Biochemistry Research International

Biochemistry Research International / 2021 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 9946183 |

Molly Mombeshora, Godloves Fru Chi, Stanley Mukanganyama, "Antibiofilm Activity of Extract and a Compound Isolated from Triumfetta welwitschii against Pseudomonas aeruginosa", Biochemistry Research International, vol. 2021, Article ID 9946183, 13 pages, 2021.

Antibiofilm Activity of Extract and a Compound Isolated from Triumfetta welwitschii against Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Academic Editor: Néstor Gutiérrez-Méndez
Received10 Mar 2021
Accepted05 Jun 2021
Published15 Jun 2021


Triumfetta welwitschii has been used as a traditional medicine in Africa. It is documented as a rich source of phytochemicals with antibacterial activities. To further explore the antibacterial potential of these phytochemical components, the phytochemical profile of the dichloromethane: methanol leaf extract from T. welwitschii was investigated using ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Compounds were isolated from the extract using column chromatography and thin-layer chromatography. Compound B1 was isolated from the fraction eluted by 90 hexane:10 ethyl acetate using column chromatography. The antibacterial activity of B1 against Pseudomonas aeruginosa was evaluated in vitro using the broth microdilution method and the iodonitrotetrazolium (INT) colorimetric assay. The antibiofilm activities of the extract and B1 against P. aeruginosa were determined by quantifying the biofilms using crystal violet. The effect of the extract and B1 on capsular polysaccharide and extracellular DNA content of biofilm formed by P. aeruginosa was determined using phenol-sulphuric acid and propidium iodide, respectively. A total of 28 peaks were detected and identified using UPLC-MS/MS. The three most abundant phytochemicals identified were catechin, umbelliferone, and a luteolin derivative. B1 showed antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) value of 25 μg/ml. Only 38% and 6% of the biofilms were formed in the presence of the extract and B1, respectively. The extract and B1 reduced the capsular polysaccharide content in biofilms formed in P. aeruginosa by 40% and 65%, respectively. The extract and B1 significantly reduced the extracellular DNA content of biofilms by 29% and 72%, respectively. The results of this study provide evidence of the antibacterial and antibiofilm activities of B1 and leaf extracts from T. welwitschii. Future work should identify the chemical structure of B1 using nuclear magnetic resonance and mass spectrometry.

1. Introduction

Antimicrobial agents play a vital role in reducing the global burden of infectious diseases. However, the emergence of resistant strains of pathogenic bacteria has become a major public health threat. The evolution of bacterial strains has rendered treatment protocols obsolete and highlights a paucity of antimicrobial agents that are effective against resistant bacterial strains [1]. The rapid global spread of resistant bacterial isolates necessitates the discovery of novel antimicrobial agents that control infections. Intracellular or biofilm-producing antibiotic-resistant bacteria are thought to be more virulent than other strains [2], which could be supported by the multicellular nature of biofilm bacterial communities. Extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) are major constituents of biofilms. The EPSs enhance a biofilm community’s ability to forage for both water and nutrients from the environment. Interestingly, this forage mechanism of EPS is not deterred in adverse environments, a phenomenon that enables biofilm-producing bacteria to persist in atypical conditions.

The invasion of implants like mechanical heart valves and catheters by biofilms has significant clinical impacts on patient outcomes [4]. The leading causes of nosocomial infections in humans have been associated with biofilm-forming pathogens, including [5] species of Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter spp. These pathogens can “evade” the effects of antimicrobial treatment due to the acquisition of resistance genes and the formation of biofilms facilitated by EPSs. Targeting of the EPSs could disrupt biofilm physiology because a reduction in EPSs diminishes the hydrated barrier between cells and their external environment.

In addition to extracellular proteins and exopolysaccharides, extracellular DNA (eDNA) is an abundant constituent of the extracellular matrix of the biofilms formed by a wide range of bacteria. Ionic interactions of eDNA with Pel, a protein that sustains cell-to-cell interactions within biofilms, have been shown to be an essential component of antibiotic resistance [6]. The formation of biofilms by P. aeruginosa is a progressive process characterised by a high population of multiplicity. The formation of microcolonies is an initial step in this process. During the initial stages, eDNA is widely spread along the surface of the substrate and enables well-organised movement throughout the channel complex by sustaining articulate cell alignments, thus avoiding movement congestion and ensuring a proficient supply of cells to the migrating front [7]. If any step in the formation of the multicellular structure of the biofilm is disrupted, the effectiveness of antibiotics and the host defences might be improved, leading to better treatment outcomes [8]. The present study was designed to determine if B1 and a DCM: methanol extract from Triumfetta welwitschii had effects on the structure, capsular polysaccharide, and eDNA production of biofilms in P. aeruginosa.

T. welwitschii is of the Tilicea family and has been widely used in ethnomedicine because of its antimicrobial properties [9, 10]. Several biological activities have been reported in T. welwitschii extracts. These include antibacterial, antipyretic, and antimycobacterial activities [1113]. T. welwitschii roots have been used to treat diarrhoea [9]. Moyo and Mukanganyama [14] have described the antiproliferative activity of root extracts from T. welwitschii against Jurkat cells. Detailed knowledge about the phytochemical profile and antibiofilm activity of the plant remains limited. The study also explored the phytochemical profile of the dichloromethane (DCM): methanol leaf extract from T. welwitschii by UPLC-MS/MS. Antibacterial activity of compound B1, which was isolated from T. welwitschii DCM: methanol extract, was evaluated against P. aeruginosa.

