Protective and Predisposing Morphological Factors in Suprascapular Nerve Entrapment Syndrome: A Fundamental Review Based on Recent Observations

Łabętowicz, Piotr; Synder, Marek; Wojciechowski, Mariusz; Orczyk, Krzysztof; Jezierski, Hubert; Topol, Mirosław; Polguj, Michał

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4659761

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusion Conflicts of Interest References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 | Article ID 4659761 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4659761

Protective and Predisposing Morphological Factors in Suprascapular Nerve Entrapment Syndrome: A Fundamental Review Based on Recent Observations

Piotr Łabętowicz,¹Marek Synder,²Mariusz Wojciechowski,³Krzysztof Orczyk,¹Hubert Jezierski,⁴Mirosław Topol,⁵and Michał Polguj¹

Academic Editor: Ayhan Cömert

Received07 Dec 2016

Revised23 Mar 2017

Accepted15 May 2017

Published13 Jun 2017

Abstract

Suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome (SNES) is a neuropathy caused by compression of the nerve along its course. The most common compression sites include the suprascapular notch and the spinoglenoid notch. The aim of this article was to review the anatomical factors influencing the occurrence of SNES in the light of the newest reports. Potential predisposing morphological factors include a V-shaped, narrow, or “deep” suprascapular notch; a band-shaped, bifurcated, or completely ossified superior transverse scapular ligament (STSL); particular arrangements of the suprascapular nerve and vessels at the suprascapular notch. A very recent report indicates structures at the suprascapular notch region that may protect from SNES, such as the suprascapular notch veins (SNV). The role of the anterior coracoscapular ligament (ACSL) is still not clear. While some studies indicate that it may predispose for SNES, the newest study proposes a protective function. Knowledge of these variations is essential for arthroscopic and other surgical procedures of this area in order to avoid iatrogenic injury of the suprascapular nerve or unexpected bleeding from the suprascapular vessels running alongside the STSL.

1. Introduction

Suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome (SNES) is a neuropathy in which the nerve is compressed along its course, most commonly at the suprascapular notch (SSN). The suprascapular nerve always passes through the SSN below the superior transverse suprascapular ligament (STSL) before entering the supraspinous fossa [1, 2]. Suprascapular neuropathy, initially described by Andre Thomas in 1936 [3], is the cause of about 1-2% [4] of conditions resulting in pain and dysfunction of the shoulder girdle. Symptoms caused by nerve compression are based on progressive atrophy of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles supplied by the suprascapular nerve [5]. Traumatic injuries such as scapular fracture, clavicular fracture, proximal humerus fractures, dislocation of the shoulder, or the acromioclavicular joint are common causes of nerve damage [6–10]. Additional causes of neuropathy include iatrogenic injuries during surgical procedures, exertional overload in athletes or physical labourers, tuberous changes of this area (like ganglion cyst, bone cyst, osteosarcoma, soft tissue sarcoma, and metastatic lesions), or even systemic diseases like systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or rheumatoid arthritis [4, 10–16].

It is becoming more common to examine the anatomical basis of SNES. Rengachary et al. [17] postulate that neuropathy may occur due to irritation of the nerve by the sharp borders of the suprascapular notch while traversing from the anterior site of the scapula to the supraspinatus fossa, this situation being referred to as the “sling effect.” Sandow and Hie [13] note that it is common for athletes to compress the infraspinatus branch of the suprascapular nerve on excessive abduction with the full rotation of the arm. Ringel et al. [18] suggest that damage to the intima in the suprascapular artery caused by its outstretching and the formation of microemboli obstructing the vessel may trigger the symptoms of SNES.

The diagnosis of SNES is typically based on interview, physical examination, and additional tests [4, 19, 20]. The diagnosis should be differentiated from damage to the brachial plexus, diseases of the cervical part of the spinal cord, cervical discopathy, or diseases of the shoulder joint, for example, degeneration of the shoulder or damage to the rotator cuff [9, 13]. Other possible tests include medical imaging (X-ray, ultrasonography, MRI, and CT) [21, 22] and electrodiagnostic study (electromyography) and evaluation of the conduction speed from the nerve point of the neck to the supra- and infraspinatus muscles [14, 19].

2. Morphological Factors Predisposing to SNES

Potential anatomical reasons which predispose a patient to SNES include the shape of the suprascapular notch [23]; band-shaped [24], bifurcated [25], or completely ossified [26] STSL; the presence of the anterior coracoscapular ligament [1] or spinoglenoid ligament [25, 27]; the course of the suprascapular nerve and vessels [28]; the structural type of the inferior transverse scapular ligament (ITSL) [29, 30]; hypertrophy of the infraspinatus muscle [31].

