Biotechnology Research International

Biotechnology Research International / 2011 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2011 |Article ID 967925 |

Chimezie Jason Ogugbue, Thomas Sawidis, "Bioremediation and Detoxification of Synthetic Wastewater Containing Triarylmethane Dyes by Aeromonas hydrophila Isolated from Industrial Effluent", Biotechnology Research International, vol. 2011, Article ID 967925, 11 pages, 2011.

Bioremediation and Detoxification of Synthetic Wastewater Containing Triarylmethane Dyes by Aeromonas hydrophila Isolated from Industrial Effluent

Academic Editor: Yu Hong Wei
Received03 Feb 2011
Revised23 May 2011
Accepted24 May 2011
Published25 Jul 2011


Economical and bio-friendly approaches are needed to remediate dye-contaminated wastewater from various industries. In this study, a novel bacterial strain capable of decolorizing triarylmethane dyes was isolated from a textile wastewater treatment plant in Greece. The bacterial isolate was identified as Aeromonas hydrophila and was shown to decolorize three triarylmethane dyes tested within 24 h with color removal in the range of 72% to 96%. Decolorization efficiency of the bacterium was a function of operational parameters (aeration, dye concentration, temperature, and pH) and the optimal operational conditions obtained for decolorization of the dyes were: pH 7-8, 35C and culture agitation. Effective color removal within 24 h was obtained at a maximum dye concentration of 50 mg/L. Dye decolorization was monitored using a scanning UV/visible spectrophotometer which indicated that decolorization was due to the degradation of dyes into non-colored intermediates. Phytotoxicity studies carried out using Triticum aestivum, Hordeum vulgare, and Lens esculenta revealed the triarylmethane dyes exerted toxic effects on plant growth parameters monitored. However, significant reduction in toxicity was obtained with the decolorized dye metabolites thus, indicating the detoxification of the dyes following degradation by Aeromonas hydrophila.

1. Introduction

Worldwide, dye wastewater has become one of the main sources of severe pollution problems due to the greater demand for textile products and the proportional increase in production and applications of synthetic dyes [1]. It is estimated that over 10,000 different dyes and pigments are used industrially and over 0.7 million tons of synthetic dyes are produced annually worldwide [2]. In the textile industry, up to 200,000 tons of these dyes are lost to effluents every year during dyeing and finishing operations as a result of inefficiency in the dyeing process [3, 4]. Unfortunately, most of these dyes escape conventional wastewater treatment processes and persist in the environment as a result of their high stability against light, temperature, water, detergents, chemicals, and microbial attack [5]. Notwithstanding, industries are required to eliminate color from their effluents containing dyes, before disposal into water bodies, due to environmental legislation [6].

Among the many different groups of synthetic dyes, triarylmethane (also called triphenylmethane) dyes are one of the most commonly used in the textile industries. Their usage constitutes about 30%–40% of the total consumption of dyes [7], and they are applied extensively on nylon, cotton, wool, and silk. They are also used for coloring food, oils, fats, waxes, varnishes, cosmetics, paper, leather, and plastics [8] as well as for staining specimens in bacteriological and histopathological processes. With dye tinctorial value usually high, less than 1 ppm of dye in water produces obvious coloration [9], and the extensive use of these dyes have resulted in highly colored effluents that may affect gas solubility in water bodies [10] and significantly decrease photosynthetic activity in aquatic life because of reduced light penetration. In addition to their visual effect, triarylmethane dyes are generally believed to be toxic and carcinogenic or prepared from other known carcinogens [11, 12]. Several reports have also shown that textile dyes and effluents have toxic effects on plants which perform important ecological functions such as providing a habitat for wildlife, protecting soil from erosion, and providing the organic matter that is so significant to soil fertility [13]. Consequently, it is pertinent to develop efficient treatment strategies for removal of color from dye wastewater.

Various physicochemical methods, such as adsorption on activated carbon, electrocoagulation, flocculation, froth flotation, ion exchange, membrane filtration, ozonation, and reverse osmosis have been used for decolorization of dyes in wastewater [2, 14]. However, these methods are less efficient, costly, of limited applicability, and produce wastes, which are difficult to dispose of [15]. On the contrary, biological processes provide a low-cost, environmentally benign, and efficient alternative for the treatment of dye wastewater [16].

