Generation of HIV-1 and Internal Control Transcripts as Standards for an In-House Quantitative Competitive RT-PCR Assay to Determine HIV-1 Viral Load

Armas Cayarga, Anny; Perea Hernández, Yenitse; González González, Yaimé J.; Dueñas Carrera, 
                            Santiago; González Pérez, Idania; Robaina Álvarez, René

doi:https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/964831

Biotechnology Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion Abbreviations Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2011 | Article ID 964831 | https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/964831

Generation of HIV-1 and Internal Control Transcripts as Standards for an In-House Quantitative Competitive RT-PCR Assay to Determine HIV-1 Viral Load

Anny Armas Cayarga,¹Yenitse Perea Hernández,¹Yaimé J. González González,¹ Santiago Dueñas Carrera,²Idania González Pérez,¹and René Robaina Álvarez¹

Academic Editor: Gabriel A. Monteiro

Received10 Jan 2011

Revised19 Apr 2011

Accepted27 Apr 2011

Published23 Jun 2011

Abstract

Human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) viral load is useful for monitoring disease progression in HIV-infected individuals. We generated RNA standards of HIV-1 and internal control (IC) by in vitro transcription and evaluated its performance in a quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assay. HIV-1 and IC standards were obtained at high RNA concentrations, without DNA contamination. When these transcripts were included as standards in a qRT-PCR assay, it was obtained a good accuracy ( log₁₀ unit of the expected results) in the quantification of the HIV-1 RNA international standard and controls. The lower limit detection achieved using these standards was 511.0 IU/mL. A high correlation () was obtained between the in-house qRT-PCR assay and the NucliSens easyQ HIV-1 test (bioMerieux) for HIV-1 RNA quantitation with clinical samples (). HIV-1 and IC RNA transcripts, generated in this study, proved to be useful as standards in an in-house qRT-PCR assay for determination of HIV-1 viral load.

1. Introduction

The quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) RNA is a crucial factor to help clinicians decide whether to stop or continue antiretroviral combinations after switching or starting antiretroviral drug therapy [1]. In addition, it is a useful biological marker to study HIV dynamics [2, 3], host/virus interaction, HIV evolution, and the progression of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) [4, 5].

There are three major methodologies available for viral load quantitation. The reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), the nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) and a signal amplification methodology termed branched-chain DNA (bDNA) technique [6]. In the past recent years there have been new reported viral load assays that have incorporated the real-time detection, such as the COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 test from Roche Diagnostics [7], which utilizes real-time PCR technology [8] and the NucliSens EasyQ HIV-1 from bioMerieux, which uses molecular beacon for the real-time detection [9]. In spite of the advantages that offer the use of the real-time PCR, which helps reducing the possibility of contamination, increasing the assay sensitivity, and improving the turnaround time [10], commercially available real-time PCR assays are just as expensive as the more standard nucleic acid viral load tests and also rely on expensive, often dedicated equipment, that can only be used for these assays [10, 11]. For this reason, inexpensive and technologically simpler assays are still needed in resource-limited countries, where the new technology and equipments are currently not available.

For the development of an in-house quantitative competitive RT-PCR assay (qRT-PCR) for the estimation of HIV-1 viral load, it is necessary to obtain an HIV-1 RNA external control (calibration curve) and an internal quantitation control (IC), which is added to the specimen at a known concentration before RNA extraction. The IC can be differentiated from the viral target sequences and serves to compensate for variability in RNA extraction and also to indicate substances in serum or plasma that may be inhibitory to PCR amplification [12].

Although chemical synthesis up to a length of about 80 nucleotides is possible, yields decrease rapidly and costs become prohibitive. A good alternative is to produce the RNA by in vitro transcription with T7 RNA polymerase [13]. RNA synthesis by in vitro transcription using phage T7 RNA polymerase allows preparation of milligram quantities of RNA for biochemical, biophysical, and structural investigations [14].

In this study, we generated RNA standards with HIV-1 and internal control sequences, using in vitro transcription method and evaluated its performance in a qRT-PCR for determining HIV-1 viral load.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. RNA Isolation

RNA was extracted from 200 μL of human serum or plasma by the guanidinium isothiocyanate-acid phenol method [17] with modifications [18]. The RNA pellets were resuspended in 20 μL of diethylpyrocarbonate- (DEPC-) treated water.

