with non-muscle-invasive BC (NMIBC) and close to 25% with muscle-invasive BC (MIBC) [3]. Similar to other solid tumors, MIBC is classified as immunogenic cancer, with numerous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in the tumor microenvironment (TME) [4]. Besides tumor cells, the TME includes fibroblasts, endothelial cells, mast cells, macrophagocytes (Mφ), TILs, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) [5]. In particular, TILs contribute to the adaptive immunological response in opposition to cancer cells and exert anticarcinoma effects in most malignant tumors, including BC, colorectal cancer, lung cancer, and melanoma [6]. Nevertheless, the dysregulation of immunosuppressive TME is intensively associated with the development from NMIBC to MIBC [7]. It is, thus, possible that the immunosuppressive functions of TILs in MIBC tumors are prompted, explaining the poor outcomes in MIBC. However, the mechanisms underlying the peculiar pathophysiologic behavior of TILs in MIBC are unclear.

Heterogeneous MDSCs, a cluster of immature myeloid-derived cells, are both immunosuppressive and angiogenic. They result from and suppress inflammatory conditions that support tumor growth [8] by stimulating the accumulation of regulatory T lymphocytes and suppressing responses initiated by cytotoxic T cells [9]. In patients bearing solid tumors, including MIBC, the interleukin 6 (IL-6) levels are often elevated and inversely associated with prognosis [10]. IL-6 can be generated in a local cytokine niche and is produced by diverse tissues, notably proinflammatory cell types, containing dendritic cells (DCs), Mφ, MDSCs, T lymphocytes, cancer-associated fibroblasts, and endothelial cells [11]. IL-6 knockdown can affect the immune status, inducing the infiltration of MDSCs. Hence, the mechanisms underlying IL-6-mediated MDSC penetration and functionality should be further explored [12].

Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) are serine-threonine protein kinases that modulate a large number of cellular processes, such as innate immunity, survival, apoptosis, differentiation, proliferation, and inflammation [13]. In the wake of tissue damage or pathogen infection, the initiation of pattern recognition receptors in the cell plasma and on the cellular surface of innate immune cells activates a majority of MAPK subfamilies, that is, p38 MAPK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), and Jun N-terminal kinase subfamilies. In combination with the upregulation of interferon-regulatory factor as well as nuclear factor-κB, MAPK activation leads to the upregulation of a plethora of relevant genes that modulate the immune responses together [13]. The ERK signaling pathway mediates the transition of MDSCs. Its downregulation is correlated with MDSC differentiation. The dysregulation of MAPK signaling pathways promotes the pathogenesis of malignant tumors [14].

This study was aimed at exploring the mechanisms by which IL-6 promotes the immunosuppressive functions and proliferation of MDSCs via the MAPK signaling pathway in MIBC.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient Materials

Malignant lesions and adjacent normal controls were obtained from 200 patients (aged 53–88 years) diagnosed with MIBC who underwent radical cystectomy or transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT). Specimens were obtained from Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China. The removal of tissues and subsequent analyses were approved by the ethics committee of the hospital and performed after obtaining informed consent from the patients’ relatives.

2.2. In Vivo Experiments

C57BL/6 mice (Shanghai Model Organisms Center, China), aged 6–8 weeks, were subcutaneously (s.c.) injected with MB49 cells () and raised under pathogen-free conditions in the Shanghai General Hospital Animal Center. In the IL-6 treatment group, the mice were randomly divided into the experimental group () and control group (). The grouping conditions in the MDSC transfer group were identical with those in the IL-6 treatment group, but it was launched after the sacrifice of mice on the 30th day in the IL-6 control group owing to the requirement of MDSCs. The BC tissues of the mice in the IL-6 control group after relevant analysis were subsequently used for MDSC separation and transfer. All the in vivo experiments were launched 10 days (the average number of days for the visible tumor node) after tumor implantation. In the IL-6 treatment group, the mice were intraperitoneally injected with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or recombinant murine IL-6 (aa 20-357, 20 ng/g body weight; carrier-free, R&D Systems) at 10 a.m. every day. In addition, MDSCs from BC tissues ( cells/mouse) mentioned earlier were adoptively transferred to BC mice via tail vein injection every 7 days, and PBS as a vehicle was administered to the control group. The tumor growth rate was calculated by measuring the estimated tumor volume with a digital caliper every 5 days. The estimated tumor volume was determined using the canonical formula: . After 30 days, 10 mice randomly extracted from each group were euthanized. The tumor tissues were collected for flow cytometry and MDSC separation for further experiments, including coculture analysis, quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), and RNA sequencing, under specific conditions. The remaining 10 mice per group were kept for survival analysis. The survival curves for all groups were established using the Kaplan–Meier criteria. The mice were considered expired when the tumor volume reached 2.5 cm3 posttreatment in concordance with the regulations released by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. The animal study was scrutinized and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Shanghai Jiao Tong University.