Several chromatographic methods may be utilised to profile phytochemicals in natural products. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is the preferred method to identify phytochemicals in natural products [15]. The coupling of HPLC with mass spectrometry (MS) and tandem MS (MS/MS) is effective in identifying phytochemicals at low concentrations when analysing complex samples [16]. However, a major drawback of this technique is the long analysis time, which ranges from 50 to 80 mins. Ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) is an improvement of the LC technique. UPLC employs chromatographic principles to separate compounds by utilising columns packed with smaller particles 1.7 μm in size and/or columns with higher flow rates [17]. This technique leads to a shorter analysis time, higher peak efficiency, and higher resolution. Therefore, UPLC offers new possibilities of improving the analytical methods for complex samples that would otherwise require high resolution and long analysis times.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals Used in Assays

Chemicals used in the study included ciprofloxacin, dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO), iodonitrotetrazolium (INT), and crystal violet were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany). Tryptic soy broth (TSB) and tryptic soy agar (TSA) (22091) were also purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany).

2.2. Plant Material and Extraction

Leaves of T. welwitschii were collected from the centenary (16.8°S, 31.1167°E, and 1156 m above sea level). The plant’s identity was authenticated by a botanist and a voucher specimen was deposited under the reference number C16 E7. The leaves were dried under shade for 14 days and then powdered to yield a sample with a mass of 2350 g. The powder was macerated with a mixture of DCM: methanol (1 : 1 ) for 48 hrs at room temperature. The extract was then concentrated under an RII rotary evaporator (BUCHI, LabortechnikAG, Switzerland) and then dried under a stream of air to create a residue (147 g) that constituted the crude extract.

2.3. UPLC-MS/MS Analysis of the DCM: Methanol Extract from T. welwitschii

Phytochemical fingerprinting of the extracts was performed as described by Thomford et al. [18]. A Waters ACQUITY UPLC system (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) with an ACQUITY BEH C18 column (2.1 mm × 100 mm, 1.7 μm particle size) that inluded a binary pump, vacuum degasser, autosampler, column oven, and Micromass Xevo tandem quadrupole mass spectrometric detector (QTOF Xevo G2; Waters Micromass, Manchester, UK) equipped with an electrospray ionisation (ESI) probe was used. Gradient elution was performed at a flow rate of 0.1 ml/min throughout at injection volumes of 10 μl. Gradient parameters were adjusted by systematically changing the percentage of organic modifier at initial conditions, the isocratic hold period at initial conditions, and/or gradient steepness. Electrospray mass spectra data were recorded in a negative ionisation mode for a mass ranging from 100 m/z to 1500 m/z at a collision energy of 50 V. MassLynx v.4.1 software (Waters) was used to determine the accurate mass and composition for the precursor ions and fragment ions. Fragmentation data, retention times, and data from relevant literature [1921] were used to identify compounds that may be found in the extracts; standard compounds and the KNApSAcK species-metabolite relationship database were used to assign metabolites.

2.4. Isolation of Compound(s) Using Column Chromatography

An extract portion weighing 120 g was mixed with silica gel (480 g) column chromatography (70–230 mesh, Merck), eluted with varying mixtures of hexane, ethyl acetate, and methanol stepwise gradients to obtain 450 fractions (250 ml each). The column had a diameter of 6 cm and a length of 42 cm. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) of the fractions collected was run on aluminium silica gel 60 F254 (MERCK) plates and viewed under an A425/G Allen Ultraviolet light lamp (P. W. Allen & Co., London, UK) at 254 nm and 365 nm. The spots representing separated compounds were further detected with 10% sulphuric acid. The TLC plate was exposed to heat at 100°C until carbon-charred spots became visible. The fractions of T. welwitschii, which were initially purified through silica gel column chromatography, did not show distinctively separated spots on TLC plates. The fractions were washed with ethyl acetate for further purification. The washed fractions were subjected to TLC. TLC studies of the residue collected on filter paper and the filtrate itself were completed using silica gel aluminium plates. Chloroform was used as the mobile phase for the separation of compounds. Visualisation of TLC plates was carried out under an ultraviolet lamp at 254 nm and 365 nm and further detection by 10% sulphuric acid. Compound B1 was isolated.

2.5. Bacterial Strain Used in Assays

The American Type Culture Collection P. aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) was acquired from the Microbiological Section in the Department of Biological Sciences at the University of Botswana (Gaborone, Botswana). Bacteria were kept as glycerol stocks at −35°C.

2.6. Determination of the Antibacterial Activity of B1 against P. aeruginosa

The antibacterial activity of B1 isolated from the DCM: methanol leaf extract of T. welwitschii against P. aeruginosa was determined using the broth microdilution assay [22]. Cells were grown overnight at 37°C in TSB. A 0.5 McFarland standard was used to calculate the volume of inoculum required to produce a value of 2 × 106 c.f.u/ml used in minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination. Concentrations of 0 to 100 μg/ml of B1 were used in the microdilution assay. Ciprofloxacin was used as a standard antibacterial agent for the assays. A Genios Pro 96-multiwell microplate reader (Tecan Group, Ltd., Mannedorf, Switzerland) was used to obtain a preincubation reading before the plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 hrs. A postincubation reading was taken after the incubation period. The growth of cells was quantified using the difference in optical density at 590 nm between the preincubation reading and the postincubation reading. A visual confirmatory test using the INT assay [23] was used to observe and spectrometrically quantify metabolically active cells at 590 nm using a Genios Pro microplate reader. The colour changes observed were red for viable cells and yellow for nonviable cells. The MIC was determined as the lowest concentration that showed no growth. The minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) was determined using samples from the MIC microtiter plate. A loopful of inoculum was collected from the well with the concentration before the well that had been read as the MIC. The samples were plated onto TSA, and bacterial growth was observed after incubating the plates for 24 hrs at 37°C. The lowest concentration of B1 showing no bacterial growth was recorded as the MBC.