2.2. Amplification of HIV-1 RNA by RT-PCR

A fragment of 120 bp located in the 5′ LTR region of the HIV-1 genome was amplified from RNA isolated from an HIV-1 subtype-B-infected serum, by RT-PCR. The cDNA synthesis by RT and amplification by PCR were carried out in a single tube in a reaction mixture of 25 μL using 5 μL of the isolated RNA. The reaction contained 25 pmol of each of the primers HIV1-Q3 and HIV1-Biot-Q4 (Table 1) that correspond to the long terminal repeat (LTR) region of the HIV-1 genome, Go Taq buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl₂, 250 μM of each dNTPs, 3.6 u of AMV-RT, 9 u of RNasin ribonuclease inhibitor, and 1.05 u of Go Taq Flexi DNA polymerase (all from Promega, USA). The reaction was carried out in a thermocycler (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). The amplified product was checked by hybridization using a probe complementary to the amplified HIV-1 fragment (HIV1-S) (Table 1).

2.3. Amplification of the Internal Control (IC) Fragment

A fragment of 120 bp was amplified by PCR, from a plasmid that contained the sequence of the p-64K protein of Neisseria meningitidis, flanked by the sequences of binding to sense and antisense primers (HIV1-Q3 and HIV1-Biot-Q4, resp.). The PCR reaction was done using the same conditions described above and the primers IC-1 and IC-2 (Table 1).

2.4. Cloning of the Amplified HIV-1 and IC Fragments into the pGEM-T Vector

The amplified HIV-1 and IC fragments were gel-purified using the Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega, USA) and cloned into the pGEM-T vector following the manufacturer’s instructions (pGEM-T and pGEM-T Easy Vector Systems, Promega, USA). Escherichia coli XL-1 blue cells were transformed with the products of the ligation reactions and plated on Luria-Bertani- (LB-) ampicillin plate to select the transformed colonies. The plasmid DNA was isolated and purified from the colonies using the Wizard plus SV Minipreps DNA Purification System (Promega, USA), and PCR amplified to check the orientation of the cloned HIV-1 and IC fragments. The PCR reactions were performed using 25 pmol of the T7 Promoter primer from Promega, USA (Table 1) and 25 pmol of HIV1-Biot-Q4 primer. The correct orientation of the HIV-1 and IC fragments into the pGEM-T vector must generate a PCR band of 189 bp.

2.5. In Vitro Transcription

Two batches of the pGEM-HIV1 and pGEM-IC plasmids were linearized with Mlu1 enzyme (Promega, USA). The correspondent HIV-1 and IC RNAs were obtained from 1 μg of pGEM-HIV1 and pGEM-IC plasmids using 50 u of T7 RNA polymerase (Promega, USA) in presence of 0.75 mM of each rNTPs (Promega, USA), transcription buffer (Promega, USA) in a 50 μL reaction, according to the procedure optimized in our laboratory, described in [19]. After transcription, 2 or 4 u of RNase free DNase (Promega, USA) per 1 μg of template DNA, were added for 15 or 30 min at 37°C to degrade the contaminant DNA. Finally, the HIV-1 and IC transcripts were purified by phenol-chloroform extraction and were precipitated with 2.5 volumes of ethanol 95%. After RNA was washed and dried, it was dissolved in 50 μL of DEPC-treated water.

2.6. Evaluation of the HIV-1 and IC Transcripts

2.6.1. Determination of RNA Concentration by Optical Density Measuring

One aliquot of each purified HIV-1 and IC transcripts was diluted 1 : 20 or 1 : 35 with DEPC-treated water and quantitated by measuring the optical density (OD) at 260 nm using the spectrophotometer (GeneQuant II, Pharmacia, USA). The ratio of absorbance at 260 and 280 nm was also obtained for the purified transcripts.

2.6.2. Evaluation of the Quality of the HIV-1 and IC Transcripts by Determining the Presence of RNA and DNA Contamination

The purified HIV-1 and IC transcripts were diluted 1 : 4 in a lysis reagent for preservation at 4°C [20, 21]. For the evaluation of the quality of the HIV-1 and IC transcripts, they were 10-fold serially diluted in lysis reagent from 1 : 4 × 10³ to 1 : 4 × 10⁹. Isolation of RNA from lysis reagent was performed as described above. In this case, the lysis reagent containing the HIV-1 and IC transcripts was used in a volume of 500 μL per sample. To simulate the natural sample, in the case of transcripts diluted in lysis reagent, 200 μL of cryosupernatant negative for hepatitis C virus (HCV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and hepatitis B virus (HBV) were added to the mixture. The absence of plasmid template and the presence of RNA in the diluted HIV-1 and IC transcripts were verified through 50 cycles of PCR and RT-PCR, respectively, in mixes of 30 μL, employing HIV1-Q3 and HIV1-Biot-Q4 primers. Several negative and positive RT-PCR and PCR controls were tested. A HIV-, HCV- and HBV-negative cryosupernatant was used as a negative control of each assay. Positive HIV-1 RT-PCR control consisted on a positive HIV-1 plasma sample while the positive HIV-1 and IC PCR controls were the same plasmids used as templates in the in vitro transcription reactions. The amplified products were checked by hybridization using probes complementary to HIV-1 (HIV1-S) and IC (IC-S1) fragments (Table 1).