2.3. Immunohistochemistry

The slices from the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks of MIBC specimens were obtained, and an anti-IL-6 antibody (ab233706, Abcam) was applied for immunostaining to investigate the expression of IL-6. Slices (4 μm) of MIBC were loaded on poly-L-lysine-coated slides with air drying and deparaffinization. Subsequently, peroxidases were blocked with 5% hydrogen peroxide in 50% methyl alcohol at 20°C for 20 min. Then, antigen retrieval was performed using a microwave oven for 20 min in citrate buffer solution. The slices were treated with a monoclonal rabbit anti-IL-6 antibody for 12 h at 4°C after blocking nonspecific binding. They were washed with PBS and treated with biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG (ab150077, Abcam) for 30 min, followed by rinsing with PBS. The immune reactivity was examined using the avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex method utilizing VECTASTAIN ABC Kit (PK-4001, Vector). Then, the slices were stained with hematoxylin, dehydrated, cleared, and mounted. The tissues manifesting brown staining in the membrane, nucleus, or cytoplasm were considered positive. The average optical density (AOD) was analyzed using ImageJ software (version 2.0.0, Rawak Software, Inc., Germany) to investigate the correlation between IL-6 levels and MDSCs.

2.4. IL-6 Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay

The IL-6 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was applied according to the product specification (ab178013 for humans and ab100713 for mice, Abcam). Duplicate aliquots of the supernatant were dispersed in the flat-bottom 96-well plates. The assay was implemented triply on independent samples.

2.5. Flow Cytometry and MDSC Isolation

Fresh tumor and adjacent tissues were used to prepare single-cell suspensions. The antibodies used for flow cytometry were provided by BioLegend and are listed in Table S1. The cells were examined using a FACSCalibur Flow Cytometer (Becton Dickinson). The cells were stained with carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) and analyzed using a flow cytometer (Thermo Fisher) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The cells were fixed, permeabilized, and stained with anti-IL-6-FITC (501104, BioLegend) for 30 min to detect the expression of IL-6. Data were analyzed using FlowJo software (version 10.7.1, Treestar). For MDSC flow cytometric sorting, cells/mL single-cell suspensions made from malignant tissues derived from tumor-bearing mice were applied with conjugated antibodies shown in Table S1 for 20 min on ice in staining buffer (1% FBS in PBS). Then, the cells were rinsed with PBS, and the samples were sorted using a BD Influx. The 1.5-drop pure sort mode was selected to obtain cells with high purity. Subsequently, isolated MDSCs were maintained for experiments as follows. The cell culture passage number was no more than 10 for all isolated cells, and three replicates were performed in each passage.

2.6. RT-PCR Analyses of IL6, Arg1, and iNOS

Total RNA was obtained using the RNeasy Mini Kit (27104, Qiagen). Reverse transcription was performed using the TaKaRa RNA PCR kit (RR012A, TaKaRa) following the manufacturer’s protocols. The primers were as follows: IL6 (forward 5-GCTTCCCTCAGGATGCTTGT-3, reverse 5-ATTAACTGGGGTGCCTGCTC-3), Arg1 (forward 5-AGGTTAGAGGCCCAAACTGC-3, reverse 5-TGTCAGCTCCACCGACTTTC-3), and iNOS (forward 5-CTGAAGATACGGACGGGTCG-3, reverse 5-CGATGAAGTCGGGGTCGTAG-3) for humans and IL6 (forward 5-GCCCTCTAGTGGTGCTTGTT-3, reverse 5-ACTGCAGGCCAGTTACATCC-3), Arg1 (forward 5-TGCATGCAGTGAAGTGTTGC-3, reverse 5-AGCCCTAAACCTCCCAATGC-3), and iNOS (forward 5-CTGAAGATACGGACGGGTCG-3, reverse 5-CGATGAAGTCGGGGTCGTAG-3) for mice. The SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (4309155, Thermo Fisher) and a real-time PCR machine (Applied Biosystems) were used in the reactions. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