2.1. Shape of Suprascapular Notch (SSN)

There are several classifications of the shape of the suprascapular notch (Table 1). The first classification created by Hrdicka [32] distinguished five types of SSN based on its general appearance: whether it was absent (I), shallow (II), medium (III), or deep (IV) or formed a complete foramen (V). An important modification introduced by Rengachary et al. [33] accounted for the fact that SSN may be U- or V-shaped. Based on this revised classification, Type IV, the variant that includes the narrowest V-shaped notch, is the main variant predisposing to SNES [34, 35].

The first classification which not only is based on a qualitative assessment of the appearance of the SSN but also took into account its actual dimensions was described by Polguj et al. [36]. The discriminating criterion was defined as the difference between the maximum depth (MD) and the superior transverse diameter (STD) of the SSN. The value of this classification has since been confirmed clinically in computed tomography [37, 38] and in ultrasonographic studies [39].

The shape of the SSN is strongly dependent on the sex of the patient [40]. The deep and narrow SSN is more common in men (28.45%) than in women (18.66%) while the broad and shallow SSN is more frequent in women (63.06%) than in men (50.87%) [37]. According to previous studies, males are three to four times more likely to suffer from suprascapular neuropathy [4, 21, 35, 41, 42], which is supported by the “sling effect” hypothesis [33] described above. Therefore, the “deep” (Figure 1(a)) and narrow V-shaped suprascapular notch is the most likely to induce injury by irritation (Figure 1(b)). This is especially important for baseball pitchers, volleyball players, and tennis players [43, 44]. The frequency of this pathology in international level high-performance volleyball players was 33% [44].

(a)

(b)

2.2. Types of Superior Transverse Scapular Ligament (STSL)

The STSL connects the two borders of the SSN, closing them into the foramen [45, 46]. The shape of STSL is highly variable: it may also even consist of two or three parts as a bifid [31, 34, 45, 46] or trifid ligament [45, 47]. There are two classifications of STSL based on distinct parameters (Table 2).

Bayramoglu et al. [34] classify the STSL on a qualitative basis using only morphological observation. They describe five types of STSL, with ossified ligament classed in a separate category. They define Type I as uniform and fan-shaped (53.1%), Type II as fan-shaped but with the additional presence of an ACSL (18.8%), Type III as having anterior and posterior parts (15.6%), and Type IV as being calcified (12.5%).

Polguj et al. [24] distinguish only three types of STSL on the basis of morphology and measurement of the ligaments. Based on their classification, the STSL may appear as a fan-shaped ligament (Type I), defined as having a proximal width at least twice that of its distal width (54.6%). Type II, with band-shaped structures, was defined as having a proximal to distal width ratio of less than two (41.9%). Type III was defined as bifid (3.5%) [24].

Quantitative analysis revealed significant differences between the specimens with fan-shaped and band-shaped types of STSL in the area of the suprascapular opening. This parameter was smaller in the band-shaped STSL, and so this type may be associated with a greater chance of suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome (Figure 2(a)).

(a)

(b)

Only one classification of bifid STSL exists in the literature [25]. It describes one subtype where the STSL is split frontally (upper and lower bands) and a second subtype where the ligament is split in the transverse plane (anterior and posterior bands). In the former (Subtype I), the bifurcated end of the ligament attaches along the medial edge of SSN, whereas, in Subtype II, two bands attach along the lateral edge of SSN [25]. The study also notes that the mean area of the suprascapular opening for suprascapular nerve passage in the specimens with singular STSL was larger than in the bifid STSL (Figure 2(b)).

2.3. Completely Ossified Superior Transverse Scapular Ligament (STSL)

A completely ossified STSL is one of the most important predisposing factors for suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome [26, 33, 36, 48] (Figure 3). It occurs more often in men (6.4%) than in women (3.75%) and the difference is statistically significant () [38]. This difference may account for the greater prevalence of suprascapular neuropathy in men. The presence of an ossified STSL varies between regions worldwide [38] (Table 3). In Europeans, it varies from 1.5% in Finland [49] to 12.5% in Turkey [50], whereas different studies have reported occurrences ranging from 0.3% to 6.34% in the United States [1, 23, 32, 33, 45, 51–54]. In small isolated populations, including Alaskan Eskimos or Native Americans, the frequency is as low as 0.3% [32] and 2.1–2.9% [50], respectively. Ossification of the STSL may lead to the shortening of the ligament [55]. An ossified STSL may compress the suprascapular nerve, which represents a risk factor for surgical examination of the area [33, 45].

(a)

(b)

2.4. Anterior Coracoscapular Ligament (ACSL)

The anterior coracoscapular ligament (ACSL) was initially described in 2002 [1]. Avery et al. [1], followed by Bayramoglu et al. [34], postulated its presence as another factor contributing to the neuropathy of the suprascapular nerve.

The ACSL attaches proximally to the anteromedial surface of the root of the coracoid process. The ligament is located anteriorly to the suprascapular foramen and below the STSL (Figure 4). Histologically, the ACSL is composed of a bunch of collagen fibres with a regular pattern [1].