2.6.3. Determination of the Working Dilution of the IC Transcript in an In-House Quantitative Competitive RT-PCR Assay

The dilution required for the IC transcript to work optimally as a competitor was determined by titration versus HIV-1-positive human plasma calibration curves in a competitive RT-PCR assay described below. The calibration curve was obtained by diluting HIV-1-positive human plasma with high viral load, 10-fold from 10⁶ to 10² IU/mL. As internal control, we evaluated four dilutions of the IC transcript, using the lysis reagent as diluent (1 : 4 × 10⁴, 1 : 4 × 10⁵, 1 : 4 × 10⁶ and 1 : 4 × 10⁷). Two HIV-1 RNA concentrations of the WHO international standard (IS) 97/656 (NIBSC, South Mimms, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, UK) 10³ and 10⁴ IU/mL were evaluated in the same experiment. Previously, each vial of the international standard was reconstituted in 1 mL of ultrapure water as instructed by the NIBSC to yield a solution containing 10⁵ IU/mL of HIV-1 RNA. The determination coefficient , the curve slope () values, and the accuracy in the quantification of different HIV-1 RNA IS concentrations were taken into account to select the working dilution of the IC transcript.

2.6.4. Determination of the HIV-1 Transcript RNA Concentration

The RNA concentration of the HIV-1 transcript was determined through the qRT-PCR assay described below using a calibration curve built from the IS 97/650 (NIBSC, South Mimms, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, UK). Each vial of the international standard was reconstituted in 1 mL of ultrapure water as instructed by the NIBSC to yield a solution containing 363 078.05 IU/mL of HIV-1 RNA. It was diluted 10-fold to obtain the calibration curve (363.08 to 363 078.05 IU/mL). Isolation of RNA from IS or lysis reagent containing the HIV-1 transcript was performed as described above. The lysis reagent containing the IC transcript in its working dilution was used in a volume of 500 μL per sample. The HIV-1 transcript was 10-fold serially diluted from 1 : 4 × 10⁷ to 1 : 4 × 10¹¹ in order to quantify it, and the RNA concentration of the original HIV-1 transcript (IU/mL) was obtained by averaging each value multiplied by the dilution factor. HIV-1 transcript dilutions, where the value was out of the calibration curve range, were considered non quantifiable.

2.6.5. Evaluation of the HIV-1 and IC Transcripts as Standards in an In-House qRT-PCR Assay for Estimation of HIV-1 Viral Load

For standardization of the assay, the HIV-1 and IC transcripts were included as standards in an in-house quantitative competitive RT-PCR assay for estimation of HIV-1 viral load. The IC transcript is a 120-bp RNA fragment, which is similar to the HIV-1 target except for a short and unique internal sequence. This transcript is added to the specimen during sample preparation and is simultaneously amplified by PCR in a competitive reaction. The IC transcript was used into the lysis reagent in its working dilution. In order to build the calibration curve, dilutions of the HIV-1 transcript were made to give 10³, 10⁴, 10⁵, 10⁶, and 10⁷ IU/mL of HIV-1 RNA. The IS was evaluated pure, 1 : 10, and 1 : 100, and also two samples with very high viral load (HIV1-235 and HIV1-157), previously quantified by the NucliSens EasyQ HIV-1 v1.1 assay (bioMerieux, Boxtel, The Netherlands), were evaluated. Different parameters such as the determination of coefficient and the accuracy in the quantification of the HIV-1 RNA IS and the two reference samples were measured.