2.7. The Effects of the Extract and B1 on Biofilms
2.7.1. The Effect of the Extract and B1 on Biofilm Formation

P. aeruginosa was grown at 37°C for 24 hrs in TSB supplemented with 2% glucose. The optical density (OD) was measured at 600 nm using a spectrophotometer (Model S2100, Unico Science, New Jersey, USA) and appropriate dilutions were made in TSB + 2% glucose to obtain an optical density of 2 × 106 cells/ml using the 0.5 McFarland standard. The assay was completed in a sterile 24-well polystyrene plate (Corning® Costar® TC, Merck). In brief, 1000 μl of P. aeruginosa cells were inoculated and cultured with or without 1000 μl of 100 μg/ml extract or B1, without shaking at 37°C. Bacterial cells without extract or B1 were used as positive controls. TSB +2% glucose was used as a negative control. TSB +2% glucose + extract (not inoculated) and TSB +2% glucose + B1 (not inoculated) were included as additional negative controls. After 72 hrs of incubation, nonadherent cells were removed by washing each sample three times in sterile phosphate buffer solution (PBS). Plates were dried by inverting them on absorbent paper for 15 mins. Samples were fixed at 60°C for 1 hr and the biofilms were stained with 1000 μl of a solution of 0.1% crystal violet in water, a method modified from O’Toole [24]. Plates were incubated at room temperature for 15 mins. Samples were washed thrice with PBS. The quantitative analysis of biofilm production was completed by adding 1250 μl of 95% ethanol to destain the samples. The quantity of biofilms was determined at 590 nm using a microplate reader (Tecan Austria GmbH, Grödig, Austria). The percentage of biofilm inhibition was determined by the following formula:

2.7.2. Microscopic Analyses of Biofilms

Microscopic analysis of the effects of the extract and B1 on biofilm structure was carried out by staining the biofilms using a crystal violet stain. An overnight culture was standardised to 2 × 106 c.f.u/ml using a 0.5 McFarland standard. Test extract or compounds (100 μg/ml) and cells were dispensed in a ratio of 10 ml: 10 ml in Petri plates containing a sterile glass slide. Petri plates were incubated at 37°C for 72 hrs. A plate with TSB only was included as a control for sterility. After the incubation period, 2.7 ml of 1.5% SDS in PBS (v/v) was added to the plates. The plates were further incubated at 37°C for a further 30 mins. The slides were removed from the Petri plates aseptically and washed with PBS. The bacterial biofilms were fixed to the slides using 2% sodium acetate and stained with 0.1% crystal violet. The slides were washed and air-dried. The biofilm was visualised under a light microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) at 40× magnification.

2.7.3. Evaluation of the Biofilm Disruption Potential of the Extract and B1

To determine the effect of the extract and B1 on biofilms developed over 72 hrs, plates were prepared in the same manner as the inhibition assay, but without the addition of test samples, and incubated for 72 hrs. Cells were washed and test samples (100 μg/ml) were dispensed into the wells. The 24-well plate was then incubated for a further 24 hrs and biofilms were quantified as before.

2.7.4. Determination of the Effects of the Extract and B1 on the Quantity of Capsular Polysaccharides

Polysaccharide extraction was done using a process modified from Wu et al. [25] with modifications. In brief, a culture of P. aeruginosa cells grown for 16 hrs was standardised using a 0.5 McFarland standard to 1 × 109 c.f.u/ml. The cells were grown in 50 ml centrifuge tubes containing 100 μg/ml of extract or B1. A final concentration of 0.25 μg/ml of ciprofloxacin was used as the standard antibacterial drug. Each tube had 5 ml of cells and 5 ml of extract, ciprofloxacin, or B1. Unexposed cells and media without cells were included as the positive and negative controls, respectively. The cell cultures were incubated in a water bath at 37°C for 4 hrs without shaking. After the incubation period, cells were separated by centrifugation at 4 000 rpm for 15 mins and washed three times with PBS. The cells were suspended in 450 μl of deionised water and an equal volume of saturated phenol. The mixture was incubated for 20 mins in a water bath at 65°C. A volume of 300 μl from each tube was transferred in triplicate to 1.5 ml microtubes (Eppendorf, Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany). A volume of 150 μl chloroform was added and the mixtures were mixed by intense vortexing. The cell suspension was centrifuged and the supernatant was collected. The supernatant was prepared for phenol-sulphuric acid assay [26]. In brief, 50 μl of each supernatant was distributed into wells on a microtiter plate. Next, 150 μl of concentrated sulphuric acid (98%) and 5% phenol were added to each well. Mannose was used as the standard sugar, and a standard curve was plotted. The standard curve was prepared by placing 50 μl of each mannose concentration of 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 μg/ml into wells on a microtiter plate. Concentrated sulphuric acid (98%) and 5% phenol were added to the standards in the same manner as for the sample supernatant. The microtiter plate was placed in a static water bath at 90°C for 5 mins. The plate was dried and the absorbance was read at 492 nm using a Stat fax 2 100 microplate reader (Awareness Technologies, Inc., Westport, USA).