Avery et al. [1] and Bayramoglu et al. [34] suggest that the ACSL reduces the space for the suprascapular nerve under the STSL. However, these results were based only on macroscopic observations. The first study to evaluate the space under STSL available for the course of the suprascapular nerve, performed by Polguj et al. [24], did not find any statistically significant difference between cadavers with and without ACSL. The same authors presented the first quantitative classification of ACSL based on measurements of the ligament in 2012 [64]. Four types were distinguished (Table 4).

Also in 2012, Piyawinijwong and Tantipoon proposed a threefold classification of the ACSL based only on macroscopic observations [28]. In Type I, the distal attachment is extended to the anterior surface of scapula and continues on to the edge of the SSN. In Type II, the distal end of the ligament passes through the suprascapular foramen and runs to the other edge of the SSN, dividing the notch into two parts. In Type III, distal attachment is located near the bottom of the SSN. Type II occurs most frequently (63.16%), and this is the variant which mostly predisposes to SNES, as it reduces the depth of the suprascapular foramen [28].

The first description of a bifid ACSL was provided by Polguj et al. [64]. Bifid ligament had a uniform lateral end attached to the lateral edge of the SSN, whereas the medial end formed two bands separately attached to the medial edge of the notch. In the case given by Polguj et al. [67] the suprascapular vein ran over the ACSL, but the suprascapular artery and nerve ran below. In this position, the nerve was in contact with the bone forming the inferior border of the SSN, which increases the likelihood of SNES. In contrast to the aforementioned variant, the suprascapular nerve may run beneath the entire ACSL [68]. Such a configuration results in a higher risk for SNES [68]. This awareness is very important for Bankart arthroscopy, as well as other procedures in this area [50, 68, 69].

Gürses et al. [70] did not report any case of bifid ACSL in a Turkish population. They report the presence of an STSL in all cadavers, whereas an ACSL was found in 32% of cases. The suprascapular nerve ran between the STSL and ACSL whenever the latter was present.

2.5. Course of Suprascapular Nerve and Vessels

Arrangements of the suprascapular triad represented another important factor in the pathomechanism of SNES. The suprascapular nerve always runs under the STSL [24, 33, 59]. The course of the suprascapular vessels is highly variable [59, 60, 65] (Table 5). Yang et al. [65] identify three main variants. In Type I, both the artery and vein extend over the ligament. Type II has four subtypes, in all of which the suprascapular vessels run both above and below the ligament. In contrast, Polguj et al. [66] distinguish four types of the arrangement of the suprascapular nerve, vein, and artery at suprascapular notch, based on their course. In Type III, the entire suprascapular triad runs below the ligament, resulting in the most significant reduction of the space beneath the STSL of all the distinguished types (Figure 5). Their observations were supported by those of other authors, who indicate that, based on macroscopical observations, Type III is the most likely to induce SNES [28, 34, 71].

Tubbs et al. [52] report that whenever the suprascapular artery ran together with the suprascapular nerve under the STSL, it resulted in compression of the nerve due to blood pressure. Ringel et al. [18] postulated that damage to the intima in the suprascapular artery leads to extension of the artery, resulting in microinjuries of small vessels supplying the nerve and, therefore, in progressive ischemic atrophy of the suprascapular nerve. The frequency of variations when the suprascapular artery runs below STSL in the neighbourhood of the nerve has been estimated to range from 2.5% [60] to 3.3% [72] of cases. Chen and Adds [73] also describe a case of a doubled suprascapular artery.

Variability of the suprascapular vein usually concerns not the course itself, but the number of veins [74]. In 19.4% of cases, two suprascapular veins are present, and in 1.9% there are three [65].

According to Gürses et al. [70], course of the suprascapular nerve is one of the most important risk factors for SNES. Undeniably, the pathway of the suprascapular nerve below the anterior coracoscapular ligament is a risk factor for SNSE. In such a situation, the SN is compressed, with a flat shape and a width almost twice that of normal [64]. In addition, the presence of a suprascapular nerve running between the two bands of STSL is a significantly greater risk factor for SNES than that of a single-band STSL [45].

2.6. Spinoglenoid Ligament (Inferior Transverse Scapular Ligament)

The spinoglenoid region is the second most common site for compression of the suprascapular nerve. Therefore, variations in the morphology of the inferior transverse scapular ligament (ITSL) may represent another risk factor for SNES. In studies, the incidence of the spinoglenoid ligament has been reported to range from 16% to 100% [25, 75]. This ligament, when present, participates in the formation of a fibro-osseous tunnel which contains motor branch of the SN supplying the infraspinatus muscle [25, 75]. As the branches are compressed in the tunnel, they may produce symptoms of SNES. In 2014, Won et al. [76] classified the spinoglenoid ligament by its shape. They distinguished three types of ligament: band-like (I), triangular (II), and irregular (III) [76]. The first type, labelled as a thin band, was previously observed by Cummins et al. [77] and Demaio et al. [78]. Accordingly, Plancher et al. [79] described irregular and quadrangular types of ligament. The triangular ITSL was originally proposed by Won et al. [76]. Moreover, the suprascapular nerve runs along the lateral margin of the scapular spine [76].