2.7. Immune Suppression

Lymphocytes from plasma were isolated by the density-gradient centrifugation using Ficoll-Hypaque solution (Solarbio). CD8+ microbeads (130-045-201, Miltenyi Biotec) or CD4+ microbeads (130-045-101, Miltenyi Biotec) were used for T cell sorting. The freshly isolated CD8+ T cells or CD4+ T cells were subsequently cultured in 96-well round-bottomed plates under the conditions that a complete culture medium contained 500 ng/mL soluble anti-CD28 (T9-577-T100, American Research Products) and 500 ng/mL soluble or immobilized anti-CD3 (T1P1D4C6, American Research Products) for T cell stimulation and activation. The CD8+ or CD4+ T cell proliferation was evaluated using the CFSE Cell Division Tracker Kit (423801, BioLegend). MDSCs were added to the coculture at different ratios to CD8+ T cells or CD4+ T cells for 72 h (CD8+ T cells/CD4+ T cells to and 2 : 1), 48 h after T cell stimulation. The cells were then collected and treated with the APC-CD8+ T cell antibody (344722 for humans and 100712 for mice, BioLegend) or APC-CD4+ T cells (357408 for humans and 100412 for mice, BioLegend) prior to flow cytometry. The cell culture passage number was no more than 10 for all isolated cells, and three replicates were performed in each passage. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

2.8. Western Blot Analysis

The cells were completely lysed in proteinase-containing radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer inhibitor (4693132001, Complete Roche). Protein quantification was applied using the protein assay reagent (5000001, Bio-Rad). Further, 10 μg of total protein was used for subsequent western blot (WB) analysis. The lysates were electrophoresed and transferred to Hybond nitrocellulose paper (FFN08, Beyotime). The nonspecific binding was blocked with 5% skimmed milk in PBS with 0.1% Tween-20 (P0220, Beyotime). For target protein examination, the blots were treated with the primary anti-human or anti-mouse antibodies at 4°C overnight. The blots were rinsed with PBST and treated with the HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody (ab6702, Abcam) for 60 min at 20°C. The target proteins were detected using the ECL WB substrate kit (ab65623, Abcam), and blots were applied to Amersham Imager 600 (GE Healthcare Life Sciences). The densitometry readings/intensity ratio of each band was analyzed by using ImageJ software (version 2.0.0, Rawak Software, Inc. Germany). All experiments were performed in triplicate. All relevant antibodies are listed in Table S2.

2.9. RNA Sequencing

Total RNA was obtained and enriched for mRNA using MicroPoly A Purist (AM1919, Ambion). The RNA quantity and quality were assessed using Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies). RNA sequencing was performed using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform (Illumina) for each sample. Digital gene expression profiles were used to analyze the differential gene expression between groups. The pathway enrichment was analyzed to further elucidate the cellular mechanisms.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

The results were expressed as . Analyses of variance and unpaired or paired-sample Student’s -tests were used for in vitro and in vivo experiments.

3. Results

3.1. IL-6 Levels Were Elevated in MIBC Cells and Associated with Cancer Progression

MIBC tissues () were collected and compared with the normal urothelium (), which included 11 recurrent MIBC tissues to test the IL-6 expression level in MIBC cells. ELISA showed that the IL-6 level was higher in MIBC tissues than in adjacent noncancer tissues (Figure 1(a)). Immunochemistry showed that IL-6 staining was more obvious in MIBC tissues than in adjacent tissues (Figure 1(b)). Also, IL-6 levels were compared between recurrent and primary MIBC. ELISA showed that the IL-6 levels were higher in recurrent MIBC tissues than in primary MIBC tissues. Immunochemistry also showed that IL-6 staining was more obvious in recurrent MIBC tissues than in primary MIBC tissues (Figures 1(c) and 1(d)). According to TCGA database, high IL-6 expression was associated with a worse prognosis in patients with MIBC than in patients with low IL-6 levels (Figure 1(e)). In vivo, MIBC mouse models were treated with IL-6 for the analyses of tumor growth rates and tumor weights. IL-6 promoted MIBC growth (Figures 1(f)1(g)). Mice with MIBC treated with IL-6 showed shorter survival times compared with untreated control mice (Figure 1(h)). These results showed that IL-6 levels were elevated in MIBC tissues, especially in cases of recurrence, and promoted MIBC progression by accelerating proliferation.

