BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2021 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 9983858 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9983858

Yan-Feng Liu, Li-Min Wang, Li-Zi Zhao, Wei Wang, Hong-Xia Zhang, "Genome-Wide Identification and Evolutionary Analysis of Argonaute Genes in Hexaploid Bread Wheat", BioMed Research International, vol. 2021, Article ID 9983858, 9 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9983858

Genome-Wide Identification and Evolutionary Analysis of Argonaute Genes in Hexaploid Bread Wheat

Academic Editor: Gopal Pandi
Received14 Mar 2021
Revised16 May 2021
Accepted08 Jun 2021
Published18 Jun 2021

Abstract

Argonaute (AGO) proteins play a pivotal role in plant growth and development as the core components of RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). However, no systematic characterization of AGO genes in wheat has been reported to date. In this study, a total number of 69 TaAGO genes in the hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring) genome, divided into 10 subfamilies, were identified. Compared to all wheat genes, TaAGOs showed a significantly lower evolutionary rate, which is consistent with their high conservation in eukaryotes. However, the homoeolog retention was remarkably higher than the average, implying the nonredundant biological importance of TaAGO genes in bread wheat. Further homoeologous gene expression bias analyses revealed that TaAGOs may have undergone neofunctionalization after polyploidization and duplication through the divergent expression of homoeologous gene copies, to provide new opportunities for the generation of adaptive traits. Moreover, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analyses indicated that TaAGO gene expression was involved in response to heat, drought, and salt stresses. Our results would provide a theoretical basis for future studies on the biological functions of TaAGO genes in wheat and other gramineous species.

1. Introduction

Small RNA- (sRNA-) guided gene silencing is crucial for the maintenance of genome stability and plant response to environmental alterations. Argonaute (AGO) family proteins function as the major components in this RNA silencing machinery. They associate with sRNAs such as short interfering RNAs (siRNA) and microRNAs (miRNAs), to form RNA-induced silencing complexes (RISC), which induce sequence-specific degradation or repress the translation of mRNAs [1]. AGO family proteins are highly conserved in eukaryotes, containing several typical domains such as the N-terminal, Piwi Argonaute Zwille (PAZ), MID, and PIWI domains. The N-terminal domain participates in the loading and unwinding of small RNA duplexes, whereas the PAZ and MID domains anchor the 3- and 5-ends of the sRNA, respectively. The PIWI domain is structurally similar to RNaseH and is responsible for the cleavage of its target mRNA.

In Arabidopsis, a total number of 10 AGO proteins, which are divided into three phylogenetic clades: AGO1/AGO5/AGO10, AGO2/AGO3/AGO7, and AGO4/AGO6/AGO8/AGO9, have been detected. AGO1 regulates plant development through the miRNA-mediated pathway. A loss of function in AGO1 led to abnormal inflorescence and filamentous structures in the Arabidopsis mutant plants [2]. AGO10 regulates the differentiation of shoot apical meristem (SAM) by sequestering AGO1 from miR165/166, leading to promoted expression of their target homeodomain-leucine zipper (HD-ZIP) proteins [3]. AGO2 and AGO3 are similar to each other and may have redundant functions. AGO2 plays a role in antibacterial immunity by binding to miR393b, which inhibits the translation of MEMB12, a gene repressing the exocytosis of PR1 [4]. No AGO3 orthologs have been detected in rice and maize [5]. In Arabidopsis, rice, and maize, AGO7 predominantly binds to miR390, which cleaves TAS3 precursor RNA [68]. The cleavage products are converted into double-stranded RNAs by the Suppressor of Gene Silencing 3 (SGS3) and RNA-directed RNA polymerase 6 (RDR6) and then diced by Dicer-like 4 (DCL4) into tasiRNAs, which control the transition from juvenile to adult phase at the vegetative stage [9]. AGO4/6/9 is involved in the de novo methylation of CG, CHG (H=A, C, T), and CHH sequence contexts in plants [10]. Mutation in AGO4 clade genes (AGO4, AGO6, AGO8, or AGO9) induces supernumerary female gametophytic precursors in Arabidopsis [11].