2.7. Description of the In-House qRT-PCR Assay

Following sample preparation and setup of the reaction mixture, reverse transcription and amplification of the target and the internal control were simultaneously performed in the same reaction tube. We added 5 μL of the isolated RNA to 25 μL of an RT-PCR reaction mixture that contained 50 pmol of the HIV1-Q3 and HIV1-Biot-Q4 primers, Go Taq buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl₂, 250 μM each dNTPs, 3.6 u of AMV-RT, 9 u of RNasin ribonuclease inhibitor, and 1.05 u of Go Taq Flexi DNA polymerase (all from Promega, USA). These reactions were carried out in a thermocycler (Eppendorf AG 22331, Hamburg, Germany) at 45°C for 30 min followed by 95°C for 3 min and 50 cycles at 95°C for 30 s, 58°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s. The hybridization and detection of the amplified products were done in the ultramicroenzyme-linked oligosorbent assay (UMELOSA) format [22]. It is a detection system similar to the one used by the Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor Test v1.5, from Roche Diagnostic Systems (Branchburg, NJ, USA) [23], but unlike the colorimetric reaction, we use a fluorescence reading. Following PCR amplification, the HIV-1 and IC amplicons were chemically denatured by the addition of denaturation solution. Aliquots were added, in duplicate, to separate wells of a microwell plate coated with HIV-1-specific (HIV1-S) an IC-specific (IC-S1) probes. HIV-1 and IC amplification products were bound to HIV-1 and IC wells, respectively, by hybridization to the microwell plate-bound probes. Following the hybridization reaction, the microwell plate was washed to remove unbound material and a streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase conjugate was added to each well of the plate. The conjugate bound to the biotin-labeled amplicon captured by the plate-bound probes. The plate was washed again to remove unbound conjugate, and a substrate 4-Methylumbelliferyl phosphate (4-MUP) was added to the wells. In the presence of this fluorescent substrate, the bound alkaline phosphatase catalyzes the hydrolysis of 4-MUP to produce a fluorescent signal that is detected by an automated microwell plate reader.

The calibration curve, made from HIV-1 reference sample, HIV-1 IS or HIV-1 transcript, was built by weighted linear regression (WLR) [24] from the common logarithms of theoretical viral loads (log₁₀VLt ) and ratios of HIV-1 and IC fluorescence signals (). HIV-1 RNA concentrations of transcripts and samples were estimated by interpolating in the calibration curve.

2.8. Determination of the In-House qRT-PCR Limit of Detection

The 95% detection limit (LoD) or the sensitivity of the in-house qRT-PCR assay was assessed on dilution series of a WHO IS 97/656 (NIBSC, South Mimms, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, UK). Each vial of the HIV-1 standard (subtype B) was reconstituted in 1 mL of ultrapure water as instructed by the NIBSC to yield a solution containing 100 000 IU/mL of HIV-1 RNA. It was further diluted in HIV-, HCV-, and HBV-negative plasma, resulting in the following concentrations: 50, 100, 250, 500, 1000, 2500, and 5000 IU/mL. The number of replicas tested varied from 5 to 15, and they were run in different days with different reagent lots and operators. A HIV-, HCV-, and HBV-negative cryosupernatant was included, as a negative control, in each run of the assay. We employed the same transcripts and assay conditions that were used in Section 2.6.5. A positive result was considered when the sample fluorescence value was three-fold the fluorescence value of the negative control. The LoD was estimated by Probit analysis [9, 11, 25, 26], using SPSS version 9.0.

2.9. Analysis of the Correlation between the In-House qRT-PCR and NucliSens EasyQ Assays

We analyzed the correlation between our in-house qRT-PCR assay and the commercial NucliSens EasyQ HIV-1 v1.1 assay (bioMerieux, Boxtel, The Netherlands) using linear regression analysis. The quantified values of 14 clinical plasma samples from antiretroviral drug-naïve and treatment-experienced patients were obtained from the “Pedro Kourí” Tropical Medicine Institute (Havana, Cuba), using the NucliSens EasyQ assay. We employed the same transcripts and assay conditions that were used in Section 2.6.5.

3. Results and Discussion

Because of HIV-1 variability, we selected and designed primers and probes for the in-house qRT-PCR assay that were based on a highly conserved LTR region of the HIV-1 genome. Instead of the gag gene, the use of the LTR region extends the spectrum of detectable and quantifiable genotypes beyond that of many current assays that are not accurate for testing “exotic” HIV-1 subtypes found mainly in developing countries [11].

To prevent PCR inhibition from interfering with accurate quantification, we designed a competitive internal control that used the same amplification primers as HIV-1 and was detected by a probe of different sequence composition.

We also optimized reaction chemistry to evaluate the RNA standards and to quantify the IS and HIV-1 samples.

The amplified HIV-1 and IC fragments were purified and cloned into the pGEM-T vector. The presence of each band in the T vector was checked by amplification using the HIV1-Q3 and HIV1-Biot-Q4 primers, and the fragment orientation was checked by amplification using the T7 Promoter and HIV1-Biot-Q4 primers. In both cases, we obtained the PCR band at the expected length, indicating the presence and the correct orientation of the HIV-1 and IC fragments into the pGEM-T vector.