3.2. Number of MDSCs Increased in MIBC Tissues and Promoted Cancer Progression

MDSCs are a heterogeneous cluster of immune cells deriving from the myeloid lineage with an immune suppression role in MIBC. MDSCs were identified as CD45+CD11b+HLA-DR-CD33+ by flow cytometry as previously studied [15], and the frequency of MDSCs was found to be higher in MIBC tissues than in the normal urothelium (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). The increase in the number of MDSCs was greater in recurrent MIBC than in primary MIBC tissues (Figures 2(c) and 2(d)). In vivo, MDSCs were adoptively transferred into mice with MIBC, and cancer progression was evaluated. MDSCs increased tumor growth rates (Figure 2(e)). The tumor weights were higher in the MDSC-treated group compared with the control group (Figure 2(f)). Based on survival time, MDSC transfer in the MIBC mouse model was related to a worse prognosis (Figure 2(g)). Taken together, MDSCs increased in MIBC tissues and promoted cancer progression.

3.3. IL-6 Promoted MDSC Proliferation in MIBC Tissues

IL-6 is closely related to several immune responses, including MDSC-induced immune suppression. A total of 100 MIBC tissues were collected to explore the relationship between IL-6 and MDSCs. Immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry were used to evaluate IL-6 levels, and flow cytometry was used to quantify MDSCs. The IL-6 levels were positively related to MDSCs (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)). In vitro, MDSCs were sorted from mouse MIBC tissues and treated with or without IL-6. As summarized in Figure 3(c), the CCK-8 assay showed that the rate of proliferation was higher in IL-6-treated MDSCs compared with the control cells (Figure 3(d)). CFSE further demonstrated that IL-6 promoted the proliferation of MDSCs (Figure 3(e)). The flow cytometry images also showed that IL-6 increased the proportion of MDSCs in both humans and mice (Figures 3(f) and 3(g)). These results showed that IL-6 accelerated MDSC accumulation by promoting proliferation.

3.4. IL-6 Improved the Immune-Suppressive Activity of MDSCs

MDSCs were sorted from human and mouse MIBC tissues to explore whether IL-6 influenced the immune-suppressive effects of MDSCs. MDSCs treated with or without IL-6 were collected and prepared for follow-up experiments (Figure 4(a)). RT-PCR showed that IL-6 treatment increased Arg1 and iNOS levels (Figures 4(b)4(e)). MDSCs were cocultured with CD8+ T cells or CD4+ T cells at different ratios ( or 1 : 2, respectively). IL-6-treated MDSCs significantly impeded the proliferation of CD8+ T cells and CD4+ T cells (Figures 4(f)4(i)). Accordingly, IL-6 promoted the proliferation of MDSCs and immune-suppressive activity.

3.5. IL-6 Activated the MAPK Signaling Pathway in MDSCs

MDSCs were collected from human and mouse MIBC tissues to explore the specific mechanism underlying the effect of IL-6 on MDSCs. MDSCs were treated with IL-6 for 48 h and used for RNA sequencing (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)). Differentially expressed genes were enriched for several signaling pathways, especially the MAPK signaling pathway (Figures 5(c) and 5(d)). To confirm this result, WB analysis was performed to evaluate the key proteins with or without phosphorylation in the MAPK signaling pathway (MEK2, ERK, and MNK1). IL-6 treatment induced the phosphorylation of MEK2, ERK, and MNK1 in MDSCs from both human and mouse MIBC tissues (Figures 5(e)5(i)). These results indicated that IL-6 promoted the proliferation and immune-suppressive effect of MDSCs by upregulating the MAPK signaling pathway.

3.6. IL-6 Promoted MDSC Proliferation and Immune-Suppressive Effects by Activating the MAPK Signaling Pathway

Aloesin was used to block the activation of the MAPK signaling pathway so as to confirm the role of the MAPK subfamilies in MDSC proliferation and immune-suppressive effects. The CCK-8 assay and flow cytometry results showed that aloesin partially attenuated the IL-6-induced increase in proliferation (Figures 6(a) and 6(b)). RT-PCR showed that IL-6 treatment increased Arg1 and iNOS levels, while IL-6 could reverse this phenomenon (Figures 6(c)6(f)). MDSCs were cocultured with CD8+ T cells or CD4+ T cells at specific ratios (). IL-6-treated MDSCs significantly impeded the proliferation of CD8+ T cells and CD4+ T cells, which was partially reversed by aloesin (Figures 6(g)6(j)). These results elucidated that IL-6 promoted the proliferation of MDSCs and immune-suppressive effects, and these effects could be reversed by targeting the MAPK signaling pathway. Taken together, IL-6 promoted the proliferation and immunosuppressive function of MDSCs via the MAPK signaling pathway in MIBC (Figure 7).