In rice, 19 OsAGOs have been identified, of which 14 were preferentially expressed at reproductive stage. Collinearity analysis revealed that segmental and tandem duplication contributed to the expansion of AGO family in rice, and duplicated genes have possessed diverged functions during evolution [12]. In pepper, 12 CaAGOs were detected. CaAGO4b, CaAGO7, and CaAGO10a were significantly repressed by salt stress, whereas CaAGO2 and CaAGO5 were induced by cold stress, suggesting a potential role of AGOs in abiotic stress resistance [13]. In Saccharum spontaneum, 21 SsAGOs were detected based on the genome-wide identification and phylogenetic analyses. Among them, SsAGO18a was preferentially expressed in the stem, and SsAGO2b, SsAGO5a, SsAGO5c, SsAGO6b, and SsAGO10c were significantly induced by osmotic stress [14]. In Populus trichocarpa, among the 14 detected AGOs, PtAGO10a, PtAGO1b, and PtAGO4c were upregulated in stems, while PtAGO4b and PtAGO5a were downregulated [15]. In potato, among the 14 identified AGOs, StAGO15 was activated upon pathogen infection [16]. In Citrus sinensis, 13 AGOs were identified, and the repression of RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) pathway is necessary for fruit abscission [17]. Therefore, AGO proteins could contribute to a diverse set of functions in plants.

Hexaploid bread wheat has been grown as one of the most important cereal crops and provides about 30% of the staple food source for humankind [18]. Abiotic stresses have severely limited global wheat production [19, 20]. sRNA-guided gene silencing at the transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels has been found to have important functions in controlling growth and resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses [21]. To date, several AGO genes have been isolated from wheat. TaAGO1b and TaAGO4 were ubiquitously expressed in both vegetative and reproductive organs [22]. TaAGO5 is involved in the resistance to Diuraphis noxia infestation. Decreased expression of TaAGO5 led to increased susceptibility of wheat D. noxia feeding [23]. To further understand the possible functions and the evolutionary dynamic of AGO genes in wheat, we performed a systematic analysis on the structural conservatism, evolutionary relationship, and expression pattern of these genes. This work will provide an overview of the AGO family and a new perspective on their possible function and evolution in cereal crops.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Identification and Characterization of Candidate AGO Genes in Bread Wheat

To identify all the candidate AGO genes, the bread wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring) high-confidence protein sequences were downloaded from https://urgi.versailles.inra.fr/download/iwgsc/IWGSC_RefSeq_Annotations/v1.0/. The Hidden Markov Model (HMM) profiles of conserved domains of AGO (PF16486, PF02170, and PF02171) were retrieved from the protein family database (Pfam, https://pfam.xfam.org/) and were used as queries to search for AGO candidate genes in the bread wheat genome as described previously [16]. All hits with a cut-off value lower than 1-5 were retained and treated as candidate AGO genes. The candidate sequences were examined to confirm the existence of the conserved AGO domains using SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/), Pfam (http://pfam.xfam.org/), and the Conserved Domain Database (CDD) in NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Proteins with anonymous or truncated domains were eliminated to ensure the accuracy of the results. The resultant AGO genes were named according to their phylogenetic relationships and subgenome location (A, B, or D). In details, each gene name consists of the abbreviation for Triticum aestivum (Ta), followed by the subfamily name of rice or maize (e.g., AGO4a) and chromosomal location (e.g., 3A). Duplicated genes from the same chromosome were labeled with lower case letters (e.g., a). TBtools, WoLF PSORT (https://wolfpsort.hgc.jp/), ExPASy (http://www.expasy.ch/tools/pi_tool.html), and MCScanX were used to generate exon-intron structures, subcellular localization, isoelectric point, molecular weight, and gene duplication type, respectively [24, 25]. The AGO genes in the progenitors, Triticum urartu (genome AA), Aegilops tauschii (genome DD), and Triticum turgidum L. ssp. durum (genome AABB), were detected using the same methods.