2.7. Coexistence of Different Risk Factors

In our opinion, the influence of morphological variations is complex and SNES formation depends on several factors. Sometimes the coexistence of such predisposing factors may increase the possibility of this pathology developing. Undeniably, both compression of the SN by the ACSL and the neighbourhood of the SA are dangerous [64]. In addition, the coexistence of a specific arrangement of the suprascapular triad with the passage of suprascapular vessels through the suprascapular notch alongside a nerve and a bifid STSL may increase the probability of developing SNES (Figure 2(b)).

3. Morphological Protective Factors for SNES

Apart from the aforementioned factors increasing the chance of SNES, a few conditions may prevent its development. These include the presence of an anterior coracoscapular ligament (ACSL) [67] and suprascapular notch veins [80].

3.1. Anterior Coracoscapular Ligament (ACSL)

Despite being considered as a factor predisposing to SNES [1, 34], high frequency of the presence of an ACSL does not correspond with a low incidence of neuropathy. Polguj et al. [64, 67] postulate that the ACSL may prevent the development of SNES unless it does not significantly reduce the space under the STSL. Such a situation can be observed when the suprascapular nerve runs over the ACSL [67], in which case the ligament acts as a support for the nerve to protect it against excessive movement and forms a flume to enable direct passage of the nerve from the front side of the scapula to the supraspinatus fossa (Figure 4). This hypothesis of the protective role of ACSL was supported by Podgórski et al. [80], who postulate that the ACSL is more common in the deep type of suprascapular notch, which is associated with a greater chance of SNES [72]. The presence of the ACSL beneath the nerve prevents irritation of the nerve by the bony border of the SSN. ACSL only plays a protective role in Types I–III, which serve the actual mechanical function [72].

3.2. Suprascapular Notch Veins (SNV)

The components of the suprascapular triad are not the only structures running through the SSN. The suprascapular notch veins (SNV) can be also found in this area (Figure 4). They were first described in 2014 by Podgórski et al. [80]. The SNV are not only a variant of the suprascapular vein but a separate anatomical structure [72]. They run from the front of the scapula to the back along the inferior border of the suprascapular notch, crossing the SSN in the opposite direction to the suprascapular vein [80]. Their presence does not decrease the space available for the passage of the SN below the STSL. Also, the presence of the SNV correlates with the presence of ACSL: they were found to accompany one another in 58.2% of cases [72]. Both the ACSL and the SNV are believed to be involved in the mechanical amortisation of the suprascapular nerve [81]. By running along the bottom of the SSN, the ACSL and SNV protect the suprascapular nerve from irritation by the bone borders of the notch. They play the same role when the nerve runs above ACSL [81].

3.3. Completely Ossified Superior Transverse Scapular Ligament (STSL)

Despite being considered as a factor predisposing to SNES [26, 33, 36, 48], high frequency of the presence of completely ossified superior transverse scapular ligament in Brazilian population (30.76%) [59] does not correspond with a higher incidence of suprascapular neuropathy in this region. Maybe an ossified ligament is thought to protect the nerve from the sling effect by the ligament. However, bony bridges are seen more in often older age suggesting that they may be related to enthesopathic changes [82, 83]. According to Rengachary et al. [17, 33], presence of ossified STSL (complete or partial) may be associated with a predilection to a traction-type injury of the suprascapular nerve. Also presence of rare anatomical variations including coexistence of the suprascapular notch with the suprascapular foramen [84] or the double suprascapular foramen [85] confirmed such hypothesis.

4. Clinical Factors Predisposing to SNES

Suprascapular neuropathy can result from traction injury on the nerve formed by a retracted superior or posterior rotator cuff tears [86]. As a rotator cuff retracts, the course of the suprascapular nerve is altered. Such change can cause a traction injury of the nerve [87, 88]. According to Albritton et al. [89], increasing retraction of the supraspinatus tendon led to a reduction in the angle between the suprascapular nerve and its first motor branch and thus increased tension may result in neuropathy. Mallon et al. [90] described reinnervation potentials after partial arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients with suprascapular neuropathy as a result of massive retracted rotator cuff tear. Also Costouros et al. [91] reported that patients with preoperative electrodiagnostically confirmed suprascapular neuropathy showed nerve recovery after partial or complete rotator cuff repair.