The pGEM-HIV1 and pGEM-IC plasmids were in vitro transcribed, and the resultant HIV-1 and IC transcripts (T-HIV1 and T-IC, resp.) were purified. Before being diluted in the lysis reagent, an aliquot of the two batches of each transcript was diluted 1 : 20 or 1 : 35 and quantified by measuring the OD at 260 nm. RNA concentration in μg/mL was obtained (Table 2).

According to McKenna et al. [14], large-scale in vitro transcription of RNA yields varies with the transcript being produced. Expected yields should fall in the range of 200–1000 μg/mL [14]. In one in vitro reaction, ARN concentration was below the lower limit of the expected range because of some loss of sample occurring during the purification step of the T-IC second transcript. This issue has been described by McKenna et al. during the phenol/chloroform extraction of transcripts although they stated that this step is necessary because far greater loss is incurred if the extraction step is omitted [14]. Sample loss during RNA purification, which rather depends on the technical skills of the analyst, allows us to explain the big yield differences obtained among the same transcript batches. In some cases, we obtained RNA yields over the upper limit of the expected RNA concentration range (Table 2). The ratio of absorbance at 260 and 280 nm (the A260/280 ratio) is frequently used to assess the purity of RNA and DNA preparations. A low A260/280 ratio indicates contamination by proteins [27]. Data presented in Table 2 showed A260/280 ratios from 1.54 to 1.70. Similar results were obtained by Okamoto and Okabe [27] when they used DEPC-treated water to dissolve RNA for performing the spectrophotometric determinations. The authors stated that DEPC-treated water did not affect the absorbance at 260 nm but elevated that at 280 nm [27].

We also evaluated the quality of the HIV-1 and IC transcripts. Transcripts with the highest RNA concentration (T-IC-2^b and T-HIV1-2^b) were 10-fold serially diluted in lysis reagent from 1 : 4 × 10³ to 1 : 4 × 10⁹. These dilutions were subjected to RT-PCR to evaluate the presence of specific RNA and also subjected to direct PCR without RT in order to test the DNA contamination. Neither PCR signal was obtained for the IC transcript dilutions tested nor for the highest dilutions of the HIV-1 transcript. Specific RT-PCR signals were obtained for both transcripts (Table 3).

The use of RNA controls must be absolutely free of plasmid DNA carryover from the in vitro transcription reaction [28]. In this sense, Hazari et al. [28] developed and evaluated a competitive RT-PCR assay for HCV RNA in serum using transcribed thioRNA as internal control. This internal control RNA was tested for DNA contamination, and no signal was obtained using 1 μL of undiluted RNA, containing 10⁸ molecules/μL [28]. Westerman et al. [29] developed a quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for measuring a marker for small cell lung carcinoma. A standard curve was constructed from a complementary RNA (cRNA) of the Human achaete-scute homologue 1 (HASH1) protein that was obtained by in vitro transcription. The authors demonstrated that complete removal of contaminating plasmid was essential for accurate quantification, and this was achieved by overnight incubation with RQ1 DNase One during cRNA purification [29].

In order to develop an in-house qRT-PCR assay for HIV-1 RNA and taking into account the very high yields that are obtained in the in vitro transcription reactions [19], we used the dilutions of the transcript T-HIV1-2^b in which DNA signal was not obtained.

We determined the working dilution of the transcript T-IC-2^b which acts as internal control of an in-house qRT-PCR assay for HIV-1 RNA. Several 10-fold dilutions of positive HIV-1 human plasma were obtained for constructing a calibration curve (10² to 10⁶ IU/mL), and four dilutions of the transcript T-IC-2^b were evaluated.

As observed in Table 4, the dilution required for the IC transcript to work optimally was 1 : 4 × 10⁶, in which the and the curve slope reached the maximum value. In the selected IC working dilution, the qRT-PCR assay was able to quantify the two IS concentrations (10³ and 10⁴ IU/mL) accurately, with log₁₀ differences below ±0.5 log₁₀ of the expected units (Table 4). As discussed by some authors, a minimally significant change in plasma viremia is considered to be a three-fold or 0.5 log₁₀ increase or decrease [30–32].

HIV-1 transcript was quantified so as to introduce it as standard in the qRT-PCR assay. For this purpose, we used the IS 97/650 to obtain the calibration curve and the transcript T-IC-2^b in its working dilution. Transcript T-HIV1-2^b was 10-fold serially diluted from 1 : 4 × 10⁷ to 1 : 4 × 10¹¹ and quantified using the calibration curve showed in Figure 1.