2.2. Evolutionary Rate Calculation of Bread Wheat Genes

The evolutionary rate was estimated using protein identity and nonsynonymous substitution ratios (Ka)/synonymous substitution ratios (Ks) as described previously [26]. The rice genome (Osativa_323_v7.0) was downloaded from the Phytozome database v12.1 (http://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html), and orthologous gene pairs between bread wheat and rice were identified using the Blastp program (-evalue0.01; -max_target_seqs1). The protein identity between bread wheat and rice was normalized according to the length of alignment using Perl scripts. To calculate Ka, Ks, and Ka/Ks of orthologous gene pairs between bread wheat and rice, the sequences were aligned with ParaAT (-m clustalw2 -f paml); then, the program “yn00” and the “Yang and Nielsen (2000) method” of Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood (PAML) software were used to get the value. The identity and Ka/Ks of the TaAGOs were extracted from all wheat genes using Perl scripts.

2.3. Phylogenetic and Chromosomal Distribution Analysis of TaAGO Genes

Phylogenetic tree was constructed with MEGA 5.0 based on the maximum likelihood method using 1000 bootstraps; the most suitable amino acid substitution model “WAG” was selected based on the results of “Find Best DNA/Protein Model.” The tree was visualized using iTOL (https://itol.embl.de/). Homoeologous TaAGOs among the A, B, and D subgenomes were identified using phylogenetic relationships and previous classification methods [27, 28]. The chromosomal distribution of the 69 TaAGOs was visualized using Circos [29].

2.4. Expression Analysis of TaAGOs Using RNA-seq Data and Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR)

The expression levels of TaAGOs in seedlings, leaves, roots, stems, spikes, grains, stamens, and pistils were downloaded as Transcripts Per Million (TPM) from http://www.wheat-expression.com. A homoeolog expression pattern analysis for triads (a single gene copy per subgenome, i.e., A : B : D configuration of 1 : 1 : 1) with a total expression above 0.5 TPM was conducted. Homoeolog expression bias was classified as balanced (similar relative transcript abundance from A, B, and D homoeologs), A/B/D-suppressed (lower abundance of transcripts from A/B/D homoeologs), or A/B/D-dominant (higher abundance of transcripts from A/B/D homoeologs) patterns as described previously [28]. The ternary plot was generated using the R package “vcd.” Chinese Spring (Triticum aestivum L.) plants were grown in a growth chamber under 16 h/8 h light/dark period until anthesis stage. Flag leaves were dissected after 6 and 24 h of heat (42°C), PEG-6000 (25%), and NaCl (200 mM) treatment. Total RNA was extracted with Omega plant RNA kit (Omega Bio-tek, China). cDNA was synthesized using EasyScript (Trans). Glyceraldehyde3-phoshate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as normalization control. Relative expression levels were calculated with the 2-ΔΔCt method. The primer sequences used for qRT-PCR are listed in Supplementary Table 1.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of Bread Wheat AGO Genes

To identify the candidate AGO genes in bread wheat, we downloaded all annotated protein sequences (https://urgi.versailles.inra.fr/download/iwgsc/IWGSC_RefSeq_Annotations/v1.0/). A total number of 69 genes were identified as TaAGO, and the protein length ranged from 675 to 1210 amino acids (Supplementary Table 2). All of them contained N-terminal, PAZ, and PIWI domains based on the SMART analyses, suggesting that they are authentic AGO genes (Supplementary Figure 1).

We further performed exon-intron structure analyses and found that the average exon number of TaAGOs was 19.6, which was significantly higher than that of all the annotated wheat genes (4.6; Wilcoxon rank-sum test, ; Figure 1(a)). Conversely, the average exon length of TaAGOs was dramatically lower than that of all wheat genes (275.8 bp vs. 562.6 bp; Wilcoxon rank-sum test, ; Figure 1(b)). In addition, protein identity between TaAGOs and their orthologs in rice was significantly higher than that of all wheat genes (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, ; Figure 1(c)), whereas Ka/Ks was significantly lower (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, ; Figure 1(d)). All these results suggest that the evolutionary rate of TaAGOs is lower than that of all wheat genes. Therefore, AGO genes are highly conserved and their biological functions have been retained during evolutionary processes.