2.7.5. Determination of the Effects of the Extract and B1 on the Quantity of eDNA

The eDNA was extracted using a procedure modified from work by Chiba et al. [27]. The quantity of extracted eDNA was determined fluorimetrically using the propidium iodide stain [28]. In brief, an overnight culture of cells was grown at 37°C at 120 rpm. The overnight culture was standardised to 2 × 106 c.f.u/ml using a 0.5 McFarland standard. The cells were centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 15 mins and the supernatant was discarded. The remaining pellet was washed using PBS. A volume of 1 ml of the resulting solution was pipetted into a 24-well plate and 1 ml of the extract or B1 (at a final concentration of 100 μg/ml) was added to respective wells. A positive control comprising cells without treatment and a negative control comprising cells treated with ciprofloxacin, the reference drug, were included. TSB was included as a sterility control. The plate was incubated at 37°C for an additional 72 hrs in a humidified atmosphere in a shaking incubator. The nonadherent contents of Plate 1 were transferred to a new 24-well plate (Plate 2) using a 1 ml pipette. The first plate was washed using PBS by running 2 ml of the buffer. The plate was inverted over a paper towel for 15 mins to drain any excess liquid. Each well of Plate 1 was stained using 900 μl PBS + 2 mM MgCl2 and 5 μl propidium iodide stock solution. Plate 2 was stained with 5 μl/well of propidium iodide. The mixture was kept in the dark for 10 mins at room temperature. A volume of 200 μl of the test samples was transferred to a 96-well plate and fluorescence was measured at excitation and emission wavelengths of 544 and 612 nm, respectively, using an fmax spectrofluorometer (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, USA).

2.8. Statistical Analyses

The data from the results obtained in this study were analysed using GraphPad Prism for Windows (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, California, USA) version 8.0.1. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and Dunnett’s multiple comparison test were used to determine the level of significance; all treated samples were compared to the control. Values with were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Chemical Composition of a Leaf Extract from T. welwitschii

A UPLC-MS/MS chromatogram of the DCM: methanol leaf extract from T. welwitschii showing a total of 28 peaks with varying relative abundances was depicted in Figure 1. Three dominant peaks of 161, 191, and 359 m/z were detected.

A total of 28 physiologically active components were identified from the extract by UPLC-MS/MS analysis. Results indicated that catechin, umbelliferone, and a derivative of luteolin were the major compounds in the leaf extract from T. welwitschii. The identified components are summarised in Table 1 according to their retention times.

PeakRt (min)[M-H]-Proposed formulaProposed compounds

11.73191.0546C7H11O6Quinic acid
21.73191.0549C7H11O6Quinic acid
312.79191.06C7H11O6Quinic acid
412.80353.0874C16H17O9Chlorogenic acid
512.88191.05C7H11O6Quinic acid
716.27563.1394C20H30O7Apigenin 6-C-arabinoside 8-glucoside
816.26563.1393C20H30O2S2Apigenin 6-C-arabinoside 8-glucoside
1721.08359.08Luteolin derivative
1921.07359.08Luteolin derivative
2121.73503.08C23H19O136,8-Di-C-β-glucupyranosylapigenin (vicenin-2)
2323.50343.085,4′-Dihydroxy-7,3′-dimethoxy8-methyl homoisoflavanone
2523.96503.0821C23H19O136,8-Di-C-β-glucupyranosylapigenin (vicenin-2)
2623.99503.09C23H19O136,8-Di-C-β-glucupyranosylapigenin (vicenin-2)
2725.38233.15Malonyl- monocinnamoylquinic acid
2826.38112.99Quinic acid derivative

The proposed compounds mainly belonged to the flavone, flavanol, phenol, coumarin, and cyclic polyol classes. Chemical structures of some compounds identified from the DCM: methanol extract using UPLC-MS/MS analyses are shown in Figure 2.

3.2. Isolation of B1 from the Leaf Extracts of T. welwitschii

A total of 450 fractions were obtained from column chromatography of the DCM: methanol leaf extract from T. welwitschii. Fractions with similar TLC profiles were combined to yield 27 pools. The 27 pools had a mixture of many impure compounds as indicated by multiple spots on TLC plates. Pooled fractions were washed with solvents of higher polarity and spotted on TLC plates to detect the number of compounds present. TLC plates were developed using chloroform as the mobile phase. Plates were viewed under 254 nm and 365 nm (UV). B1 showed a distinct single spot, while the rest of the fractions showed some tailing along with spots. The presence of a single spot from B1 implied that a potential pure compound had been isolated. MB1, FA27, A29, and FA29 had single spots with some tailing. A27 and FA1 had two and three spots, respectively.

3.3. Antibacterial Activity of B1

The effect of B1 on the growth of P. aeruginosa was determined using the broth microdilution method. B1 showed a concentration-dependent inhibition on the growth of P. aeruginosa starting from 6.3 μg/ml up to 25 μg/ml. Total inhibition of bacterial growth was observed at concentrations ≥25 μg/ml, as shown in Figure 3. The MBC for B1 was found to be 25 μg/ml.

3.4. The Effects of the Extract and B1 on Biofilm Formation

The formation of biofilm by P. aeruginosa in the presence and absence of the extract or B1 at 100 μg/ml is presented in Figure 4. There was a significant difference in the biofilm formed by bacteria exposed to all three test samples when compared to the biofilm formed in bacteria not exposed to the test samples.

The structure of biofilm after 72-hour exposure to test samples was analysed under light microscopy. Biofilms exposed to the extract or B1 showed disrupted structure, while unexposed biofilm retained a compact structure. Images of the effects of the extract and B1 on biofilm structure obtained using a microscope are included in Figure 5.

3.5. Disruption of Mature Biofilms

The effect of the extract and B1 on preformed biofilms in 24-well plates was determined using the crystal violet assay. Both the extract and B1 were unable to disrupt the preformed biofilm, as shown in Figure 6.

3.6. The Effects of the Extract and B1 on the eDNA Content of Biofilms

The extract, B1, and ciprofloxacin significantly reduced the production of eDNA by P. aeruginosa compared to the untreated biofilms. The untreated biofilms produced the highest quantity of eDNA compared to treated cells. The effects of the extract and B1 on the production of eDNA in biofilm are presented in Figure 7.