4. Discussion

IL-6 is highly pleiotropic and has a wide range of functions in various diseases [16]. The TME of most malignant lesions shows immune cell enrichment with immunosuppressive phenotypes, often via the immunomodulatory activities of IL-6-family cytokines. The members of this family have been identified as diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers of the response to therapy and disease activity in various cancers [17]. Aberrant IL-6 family overexpression and downstream receptor signaling pathway stimulation are frequent cytokine events in carcinomas and are often correlated with poor clinical outcomes [18]. The tumorigenesis-promoting effects of IL-6 cytokine family members are mediated via direct effects on proliferation, survival, migration, invasion, and metastasis in cancer cells and indirect effects on immunosuppression, modulation of inflammation, and angiogenesis in the interstitial stromal cells, which form the local TME [19]. IL-6 is expressed in numerous BC cell lines and is more abundant in the specimens of patients with MIBC than those with NMIBC [20]. Both BC cell lines and primary BC tissues express IL-6 and IL-6 receptor protein [21]. IL-6 clinically serves as an alternative marker of host immunity in patients with BC [22]. The canonical activation of immunity in BC elicits the production of IL-6, leading to BC-associated immune malfunction [23]. Typically, serum IL-6 level is significantly higher in higher-grade patients than in low-grade patients; furthermore, it is linked to patients with recurrent BC [24]. Patients with elevated IL-6 levels have a high risk of distant metastases and lymphatic metastases [25].

Among IL-6 cytokine family members, IL-6 has the most well-defined effect on the TME by prompting chronic inflammatory responses, regulating tumor vasculogenesis and the outgrowth of heterogeneous cells, and preventing Th1 cell-mediated antitumor immunocytotoxicity [26]. These protumorigenic effects are mediated by the recruitment, retention, activation, and function of TILs and reflect the various innate and adaptive immune responses regulated by IL-6 in immunity and chronic inflammatory diseases [27]. In melanoma, however, IL-6 exerts antitumor effects in the early stages of disease progression and later promotes tumor angiogenesis and the recruitment of immunosuppressive myeloid cells, such as MDSCs, to the TME [28]. Additionally, the tumor-promoting effects of IL-6 involve increases in MDSCs and Th17 cells, suppression of DCs and cytotoxic T cells, and phenotypic switching of tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) from an antitumor M1 phenotype to an immunosuppressive M2 phenotype [26]. In gastric cancer, serum-derived IL-6 activates and induces MDSCs, which express arginase 1, via the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, thereby suppressing cytotoxic T cell functionality [29]. In hepatocellular cancer, the interaction between MDSCs and IL-6 promoted the generation of a chemoresistant phenotype [30]. However, in BC, low IL-6 levels could inhibit the activation of STAT3, promoting the formation of MDSCs [31]. The IL-6-induced experiments were simply performed on MDSCs in the serum of patients with BC. The serum MDSCs might not completely represent MDSCs in the TME of BC where elusive cell-cell communications are abundant, and MDSCs can be immunomodulated and undergo various alterations. The present analysis showed that IL-6 could stimulate the proliferation of MDSCs from the BC microenvironment in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Also, it indicated that further analysis, such as dose-dependent experiments for IL-6-induced MDSC alteration, should be implemented and more details should be elucidated.

MDSCs are primary inhibitors of efficient antitumor immunity as well as T cell proliferation and immune activity [32]. This study found that the proliferation of MDSCs correlated with increasing levels of IL-6; mice with high levels of IL-6 had increased frequencies of MDSCs. Patients with high frequencies of MDSCs had poorer overall survival compared with patients with low frequencies of these myeloid cells [33]. Peripheral MDSCs have a high correlation with tumor progression and grade, and low MDSC levels in circulation are significantly associated with an improved prognosis and outcomes in BC [34].