3.2. TaAGO Genes Belong to Well-Defined Subfamilies

A maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed with Arabidopsis, rice, and maize AGO proteins (Figure 2(a)). TaAGOs were divided into 10 subfamilies: AGO1, AGO2, AGO4, AGO5, AGO6, AGO7, AGO9, AGO10, AGO17, and AGO18. Consistent with rice and maize AGOs, no AGO3 and AGO8 orthologs were detected in wheat. In some clades, gene phylogeny roughly followed species phylogeny, with one rice gene closely related to a wheat homoeolog triad (e.g., subclades AGO6 and AGO7). Duplication events made topology more complex in other subclades (e.g., subclades AGO1, AGO5, and AGO10). In addition, compared with those in rice and maize, subfamilies AGO9 were expanded even when the ploidy level was corrected (Figure 2(b)). The expansion mainly resulted from the B subgenome since the gene number in Triticum urartu and Aegilops tauschii was the same as that in maize and rice but expanded in the B subgenome of Triticum turgidum L. ssp. Durum and bread wheat (Supplementary Table 3). The expansion of AGO9 may be a result of adaptive evolution of RdDM in wheat, which helps to repress the amplified transposable element (85% in wheat vs. 35% in rice) [26, 30].

3.3. Chromosomal Location and High Rate of Homoeolog Retention of TaAGOs

The TaAGO genes were dispersed nonuniformly among the chromosomes, with chromosome 5B containing a significantly higher number of genes than expected from the chromosome length ( test, ; Supplementary Figure 2). This mainly resulted from segmental duplication (or whole-genome duplication) of the subfamily AGO5. Furthermore, this duplication pattern also led to more TaAGO genes located on chromosome 7B than expected (10.5% vs. 5.3%; Supplemental Figure 2). In addition, bread wheat contained A, B, and D subgenomes, and 41.3% of the high-confidence genes presented as triads, while 60.9% (42/69) of the TaAGOs presented as triads (Supplementary Table 4). The high rate of homoeolog retention indicated that the high TaAGO gene number mainly resulted from the segmental duplication (or whole genome duplication) in wheat.

3.4. Expression Pattern Analysis of TaAGOs during Wheat Development

To characterize the expression pattern of TaAGOs in different tissues, RNA-seq data from seedlings, roots, stems, leaves, stamens, pistils, spikes, and grains were analyzed. The results showed that 69.6% (48/69) of TaAGOs were expressed in at least one developmental stage (; Supplementary Table 5). A total of 27.5% (19/69) of genes were expressed in all the tested tissues (; Supplementary Table 5). Consistent with a previous study in wheat, TaAGO4a-3A and TaAGO1d-7D were expressed in both vegetative and reproductive tissues (Supplementary Table 5) [22]. In general, the expression patterns of the TaAGOs were comparable with the findings in rice and maize. For example, genes from subclades AGO4a, AGO5b, AGO6, and AGO9 were preferentially expressed in reproductive tissues, consistent with their roles in gametophyte development (Supplementary Table 5) [11].

Polyploidization could alter the transcriptional landscape, help to evolve new expression patterns for homoeologous gene copies, and may represent the initial steps toward sub- or neofunctionalization of wheat homoeologs [26]. To better understand the expression patterns of TaAGOs, we analyzed the homoeolog expression bias in different tissues. The percentage of triads displayed that similar transcript abundance from the A, B, and D homoeologs (defined as balanced) was between 16.8% and 42.9%, with an average of 33.2% (Supplementary Table 6). Further analyses indicated that histone modification may contribute to the biased expression of TaAGOs. For example, in seedlings, the higher level of the active marker H3K36me3 around the transcripts of TaAGO2b-2A than that around TaAGO2b-2B and TaAGO2b-2D may lead to an A-dominant expression pattern, while the higher levels of H3K36me3 around the transcripts of TaAGO5b-2D than those around TaAGO5b-2A and TaAGO5b-2B may result in a D-dominant expression pattern (Figure 3).

