Research Article

Utilization of Deworming Drugs and Its Individual and Community Level Predictors among Pregnant Married Women in Cameroon: A Multilevel Modeling

Table 2

Multilevel multivariable results for individual/household and community-level predictors of utilization of deworming medication among pregnant women: evidence from 2018/19 CDHS.

VariablesModel 0Model I AOR [95% CI]Model II AOR [95% CI]Model III AOR [95% CI]

Women’s educational status
 No formal education (ref)
 Primary school1.38 (1.08-1.77)1.27 (0.99-1.64)
 Secondary school1.53 (1.16-2.02)1.38 (1.04-1.83)
 Higher1.43 (0.93-2.22)1.28 (0.82-1.98)
Husband educational status
 No formal education (ref)
 Primary school0.91 (0.72-1.15)0.85 (0.67-1.07)
 Secondary school0.92 (0.72-1.17)0.86 (0.67-1.09)
 Higher0.87 (0.60-1.25)0.83 (0.58-1.19)
Women occupation
 Not working (ref)
 Clerical0.92 (0.51-1.69)0.88 (0.48-1.60)
 Sales1.18 (0.96-1.45)1.19 (0.97-1.46)
 Agricultural self-employed1.22 (0.98-1.52)1.23 (0.98-1.54)
 Services1.08 (0.83-1.39)1.07 (0.83-1.38)
 Skilled manual0.92 (0.68-1.24)0.93 (0.69-1.26)
 Unskilled manual1.14 (0.63-2.07)1.10 (0.61-1.98)
Husband occupation
 Not working (ref)
 Professional or technical or managerial0.74 (0.42-1.29)0.80 (0.45-1.39)
 Clerical0.73 (0.38-1.39)0.79 (0.42-1.49)
 Sales0.69 (0.42-1.13)0.74 (0.46-1.21)
 Agricultural self-employed0.82 (0.50-1.35)0.91 (0.56-1.48)
 Service0.68 (0.41-1.14)0.75 (0.45-1.25)
 Skilled manual0.91 (0.56-1.48)0.97 (0.60-1.56)
 Unskilled manual0.52 (0.29-0.95)0.58 (0.32-1.04)
Religion
 Catholic (ref)
 Protestant1.04 (0.87-1.24)1.00 (0.83-1.19)
 Other Christians0.90 (0.69-1.18)0.86 (0.66-1.12)
 Muslim0.88 (0.70-1.10)0.96 (0.76-1.21)
 Other0.61 (0.38-0.98)0.67 (0.42-1.06)
Media exposure
 No (ref)
 Yes1.12 (0.92-1.36)1.08 (0.89-1.31)
Economic status
 Quintiles 1 (ref)
 Quintiles 21.51 (1.16-1.98)1.32 (1.00-1.74)
 Quintiles 31.59 (1.18-2.13)1.39 (1.01-1.90)
 Quintiles 41.93 (1.39-2.69)1.69 (1.17-2.44)
 Quintiles 52.19 (1.51-3.16)1.90 (1.25-2.88)
Decision-making
 No (ref)
 Yes1.04 (0.89-1.20)0.98 (0.85-1.14)
Skill ANC
 No (ref)
 Yes18.25 (10.88-30.62)18.54 (11.05-31.10)
Sex of HH head
 Male (ref)
 Female1.07 (0.88-1.30)1.03 (0.85-1.26)
Distance to HF
 Big problem (ref)
 Not a big problem1.28 (1.11-1.48)1.19 (1.02-1.39)
Place of residence
 Urban (ref)
 Rural0.89 (0.70-1.15)1.08 (0.83-1.41)
Region
 Adamawa (ref)
 Centre (without Yaoun)1.44 (0.89-2.35)0.98 (0.59-1.63)
 Douala1.38 (0.82-2.31)0.91 (0.54-1.55)
 East1.76 (1.14-2.71)1.34 (0.85-2.13)
 Far-North1.05 (0.71-1.56)0.92 (0.61-1.39)
 Littoral (without Dou)1.17 (0.70-1.95)0.72 (0.43-1.22)
 North0.32 (0.20-0.50)0.27 (0.17-0.43)
 North-West2.40 (1.49-3.86)1.44 (0.88-2.36)
 West1.27 (0.78-2.06)0.77 (0.47-1.27)
 South3.08 (1.89-5.02)2.09 (1.27-3.45)
 South-West1.53 (0.78-3.03)1.04 (0.52-2.07)
 Yaounde1.23 (0.74-2.05)0.87 (0.52-1.47)
Community literacy level
 Low (ref)
 Medium1.22 (0.89-1.67)0.98 (0.71-1.34)
 High1.36 (0.95-1.96)1.10 (0.76-1.59)
Community socioeconomic status
 Low (ref)
 Moderate1.21 (0.93-1.56)1.08 (0.83-1.40)
 High1.21 (0.88-1.67)1.05 (0.75-1.47)
Random effect result
 PSU variance (95% CI)0.77 (0.60-0.98)0.45 (0.33-0.61)0.31 (0.21-0.44)0.26 (0.18-0.40)
 ICC0.190.120.080.07
 LR test308.19121.0271.5852.73
 Wald chi-square and p-valueReference, , ,
Model fitness
 Log-likelihood-2988.28-2775.28-2891.00-2723.31
 AIC5980.565616.575820.015546.63
 PSU427427427427
5,0135,0135,0135,013

Notes: significant at , significant at , significant at ; ref: reference; AIC: Akaike Information Criterion.