Decolorization by biological means may take place in two ways: either by adsorption (or biosorption) on the microbial biomass or biodegradation by the cells [17]. Biosorption involves the entrapment of dyes in the matrix of the adsorbent (microbial biomass) without destruction of the pollutant, whereas in biodegradation, the original dye structure is fragmented into smaller compounds resulting in the decolorization of synthetic dyes. Several researchers have described the use of microorganisms as biosorption agents in the removal of pollutants from wastewater [1820]. However, due to operational ease and facile adaptability of microorganisms to a given set of conditions, the biodegradation mechanism is considered efficacious in comparison to biosorption for treatment of dye wastewater [21]. Over the past few decades, numerous microorganisms have been isolated and characterized for degradation of various synthetic dyes, but most of the reports have dealt mainly with decolorization of azo dyes [2224]. There is a dearth of information regarding the degradation and detoxification of triarylmethane dyes by microbial systems despite their increased use by the textile industry. Hence, the isolation of potent species that have the capability for degradation and detoxification of triarylmethane dyes is of interest in the biotechnological aspect of dye effluent treatment.

In this study, a bacterial strain, Aeromonas hydrophila, capable of decolorizing triarylmethane dyes was isolated from textile industrial wastewater using the selective enrichment method. The effects of various parameters (such as culture agitation, initial dye concentration, pH, and temperature) on dye decolorization by the bacterial strain were investigated and the toxicity of the products formed after decolorization was determined using plant assay.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

The triarylmethane dyes (Basic violet 14, Basic violet 3, and Acid blue 90) used in this study were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, Mo, USA). The chemical structures and characteristics of the dyes used are depicted in Table 1. The stock solutions of each dye were prepared by membrane filtration. All other chemicals used were of analytical grade.

NameColor index no.StructureMolecular weight (nm)

Basic violet 1442510967925.table.001a337.85546
Basic violet 342555967925.table.001b408.0593
Acid blue 9042655967925.table.001c854.02554

2.2. Bacteria and Growth Medium

The bacterial strain used was isolated from dye wastewater obtained from Textile of Thessaloniki, SA, Greece. The principle of sequential selective enrichment batch culture for selection of dye decolorizing bacteria was employed in synthetic wastewater medium (SWM) with Basic Violet 3 as the carbon source. The basic composition of the synthetic wastewater medium was (g/L); (NH4)2SO4 0.28, NH4Cl 0.23, KH2PO4 0.067, MgSO47H2O 0.04, CaCl22H2O 0.022, FeCl36H2O 0.005, NaCl 0.15, NaHCO3 1.0, and 1 mL/L of a trace element solution containing (g/L); ZnSO47H2O 0.01, MnCl24H2O 0.1, CuSO45H2O 0.392, CoCl26H2O 0.248, NaB4O710H2O 0.177, and NiCl26H2O 0.02. The textile wastewater used for isolation of dye-decolorizing bacteria was acclimatized for 8 weeks prior to transfer into 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 100 mL SWM. After incubation of the flasks, a mixed culture that showed quick and stable decolorization activity was transferred to newly prepared SWM. After five successive transfers, it was plated on SWM agar containing 20 mg/L of each dye and incubated at 30°C for 5 days. Bacterial colonies around which clear zones expanded quickly were picked for further studies and designated as TTW 1–5. To check for the dye-degrading potential of each bacterial isolate, preliminary batch experiments were carried out using sterile 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 100 mL of SWM spiked with dye, after which the solution was inoculated with freshly grown bacterial cells. The final pH was 7.2. The bacterial isolate that showed the highest ability to degrade the triarylmethane dyes was selected and used for subsequent investigations. The selected bacterium (TTW 4) was characterized and identified as Aeromonas hydrophila using Gram stain, spore test, motility test, and a battery of biochemical and physiological tests (Table 2) as described by Vanderzannt and Splittstoesser [25] and Cheesbrough [26] and with reference to the Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology [27].

TestAeromonas hydrophila

Cellular morphology
 Gram reactionGram negative
 Presence of endospore
Physiological tests
 Growth at 25–43°C+
 Growth at pH 4–10+
 Salt tolerance4%
Biochemical tests
 Methy red
 Voges proskauer+
 Citrate utilization+
 Hydrolysis of:
 Gas from glucose+
 Hydrogen sulphide production+
 Acid from

Abbreviations: ONPG, o-nitrophenyl: D-galactopyranoside; VP, Voges-Proskauer; LDC, lysine decarboxylase; ODC, ornithine decarboxylase; ADH, arginine dihydrolase; PPA, phenylpyruvic acid (phenylalanine deaminase).
2.3. Batch Decolorization Operation