3.5. TaAGO Genes Were Influenced by Heat, Osmotic, and Salt Stress Treatments

To understand if the expression of TaAGOs was affected by abiotic stresses, the transcription levels of TaAGOs were measured after the treatment with heat (42°C), PEG (25%), and NaCl (200 mM) for 6 and 24 hours at anthesis stage of wheat (Figure 4). The results showed that heat stress caused greater effects on the expression of TaAGOs. Almost all of the detected TaAGOs, except TaAGO4a-3D and members of subclade TaAGO6, were significantly suppressed by heat treatment, while 24 h treatment of heat significantly induced the expression of members of TaAGO6. In addition, the expression levels of seven TaAGOs were significantly affected by all the stress treatments, with a significantly downregulated expression of TaAGO1a-6A, TaAGO1b-2A, TaAGO9-1A, and TaAGO17-5B. Furthermore, TaAGO4a might have undergone neofunctionalization after duplication because TaAGO4a-3A and TaAGO4a-3B were significantly suppressed by heat treatments, while its homoeolog, TaAGO4a-3D, was not affected (Figure 4).

4. Discussion

RNA silencing is a conserved mechanism that regulates gene expression at the transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels. This process is mediated by several kinds of proteins including AGOs. The AGO family proteins have expanded via duplication during plant evolution, from three or fewer members in ancient unicellular green algae (e.g., Chlamydomonas reinhardtii) to ten or more members in flowering plants (e.g., Arabidopsis and rice). In this study, a total number of 69 TaAGOs were systematically identified and comprehensively analyzed (Supplementary Table 2). Our results indicated that segmental duplication (or whole-genome duplication) contributed to the expansion in wheat. Consistent with previous results in Brassica species, expansion in AGO9 clades was detected compared with that in both rice and maize (Figure 2(b)) [31]. The expansion of AGO9 presumably reflected the expansion of RdDM pathway in wheat.

In mammals, exon conservation increases with exon number and decreases with exon length [32]. In plants, TaAGOs have evolutionarily conserved roles. We found that TaAGOs showed higher exon numbers but lower exon lengths compared with those of all wheat genes (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). Consistently, TaAGOs showed lower evolutionary rates, as reflected by their higher identity and lower Ka/Ks (Figures 1(c) and 1(d)). The high conservation may allow AGOs to recognize specific small RNA types in different species. For example, AGO7 binds to miR390 and promotes the production of tasiRNA in Arabidopsis, rice, and maize [7, 8, 33]. The expression pattern of many TaAGOs is similar to that in other plants that also indicated their conserved function among different plant species. For example, AGO9 participated in female gamete development in both Arabidopsis and maize [11, 34]. Consistently, TaAGO9 displayed a higher expression level in wheat pistils (Supplementary Table 5), implying that TaAGO9 may be involved in female gamete formation. The evolutionary conservation may underline the biological importance of AGO gene family in wheat.

It is well known that the AGO family can protect plants from abiotic stresses. Many plant AGO genes showed responsive expression to a variety of abiotic stresses, including ABA, drought, high salinity, heat, and cold stresses [35, 36]. ZmAGO18b was significantly induced by drought, and mutation in ZmAGO18b led to hypersensitivity to drought stress [35]. In foxtail millet, mutation of siAGO1b led to decreased resistance to drought stress [37]. Chilling stress significantly upregulated the expression level of VvAGO1, suggesting its role in cold resistance [38]. At the transcript level, AtAGO2 improved salt tolerance through affecting the SOS signaling cascade [39]. We observed that the expression of 12 (75%) TaAGOs was suppressed by heat stress. TaAGOs (TaAGO6-5A and TaAGO6-5D) were downregulated at 6 hours after heat stress and then significantly upregulated at 24 h, while TaAGO6-5B was upregulated at 6 and 24 h. Similar results were also observed in cucumber CsAGOs. These results indicate that TaAGOs may play an important role in response to high-temperature stress (Figure 4). Moreover, the expression of 12 (75.0%) and 11 (68.8%) TaAGOs was significantly affected by PEG and salt stress, respectively. And TaAGOs (TaAGO1a-6A, TaAGO1b-2A, TaAGO1b-U, TaAGO4b-7Bb, TaAGO6-5D, TaAGO9-1A, and TaAGO17-5B) were significantly affected by all the stress treatments, suggesting that these TaAGOs might participate in multiple abiotic stress responses. Collectively, our findings provide potential gene-editing targets to improve wheat performance.