The RNA concentration estimated for the transcript T-HIV1-2^b was similar to the ones obtained by González et al., in which the log₁₀ orders of estimated HCV RNA concentrations were higher than 11 for all transcripts they obtained [19]. In our study, we obtained HIV-1 RNA concentrations about 10¹⁴ IU/mL (Table 5), allowing us to use the HIV-1 transcript as standard for quantification purposes in calibration curves that commonly have maximal concentrations with log₁₀ orders between 5 and 9 [19, 29].

HIV-1 and IC transcripts were included as standards in an in-house qRT-PCR assay for estimating the HIV-1 viral load from plasma samples. The calibration curve was built from the HIV-1 transcript (T-HIV1-2^b), and the transcript (T-IC-2^b) in its working dilution was used as internal control. Different HIV-1 RNA concentration of the IS and two reference plasma samples with very high viral load were tested to evaluate the accuracy of the assay using these HIV-1 controls.

Figure 2 shows the calibration curve obtained with the inclusion of the HIV-1 and IC transcripts as standards. It was obtained a regression line with an . All results were found to be within ±0.5 log₁₀ unit of the expected results (Table 6), which is considered not significant for the quantification assay employed [30–32]. Similar results were obtained by Muller et al., who evaluated five HIV-1 controls from 10² to 5 × 10⁴ copies/mL using a quantitative Abbott LCx HIV RNA assay, and all results were found to be within ±0.32 log₁₀ unit of the expected results [31]. In order to consider if a biological change in the viral load is significant or not, we show here the intra- and inter-assay variability of the assay using three serum samples with different viral load values. These samples were repeated 24 times in this precision study. Precision is defined as the standard deviation of the log-transformed values [9]. In our study, intra-assay precision was 0.3, 0.09, and 0.03 log units at concentrations 2.7 × 10³, 2.6 × 10⁴, and 2.0 × 10⁵ IU/mL, respectively. Interassay precision was 0.43, 0.32, and 0.23 log units at concentrations 2.7 × 10³, 2.6 × 10⁴, and 2.0 × 10⁵ IU/mL, respectively. The intra-assay variability reported here was in the range of that obtained for three commercially available HIV-1 viral load assays, with reported values from 0.12 to 0.33 logs [23]. De Mendoza et al. (2005) also reported intra-assay precision values of approximately 0.17 log units at HIV-1 RNA concentrations above 1000 IU/mL, and 0.26 log units for values lower than 1 000 IU/mL when they evaluated the NucliSens EasyQ HIV-1 v1.1 assay [9].

The percentage of positive results corresponding to each HIV-1 RNA concentration tested by the in-house qRT-PCR assay is shown in Table 7. Using Probit analysis, the concentration of HIV-1 RNA with 95% detection was estimated to be 511.0 IU/mL (95% confidence interval, 433.4–588.6 IU/mL). The LoD for the Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor test v1.5 (Roche Diagnostic Systems, Branchburg, NJ, USA) using the standard specimen preparation procedure was 200 copies/mL [33] or 312.5 IU/mL if we take into account the Roche conversion factor, 0.64 [34]. This Roche test is based on a similar assay methodology to that of our in-house qRT-PCR assay.

The sensitivity obtained for our in-house qRT-PCR assay was similar to the one obtained with the NucliSens EasyQ HIV-1 (500.0 IU/mL) using 0.2 mL of input sample volume [10, 32].

The analysis of correlation between our in-house qRT-PCR assay and the NucliSens EasyQ HIV-1 test is shown in Figure 3. The correlation between the two assays was high (). A similar correlation coefficient () was obtained by Choi et al., who compared the NucliSens EasyQ HIV-1 v1.1 (bioMerieux) and RealTime HIV-1 (Abbott) kits [1]. The correlation coefficient of the NucliSens EasyQ HIV-1 kit with the Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor v1.5 (Roche Diagnostic Systems, Branchburg, NJ, USA) test, which is based on traditional PCR method instead of real-time PCR, was 0.87 [9].

A high correlation between different assays is important because the data on HIV-1 RNA quantitation are collected from various laboratories using different kinds of assay kits nationwide [1]. However, it has been recommended using the same method and also possibly the same laboratory to monitor patients [35].

Human plasma or serum samples can be indistinctly used in our in-house qRT-PCR assay because they were both evaluated, and no significant viral load differences were found between them (data not shown).

It was observed a good linear behavior along the calibration curve built with the transcripts, which reached maximum HIV-1 RNA concentration near 10⁷ IU/mL or 7 log₁₀ (Figure 2). As discussed by Yao et al., the ability to quantify HIV-1 RNA over a 5 log₁₀ is important in this kind of assays that are used to evaluate a variety of patient populations with a wide range of viral loads. This is an important asset when a normal clinical laboratory test run includes samples from newly diagnosed untreated patients, who generally have a higher viral load than chronic HIV-1 infected adults. This feature also eliminates the need for reflex repeat testing, improves turnaround time for results, and is associated with significant savings in both technical time and reagent costs [32].

