Research Article

Management of LC Type I (LC-1) Pelvic Injuries with Complete Sacral Fracture: Comparison of Solitary Anterior Fixation with Combined Anterior-Posterior Fixation

Table 2

The comparison of surgical factors, radiological outcomes, and functional outcomes, between group 1 and group 2.

Non-operative of posterior pelvic
(group 1, )
Operative of posterior pelvic
(group 2, )
level

Fixation of anterior -ring0.14
Plate2422
Cannulated screw69
Infix50
Exfix11
Fixation of posterior -ringā€”
PlateNA9 (28.1%)
Cannulated screwNA16 (50%)
Rod with pedicle screwsNA7 (21.9%)
Operation time
(min, from incision to closure)
Blood loss (ml)0.034
Fluoroscopy time (seconds)
Pain
Preoperation
#
#
Postoperation#
Early weight-bearing status
Nonweight-bearing97
Partial weight-bearing273
Full weight-bearing022
Radiographic grades
(Tornetta and Matta radiographic grading)0.948
Excellent29 (80.6%)25 (78.2%)
Good4 (11.1%)3 (9.4%)
Fair3 (5.5%)3 (6.2%)
Poor0 (0%)1 (3.1%)
Function outcomes (Majeed scores grading)0.693
Excellent23 (63.9%)16 (50.0%)
Good9 (25%)12 (37.5%)
Fair3 (8.3%)3 (9.3%)
Poor1 (2.8%)1 (3.1%)

Tips: compare the preoperation with the postoperation in group 1. #Compare the preoperation with the postoperation in group 2. NA: not available.