Polyploidization and duplication provide additional opportunities to adapt to the environment changes through homoeologous gene expression divergence, such as neofunctionalization or subfunctionalization [28]. Bread wheat is an evolutionarily young polyploid. Its hexaploid nature provides an opportunity to study the fate of TaAGOs after polyploidization and analyze its contribution to the high adaptability of wheat. Based on the observation that TaAGO4a-3A and TaAGO4a-3B but not TaAGO4a-3D were suppressed by heat stress treatment, the evolution of TaAGOs could have undergone neofunctionalization (Figure 4). Furthermore, since the highly expressed homoeologs showed a higher active histone marker, H3K36me3, epigenetic modification may be associated with the expression divergence of TaAGOs in bread wheat (Figure 3).

Taken together, TaAGO genes are critical for the development and adaptability to diverse environmental conditions in bread wheat. The results of this study will broaden our understanding on the structure and function of the AGO gene family in wheat and help to clarify potential candidate AGO genes to be used for the future breeding of new wheat and other cereal crop species with increased grain yield and improved resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses.

5. Conclusions

The bread wheat genome possessed 69 TaAGO genes. We discussed the structures and performed a detailed phylogenetic analysis of this gene family. TaAGOs displayed slower evolutionary rate when compared with all wheat genes. Chromosome localization analysis revealed that segmental duplication (or whole-genome duplication) contributed to the expansion of the AGO gene family in wheat. Gene expression profiles revealed that TaAGOs were responsive to various abiotic stresses. This study provides basis for further functional characterization of these genes.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the supplementary information file(s).

Conflicts of Interest

We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest with the work submitted.

Authors’ Contributions

WW and HXZ designed the experiments; YFL, LMW, and LZZ performed the experiments; YFL and WW analyzed the data; YFL, WW, and HXZ wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Yong-Zhen Wu (Ludong University, Yantai, Shandong Province, China) for providing the bread wheat materials. This work was jointly supported by the following grants: Agricultural Variety Improvement Project of Shandong Province (grant numbers: 2019LZGC009, 2019LZGC010); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers: 31870576, 31901572, 32001389, and 32071733); the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (grant numbers: ZR2018PH041, ZR2019PC015, and ZR2020QC186); the Key R and D Program of Shandong Province of China (2019GSF108154).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure 1: exon-intron structure and domains of TaAGO genes. Supplementary Figure 2: chromosomal distribution of TaAGOs in wheat genomes. The TaAGO gene name was shown in different colors. The outer and inner track indicated the chromosome and chromosomal segment (light grey: C; grey: R2a and R2b; dark grey: R1 and R3). Connecting lines in the center of the diagram indicated the homoeologous genes. Supplementary Table 1: primers used in this study for qRT-PCR. Supplementary Table 2: list of all TaAGO genes identified in bread wheat. Supplementary Table 3: GeneID of subfamily AGO9 in different species. Supplementary Table 4: homoeologous groups of TaAGO genes. Supplementary Table 5: relative expression level (TPM) of TaAGOs in different tissues. Supplementary Table 6: homoeolog expression bias for triads in grain, spike, stem, leaf, root, seedling, stamen, and pistil. (Supplementary Materials)

