Impact of Rehabilitation on Gait Kinematic following Grade II Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury among Wrestlers

Table 2

Comparison of joints angles mean between pre- and postrehabilitation program at stance phase.

Joint angles	Stance phase		Paired differences				value	Cohen’s
			Mean %	SD	SEM
HA (pre)	Initial contact		13.08%↑	3.36	0.87	2.85	0.04	0.74
H.A. (post)
KA (pre)			58.43%↓	1.68	0.43	4.29	0.02	1.11ˆ
KA (post)
A.A. (pre)			05.26%↓	0.59	0.15	0.44	0.67	0.10
A.A. (post)
HA (pre)	Loading response/foot flat		22.10%↓	3.96	1.02	4.1	0.02	1.05ˆ
H.A. (post)
KA (pre)			17.78%↓	2.18	2.05	5.7	0.01	1.50ˆ
KA (post)
A.A. (pre)			25.09%↑	1.27	-1.44	2.21	0.04	0.57
A.A. (post)
HA (pre)	Mid-stance		48.49%↓	1.35	0.35	3.23	0.03	0.88ˆ
H.A. (post)
KA (pre)			41.76%↓	2.54	0.65	5.67	0.01	1.46ˆ
KA (post)
A.A. (pre)			20.79%↓	1.48	0.38	3.30	0.03	0.85ˆ
A.A. (post)
HA (pre)	Terminal-stance		29.37%↑	3.83	0.98	4.17	0.02	1.08ˆ
H.A. (post)
KA (pre)			73.76%↓	1.70	0.44	11.47	0.01	2.94ˆ
KA (post)
A.A. (pre)			0.00%	1.25	0.32	0.00	1.00	0.00
A.A. (post)
HA (pre)	Preswing/toe off		27.79%↑	3.39	0.87	3.80	0.03	0.98ˆ
H.A. (post)
KA (pre)			35.64%↑	5.06	1.30	-6.57	0.01	1.70ˆ
KA (post)
A.A. (pre)			-6.76%↑	3.54	0.91	1.30	0.21	0.34
A.A. (post)

HA: hip angle; KA: knee angle; AA: ankle angle; ; significant value if ; SD: standard deviation; SEM: standard error mean; ˆeffect size is large if .