The decolorization of the triarylmethane dyes was studied in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 100 mL of SWM and bacterial biomass in a batch mode. Each flask was inoculated with 2 mL of freshly grown Aeromonas hydrophila. The inoculum size was adjusted at optical density 1.0 at λ = 620 nm (1.50 × 107 cells/mL) and incubated under shaking (150 rpm) and static conditions at 30°C. To evaluate the effects of other operational factors on the efficiency of color removal, the batch decolorization experiments were carried out at different initial dye concentrations (1–100 mg/L), temperatures (15°C–45°C) and initial pH (4–10) under shaking incubation condition. Thereafter, optimal conditions of 35°C and pH 7 and initial dye concentration of 50 mg/L were used in subsequent experiments under shaking condition. Three types of control were used: uninoculated sterile control, heat-killed control, and sodium azide (0.1% w/v) amended control. The first indicated the effect of medium components on decolorization, and the latter two showed adsorption of dyes on cells. After incubation, aliquots (5 mL) were taken and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 15 min to separate the bacterial cell mass and obtain a clear supernatant, which was used to measure the absorbance of culture samples at the maximum absorption wavelength () of the respective dyes using a scanning spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-2401 PC model Kyoto, Japan). Residual dye concentration of samples was then obtained from a calibration curve of dye concentration versus absorbance prepared for each dye. Decolorization activity was determined by using adsorption (A) and dye removal by living biomass (R) which were calculated according to the following formulae [28]: where C0—the concentration (mg/L) of dye in control sample, C1—the residual concentration (mg/L) of dye in culture samples with killed or sodium azide treated cells, C1L—the residual concentration (mg/L) of dye in samples with living biomass. Enumeration of bacterial counts in culture flasks was carried out on plate count agar (Merck) after 10-fold serial dilution of culture samples using the spread-plate method. Viable cell counts obtained after incubation for 24 h at 35°C were expressed as colony-forming units per mL (CFU/mL).

2.4. Toxicity Study

Phytotoxicity studies were carried out with 50 mg/L of each dye and its extracted metabolites using seeds of Triticum aestivum, Hordeum vulgare and Lens esculenta with SWM as control. The degradation metabolites of each dye extracted in ethyl acetate were dried and dissolved in water to form the final concentration of 50 mg/L for phytotoxicity studies [12]. The seeds were surface sterilized with 1.2% sodium hypochloride solution to discourage fungal growth. Fifteen seeds of each plant species were placed in each Petri dish in sets and watered separately with 5 mL samples of each dye and its degradation product per day. The Petri dishes were kept in the dark and observed for germination. Seeds with radicle (>1 mm) were considered germinated [29]. The germinated seeds were then exposed to day and night cycle length of 10/14 h, respectively, with a temperature regime of about 28 ± 2°C. The length of plumule (shoot) and radicle (root), and the germination rate (%) were recorded after 7 days.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Data presented are means of three replicates (±SE) obtained from three independent experiments. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), with the Dunett post hoc test to check for interactive effects between factors [30]. The significance level was set at 5%.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Isolation of Dye-Degrading Bacteria