References

  1. M. Jinek and J. A. Doudna, “A three-dimensional view of the molecular machinery of RNA interference,” Nature, vol. 457, no. 7228, pp. 405–412, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. K. Bohmert, I. Camus, C. Bellini, D. Bouchez, M. Caboche, and C. Benning, “AGO1 defines a novel locus of Arabidopsis controlling leaf development,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 170–180, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. H. Zhu, F. Hu, R. Wang et al., “Arabidopsis Argonaute10 specifically sequesters miR166/165 to regulate shoot apical meristem development,” Cell, vol. 145, no. 2, pp. 242–256, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. X. Zhang, H. Zhao, S. Gao et al., “Arabidopsis Argonaute 2 regulates innate immunity via miRNA393()-mediated silencing of a Golgi-localized SNARE gene, MEMB12,” Molecular Cell, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 356–366, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. H. Vaucheret, “Plant ARGONAUTES,” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 350–358, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. T. A. Montgomery, M. D. Howell, J. T. Cuperus et al., “Specificity of ARGONAUTE7-miR390 interaction and dual functionality in TAS3 trans-acting siRNA formation,” Cell, vol. 133, no. 1, pp. 128–141, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. H. Nagasaki, J. Itoh, K. Hayashi et al., “The small interfering RNA production pathway is required for shoot meristem initiation in rice,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 37, pp. 14867–14871, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. R. N. Douglas, D. Wiley, A. Sarkar, N. Springer, M. C. Timmermans, and M. J. Scanlon, “Ragged seedling2 encodes an ARGONAUTE7-like protein required for mediolateral expansion, but not dorsiventrality, of maize leaves,” Plant Cell, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1441–1451, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. N. Fahlgren, T. A. Montgomery, M. D. Howell et al., “Regulation of AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR3 by TAS3 ta-siRNA affects developmental timing and patterning in Arabidopsis,” Current Biology, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 939–944, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. C. Oliver, J. L. Santos, and M. Pradillo, “On the role of some ARGONAUTE proteins in meiosis and DNA repair in Arabidopsis thaliana,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 5, p. 177, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. E. Hernandez-Lagana, D. Rodriguez-Leal, J. Lua, and J. P. Vielle-Calzada, “A multigenic network of ARGONAUTE4 clade members controls early megaspore formation in Arabidopsis,” Genetics, vol. 204, no. 3, pp. 1045–1056, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Kapoor, R. Arora, T. Lama et al., “Genome-wide identification, organization and phylogenetic analysis of Dicer-like, Argonaute and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene families and their expression analysis during reproductive development and stress in rice,” BMC Genomics, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 451, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. L. Qin, N. Mo, T. Muhammad, and Y. Liang, “Genome-wide analysis of DCL, AGO, and RDR gene families in pepper (Capsicum Annuum L.),” International Journal of Molecular Science, vol. 19, no. 4, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. D. L. Cui, J. Y. Meng, X. Y. Ren et al., “Genome-wide identification and characterization of DCL, AGO and RDR gene families in _Saccharum spontaneum_,” Scientific Report, vol. 10, no. 1, article 13202, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. Y. Cao, X. Xu, and L. Jiang, “Integrative analysis of the RNA interference toolbox in two Salicaceae willow species, and their roles in stress response in poplar (Populus trichocarpa Torr. & Gray),” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 162, pp. 1127–1139, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. Z. Liao, K. P. Hodén, R. K. Singh, and C. Dixelius, “Genome-wide identification of Argonautes in Solanaceae with emphasis on potato,” Scientific Reports, vol. 10, no. 1, article 20577, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. Sabbione, L. Daurelio, A. Vegetti, M. Talon, F. Tadeo, and M. Dotto, “Genome-wide analysis of AGO, DCL and RDR gene families reveals RNA-directed DNA methylation is involved in fruit abscission in Citrus sinensis,” BMC Plant Biology, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 401, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. The International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium (IWGSC), K. F. X. Mayer, J. Rogers et al., “A chromosome-based draft sequence of the hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) genome,” Science, vol. 345, no. 6194, article 1251788, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. Bhatta, T. Regassa, S. N. Wegulo, and P. S. Baenziger, “Foliar fungicide effects on disease severity, yield, and agronomic characteristics of modern winter wheat genotypes,” Agronomy Journal, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 602–610, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. K. Abhinandan, L. Skori, M. Stanic, N. M. N. Hickerson, M. Jamshed, and M. A. Samuel, “Abiotic stress