Review Article

Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis and Cognition: A Review of Clinical, Neuropsychologic, and Neuroradiologic Features

Table 2

Methods and results of longitudinal follow-up studies.

AuthorsMS sample size at follow-upHealthy controls sample size at follow-upDuration of follow-upNeuropsychological testsRate of decline in MS sampleImpaired cognitive domains

Amato et al. [16]562 yearsSRT, SRT-D, SPART, SPART-D, SDMT, TMT-A, TMT-B, Tower of London Test, Semantic and Phonemic Verbal Fluency Test, Oral Denomination Test from the Aachener Aphasia Test70% (failure on at least 3 tests)
(change in CCI between baseline and 2 years)
Deteriorating: 75%
Stable: 11.5%
Improving: 13.5%
Verbal memory, complex attention, verbal fluency, receptive language

Amato et al. [17]485 yearsSRT, SRT-D, SPART, SPART-D, SDMT, TMT-A, TMT-B, Tower of London Test, Semantic and Phonemic Verbal Fluency Test, Oral Denomination Test from the Aachener Aphasia Test38% (failure on at least 3 tests)
(change in CCI between baseline and 5 years)
Deteriorating: 56%
Stable: 18.8%
Improving: 25%
(change in CCI between years 2 and 5)
Deteriorating: 22.9%
Stable: 10.4%
Improving: 66.7%
Visual–spatial learning, expressive language

MacAllister et al. [18]1221.58 ± 9.3 monthsTMT, COWAT, Boston Naming Test, CELF 3rd edition, WRAML, WMI5/12 (cognitive decline assessed using the criteria of more tests showing impaired at the time of the 2nd test than at the baseline)
7/12 (cognitive decline assessed using the criteria of decline in z-score composite from the baseline to the time of the 2nd test)
Attention, executive functions, memory

Charvet et al. [19]62 (MS)
5 (CIS)
1.64 ± 0.63 yearsWASI, WASI-II, CVLT-C, CVLT-II, EOWPVT, WIAT-II, VMI, Digit Span subtest from WISC-IV, WAIS-IV, TMTRate of impairment was 37% at baseline and 33% at follow-up
Most participants showed no change while (6%) declined on two or more tasks and (9%) improved on 2 or more tasks
Visuomotor integration, information processing speed, attention

Hosseini et al. [20]35Neuropsychological evaluations were conducted at baseline and up to four more assessments, with each evaluation separated by a minimum of 1 year.SDMT, TMT, WASI,
WISC-III
This study examined changes in cognitive maturation in a cohort of pediatric-onset MS patients as a function of age at disease onset and cognitive reserve factors (baseline IQ and parental social status)
Younger age at disease onset was associated with a greater likelihood of cognitive decline on both the TMT-B () and SDMT ()
Younger age at disease-onset increases the vulnerability for disrupted performance on measures of information processing, visual scanning, perceptual/motor speed, and working memory

Till et al. [21]282613–16 months (mean: 15 months)WASI, Visual Matching from the WJ Tests of Cognitive Abilities, TMT A-B, SDMT, Conner’s Continuous Performance Test (5th edition)–number of omission errors, Vocabulary and Similarities subtests of the WASI, WJ Tests of Achievement, Verbal Fluency Test from DKEFS, VMI, Block Design and Matrix Reasoning subtests from the WASI, TOMAL-2, WSR, Grooved Pegboard testImproving: 18% in MS group, 86% in control group
The RCI method results showed that the majority of patients remained stable or improved over time (21 of 28; 75%), with only seven of 28 patients (25%) demonstrating decline on three or more of the neuropsychological tests. Only 1 of 26 controls (3.8%) showed cognitive deterioration ().
Attention, information processing speed, visuomotor integration, verbal fluency, visual memory, calculation, spelling ability

CCI: cognitive change index; CVLT: California Verbal Learning Test; DKEFS: Delis–Kaplan executive function system; EOWPVT: Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test; RCI: reliable change index; TOMAL-2: test of memory and learning-2nd edition; WAIS-IV: Wechsler adult intelligence scale 4th edition; WIAT-II: Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-2nd edition.