In summary, the HIV-1 and IC transcripts were obtained with the required quality to be used as standards for quantification purposes, considering also the advantage of their long-term stability when stored in the lysis reagent [20, 21]. It was obtained a high correlation between our assay and a commercial one. On the other hand, one of the major benefits of our method is cost reduction. Commercially assays are currently offered, even in developing countries, at prices of approximately US $50–$100 per test [10, 11]. For our in-house HIV-1 viral load assay, the net price would be reduced considerably.

Abbreviations

RNA:	Ribonucleic acid
DNA:	Desoxyribonucleic acid
cDNA:	Complementary DNA
RT:	Reverse transcription
PCR:	Polymerase chain reaction
RT-PCR:	Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
qRT-PCR:	Quantitative competitive RT-PCR
IC:	Internal control
HCV:	Hepatitis C virus
HBV:	Hepatitis B virus
HIV-1:	Human immunodeficiency virus type-1
Bp:	Base pairs
WLR:	Weighted linear regression
dNTP:	Desoxribonucleotides
rNTP:	Ribonucleotides
WHO:	World Health Organization
IS:	WHO international standard
DEPC:	Diethylpyrocarbonate
LTR:	Long terminal repeat
OD:	Optical density
:	Determination coefficient
:	Curve slope
NIBSC:	National Institute for Biological Standards and Control
VLt:	Theoretical viral load
VLe:	Estimated viral load
:	Ratio of HIV-1 and IC fluorescence signals
log₁₀ VLt:	Common logarithm of VLt
:	Common logarithm of the ratio of HIV-1 and IC fluorescence signals
FU:	Fluorescent units
AU:	Absorbance units
SD:	Standard deviation
LoD:	95% detection limit.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Jorge Pérez Ávila., from the “Pedro Kourí” Tropical Medicine Institute (Havana, Cuba) for supplying the clinical samples that were quantified with the commercial NucliSens EasyQ HIV-1 v1.1 assay (bioMerieux) in such institute. They also thank Ricardo Silva Rodríguez. (Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Havana, Cuba) for his valuable help in revising the English paper.