3.7. The Effects of the Extract and B1 on the Content of Extracellular Polysaccharide (EPS) in Biofilms

The amount of capsular polysaccharide remaining after biofilm treated under different conditions was interpolated from the standard curve of mannose. Biofilms treated with ciprofloxacin, the extract, or B1 had significantly lower sugar content compared to the untreated biofilms. Biofilms exposed to ciprofloxacin had the lowest amount of sugar compared to all other treatments. The effects of the extract and B1 on the content of EPS in P. aeruginosa biofilms are presented in Figure 8.

4. Discussion

4.1. Identification of Compounds in T. welwitschii Using UPLC-MS/MS

Antibacterial activities of extracts from T. welwitschii have been previously reported [11] and the DCM: methanol extract has been found to be the most potent. UPLC-MS analysis of the DCM: methanol extract from T. welwitschii led to the identification of 28 phytochemicals. The majority of compounds identified belonged to the flavonoid class. Several flavonoids are known to exhibit antioxidant, antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral activities [29]. The three most abundant compounds identified from the extract were catechin, umbelliferone, and a luteolin derivative. The flavonoid catechin has many reported positive effects on human health, such as anticancer, antiobesity, antidiabetic, anticardiovascular, antimicrobial, hepatoprotective, and neurological benefits [30]. Irreversible damage to the microbial cytoplasmic membrane has been reported as the antimicrobial mechanism of catechins [31]. Luteolin is another bioactive flavonoid. The antimicrobial activity of Achillea tenuifolia against Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, and Enterococcus faecalis has been attributed to two derivatives of luteolin [32]. The plant-derived phenolic coumarin umbelliferone has been found to possess antifungal and antibacterial activities. Mazimba [33] has reported bioactivities of umbelliferone against inflammation and tumour cells. The biological activities observed for the extracts of T. welwitschii may be attributed to these bioactive compounds. A summary of the pharmacological roles of the other compounds detected and identified in the DCM: methanol leaf extract from T. welwitschii is included in Table 2.

Proposed compoundsPharmacological roleReferences

Quinic acidAntibacterial activity[34]
Chlorogenic acidAntioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities[35]
Apigenin 6-C-arabinoside 8-glucosideAntioxidant and lipophilicity activities[36]
VitexinAnti-inflammatory, antioxidant, cardioprotective, antcancer, and antidiabetic activities[37]
Methylkaempferol-hexoseAntioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities[35]
ApigeninAntifungal activity and cytotoxicity on colon cancer cells[38]
Apigenin-7-O- glucuronylAntifungal activity and cytotoxicity on colon cancer cells[38]
6,8-Di-C-β-glucupyranosyl apigenin (vicenin-2)Antioxidant, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, and hepatoprotective[39]
5,4′-Dihydroxy-7,3′-dimethoxy8-methyl homoisoflavanoneAnti-inflammatory and antihyperglycemic activities[40, 41]
Malonyl-monocinnamoylquinic acidAntibacterial and antifungal activities[42]

4.2. Isolation of B1 from the Leaf Extracts of T. welwitschii

Chromatography can be used for separation or quantitative analysis [43]. Separation should be achieved within a suitable time period. In this work, TLC was used to determine the number of compounds in each fraction obtained from column chromatography, followed by washing with ethyl acetate. Some molecules of the samples were colourless; thus, fluorescence and 10% sulphuric acid were used to create a detectable coloured product to observe spots on the chromatogram. The formation of visible colour was observed under UV light. Fraction B1 showed a pure band on the TLC plate, while fractions MB1, FA27, A29, and FA29 showed one band and some tailing. Fractions B1 may contain a pure compound [44], while fractions FA27, A29, and FA29 may require further purification. The tailing observed for the three fractions may be an indication that they contain alkaloids [45]. Fractions FA1 and FA27 had more than two spots, indicating that they may contain more than one compound in them.

4.3. Antibacterial Activity of B1

A large number of medicinal plants have been documented as valuable sources of natural antimicrobial compounds that may offer effective alternatives in the treatment of problematic bacterial infections. Antibacterial activity of the DCM: methanol, ethanolic, and acetone extracts from T. welwitschii was reported in a previous study [11]. The most potent extract was reported as the DCM: methanol extract, with an MIC of 100 μg/ml and an MBC of greater than 100 μg/ml. Extracts prepared from the DCM: methanol solvents were used to isolate and purify the active compounds that may be responsible for bioactivity. B1 was isolated from the extract using column chromatography and TLC. The antibacterial activity of B1, the compound isolated from T. welwitschii, was determined in the current study. According to the present results, B1 had an antibacterial activity with a MIC and MBC of 25 μg/ml. The isolated compound showed greater antibacterial activity compared to the crude extract, suggesting that purification aided in the separation of the compounds interfering with the activity of the extract [46].

4.4. The Effects of the Extract and B1 on the Formation of Biofilms

Antibiofilm activities of compounds from natural products may play an essential role in bacterial infections associated with medical devices. Pathogens can resist antimicrobials more when they exist in biofilms as infection can persist on different biotic and abiotic surfaces [47]. Factors that cause resistance in biofilms include the presence of an extracellular polymeric matrix, which causes the strong attachment of microbes to surfaces and low antibiotic penetration or increased activity of efflux pumps that expel antimicrobial agents from cells [48]. The extract and B1 inhibited biofilm formation (Figure 4). The extract and B1 may have interfered with any of these factors. The extract and B1 may have also interfered with cell-to-cell communication strategies (quorum sensing) of the bacteria, thereby reducing biofilm formation [49].

