An Elevated Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Poor Prognosis in Patients with Liver Cancer after Interventional Treatments

Li, Xiaonan; Zhang, Yongsheng; Ma, Wei; Li, Jingwen

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6141317

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Data Availability Ethical Approval Consent Disclosure Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 6141317 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6141317

An Elevated Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Poor Prognosis in Patients with Liver Cancer after Interventional Treatments

Xiaonan Li,¹Yongsheng Zhang,¹Wei Ma,¹and Jingwen Li²

Academic Editor: Hui Yu

Received13 May 2022

Revised25 Oct 2022

Accepted08 Nov 2022

Published25 Nov 2022

Abstract

This study is aimed at examining the prognostic value of blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Demographic and clinical data of 543 HCC patients treated with interventional therapies were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative NLRs were determined and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted for survival time in patients with high (NLR ≥3.8) and low (NLR<3.8) NLR. The median overall survival (OS) was 1241 days after interventional therapies and was significantly reduced in the high NLR group when compared to the low NLR group. The median progression-free survival time (PFST) of patients was also significantly shorter in the high NLR group than in the low NLR group. Univariate analysis revealed that tumor type, therapy method, maximum tumor size (>3 mm), and NLR (>3.8) were risk factors for OST and PFST (). Multivariate analysis indicated that tumor type, maximum tumor diameter, therapy method, and NLR (>3.8) were independent risk factors for PFST (). Our results demonstrate that preoperative NLR has prognostic value for patients with HCC undergoing interventional therapies, and high NLR is an indication of poor prognosis.

1. Introduction

Liver cancer is one of the leading malignant tumors in the world and ranks the fourth in the causes of cancer-related death [1, 2]. For patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of all stages, the overall 5-year survival rate is estimated to be about 18%, and the incidence is increasing year by year. For instance, the incidence is about 18.3 per 1,000,000 persons in China, and the mortality rate is about 17.1/100000 [3]. Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is one of the best treatment options for liver cirrhosis and HCC. However, due to insidious onset of HCC, a majority of patients are already at late stage once diagnosed, and only less than 20% can be treated with OLT or surgically [4, 5]. It is therefore important to develop prognostic biomarker to better manage patients for this disease.

Inflammation-related prognostic indicators have been related to the survival and other prognostic parameters such as tumor aggressiveness [6]. They include a number of easily measurable indicators of inflammation that can be obtained in routine clinical blood-based tests, such as counts and levels of neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, platelets, albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratios, among others [7–9]. Neutrophils in human peripheral blood have the functions of phagocytosis, chemotaxis, and bactericide, and lymphocytes are involved in the immune response [10, 11]. Studies have shown that the normal NLR values in an adult, nongeriatric, population in good health are between 0.78 and 3.53 [12], neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has a potential as prognostic marker, and the elevated NLR is associated with poor prognosis of diseases and cancers such as breast cancer [13], gastric cancer [14, 15], advanced melanoma treated with nivolumab [16], pancreatic cancer [17], in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer [18], and others [19, 20]. However, it is unknown whether if it has prognostic value for HCC patients after interventional therapies.

In the present study, we retrospectively analyzed the relationship between the ratio and survival of HCC patients after interventional therapies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

This is a single-center retrospective study. The medical records of patients who underwent interventional therapies for HCC between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019 at Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China, were retrieved and analyzed. Patients were included if they fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: (1) had complete baseline clinical data for HCC, including CT scan findings on HCC size, (2) histologically proven HCC, and (3) received hepatectomy and other treatments for HCC. Patients were excluded if (1) distant metastasis was found at the first visit, (2) treated for other cancers within 6 weeks, (3) had severe infections or any hematology-related diseases, and (4) administered with any immunosuppressive medications within 6 months. Data retrieved from the hospital electronical medical data system included age, gender, history of smoking, maximum tumor diameter (MTD), pathological type, therapeutic method, and distant metastasis. This work was reported in line with the STROCSS criteria [21] and was approved by the Research Ethic Committee of Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China (approval number: SPH-CR-2316, July 2020). Written informed consent was obtained from every patient.