Besides retracted rotator cuff tears, there can be other causes of suprascapular neuropathy. One of the most common conditions resulting in compression of the suprascapular nerve is a paralabral cyst. A cyst develops as a consequence of a labral injury can compress the suprascapular nerve, typically at the spinoglenoid notch [92, 93]. However if the cyst becomes sufficiently large, the nerve can also be compressed at the suprascapular notch [90, 94].

5. Conclusion

The vast range of morphological variation demonstrated by structures in the area of the suprascapular notch has been examined during studies on the pathogenesis of suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome. Based on descriptions of new anatomical structures (namely, the ACSL and SNV), several factors predisposing to and protecting from SNES can be distinguished. The pathogenesis of SNES remains complex and multifactorial. An awareness of the variation of the structures in the suprascapular notch region, particularly the mutual relations between vessels and the suprascapular nerve, is very important because surgical approaches must be carried out with caution to avoid iatrogenic damage of the suprascapular nerve or bleeding from the suprascapular vessels above and below the ligament.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

B. W. Avery, F. M. Pilon, and J. K. Barclay, “Anterior coracoscapular ligament and suprascapular nerve entrapment,” Clinical Anatomy, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 383–386, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Johnson, “Pectoral girdle, shoulder region and axilla,” in Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice, S. Standring, Ed., pp. 820-821, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 40th edition, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Pećina, “Who really first described and explained the suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome?” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery—American Volume, vol. 83, no. 8, pp. 1273-1274, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Zehetgruber, H. Noske, T. Lang, and C. Wurnig, “Suprascapular nerve entrapment. A meta-analysis,” International Orthopaedics, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 339–343, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. S. Snell, Clinical Anatomy for Medical Students, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, Md, USA, 1995.
L. F. Solheim and A. Roaas, “Compression of the suprascapular nerve after fracture of the scapular notch,” Acta Orthopaedica, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 338–340, 1978.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. D. Zoltan, “Injury to the suprascapular nerve associated with anterior dislocation of the shoulder,” The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 203–206, 1979.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. L. Weaver, “Isolated suprascapular nerve lesions,” Injury, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 117–126, 1983.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Fabre, C. Piton, G. Leclouerec, F. Gervais-Delion, and A. Durandeau, “Entrapment of the suprascapular nerve,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery—Series B, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 414–419, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Demirhan, A. B. Imhoff, R. E. Debski, P. R. Patel, F. H. Fu, and S. L.-Y. Woo, “The spinoglenoid ligament and its relationship to the suprascapular nerve,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 238–243, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. M. Zanotti, J. E. Carpenter, R. B. Blasier, M. L. V. H. Greenfield, R. S. Adler, and M. B. Bromberg, “The low incidence of suprascapular nerve injury after primary repair of massive rotator cuff tears,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 258–264, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. J. Mallon, P. R. Bronec, R. J. Spinner, and L. S. Levin, “Suprascapular neuropathy after distal clavicle excision,” Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, vol. 329, pp. 207–211, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Sandow and J. Hie, “Suprascapular nerve rotator cuff compression syndrome in Volleyball players,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 516–521, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Asami, M. Sonohota, and K. Morisawa, “Bilateral suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome associated with rotator cuff tear,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 70–72, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. O. Sjödén, T. Movin, P. Güntner, and H. Ingelman-Sundberg, “Spinoglenoid bone cyst causing suprascapular nerve compression,” Journal of Shoulder And Elbow Surgery, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 147–149, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. W. Ganzhorn, J. T. Hocker, M. Horowitz, and H. E. Switzer, “Suprascapular-nerve entrapment. A case report,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 492–494, 1981.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. S. Rengachary, J. P. Neff, P. A. Singer, and C. E. Brackett, “Suprascapular entrapment neuropathy: a clinical, anatomical, and comparative study. I: clinical study,” Neurosurgery, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 441–446, 1979.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. P. Ringel, M. Treihaft, M. Carr, R. Fisher, and P. Jacobs, “Suprascapular neuropathy in pitchers,” The American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 80–86, 1990.