The effects of the extract and B1 on P. aeruginosa biofilm structure were analysed using a light microscope. Cells treated with the extract showed a greater reduction in the biofilm thickness compared to the untreated culture. The extract evidently inhibited the production of virulence factors and biofilm formation [50] in P. aeruginosa. Cells treated with B1 and ciprofloxacin had no biofilm structure nor any viable cells. The antibiofilm effects of natural products may be attributed to the inhibition of the formation of the polymer matrix, consequently hindering the quorum sensing network and the development of biofilm [51]. This effect may have left the cells exposed and more susceptible to the antimicrobial effects of B1 and ciprofloxacin.

4.5. The Effects of the Extracts and B1 on Mature Biofilms

The extract and B1 did not have any disruptive effect on mature (72 hr) biofilms of P. aeruginosa was observed. Once biofilms have been established, they tend to exhibit more resistance to external agents such as antibiotics, detergents, or biocides than their planktonic cells [52]. Therefore, disruption of mature biofilms tends to require higher doses of disrupting agents than those needed to destroy planktonic cells [53]. Slow or incomplete penetration of the antimicrobials into the established biofilm population [54] or an altered biochemical microenvironment within the biofilm increases the difficulty of disrupting mature biofilms [8].

4.6. The Effects of the Extract and Compound on Extracellular Polysaccharide Content

The phenol-sulphuric acid assay was used to determine the carbohydrate content in the cells exposed to different conditions. In the presence of strong acids and heat, carbohydrates undergo a series of reactions that lead to the formation of furan derivatives such as furanaldehyde and hydroxymethyl furaldehyde [55]. The role of the EPS in the pathogenesis of biofilms has been studied in many organisms in an attempt to evade the widespread infectious effects of biofilms. The adhesion and resistance-related allow them to synthesize and secrete exopolysaccharides [3]. The extract and B1 induced a decrease in the capsular polysaccharide content. Ciprofloxacin reduces bacterial biomass by inhibiting DNA gyrase [56]; reduced biomass may be related to the reduction of the bacterial density that consequently reduces polysaccharide production. The reduction of the exopolysaccharides after exposure to the extract and B1 suggests that the production of exopolysaccharides by surviving cells might also be impaired [57]. The underlying mechanism for such reduction of exopolysaccharide production after exposure to antimicrobials remains unknown, and investigating the regulatory cascade leading to exopolysaccharide production would be a promising research direction. Otani et al. [58] have suggested that the β-lactam ceftazidime may weaken the polysaccharide matrix synthesis of P. aeruginosa through a reduction in the production of Pel and Psl exopolysaccharides. Reducing the amount of Pel amount might have been a mechanism of polysaccharide content reduction by the extract and B1.

4.7. The Effects of the Extract and B1 on eDNA Production

Biofilm has eDNA as a structural component that binds biofilm during formation and shields it from antimicrobials, giving resistance mechanisms to P. aeruginosa. The release of eDNA plays an important part in the mechanism of action of antibiofilm agents [59]. The extract and B1 significantly reduced eDNA produced by the biofilm of P. aeruginosa. This finding supports results from a study by [60], which found a significant reduction in the amount of eDNA in the biofilm matrix of biofilm treated with hamamelitannin. In the formation of biofilm by P. aeruginosa, eDNA is an adhesion agent that facilitates cell-to-cell attachment stabilising the biofilm and augments resistance against degrading agents [61]. Therefore, an agent that can decrease the amount of eDNA may reduce the formation of biofilm.

5. Conclusion

Compounds detected and identified by UPLC-MS/MS analysis may be responsible for the biological activities of extracts from T. welwitschii. B1 may be a pure compound. Further work to identify its structure is to be carried out using nuclear magnetic resonance and mass spectrometry. B1 possesses antibacterial and antibiofilm activity against P. aeruginosa. The DCM: methanol extract and B1 significantly reduced the content of capsular polysaccharides in P. aeruginosa biofilm. The DCM: methanol extract and compound B1 from T. welwitschii inhibited the production of eDNA and may be one of the mechanisms of disrupting biofilm formation by P. aeruginosa. Thus, phytochemicals from T. welwitschii may serve as antibiofilm and antibacterial lead compounds for targeting infections due to P. aeruginosa.

Data Availability

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


The authors acknowledge the support of the Swedish International Development Agency through the International Science Programmes (ISP) (ISP IPICS: ZIM01, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden). ISP IPICS: ZIM01 supported the research under the title “Biomolecular Interactions Analyses.” Support from the Alliance for Global Health and Science (University of California, Berkeley) and the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) is acknowledged. The authors are grateful to the National Botanical and Herbarium Garden for the identification of the plant.