This study investigated the mechanisms by which IL-6 activated MDSCs, identifying the important role of the MAPK signaling pathway in MDSC proliferation in MIBC. Nevertheless, the precise interactions between IL-6 and MAPK are still unclear. Bongartz et al. reported that IL-6-induced MAPK activation could be categorized into a Gab1-independent early phase and a Gab1-dependent late phase. Gab1-independent MAPK activation in the early phase is vital for the follow-up launch of the Gab1-dependent expansion of MAPK activation, with the binding of the IL-6 receptor complex and SH2 domain-containing phosphatase 2 (SHP2). The successive synergetic recruitment of Grb2 and SHP2 to Gab1 is crucial for the Gab1-dependent augmentation of IL-6, eliciting MAPK signaling pathway activation in the late phase and the upregulation of various genes [35]. Additionally, MAPK cascade activation caused by IL-6 relies critically on the recruitment of SHP2 to Y759 of phosphorylation in the cytoplasmic territory of gp13063 [36].

ERK, a member of the MAPK family, is a survival-promoting factor in immunocytes, indicating that its activity may harbor immune-stimulating or immune-suppressive effects relying on the cell types penetrating the solid tumor [37]. ERK can activate the amplification of CD8+ TILs and promote the secretion of lytic granules and cytokines, upgrading the cytotoxicity of TILs in the TME [38]. The critical role of immature MDSCs in immune evasion was mediated by ERK in the present study. Generally, a subset of MDSCs shared numerous similarities with TAM; however, the upregulation of the MAPK pathway could polarize macrophages from the M2 phenotype to M1 phenotype and lead to the inhibition of the suppressive effects of MDSCs by the stimulation of LPS [39]. STAT3 inhibition could decrease MAPK and lead to the apoptosis of MDSCs [40]. In BC, tumor cells induced MDSC aggregation and expansion in the TME via the CXCL2/MIF-CXCR2 signaling pathway and the elevated phosphorylation of p38, ERK, and p65 [41].

In summary, the data suggested that IL-6 promoted MIBC progression by not only accelerating proliferation but also improving the immune suppression ability of MDSCs via activating the MAPK signaling pathway.

Abbreviations

BC:Bladder cancer
NMIBC:Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer
MIBC:Muscle-invasive bladder cancer
TIL:Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte
TME:Tumor microenvironment
MDSC:Myeloid-derived suppressor cell
IL-6:Interleukin 6
DC:Dendritic cell
MAPK:Mitogen-activated protein kinase
ERK:Extracellular signal-regulated kinase
ELISA:Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
CFSE:Carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester
RT-PCR:Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
HPRT:Hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase
SD:Standard deviation
CCK-8:Cell Counting Kit-8
ARG1:Arginase 1
iNOS:Inducible nitric oxide synthase
MEK2:Mitogen-activated protein kinase 2
MNK1:Mitogen-activated protein kinase-interacting kinase 1
PI3K:Phosphoinositide 3-kinase
AKT:Protein kinase B
Stat3:Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3
Gab1:GRB2-associated-binding protein 1
SHP2:SH2 domain-containing phosphatase 2
LPS:Lipopolysaccharide
CXCL2:C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 2
CXCR2:C-X-C chemokine receptor 2
AOD:Average optical density
MFI:Median fluorescence intensity.

Data Availability

The detailed procedures of methods and figures are attached. The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Additional Points

Précis. IL-6 strengthens the immunosuppressive ability of MDSCs via the MAPK signaling pathway in MIBC.

Ethical Approval

This work was approved by the Ethical Committee of Shanghai Jiao Tong University according to the Chinese Ethical Regulations. All animal experiments complied with the Shanghai Jiao Tong University of Medicine Policy on the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

The authors confirmed that we have obtained written consent from the patients to publish the manuscript.

Disclosure

The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ Contributions

Junhua Zheng was responsible for the conceptualization and funding acquisition. Ke Wu was responsible for the supervision and resources. Zhihong Liu was responsible for the project administration and funding acquisition. Zhong Zheng was responsible for the methodology, software, and validation. Xinyi Zheng was responsible for the formal analysis and investigation. Yiwen Zhu was responsible for the data curation and visualization. Zhixian Yao was responsible for the software and writing of the original draft. Weiguang Zhao was involved in the writing of the original draft. Youjia Zhu was involved in the review and editing of the manuscript. Feng Sun was involved in the review and editing of the manuscript. Xingyu Mu was involved in the writing of the original draft. Yong Wang was involved in the writing of the original draft. Wanqing He was involved in the review and editing of the manuscript. Zhong Zheng, Xinyi Zheng, and Yiwen Zhu contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support from the Youth Science and Technology Innovation Studio of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. The reported work was supported in part by research grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 81972393, 81772705, 31570775, 81672515, and 82072823), Shanghai Municipal Education Commission—Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant (20172019), and the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (20ZR1444900).