References

J. Y. Choi, E. J. Kim, H. J. Rho et al., “Evaluation of the NucliSens EasyQ HIV-1 v1.1 and RealTime HIV-1 kits for quantitation of HIV-1 RNA in plasma,” Journal of Virological Methods, vol. 161, no. 1, pp. 7–11, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. D. Ho, “Dynamics of HIV-1 replication in vivo,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 99, no. 11, pp. 2565–2567, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
V. Simon and D. D. Ho, “HIV-1 dynamics in vivo: implications for therapy,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 181–190, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
D. V. Havlir and D. D. Richman, “Viral dynamics of HIV: implications for drug development and therapeutic strategies,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 124, no. 11, pp. 984–994, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
M. E. Quiñones-Mateu and E. J. Arts, “Fitness of drug resistant HIV-1: methodology and clinical implications,” Drug Resistance Updates, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 224–233, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. B. Peter and J. S. Sevall, “Molecular-based methods for quantifying HIV viral load,” AIDS Patient Care and STDs, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 75–79, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Katsoulidou, M. Petrodaskalaki, V. Sypsa et al., “Evaluation of the clinical sensitivity for the quantification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA in plasma: comparison of the new COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 with three current HIV-RNA assays—LCx HIV RNA quantitative, VERSANT HIV-1 RNA 3.0 (bDNA) and COBAS AMPLICOR HIV-1 Monitor v1.5,” Journal of Virological Methods, vol. 131, no. 2, pp. 168–174, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Heid, J. Stevens, K. J. Livak, and P. M. Williams, “Real time quantitative PCR,” Genome Research, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 986–994, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
C. De Mendoza, M. Koppelman, B. Montès et al., “Multicenter evaluation of the NucliSens EasyQ HIV-1 v1.1 assay for the quantitative detection of HIV-1 RNA in plasma,” Journal of Virological Methods, vol. 127, no. 1, pp. 54–59, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Fiscus, B. Cheng, S. M. Crowe et al., “HIV-1 viral load assays for resource-limited settings,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 1743–1750, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Drosten, M. Panning, J. F. Drexler et al., “Ultrasensitive monitoring of HIV-1 viral load by a low-cost real-time reverse transcription-PCR assay with internal control for the 5′ long terminal repeat domain,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 1258–1266, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Telenti, P. Imboden, and D. Germann, “Competitive polymerase chain reaction using an internal standard: application to the quantitation of viral DNA,” Journal of Virological Methods, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 259–268, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Gallo, M. Furler, and R. Sigel, “In vitro transcription and purification of RNAs of different size,” Chimia, vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 812–816, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. McKenna, I. Kim, E. V. Puglisi et al., “Purification and characterization of transcribed RNAs using gel filtration chromatography,” Nature Protocols, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 3270–3277, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. P. De Baar, M. W. Van Dooren, E. De Rooij et al., “Single rapid real-time monitored isothermal RNA amplification assay for quantification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates from groups M, N, and O,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1378–1384, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
“pGEM^®-T y pGEM^®-T Easy Vectors Systems,” Technical Manual, Promega, Madison, Wis, USA, 2007, http://www.promega.com.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Chomczynski, “A reagent for the single-step simultaneous isolation of RNA, DNA and proteins from cell and tissue samples,” BioTechniques, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 532–535, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
I. González, A. Armas, I. García, and Y. González, “Homemade viral RNA isolation protocol using silica columns: a comparison of four protocols,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 360, no. 1, pp. 148–150, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. González, I. García, A. Armas et al., “Scaling up in vitro transcription synthesis of RNA standards for competitive quantitative RT-PCR: looking for bigger yields,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 385, no. 1, pp. 179–181, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. González, A. Armas, I. García et al., “Composición estabilizadora de ácidos nucleicos para su conservación a 4 ºC por períodos prolongados,” Cuban patent application 23588, September 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
I. González, A. Armas, Y. Perea et al., “Long-term conservation of HCV RNA at 4 ºC using a new RNA stabilizing solution,” Journal of Virological Methods, vol. 168, no. 1-2, pp. 207–211, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. González, Y. J. González, A. Armas et al., “Validation of a nested PCR assay UMELOSA HCV CUALITATIVO for the detection of hepatitis C virus,” Biologicals, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 55–61, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Schmitt, “Performance characteristics of quantification assays for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA,” Journal of Clinical Virology, vol. 20, no. 1-2, pp. 31–33, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D.C. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments, John Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 1991.
A. M. Caliendo, J. Ingersoll, A. M. Green, F. S. Nolte, and K. A. Easley, “Comparison of the sensitivities and viral load values of the AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR version 1.0 and 1.5 tests,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 5392–5393, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. José, R. Gajardo, and J. I. Jorquera, “Stability of HCV, HIV-1 and HBV nucleic acids in plasma samples under long-term storage,” Biologicals, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 9–16, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Okamoto and S. Okabe, “Ultraviolet absorbance at 260 and 280 nm in RNA measurement is dependent on measurement solution,” International Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 657–659, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Hazari, S. K. Acharya, and S. K. Panda, “Development and evaluation of a quantitative competitive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for hepatitis C virus RNA in serum using transcribed thio-RNA as internal control,” Journal of Virological Methods, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 45–54, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. A. Westerman, S. Neijenhuis, A. Poutsma et al., “Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction measurement of HASH1 (ASCL1), a marker for small cell lung carcinomas with neuroendocrine features,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1082–1086, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
C. A. Gleaves, J. Welle, M. Campbell et al., “Multicenter evaluation of the Bayer VERSANT™ HIV-1 RNA 3.0 assay: analytical and clinical performance,” Journal of Clinical Virology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 205–216, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Muller, E. Stelzl, M. Bozic, J. Haas, E. Marth, and H. H. Kessler, “Evaluation of automated sample preparation and quantitative PCR LCx assay for determination of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1439–1443, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Yao, Z. Liu, L. S. Ko, G. Pan, and Y. Jiang, “Quantitative detection of HIV-1 RNA using NucliSens EasyQ HIV-1 assay,” Journal of Virological Methods, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 40–46, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Triques, J. Coste, J. L. Perret et al., “Efficiencies of four versions of the AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR Test for quantification of different subtypes of human immunodeficiency virus type 1,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 110–116, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Palla, M. L. Vatteroni, L. Vacri, F. Maggi, and U. Baicchi, “HIV-1 NAT minipool during the pre-seroconversion window period: detection of a repeat blood donor,” Vox Sanguinis, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 59–62, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Hammer, J. J. Eron, P. Reiss Jr. et al., “Antiretroviral treatment of adult HIV infection: 2008 recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA panel,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 300, no. 5, pp. 555–570, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2011 Anny Armas Cayarga et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

3293

Downloads

1181

Citations