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. O. Narakas, “Compression and traction neuropathies in the shoulder and arm,” in Operative Nerve Repair And Reconstruction, R. H. Gelberman, Ed., JB Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. P. Moore and R. E. Hunter, “Suprascapular nerve entrapment,” Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 8–14, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Inokuchi, K. Ogawa, and Y. Horiuchi, “Magnetic resonance imaging of suprascapular nerve palsy,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 223–227, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Küllmer, K. W. Sievers, C. D. Reimers et al., “Changes of sonographic, magnetic resonance tomographic, electromyographic, and histopathologic findings within a 2-month period of examinations after experimental muscle denervation,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, vol. 117, no. 4-5, pp. 228–234, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Dunkelgrun, K. Iesaka, S. S. Park, F. J. Kummer, and J. D. Zuckerman, “Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility in suprascapular notch typing,” Bulletin: Hospital for Joint Diseases, vol. 61, no. 3-4, pp. 118–122, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Polguj, K. Jedrzejewski, M. Podgórski, A. Majos, and M. Topol, “A proposal for classification of the superior transverse scapular ligament: variable morphology and its potential influence on suprascapular nerve entrapment,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1265–1273, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Polguj, K. Jędrzejewski, A. Majos, and M. Topol, “Variations in bifid superior transverse scapular ligament as a possible factor of suprascapular entrapment: an Anatomical Study,” International Orthopaedics, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 2095–2100, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. S. Tubbs, C. Nechtman, A. V. D'Antoni et al., “Ossification of the suprascapular ligament: a risk factor for suprascapular nerve compression?” International Journal of Shoulder Surgery, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 19–22, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Bektas, S. Ay, C. Yilmaz, I. Tekdemir, and A. Elhan, “Spinoglenoid septum: a new anatomic finding,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 491-492, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Piyawinijwong and P. Tantipoon, “The anterior coracoscapular ligament in Thais: possible etiological factor of suprascapular nerve entrapment,” Siriraj Medical Journal, vol. 64, pp. S12–S14, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
I. Aiello, G. Serra, G. C. Traina, and V. Tugnoli, “Entrapment of the suprascapular nerve at the spinoglenoid notch,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 314–316, 1982.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Ide, S. Maeda, and K. Takagi, “Does the inferior transverse scapular ligament cause distal suprascapular nerve entrapment? An anatomic and morphologic study,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 253–255, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Duparc, D. Coquerel, J. Ozeel, M. Noyon, A. Gerometta, and C. Michot, “Anatomical basis of the suprascapular nerve entrapment, and clinical relevance of the supraspinatus fascia,” Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 277–284, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Hrdicka, “The adult scapula: visual observations,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol. 29, pp. 73–94, 1942.
View at: Google Scholar
S. S. Rengachary, D. Burr, S. Lucas, K. M. Hassanein, M. P. Mohn, and H. Matzke, “Suprascapular entrapment neuropathy: a clinical, anatomical, and comparative study. II: anatomical study,” Neurosurgery, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 447–451, 1979.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Bayramoglu, D. Demiryürek, E. Tüccar et al., “Variations in anatomy at the suprascapular notch possibly causing suprascapular nerve entrapment: an anatomical study,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 393–398, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Antoniadis, H.-P. Richter, S. Rath, V. Braun, and G. Moese, “Suprascapular nerve entrapment: experience with 28 cases,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 1020–1025, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Polguj, K. Jędrzejewski, M. Podgórski, and M. Topol, “Morphometric study of the suprascapular notch: proposal of classification,” Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 781–787, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Polguj, M. Sibiński, A. Grzegorzewski, P. Grzelak, A. Majos, and M. Topol, “Variation in morphology of suprascapular notch as a factor of suprascapular nerve entrapment,” International Orthopaedics, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 2185–2192, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Polguj, M. Sibiński, A. Grzegorzewski, M. Waszczykowski, A. Majos, and M. Topol, “Morphological and radiological study of ossified superior transverse scapular ligament as potential risk factor of suprascapular nerve entrapment,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 613601, 7 pages, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Polguj, M. Synder, A. Kwapisz et al., “Clinical evaluation of the shape of the suprascapular notch—An ultrasonographic and computed tomography comparative study: application to shoulder pain syndromes,” Clinical Anatomy, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 774–779, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. P. von Schroeder, S. D. Kuiper, and M. J. Botte, “Osseous anatomy of the scapula,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 383, pp. 131–139, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. E. Boykin, D. J. Friedman, Z. R. Zimmer, A. L. Oaklander, L. D. Higgins, and J. J. P. Warner, “Suprascapular neuropathy in a shoulder referral practice,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 983–988, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Vastamäki and H. Göransson, “Suprascapular nerve entrapment,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 297, pp. 135–143, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. W. Young, J. Dakic, K. Stroia, M. L. Nguyen, A. H. S. Harris, and M. R. Safran, “High incidence of infraspinatus muscle atrophy in elite professional female tennis players,” American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 1989–1993, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Holzgraefe, B. Kukowski, and S. Eggert, “Prevalence of latent and manifest suprascapular neuropathy in high-performance volleyball players,” British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 177–179, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. B. Ticker, M. Djurasovic, R. J. Strauch et al., “The incidence of ganglion cysts and other variations in anatomy along the course of the suprascapular nerve,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 472–478, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Alon, S. Weiss, B. Fishel, and S. Dekel, “Bilateral suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome due to an anomalous transverse scapular ligament,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 234, pp. 31–33, 1988.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Polguj, K. Jȩdrzejewski, A. Majos, and M. Topol, “The trifid superior transverse scapular ligament: a case report and review of the literature,” Folia Morphologica (Warsz), vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 118–120, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