Supplementary Materials

Table S1: monoclonal antibodies used for flow cytometric assay. Table S2: antibodies used for western blotting. Table S3: statistics of the RNA-seq data for human MDSCs. Table S4: statistics of the RNA-seq data for mice MDSCs. (Supplementary Materials)

References

  1. N. Mahdavifar, M. Ghoncheh, R. Pakzad, Z. Momenimovahed, and H. Salehiniya, “Epidemiology, incidence and mortality of bladder cancer and their relationship with the development index in the world,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 381–386, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. L. Klotz and M. A. Brausi, “World Urologic Oncology Federation Bladder Cancer Prevention Program: a global initiative,” Urologic Oncology, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 25–29, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. Lei, H. Xu, N. Chen et al., “MKP-1 overexpression is associated with chemoresistance in bladder cancer via the MAPK pathway,” Oncology Letters, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1743–1751, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. P. L. Crispen and S. Kusmartsev, “Mechanisms of immune evasion in bladder cancer,” Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 3–14, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. A. K. Schneider, M. F. Chevalier, and L. Derré, “The multifaceted immune regulation of bladder cancer,” Nature Reviews. Urology, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 613–630, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. W. H. Fridman, F. Pagès, C. Sautès-Fridman, and J. Galon, “The immune contexture in human tumours: impact on clinical outcome,” Nature Reviews. Cancer, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 298–306, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. Z. Zheng, S. Mao, W. Zhang et al., “Dysregulation of the immune microenvironment contributes to malignant progression and has prognostic value in bladder cancer,” Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 10, article 542492, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. D. I. Gabrilovich, “Myeloid-derived suppressor cells,” Cancer Immunology Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 3–8, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. D. M. Pardoll, “The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy,” Nature Reviews. Cancer, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 252–264, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. B. Lamano, J. B. Lamano, Y. D. Li et al., “Glioblastoma-derived IL6 induces immunosuppressive peripheral myeloid cell PD-L1 and promotes tumor growth,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 3643–3657, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. T. A. Karakasheva, E. W. Lin, Q. Tang et al., “IL-6 mediates cross-talk between tumor cells and activated fibroblasts in the tumor microenvironment,” Cancer Research, vol. 78, no. 17, pp. 4957–4970, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. L. Ibrahim, C. Lu, J. D. Klement et al., “Expression profiles and function of IL6 in polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells,” Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 2233–2245, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J. S. C. Arthur and S. C. Ley, “Mitogen-activated protein kinases in innate immunity,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 679–692, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. E. K. Kim and E.-J. Choi, “Pathological roles of MAPK signaling pathways in human diseases,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1802, no. 4, pp. 396–405, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. X. Y. Mu, R. J. Wang, Z. X. Yao et al., “RS 504393 inhibits M-MDSCs recruiting in immune microenvironment of bladder cancer after gemcitabine treatment,” Molecular Immunology, vol. 109, pp. 140–148, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. C. Garbers, H. M. Hermanns, F. Schaper et al., “Plasticity and cross-talk of interleukin 6-type cytokines,” Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 85–97, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. D. E. Johnson, R. A. O'Keefe, and J. R. Grandis, “Targeting the IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signalling axis in cancer,” Nature Reviews. Clinical Oncology, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 234–248, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. K. Taniguchi and M. Karin, “IL-6 and related cytokines as the critical lynchpins between inflammation and cancer,” Seminars in Immunology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 54–74, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. S. A. Jones and B. J. Jenkins, “Recent insights into targeting the IL-6 cytokine family in inflammatory diseases and cancer,” Nature Reviews. Immunology, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 773–789, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. F. Chen, P. Y. Lin, C. F. Wu, W. C. Chen, and C. T. Wu, “IL-6 expression regulates tumorigenicity and correlates with prognosis in bladder cancer,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 4, article e61901, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. H. Wei, “Interleukin 6 signaling maintains the stem-like properties of bladder cancer stem cells,” Translational Cancer Research, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 557–566, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. D. B. Thompson, L. E. Siref, M. P. Feloney, R. J. Hauke, and D. K. Agrawal, “Immunological basis in the pathogenesis and treatment of bladder cancer,” Expert Review of Clinical Immunology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 