signaling in wheat – an inclusive overview of hormonal interactions during abiotic stress responses in wheat,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 9, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. R. Sunkar, X. Zhou, Y. Zheng, W. Zhang, and J. K. Zhu, “Identification of novel and candidate miRNAs in rice by high throughput sequencing,” BMC Plant Biology, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 25, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. F. Meng, H. Jia, N. Ling et al., “Cloning and characterization of two Argonaute genes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.),” BMC Plant Biology, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 18, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. P. Sibisi and E. Venter, “Wheat Argonaute 5 functions in aphid–plant interaction,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 11, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. C. Chen, H. Chen, Y. Zhang et al., “TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data,” Molecular Plant, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1194–1202, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. Y. Wang, H. Tang, J. D. DeBarry et al., “MCScanX: a toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity,” Nucleic Acid Research, vol. 40, no. 7, article e49, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. The International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium (IWGSC), “Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome,” Science, vol. 361, no. 6403, article eaar7191, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. S. Schilling, A. Kennedy, S. Pan, L. S. Jermiin, and R. Melzer, “Genome-wide analysis of MIKC-type MADS-box genes in wheat: pervasive duplications, functional conservation and putative neofunctionalization,” New Phytologist, vol. 225, no. 1, pp. 511–529, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. R. H. Ramírez-González, P. Borrill, D. Lang et al., “The transcriptional landscape of polyploid wheat,” Science, vol. 361, no. 6403, p. eaar6089, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M. Krzywinski, J. Schein, I. Birol et al., “Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics,” Genome Research, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1639–1645, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. International Rice Genome Sequencing Project and T. Sasaki, “The map-based sequence of the rice genome,” Nature, vol. 436, no. 7052, pp. 793–800, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. Y. Cao, Y. P. Xu, W. Li, S. S. Li, H. Rahman, and X. Z. Cai, “Genome-wide identification of Dicer-like, Argonaute, and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene families in Brassica species and functional analyses of their Arabidopsis homologs in resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 7, article 1614, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. C. Nikolaou, “Menzerath-Altmann law in mammalian exons reflects the dynamics of gene structure evolution,” Computational Biology and Chemistry, vol. 53, pp. 134–143, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. C. Zhou, L. Han, C. Fu et al., “The trans-acting short interfering RNA3 pathway and no apical meristem antagonistically regulate leaf margin development and lateral organ separation, as revealed by analysis of an argonaute7/lobed leaflet1 mutant in Medicago truncatula,” Plant Cell, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 4845–4862, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. Singh, S. Goel, R. B. Meeley et al., “Production of viable gametes without meiosis in maize deficient for an ARGONAUTE protein,” Plant Cell, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 443–458, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. L. Zhai, F. Teng, K. Zheng, J. Xiao, W. Deng, and W. Sun, “Expression analysis of Argonaute genes in maize (Zea mays L.) in response to abiotic stress,” Hereditas, vol. 156, no. 1, p. 27, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. D. Gan, M. Zhan, F. Yang et al., “Expression analysis of argonaute, Dicer-like, and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase genes in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) in response to abiotic stress,” Journal of Genetics, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 235–249, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. X. Liu, S. Tang, G. Jia et al., “The C-terminal motif of SiAGO1b is required for the regulation of growth, development and stress responses in foxtail millet (Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv),” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 67, no. 11, pp. 3237–3249, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. M. Gong, Y. Wang, J. Zhang et al., “Chilling stress triggers VvAgo1-mediated miRNA-like RNA biogenesis in Volvariella volvacea,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 11, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. H. Wang, C. Liu, Y. Ren et al., “An RNA-binding protein MUG13.4 interacts with AtAGO2 to modulate salinity tolerance in Arabidopsis,” Plant Science, vol. 288, article 110218, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Yan-Feng Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views88
Downloads126
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.