S. B. Cohen, D. M. Dines, and C. T. Moorman, “Familial calcification of the superior transverse scapular ligament causing neuropathy,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 334, pp. 131–135, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Kayava, “Uber den schultergürtel der finen,” Annales Academiae Scientarium Fennicae A, vol. 21, pp. 1–69, 1924.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Ürgüden, H. Özdemir, B. Dönmez, H. Bilbaşar, and N. Oǧuz, “Is there any effect of suprascapular notch type in iatrogenic suprascapular nerve lesions? An anatomical study,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 241–245, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Lafosse, A. Tomasi, S. Corbett, G. Baier, K. Willems, and R. Gobezie, “Arthroscopic release of suprascapular nerve entrapment at the suprascapular notch: technique and preliminary results,” Arthroscopy, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 34–42, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. S. Tubbs, M. D. Smyth, G. Salter, and W. J. Oakes, “Anomalous traversement of the suprascapular artery through the suprascapular notch: a possible mechanism for undiagnosed shoulder pain?” Medical Science Monitor, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. BR116–BR119, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
D. J. Gray, “Variations in human scapulae,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 57–72, 1942.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. G. Edelson, “Bony bridges and other variations of the suprascapular notch,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (British Volume), vol. 77, pp. 505-506, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Shaibani, R. Workman, and B. M. Rothschild, “The significance of enthesopathy as a skeletal phenomenon,” Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 399–403, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Olivier, “Pratique anthropologique,” in Le Scapulum, Vigot Freres, Paris, France, 1960.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Natsis, T. Totlis, P. Tsikaras, H. J. Appell, P. Skandalakis, and J. Koebke, “Proposal for classification of the suprascapular notch: a study on 423 dried scapulas,” Clinical Anatomy, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 135–139, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Iqbal, R. Iqbal, and S. G. Khan, “Anatomical variations in shape of suprascapular notch of scapula,” Journal of Morphological Sciences, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1-2, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
J. G. Silva, M. Abidu-Figueiredo, R. M. P. Fernandes et al., “High incidence of complete ossification of the superior transverse scapular ligament in Brazilians and its clinical implications,” International Journal of Morphology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 855–859, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
H. V. Vallois, “L'os acromial dans les races Humanie,” L'Anthropologie, vol. 35, pp. 977–1022, 1925.
View at: Google Scholar
H. V. Vallois, “Variations de la Cavie glenoide de L’omplate,” Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Seances et Memoires de la Societe de Biologie, vol. 94, pp. 559-560, 1926.
View at: Google Scholar
H.-J. Wang, C. Chen, L.-P. Wu, C.-Q. Pan, W.-J. Zhang, and Y.-K. Li, “Variable morphology of the suprascapular notch: an investigation and quantitative measurements in Chinese population,” Clinical Anatomy, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 47–55, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. R. Sinkeet, K. O. Awori, P. O. Odula, J. A. Ogeng'o, and P. M. Mwachaka, “The suprascapular notch: its morphology and distance from the glenoid cavity in a Kenyan population,” Folia Morphologica, vol. 69, pp. 241–245, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Polguj, K. Jędrzejewski, and M. Topol, “Variable morphology of the anterior coracoscapular ligament—a proposal of classification,” Annals of Anatomy, vol. 195, no. 1, pp. 77–81, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-J. Yang, Y.-C. Gil, J.-D. Jin, S. V. Ahn, and H.-Y. Lee, “Topographical anatomy of the suprascapular nerve and vessels at the suprascapular notch,” Clinical Anatomy, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 359–365, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Polguj, J. Rozniecki, M. Sibiński, A. Grzegorzewski, A. Majos, and M. Topol, “The variable morphology of suprascapular nerve and vessels at suprascapular notch: a proposal for classification and its potential clinical implications,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1542–1548, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Polguj, K. Jędrzejewski, and M. Topol, “The bifid anterior coracoscapular ligament: a new morphological variation and its potential clinical implications,” Folia Morphologica, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 282–284, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Meyer, N. Graveleau, P. Hardy, and P. Landreau, “Anatomic risks of shoulder arthroscopy portals: anatomic cadaveric study of 12 portals,” Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 529–536, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. N. Bhatia, J. F. de Beer, K. S. van Rooyen, and D. F. du Toit, “Arthroscopic suprascapular nerve decompression at the suprascapular notch,” Arthroscopy—Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1009–1013, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. A. Gürses, Ö. Gayretli, O. Coşkun, A. Kale, and A. Öztürk, “Anatomical relations between anterior coracoscapular ligament and suprascapular neurovascular structures and a proposal for classification,” Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 433–437, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Greiner, K. Golser, M. Wambacher, F. Kralinger, and G. Sperner, “The course of the suprascapular nerve in the supraspinatus fossa and its vulnerability in muscle advancement,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 256–259, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Podgórski, M. Topol, M. Sibiński, M. Domżalski, P. Grzelak, and M. Polguj, “What is the function of the anterior coracoscapular ligament?