265–279, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. R. Cardillo, P. Sale, and F. Di Silverio, “Heat shock protein-90, IL-6 and IL-10 in bladder cancer,” Anticancer Research, vol. 20, no. 6b, pp. 4579–4583, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  24. N. Kumari, U. Agrawal, A. K. Mishra et al., “Predictive role of serum and urinary cytokines in invasion and recurrence of bladder cancer,” Tumour Biology, vol. 39, no. 4, article 101042831769755, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. B. Andrews, S. F. Shariat, J. H. Kim, T. M. Wheeler, K. M. Slawin, and S. P. Lerner, “Preoperative plasma levels of interleukin-6 and its soluble receptor predict disease recurrence and survival of patients with bladder cancer,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 167, no. 3, pp. 1475–1481, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. H. Tsukamoto, K. Fujieda, S. Senju, T. Ikeda, H. Oshiumi, and Y. Nishimura, “Immune-suppressive effects of interleukin-6 on T-cell-mediated anti-tumor immunity,” Cancer Science, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 523–530, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. M. Jiang, J. Chen, W. Zhang et al. et al., “Interleukin-6 Trans-Signaling Pathway Promotes Immunosuppressive Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells via Suppression of Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling 3 in Breast Cancer,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 8, p. 1840, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. H. L. Young, E. J. Rowling, M. Bugatti et al., “An adaptive signaling network in melanoma inflammatory niches confers tolerance to MAPK signaling inhibition,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 214, no. 6, pp. 1691–1710, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. F. Y. Mao, Y. L. Zhao, Y. P. Lv et al., “CD45+CD33lowCD11bdim myeloid-derived suppressor cells suppress CD8+ T cell activity via the IL-6/IL-8-arginase I axis in human gastric cancer,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 9, no. 7, p. 763, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. M. Xu, Z. Zhao, J. Song et al., “Interactions between interleukin-6 and myeloid-derived suppressor cells drive the chemoresistant phenotype of hepatocellular cancer,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 351, no. 2, pp. 142–149, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. G. Yang, W. Shen, Y. Zhang et al., “Accumulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) induced by low levels of IL-6 correlates with poor prognosis in bladder cancer,” Oncotarget, vol. 8, no. 24, pp. 38378–38388, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. D. Marvel and D. I. Gabrilovich, “Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the tumor microenvironment: expect the unexpected,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 125, no. 9, pp. 3356–3364, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. R. P. Tobin, D. Davis, K. R. Jordan, and M. D. McCarter, “The clinical evidence for targeting human myeloid-derived suppressor cells in cancer patients,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 381–391, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. E. Eruslanov, M. Neuberger, I. Daurkin et al., “Circulating and tumor-infiltrating myeloid cell subsets in patients with bladder cancer,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 130, no. 5, pp. 1109–1119, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. H. Bongartz, K. Gille, W. Hessenkemper et al., “The multi-site docking protein Grb2-associated binder 1 (Gab1) enhances interleukin-6-induced MAPK-pathway activation in an SHP2-, Grb2-, and time-dependent manner,” Cell Communication and Signaling: CCS, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 135, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. W. P. Schiemann, J. L. Bartoe, and N. M. Nathanson, “Box 3-independent Signaling Mechanisms Are Involved in Leukemia Inhibitory Factor Receptor α\- and gp130-mediated Stimulation of Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase:,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 26, pp. 16631–16636, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. I. C. Salaroglio, E. Mungo, E. Gazzano, J. Kopecka, and C. Riganti, “ERK is a pivotal player of chemo-immune-resistance in cancer,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 20, no. 10, p. 2505, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. L. K. Robertson, L. R. Mireau, and H. L. Ostergaard, “A role for phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in TCR-stimulated ERK activation leading to paxillin phosphorylation and CTL degranulation,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 175, no. 12, pp. 8138–8145, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. Y. Yang, R. Zhang, F. Xia et al., “LPS converts Gr-1+CD115+ myeloid- derived suppressor cells from M2 to M1 via P38 MAPK,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 319, no. 12, pp. 1774–1783, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. P. Guha, J. Gardell, J. Darpolor et al., “STAT3 inhibition induces Bax-dependent apoptosis in liver tumor myeloid- derived suppressor cells,” Oncogene, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 533–548, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. H. Zhang, Y. L. Ye, M. X. Li et al., “CXCL2/MIF-CXCR2 signaling promotes the recruitment of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and is correlated with prognosis in bladder cancer,” Oncogene, vol. 36, no. 15, pp. 2095–2104, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Zhong Zheng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views445
Downloads729
Citations

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.