2.2. Data Collection

Peripheral venous blood samples (10 ml) were drawn from all patients within 2 days prior to the interventional therapies and used to assess neutrophil and lymphocyte counts. NLR was calculated and used to plot receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for postoperative median survival time. Since NLR was 3.8 at the maximum Youden’s index, this value was used as optimal cut-point to group the patients into high and low NLR groups. The Youden index is a main summary statistic that measures the potential effectiveness of a biomarker based on the ROC curve [22]. The cut-point that achieves this maximum is referred to as the optimal cut-point because it is the cut-point that optimizes the biomarker’s differentiating ability when equal weight is given to sensitivity and specificity [23, 24].

2.3. Follow-Up and Survive Survey

After therapy, patients were followed-up regularly via phone and mail till June 31, 2020. The follow-up lasted up to 1820 day, with a medium follow-up time of 1113 days. Overall survival (OS) time and progression-free survival (PFS) time were calculated.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The Student -test was used to compare normally distributed data. A chi-square test was used for categorical variables. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed, and the areas under the curves (AUCs) were calculated to evaluate the predictive abilities of the NLR for discriminating patients with good and poor prognosis. Overall, progression-free survival rate of patients was estimated through Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The log-rank test was used to compare survival rates for groups for high and low NLR. Prognostic factors were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses (Cox proportional hazard regression model). Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics (v. 20.0, IBM, New York, USA). was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Characteristics

A total of 599 patients were found satisficing the inclusion criteria. Among them, 56 patients were later excluded due to various reasons, including the loss of follow-up, and the clinical data for the remaining 543 patients were collected and analyzed. The study population consisted of 287 males and 256 females with a median age of 55.8 years (range 32-82 years).

Among them, 151 were smokers, and most cancers had not distant metastasis. The MTD ranged from 3 to 7 mm. ROC curve for postoperative OS time revealed that NLR was 3.8 at the Youden index, and AUC was 0.891. For the prediction at this point, the sensitivity was 84.4% and specificity was 86.5% (Figure 1). This value was used to group the patients into high (≥3.8, ) and low (<3.8, ) NLR groups. Analysis showed that the two groups were not statistically different in age, gender, history of smoking, MTD, tumor site and type, and therapeutic methods but their NLR values were different (3.8-5.4 in high vs 2.1-3.8 in low NLR groups (Table 1).

3.2. High NLR Reduces Survival Time

After the interventional therapy, patients were followed-up for up to five years. By the end of this study, 309 patients died and 234 were alive. Taken all patients together, the median OS time was 1241 days, and 1- and 2-year OS rates were 64.10% and 32.80%, respectively. For patients with high NLR (≥3.8), the median OS time was 381 days, and 1- and 2-year OS rates were 33.10% and 12.30%, respectively, and for patients with low NLR (<3.8), the median OS time was 1465 days and 1- and 2-year OS rates were 85.40% and 43.60%, respectively. The difference in the survival time and rates were statistically significant between the high and low NLR groups (, Figure 2). The PFS time was 529 days in all patients. However, the PFS time was significantly shorter in high than in low NLR patients, (242 vs 761 days, , Figure 3).

3.3. Factors Affecting Prognosis of OS and PFS

To analyze factors that affect OS and PFS after the therapy, we first performed univariate analysis, and the results indicated that the tumor type, therapy method, MTD, and NLR were significantly related to postoperative OS time and PFS time (, Tables 2 and 3). On other hand, other demographic and clinical features such as age, gender, smoking status, and tumor site were not significantly associated with the OS time and PFS time. These significantly related variables were then included in multivariate regression models for further analysis. The results revealed that therapy method, MTD, and NLR were the independent risk factors affecting OS time and PFS time (, Table 4).