  1. B. Aslam, W. Wang, M. I. Arshad et al., “Antibiotic resistance: a rundown of a global crisis,” Infection and Drug Resistance, vol. 11, pp. 1645–1658, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. D. Sharma, L. Misba, and A. U. Khan, “Antibiotics versus biofilm: an emerging battleground in microbial communities,” Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 76, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. P. M. Bales, E. M. Renke, S. L. May, Y. Shen, and D. C. Nelson, “Purification and characterization of biofilm-associated EPS exopolysaccharides from ESKAPE organisms and other pathogens,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 6, Article ID e67950, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. L. N. Silva, K. R. Zimmer, A. J. Macedo, and D. S. Trentin, “Plant natural products targeting bacterial virulence factors,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 116, no. 16, pp. 9162–9236, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. Revdiwala, B. M. Rajdev, and S. Mulla, “Characterization of bacterial etiologic agents of biofilm formation in medical devices in critical care setup,” Critical Care Research and Practice, vol. 12, Article ID e945805, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  6. L. K. Jennings, K. M. Storek, H. E. Ledvina et al., “Pel is a cationic exopolysaccharide that cross-links extracellular DNA in thePseudomonas aeruginosabiofilm matrix,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 112, no. 36, pp. 11353–11358, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. E. S. Gloag, L. Turnbull, A. Huang et al., “Self-organization of bacterial biofilms is facilitated by extracellular DNA,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 110, no. 28, pp. 11541–11546, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. H. Koo, R. N. Allan, R. P. Howlin et al., “Targeting microbial biofilms: current and prospective therapeutic strategies,” National Reviews of Microbiology, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 740–755, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  9. F. Chinemana, R. B. Drummond, S. Mavi, and I. De Zoysa, “Indigenous plant remedies in Zimbabwe,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 14, no. 2-3, pp. 159–172, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. D. G. Fowler, Traditional Fever Remedies: A List of Zambian Plants, 2006,
  11. M. Mombeshora and S. Mukanganyama, “Antibacterial activities, proposed mode of action and cytotoxicity of leaf extracts from Triumfetta welwitschii against Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 315, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Gelfand, S. Mavi, R. B. Drummond et al., The Traditional Medical Practitioner in Zimbabwe, Mambo Press, Gweru, Zimbabwe, 1985.
  13. L. Marime, T. Chimponda, E. Chirisa et al., “Antimycobacterial effects of Triumfetta welwitschii extracts on Mycobacterium Aurum and Mycobacterium Smegmatis,” Journal of Antimicrobials. Photon, vol. 129, pp. 319–332, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  14. B. Moyo and S. Mukanganyama, “Antiproliferative activity of T. Welwitschii extract on Jurkat T cells in vitro,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 817624, 10 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. K. Chandraman, “An updated review on ultra performance liquid chromatography,” Analytical Chemistry: An Indian Journal, vol. 16, pp. 1–9, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  16. K. A. Cooper, E. Campos-Giménez, D. Nagy, J. L. Donovan, and G. Williamson, “Rapid reversed phase ultra-performance liquid chromatography analysis of the major cocoa polyphenols and inter-relationships of their concentrations in chocolate,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 2841–2847, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. N. Yang, A. Xiong, R. Wang, L. Yang, and Z. Wang, “Quality evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine compounds in Xiaoyan Lidan tablets: fingerprint and quantitative analysis using UPLC-MS,” Molecules, vol. 21, no. 2, p. 83, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. N. E. Thomford, K. Dzobo, F. Adu, S. Chirikure, A. Wonkam, and C. Dandara, “Bush mint (Hyptis suaveolens) and spreading hogweed (Boerhavia diffusa) medicinal plant extracts differentially affect activities of CYP1A2, CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 enzymes,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 211, pp. 58–69, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. Z. Xin, S. Ma, D. Ren et al., “UPLC-orbitrap-MS/MS combined with chemometrics establishes variations in chemical components in green tea from Yunnan and Hunan origins,” Food Chemistry, vol. 266, pp. 534–544, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. I. M. Abu-Reidah, M. S. Ali-Shtayeh, R. M. Jamous, D. Arráez-Román, and A. Segura-Carretero, “HPLC-DAD-ESI-MS/MS screening of bioactive components from Rhus coriaria L. (Sumac) fruits,” Food Chemistry, vol. 166, pp. 179–191, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. Rao, A. B. Santhakumar, K. A. Chinkwo, and C. L. Blanchard, “Q-TOF LC/MS identification and UHPLC-online ABTS antioxidant activity guided mapping of barley polyphenols,” Food Chemistry, vol. 266, pp. 323–328, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. V. Kuete, F. Nana, B. Ngameni, A. T. Mbaveng, F. Keumedjio, and B. T. Ngadjui, “Antimicrobial activity of the crude extract, fractions and compounds from stem bark of Ficus ovata (Moraceae),” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 556–561, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. J. Eloff, “A sensitive and quick microplate method to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration of plant extracts for bacteria,” Planta Medica, vol. 64, no. 8, pp. 711–713, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. G. A. O’Toole, “Microtiter dish biofilm formation assay,” JoVE, vol. 47, pp. 1-2, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  25. H. Wu, C. Moser, H.-Z. Wang, N. Høiby, and Z.-J. Song, “Strategies for combating bacterial biofilm infections,” International Journal of Oral Science, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. T. Masuko, A. Minami, N. Iwasaki, T. Majima, S.-I. Nishimura, and Y. C. Lee, “Carbohydrate analysis by a phenol-sulfuric acid method in microplate format,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 339, no. 1, pp. 69–72, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. Chiba, S. Sugimoto, F. Sato, S. Hori, and Y. Mizunoe, “A refined technique for extraction of extracellular matrices from bacterial biofilms and its applicability,” Microbial Biotechnology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 392–403, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. W. A. Dengler, J. Schulte, D. P. Berger, R. Mertelsmann, and H. H. Fiebig, “Development of a propidium iodide fluorescence assay for proliferation and cytotoxicity assays,” Anti-Cancer Drugs, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 522–532, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S. Kumar and A. K. Pandey, “Chemistry and biological activities of flavonoids: an overview,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2013, Article ID 162750, 16 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. M. Isemura, “Catechin in human health and disease,” Molecules, vol. 24, pp. 1–5, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. M. Hirasawa, K. Takada, and S. Otake, “Inhibition of acid production in dental plaque bacteria by green tea catechins,” Caries Research, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 265–270, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. A. Shafaghat, F. Pirfarshi, and