Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Behavioural Neurology
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 15-22
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/BEN-1995-8102

Mini-Mental Parkinson: First Validation Study of a New Bedside Test Constructed for Parkinson’s Disease

F. Mahieux,1,2,4 D. Michelet,1 M.-J. Manifacier,1 F. Boller,2 J. Fermanian,3 and A. Guillard1

1Service de Neurologie, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
2INSERM, U 324, Paris, France
3Département de Statistique Médicale, Hôpital Necker, Paris, France
4Service de Neurologie, Hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, 75970 Paris Cedex, France

Received 1 March 1994; Accepted 1 December 1994

Copyright © 1995 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

We have developed a brief screening test aimed at identifying cognitive disorders in Parkinson’s disease. The Mini-Mental Parkinson derives from the Mini-Mental State Examination of Folstein. It includes seven ordered subsections, with a total score of 32. A pilot study was conducted in 50 community-dwelling parkinsonian patients, in order to establish its metrological qualities. Comparisons were made with a neuropsychological battery including several tests widely used in the assessment of specific cognitive disorders in Parkinson’s disease. The correlations between the Mini-Mental Parkinson and each component of this battery were substantial, especially for the performance subtests of the WAIS-R (r = 0.62 to 0.72), the Stroop test (r = 0.65) the 15-objects test (r = 0.64), the word fluency (r = 0.63) and the Odd Man Out test (r = 0.61). The validity of each subtest of the Mini-Mental Parkinson was adequate except for one, based on a word choice, which requires a modification in French before definitive use. The test-retest reliability was high (r = 0.84). There was a significant difference in the mean scores in cases with confusional event (22.4), even without current signs of dementia, compared with patients with no such history (27.2). In conclusion, this brief test is suitable for assessment of parkinsonian patients.