4. Discussion

Most HCC patients are in the middle and late stages when diagnosed and may have missed the optimal surgery time [25]. Several treatment options are available for HCC patients, and among them, OLT and surgical resection are the mainstay treatments, although personalized therapies such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), transarterial radioembolization (TARE), and stereotactic body radiation (SBRT) as well as immunotherapy for HCC are being developed to improve overall survival [4, 26]. However, the overall survival of patients is still not satisfactory after the therapeutic processes due to various reasons. Therefore, discovery of indicators that can predict the prognosis for HCC patients is highly demanded. Studies have shown that the occurrence and progression of HCC is related to inflammation over a long period [27, 28]. NLR is an indicator of inflammation and is shown to be associated with prognosis of a variety of tumors [29]. Increased number of neutrophils in tumor and deceased lymphocyte count often indicate poor prognosis in the cancer patients [30, 31] or patients after selective internal radiation therapy [32].

Since both lymphocytes and neutrophils mainly play roles in protecting the body from infections and are a part of the immune system, they are associated with prognosis of diseases, including cancers. For example, lymphocyte was shown to be able to predict the severity and prognosis in patients with HBV-related acute-on-chronic liver failure [33] and lung cancer [34]. Neutrophils increase as a result of detrimental outcome in several tumors [35]. However, in our patient data, no relationship between either absolute neutrophil or leucocyte count alone was found to be significantly associated with the prognosis.

NLR has been reported as a potential prognostic marker, and the elevated ratio is associated with poor prognosis of different cancers such as breast cancer [13], gastric cancer [14, 15], advanced melanoma treated with nivolumab [16], pancreatic cancer [17], and in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer [18]. However, due to the heterogenicity of patient populations, the relationship needs to be analyzed for different patient populations to develop a cut-off that is best fit for specific patient groups (or at least large patient groups), because neutrophil and lymphocyte may vary in response to many factors, including treatment protocols, drugs, and methods. For HCC, NLR was found to accurately predict the probability of long survival after sorafenib treatment [36], and increased NLR was associated with poor survival after selective internal radiation therapy [32]. However, NLR variation after surgical section in HCC has not been well addressed.

In this study, we focused on HCC patients mainly after surgical sections and other interventional therapies such as liver transplant and radiation therapy and found that the NLR are related to OS and PFS times, and high NLR predicts shorter OS time and PFS time and has significant prognostic value. This is consistent with the previous results in lung cancer [37–39]. In addition, NLR is found to be related to the recurrence, metastasis, and prognosis of a number of solid tumors, such as esophageal cancer [40], prostatic cancer [41], and cervical cancer [42], and liver cancer [43] is useful in analyzing allergic conditions, inflammatory disorders, and infectious diseases [44, 45]. Different from other clinical indicators such as tumor size and grading, which require use of relatively complex and invasive surgical procedure, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts are readily available in routine blood tests. Therefore, NLR is a convenient biomarker for predicting the prognosis of HCC patient and can be used to stratify patients before different surgical and interventional treatment options. For instance, patients with high NLR could be allocated to receive relatively less invasive surgery to reduce their postoperative risk. On other hand, patients with low NLR may be tolerant to liver transplant and section. In addition, NLR could be monitored over the therapeutic periods as an auxiliary index for the progress and outcome of HCC after treatment. However, since the lymphocyte and neutrophil counts are affected by many factors, especially infections [46, 47] and drugs [48], and in a recent study, COVID-19 infection was also found to result in severe lymphopenia [49], therefore, cautions should be taken to interpret the changes of NLR in HCC patients, and additional data, particularly inflammation-related data, are needed to trace the therapeutic outcomes and to rule out other factors and diseases that may affect changes. For example, the pathogenesis of several diseases such as cardiovascular diseases [50], retinal artery occlusion [51], and spinal epidural abscess [52] have been found to result in high NLR, while treatment with 25-hydroxyvitamin D 3 and smoking cessation are associated with a reduced blood NLR [53, 54], suggesting when NLR is used for individual patients, it should be evaluated along with other pathological conditions to obtain more reliable prediction.

Mechanisms by which high NLR are associated with poor HCC prognosis may result from the interaction between tumor and inflammatory microenvironment [55, 56]. Immune cells such as activated macrophages, stellate, and mast cells have the ability to infiltrate into tumors, leading to increased tumor growth [57]. The peritumor infiltration by neutrophils may trigger inflammatory response to release free radicals and angiogenic response to enhance tumor growth [58, 59]. In addition, therapy method and MTD were also found to be related to the survival of HCC patients after treatments. This is consistent with early studies [38, 60, 61].