M. Shafaghatlonbar, “Luteolin derivatives and antimicrobial activity of Achillea tenuifolia Lam. methanol extract,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 62, pp. 533–536, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. O. Mazimba, “Umbelliferone: sources, chemistry and bioactivities review,” Bulletin of Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 223–232, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. A. R. Gohari, S. Saeidnia, K. Mollazadeh, N. Yassa, M. Malmir, and A. R. Shahverdi, “Isolation of a new quinic acid derivative and its antibacterial modulating activity,” Daru: Journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 69–73, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  35. A. F. Burlec, Ł. Pecio, C. Mircea et al., “Chemical profile and antioxidant activity of Zinnia elegans Jacq. fractions,” Molecules, vol. 24, no. 16, p. 2934, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. Materska, “Flavone C-glycosides from Capsicum annuum L.: relationships between antioxidant activity and lipophilicity,” European Food Research and Technology, vol. 240, no. 3, pp. 549–557, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. M. S. Aslam, M. S. Ahmad, and A. S. Mamat, “Pharmacological potential of vitexin,” Indian Research Journal of Pharmacy and Science, vol. 5, pp. 114–122, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  38. M. Smiljkovic, D. Stanisavljevic, D. Stojkovic et al., “Apigenin-7-O-glucoside versus apigenin: insight into the modes of anticandidal and cytotoxic actions,” EXCLI Journal, vol. 16, pp. 795–807, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. P. Zeng, Y. Zhang, C. Pan et al., “Advances in studying of the pharmacological activities and structure-activity relationships of natural C-glycosylflavonoids,” Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 154–162, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. N. Li, J.-Y. Zhang, K.-W. Zeng, L. Zhang, Y.-Y. Che, and P.-F. Tu, “Anti-inflammatory homoisoflavonoids from the tuberous roots of Ophiopogon japonicus,” Fitoterapia, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 1042–1045, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. S. B. Choi, J. D. Wha, and S. Park, “The insulin sensitizing effect of homoisoflavone-enriched fraction in Liriope platyphylla Wang et Tang via PI3-kinase pathway,” Life Sciences, vol. 75, no. 22, pp. 2653–2664, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. G. İşcan, F. Göger, B. Demirci et al., “Chemical composition and biological activity of Nepeta cilicica,” Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 12, pp. 204–209, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  43. H. Determann, Gel Chromatography Gel Filtration· Gel Permeation· Molecular Sieves: A Laboratory Handbook, Springer-Verlag New York Inc, New York, NY, USA, 2012.
  44. R. R. Chitte, S. L. Nagare, and P. K. Date, “Detection of phytoconstituents of medicinal plant Terminalia arjuna using chromatographic techniques,” Journal of Chromatography Separation Techniques, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1–8, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  45. Q. W. Zhang, L. G. Lin, and W. C. Ye, “Techniques for extraction and isolation of natural products: a comprehensive review,” Chinese Medicine, vol. 13, no. 20, pp. 20–26, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. V. C. Gala, N. R. John, and A. M. Bhagwat, “Attenuation of quorum sensing-regulated behaviour by Tinospora cordifolia extract and identification of its active constituents,” The Indian Journal of Medical Research, vol. 144, pp. 92–103, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  47. H. Miladi, T. Zmantar, B. Kouidhi et al., “Use of carvacrol, thymol, and eugenol for biofilm eradication and resistance modifying susceptibility of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium strains to Nalidixic acid,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 104, pp. 56–63, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. Jamal, W. Ahmad, S. Andleeb et al., “Bacterial biofilm and associated infections,” Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 7–11, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. A. Merghni, E. Noumi, O. Hadded et al., “Assessment of the antibiofilm and antiquorum sensing activities of Eucalyptus globulus essential oil and its main component 1,8-cineole against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 118, pp. 74–80, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. P. Sankar Ganesh and V. Ravishankar Rai, “Attenuation of quorum-sensing-dependent virulence factors and biofilm formation by medicinal plants against antibiotic resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 170–177, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. L. Lu, W. Hu, Z. Tian et al., “Developing natural products as potential anti-biofilm agents,” Chinese Medicine, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 11–17, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. T.-F. Mah, “Biofilm-specific antibiotic resistance,” Future Microbiology, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 1061–1072, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. S. K. Filoche, K. Soma, and C. H. Sissons, “Antimicrobial effects of essential oils in combination with chlorhexidine digluconate,” Oral Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 221–225, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. D. Lebeaux, J.-M. Ghigo, and C. Beloin, “Biofilm-related infections: bridging the gap between clinical management and fundamental aspects of recalcitrance toward antibiotics,” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 510–543, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. J. N. BeMiller, “Carbohydrate analysis: chapter 10,” in Food Analysis, S. S. Nielsen, Ed., Springer, NewYork, NY, USA, 4th edition, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  56. A. Rehman, W. M. Patrick, and I. L. Lamont, “Mechanisms of ciprofloxacin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: new approaches to an old problem,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. A. Soares, V. Roussel, M. Pestel-Caron et al., “Understanding ciprofloxacin failure in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm: persister cells survive matrix disruption,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 10, no. 2603, pp. 2603–2610, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. S. Otani, K. Hiramatsu, K. Hashinaga et al., “Sub-minimum inhibitory concentrations of ceftazidime inhibit Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation,” Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 428–433, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. A. Tahrioui, R. Duchesne, and E. Bouffartigues, “Extracellular DNA release, quorum sensing and PrrF1/F2 small RNAs are key players in Pseudomonas aeruginosa tobramycin-enhanced biofilm formation,” Biofilms and Microbes, vol. 15, pp. 1–11, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  60. G. Brackman, K. Breyne, R. Vermote et al., “The quorum sensing inhibitor hamamelitannin increases antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms by affecting peptidoglycan biosynthesis and eDNA release,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 20321, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. M. Allesen-Holm, K. B. Barken, L. Yang et al., “A characterization of DNA release in Pseudomonas aeruginosa cultures and biofilms,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 1114–1128, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Molly Mombeshora et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.