—a morphological study on the newest potential risk factor for suprascapular nerve entrapment,” Annals of Anatomy, vol. 201, pp. 38–42, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Chen and P. Adds, “Accessory suprascapular artery,” Clinical Anatomy, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 498–500, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Pyrgakis, E. Panagouli, and D. Venieratos, “Anomalous origin and course of the suprascapular artery combined with absence of the suprascapular vein: case study and clinical implications,” North American Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 129–133, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Pecina, J. Krmpotic-Nemanic, and A. D. Markiewitz, in Tunnel Syndromes—Peripheral Nerve Compression Syndromes, pp. 267–274, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2001.
H. Won, H. Won, C. Oh, S. Han, I. Chung, and Y. C. Yoon, “Morphological study of the inferior transverse scapular ligament,” Clinical Anatomy, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 707–711, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Cummins, K. Anderson, M. Bowen, G. Nuber, and S. I. Roth, “Anatomy and histological characteristics of the spinoglenoid ligament,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, vol. 80, no. 11, pp. 1622–5, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Demaio, D. Drez, and R. C. Mullins, “The inferior transverse scapular ligament as a possible cause of entrapment neuropathy of the nerve to the infraspinatus. A brief note,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, vol. 73, no. 7, pp. 1061–1063, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. D. Plancher, R. K. Peterson, J. C. Johnston, and T. A. Luke, “The spinoglenoid ligament,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 361–365, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Podgórski, M. Sibiński, A. Majos, L. Stefańczyk, M. Topol, and M. Polguj, “The suprascapular vein: a possible etiology for suprascapular nerve entrapment and risk of complication during procedures around the suprascapular foramen region,” Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery & Research, vol. 100, no. 5, pp. 515–519, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. R. Reineck and S. G. Krishnan, “Subligamentous suprascapular artery encountered during arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release: a report of three cases,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. e1–e3, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Hrdlička, “The scapula: visual observations,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 73–94, 1942.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Suby, G. Millán, J. Gómez Otero, and S. Dahinten, “Suprascapular ligament ossification and nerve entrapment in a modern skeleton from the central coast of Patagonia, Southern South America,” European Journal of Anatomy, vol. 21, no. 1, Article ID eja.160213js, pp. 65–70, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Polguj, K. Jędrzejewski, A. Majos, and M. Topol, “Coexistence of the suprascapular notch and the suprascapular foramen—a rare anatomical variation and a new hypothesis on its formation based on anatomical and radiological studies,” Anatomical Science International, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 156–162, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Polguj, M. Podgórski, K. Jędrzejewski, and M. Topol, “The double suprascapular foramen: unique anatomical variation and the new hypothesis of its formation,” Skeletal Radiology, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 1631–1636, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. L. Shi, M. T. Freehill, P. Yannopoulos, and J. J. Warner, “Suprascapular nerve: is it important in cuff pathology?” Advances in Orthopedics, vol. 2012, Article ID 516985, 6 pages, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. C. Moen, O. M. Babatunde, S. H. Hsu, C. S. Ahmad, and W. N. Levine, “Suprascapular neuropathy: what does the literature show?” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 835–846, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
V. B. Vad, D. Southern, R. F. Warren, D. W. Altchek, and D. Dines, “Prevalence of peripheral neurologic injuries in rotator cuff tears with atrophy,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 333–336, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Albritton, R. D. Graham, R. S. Richards II, and C. J. Basamania, “An anatomic study of the effects on the suprascapular nerve due to retraction of the supraspinatus muscle after a rotator cuff tear,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 497–500, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. J. Mallon, R. J. Wilson, and C. J. Basamania, “The association of suprascapular neuropathy with massive rotator cuff tears: a preliminary report,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 395–398, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. G. Costouros, M. Porramatikul, D. T. Lie, and J. J. P. Warner, “Reversal of suprascapular neuropathy following arthroscopic repair of massive supraspinatus and infraspinatus rotator cuff tears,” Arthroscopy—Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1152–1161, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. P. Moore, H. M. Fritts, D. C. Quick, and D. D. Buss, “Suprascapular nerve entrapment caused by supraglenoid cyst compression,” Journal of Shoulder And Elbow Surgery, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 455–462, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. J. Westerheide, R. M. Dopirak, R. P. Karzel, and S. J. Snyder, “Suprascapular nerve palsy secondary to spinoglenoid cysts: results of arthroscopic treatment,” Arthroscopy, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 721–727, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Abboud, D. Silverberg, D. L. Glaser, M. L. Ramsey, and G. R. Williams, “Arthroscopy effectively treats ganglion cysts of the shoulder,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, no. 444, pp. 129–133, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2017 Piotr Łabętowicz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

2428

Downloads

1075

Citations