There are limitations in this study. This study is a single-center retrospective analysis; the sample size is relatively small. However, it may serve as starting point for multicenter and large prospective study in the future to further validate our conclusions for HCC patients.

Taken together, our study demonstrated that blood NLR may be used as prognostic marker to predict the prognosis of HCC for patients with middle and later stage HCC after interventional therapy. The preoperative NLR values may be used to stratify patients for different surgical and interventional treatment options before treatments and to monitor postoperatively the progress and outcomes of treatments.

Data Availability

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the ethical committee of Shandong First Medical University. The work was carried out in accordance with The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) for experiments involving humans.

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Disclosure

The sponsor did not have role in study design, experiment, manuscript writing, and publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

XL and JL designed the study. XL, YZ, and WM collected the data and performed analysis. XL, YZ, WM, and JL drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This study did not receive any specific fund from public and private sector and was carried out with institutional operational budget of Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University.

References

J. Hartke, M. Johnson, and M. Ghabril, “The diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,” Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 153–159, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Llovet, R. K. Kelley, A. Villanueva et al., “Hepatocellular carcinoma,” Nature Reviews. Disease Primers, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 6, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. L. Siegel, K. D. Miller, and A. Jemal, “Cancer statistics, 2020,” CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 7–30, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Couri and A. Pillai, “Goals and targets for personalized therapy for HCC,” Hepatology International, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 125–137, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Schlachterman, W. W. Craft Jr., E. Hilgenfeldt, A. Mitra, and R. Cabrera, “Current and future treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 21, no. 28, pp. 8478–8491, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. I. Carr, H. Akkiz, V. Guerra et al., “C-reactive protein and hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of its relationships to tumor factors,” Clinical practice (London, England), vol. 15, no. Spec Issue, pp. 625–634, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Hashimoto, Y. Ikeda, D. Korenaga et al., “The impact of preoperative serum C-reactive protein on the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma,” Cancer, vol. 103, no. 9, pp. 1856–1864, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Imai, T. Maeda, M. Shimokawa et al., “Prognostic nutritional index is superior as a predictor of prognosis among various inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection,” Hepatology Research, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 101–109, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ishizuka, K. Kubota, J. Kita, M. Shimoda, M. Kato, and T. Sawada, “Impact of an inflammation-based prognostic system on patients undergoing surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study of 398 Japanese patients,” American Journal of Surgery, vol. 203, no. 1, pp. 101–106, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Risnik, E. E. Elias, I. Keitelman et al., “The effect of ibrutinib on neutrophil and γδ T cell functions,” Leukemia & Lymphoma, vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 2409–2418, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zhang, Y. Yuan, Q. Xu, Z. Jiang, and C. Q. Chu, “Contribution of neutrophils in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis,” Journal of Biomedical Research, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 86–93, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Forget, C. Khalifa, J. P. Defour, D. Latinne, M. C. Van Pel, and M. De Kock, “What is the normal value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio?” BMC Research Notes, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 12, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Ethier, D. Desautels, A. Templeton, P. S. Shah, and E. Amir, “Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Breast Cancer Research, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 2, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Hirahara, T. Arigami, S. Yanagita et al., “Combined neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio predicts chemotherapy response and prognosis in patients with advanced gastric cancer,” BMC Cancer, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 672, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Miyamoto, S. Inagawa, N. Sano, S. Tadano, S. Adachi, and M. Yamamoto, “The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) predicts short-term and long-term outcomes in gastric cancer patients,” European Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 607–612, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Capone, D. Giannarelli, D. Mallardo et al., “Baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and derived NLR could predict overall survival in patients with advanced melanoma treated with nivolumab,” Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 74, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhou, Q. Wei, J. Fan, S. Cheng, W. Ding, and Z. Hua, “Prognostic role of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis containing 8252 patients,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 479, pp. 181–189, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Drpa, M. Sutic, J. Baranasic et al., “Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio