Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Behavioural Neurology
Volume 2017, Article ID 8980103, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8980103
Research Article

Functional Capacity and Motor Performance of Upper Limbs in Individuals with Cerebellar Disorders: A Pilot Study

Master’s and Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo SP, Brazil

Correspondence should be addressed to Sandra Regina Alouche; rb.moc.lou@ehcuolas

Received 28 March 2017; Revised 7 June 2017; Accepted 3 July 2017; Published 8 August 2017

Academic Editor: Luigi Ferini-Strambi

Copyright © 2017 Vivian Farahte Giangiardi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Manto, J. M. Bower, A. B. Conforto et al., “Consensus paper: roles of the cerebellum in motor control—the diversity of ideas on cerebellar involvement in movement,” Cerebellum, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 457–487, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. E. Kandel and J. Schwartz, Principles of Neural Science, McGraw-Hill Education, Fifth edition, 2013.
  3. Y. W. Tseng, J. Diedrichsen, J. W. Krakauer, R. Shadmehr, and A. J. Bastian, “Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 54–62, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Izawa, S. E. Criscimagna-Hemminger, and R. Shadmehr, “Cerebellar contributions to reach adaptation and learning sensory consequences of action,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 4230–4239, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. Lent, Cem bilhões de neurônios: conceitos fundamentais de neurociência: Atheneu, 2001.
  6. J. E. Schlerf, J. Xu, N. M. Klemfuss, T. L. Griffiths, and R. B. Ivry, “Individuals with cerebellar degeneration show similar adaptation deficits with large and small visuomotor errors,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 1164–1173, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. J. Ebner and S. Pasalar, “Cerebellum predicts the future motor state,” Cerebellum, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 583–588, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. C. Miall, L. O. Christensen, O. Cain, and J. Stanley, “Disruption of state estimation in the human lateral cerebellum,” PLoS Biology, vol. 5, no. 11, article e316, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. Shadmehr, M. A. Smith, and J. W. Krakauer, “Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control,” Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 33, pp. 89–108, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. A. Nowak, D. Timmann, and J. Hermsdorfer, “Dexterity in cerebellar agenesis,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 696–703, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  11. H. Chen, S. E. Hua, M. A. Smith, F. A. Lenz, and R. Shadmehr, “Effects of human cerebellar thalamus disruption on adaptive control of reaching,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1462–1473, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. Maschke, C. M. Gomez, T. J. Ebner, and J. Konczak, “Hereditary cerebellar ataxia progressively impairs force adaptation during goal-directed arm movements,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 230–238, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. X. Brooks, J. Carriot, and K. E. Cullen, “Learning to expect the unexpected: rapid updating in primate cerebellum during voluntary self-motion,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 1310–1317, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. E. Kandel, J. Schwartz, T. Jessell, S. Siegelbaum, and A. J. Hudspeth, Princípios de Neurociências, AMGH Editora, 5 edition, 2014.
  15. R. C. Oldfield, “The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 97–113, 1971. View at Google Scholar
  16. A. R. Fugl-Meyer, L. Jaasko, I. Leyman, S. Olsson, and S. Steglind, “The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance,” Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 13–31, 1975. View at Google Scholar
  17. V. Mathiowetz, N. Kashman, G. Volland, K. Weber, M. Dowe, and S. Rogers, “Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 69–74, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  18. L. A. Buddenberg and C. Davis, “Test-retest reliability of the Purdue Pegboard Test,” The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 555–558, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  19. L. I. Company, Purdue Pegboard Test User Instructions, 2002.
  20. D. Elliott, “Khan MVision and goal-directed movement: neurobehavioral perspectives,” Human Kinetics, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  21. J. A. Bernard and R. D. Seidler, “Cerebellar contributions to visuomotor adaptation and motor sequence learning: an ALE meta-analysis,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 7, p. 27, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. J. Bastian, “Learning to predict the future: the cerebellum adapts feedforward movement control,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 645–649, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. C. Miall and D. King, “State estimation in the cerebellum,” Cerebellum, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 572–576, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. Elliott, W. F. Helsen, and R. Chua, “A century later: Woodworth’s (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 342–357, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  25. R. John, Control of Human Voluntary Movement, Springer, Netherlands, 2012.