can predict outcome in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer,” Radiology and Oncology, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 437–446, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. S. Faria, P. C. Fernandes Jr., M. J. Silva et al., “The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: a narrative review,” Ecancermedicalscience, vol. 10, p. 702, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Haram, M. R. Boland, M. E. Kelly, J. C. Bolger, R. M. Waldron, and M. J. Kerin, “The prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in colorectal cancer: a systematic review,” Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 115, no. 4, pp. 470–479, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Agha, A. Abdall-Razak, E. Crossley et al., “STROCSS 2019 guideline: strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery,” International Journal of Surgery, vol. 72, pp. 156–165, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. D. Ruopp, N. J. Perkins, B. W. Whitcomb, and E. F. Schisterman, “Youden index and optimal cut-point estimated from observations affected by a lower limit of detection,” Biometrical Journal, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 419–430, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Reiser, “Measuring the effectiveness of diagnostic markers in the presence of measurement error through the use of ROC curves,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 19, no. 16, pp. 2115–2129, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. J. Youden, “Index for rating diagnostic tests,” Cancer, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 32–35, 1950.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. H. Xu, W. Wei, M. Krawczyk et al., “Circulating tumour DNA methylation markers for diagnosis and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma,” Nature Materials, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 1155–1161, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Llovet, R. Montal, D. Sia, and R. S. Finn, “Molecular therapies and precision medicine for hepatocellular carcinoma,” Nature Reviews. Clinical Oncology, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 599–616, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Bishayee, “The inflammation and liver cancer,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 816, pp. 401–435, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Desterke and F. Chiappini, “Lipid related genes altered in NASH connect inflammation in liver pathogenesis progression to HCC: a canonical pathway,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 20, no. 22, p. 5594, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. J. Guthrie, K. A. Charles, C. S. Roxburgh, P. G. Horgan, D. C. McMillan, and S. J. Clarke, “The systemic inflammation-based neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio: experience in patients with cancer,” Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 218–230, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Q. Li, Z. H. Lu, L. Yang et al., “Neutrophil count and the inflammation-based Glasgow prognostic score predict survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 945–950, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. E. Pauken and E. J. Wherry, “Overcoming T cell exhaustion in infection and cancer,” Trends in Immunology, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 265–276, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Estrade, C. Lescure, L. Muzellec et al., “Lymphocytes and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio variations after selective internal radiation treatment for HCC: a retrospective cohort study,” Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 1175–1181, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Wang, W. Sun, Q. Xiao et al., “Peripheral T lymphocytes predict the severity and prognosis in patients with HBV-related acute-on-chronic liver failure,” Medicine (Baltimore), vol. 100, no. 5, article e24075, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Luo, Y. Wang, Y. Lou et al., “Unfavorable clinical implications of peripheral blood CD44⁺ and CD54⁺ lymphocytes in patients with lung cancer undergoing chemotherapy,” The International Journal of Biological Markers, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 208–214, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ocana, C. Nieto-Jimenez, A. Pandiella, and A. J. Templeton, “Neutrophils in cancer: prognostic role and therapeutic strategies,” Molecular Cancer, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 137, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Casadei-Gardini, V. Dadduzio, G. Rovesti et al., “Utility of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio to identify long-term survivors among HCC patients treated with sorafenib,” Medicine (Baltimore), vol. 99, no. 22, article e19958, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Hara, A. Takeda, Y. Tsurugai et al., “Radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma results in comparable survival to radiofrequency ablation: a propensity score analysis,” Hepatology, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 2533–2545, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Huang, Z. Dong, H. Cai et al., “Imaging biomarkers for well and moderate hepatocellular carcinoma: preoperative magnetic resonance image and histopathological correlation,” BMC Cancer, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 364, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Sonpavde, G. R. Pond, A. J. Armstrong et al., “Prognostic impact of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer,” Clinical Genitourinary Cancer, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 317–324, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Grenader, T. Waddell, C. Peckitt et al., “Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in advanced oesophago- gastric cancer: exploratory analysis of the REAL-2 trial,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 687–692, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Lorente, J. Mateo, A. J. Templeton et al., “Baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is associated with survival and response to treatment with second-line chemotherapy for advanced prostate cancer independent of baseline steroid use,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 750–755, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mizunuma, Y. Yokoyama, M. Futagami, M. Aoki, Y. Takai, and H. Mizunuma, “The pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts therapeutic response to radiation therapy and concurrent chemoradiation therapy in uterine cervical cancer,” International Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 989–996, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Suner and B. I. Carr, “Platelet-to-lymphocyte and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios predict tumor size and survival in HCC patients: retrospective study,” Annals of Medicine and Surgery (Lond), vol. 58, pp. 167–171, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Aktar, R. Tekin, M. S. Bektas et al., “Diagnostic role of inflammatory markers in pediatric Brucella arthritis,” Italian Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 42, no. 1, p. 3, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Dogru and R. G. Yesiltepe Mutlu, “The evaluation of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in children with asthma,” Allergol Immunopathol (Madr), vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 292–296, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Honda, T. Uehara, G. Matsumoto, S. Arai, and M. Sugano, “Neutrophil left shift and white blood cell count as markers of bacterial infection,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 457, pp. 46–53, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Qu, H. Y. Yuan, Y. Huang et al., “Evaluation of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in predicting bloodstream infection,” Biomarkers in Medicine, vol. 13, no. 15, pp. 1255–1261, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. B. Hathaway and F. Frankenburg, “Diurnal variability in neutrophil counts in clozapine treatment: a case report and review of the literature,” Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 506–508, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Bolondi, E. Russo, E. Gamberini et al., “Iron metabolism and lymphocyte characterisation during COVID-19 infection in ICU patients: an observational cohort study,” World Journal of Emergency Surgery : WJES, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 41, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. Afari and T. Bhat, “Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and cardiovascular diseases: an update,” Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 573–577, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Atum and G. Alagoz, “Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with retinal artery occlusion,” Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 195–200, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. V. Karhade, K. C. Shah, A. A. Shah, P. T. Ogink, S. B. Nelson, and J. H. Schwab, “Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and mortality in spinal epidural abscess,” The Spine Journal, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1180–1185, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Komiyama, Y. Ozaki, Y. Miyazaki et al., “Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio is correlated with levels of inflammatory markers and is significantly reduced by smoking cessation,” The Journal of International Medical Research, vol. 49, no. 6, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Maghbooli, M. A. Sahraian, S. Jamalimoghadamsiahkali et al., “Treatment with 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (Calcifediol) is associated with a reduction in the blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio marker of disease severity in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a pilot multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded clinical trial,” Endocrine Practice, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 1242–1251, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Balkwill and A. Mantovani, “Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow?” Lancet, vol. 357, no. 9255, pp. 539–545, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Hernandez-Gea, S. Toffanin, S. L. Friedman, and J. M. Llovet, “Role of the microenvironment in the pathogenesis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,” Gastroenterology, vol. 144, no. 3, pp. 512–527, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Utsunomiya, M. Shimada, S. Imura, Y. Morine, T. Ikemoto, and M. Mori, “Molecular signatures of noncancerous liver tissue can predict the risk for late recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma,” Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 146–152, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Chen, Q. Zhang, W. Chang, Y. Du, H. Zhang, and G. Cao, “Viral and host inflammation-related factors that can predict the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 48, no. 13, pp. 1977–1987, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. M. Kuang, Q. Zhao, Y. Wu et al., “Peritumoral neutrophils link inflammatory response to disease progression by fostering angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 948–955, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Anwanwan, S. K. Singh, S. Singh, V. Saikam, and R. Singh, “Challenges in liver cancer and possible treatment approaches,” Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta. Reviews on Cancer, vol. 1873, no. 1, article 188314, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Sasaki, D. Morioka, S. Conci et al., “The tumor burden score: a new "metro-ticket" prognostic tool for colorectal liver metastases based on tumor size and number of tumors,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 267, no. 1, pp. 132–141, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Xiaonan Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

346

Downloads

417

Citations