Five bacterial isolates that exhibited dye decolorization potentials on SWM agar spiked with Basic violet 3 were picked and screened for their ability to degrade three triarylmethane dyes (Basic violet 14, Basic violet 3 and Acid blue 90). The bacterial isolates decolorized the three dyes albeit to varying degrees (Table 3) within 24 h, and further decolorization of the dyes by the isolates was obtained after 36 h. The variation in decolorization efficiency of the isolates may be attributed to differences in the chemical structure of the dyes [10] and the varying metabolic functions of the different bacterial isolates. Decolorization of the dyes by the isolates was found to be due to degradation to a greater extent than adsorption as % adsorption obtained were quite low compared to % dye reduction by viable cells. Isolate TTW 4 did not show any evidence of adsorption after 24 h. Adsorption and/or degradation are the two mechanisms responsible for dye decolorization by microorganisms. Dye adsorption may be evident from inspection of the bacterial growth as those adsorbing dyes will be deeply colored, whereas those causing degradation will remain colorless. While the isolate TTW 4 cells cultured for 8 h with the dyes were colored, none of the cells was colored with any one of the dyes tested after incubation and decolorization for 24 h. Decolorization assay of a butanol extract of the cell pellets after incubation for 24 h with the dyes showed that the dyes were not adsorbed to the cell (data not shown). This indicates that decolorization of the dyes was mainly due to degradation rather than adsorption to cells. The deeply colored cell mats after 8 h may be explained by the fact that adsorption is frequently the first step of the biodegradation process before transportation of dye into the cytoplasm and its eventual breakdown by viable microbial cells. However, adsorption levels most times are an indication of biotransformation efficiency or its absence as rapid dye biodegraders rarely show high adsorption rates upon decolorization and incubation for an extended time period. In another experiment carried out using viable, autoclaved (killed), and metabolically poisoned cells of isolate TTW 4, dye decolorization was below 4.5% for the killed and poisoned cells while the viable cells exhibited color removal ranging from 54%–78% (Table 4). Hence, color removal exhibited by viable cells was attributed to the biotransformation of these dyes by the metabolic functions of the bacterium. Prior to now, various authors [31, 32] had reported the isolation of a gene (tmr) encoding the enzyme, triphenylmethane reductase (TpmD), from bacteria, and we believe that this enzyme may be responsible for the bioconversion of the dyes tested. The visual change in biomass color of the killed and poisoned cells and their resuspension in methanol showed that the slight decolorization of their culture medium observed was due to adsorption of dyes on bacterial cells. Decolorization (adsorption) by dead cells may be due to the increase of the cell wall area that ruptured during autoclaving and may also be attributed to the revealing of special sites on cell walls [33]. Based on results, isolate TTW 4 which was identified as Aeromonas hydrophila was selected as having the best dye decolorization potential, since it showed little or no sorption of the three dyes and exhibited rapid decolorization of dyes within 24 h. TTW 4 was, thus, considered a good candidate for effective biological treatment of textile wastewater and used for further studies.

IsolateBasic violet 14Basic violet 3Acid blue 90
Decolorization due to reduction (%)Decolorization due to adsorption (%)Decolorization due to reduction (%)Decolorization due to adsorption (%)Decolorization due to reduction (%)Decolorization due to adsorption (%)

TTW 174.0 ± 0.52.5 ± 0.845.0 ± 0.86.8 ± 0.830.2 ± 0.56.2 ± 0.2
TTW 252.2 ± 0.86.0 ± 1.240.5 ± 0.26.4 ± 1.435.0 ± 0.95.8 ± 0.8
TTW 365.5 ± 0.33.5 ± 0.652.0 ± 1.47.6 ± 0.833.8 ± 0.73.5 ± 0.7
TTW 490.4 ± 0.5ND78.6 ± 0.50.8 ± 0.282.6 ± 0.5ND
TTW 548.8 ± 0.75.8 ± 0.734.7 ± 0.67.8 ± 0.525.0 ± 0.37.3 ± 0.3

Values are means of triplicate determinations. ND—not detected.

Dye used% Dye decolorization
ControlInoculated IInoculated IIInoculated III
(uninoculated)(Killed cells)(sodium azide treated)(viable cells)

Basic violet 14ND3.1 ± 0.252.5 ± 0.1578 ± 2.5
Basic violet 3ND3.4 ± 0.183.5 ± 0.2870 ± 2.0
Acid blue 90ND4.5 ± 0.404.0 ± 0.3754 ± 3.0

Values are means of triplicate determinations. ND—not detected.
3.2. Effect of Agitation on Decolorization

The isolate, A. hydrophila, exhibited effective color removal activity only when incubated under shaking condition, whereas poor decolorization (<30%) for the three dyes was obtained under static condition (Figure 1). Under agitated condition, decolorization percentages of dyes were 90%, 75%, and 66% for Basic violet 14, Basic violet 3, and Acid blue 90, respectively, within 24 h of incubation. Incubation under agitated condition was also necessary for better cell growth in contrast to incubation under static condition (data not shown). Poor decolorization of the dyes obtained under static condition could be attributed to the limitation of oxygen needed for the oxidative breakdown of the triarylmethane moiety, since enhanced decolorization was obtained when static cultures were subsequently incubated under agitated condition. A. hydrophila also exhibited maximum decolorization of dyes when 0.02% (w/v) yeast extract, starch or other carbon sources were supplemented in the medium (data not shown). In absence of a cosubstrate, the bacterial culture showed reduced decolorization rates which suggested that the availability of a supplementary carbon source probably for generation of NADH molecules seems to be necessary for growth and decolorization of dyes. A previous report [34] had shown that both NADH/NADPH and molecular oxygen are necessary for the enzyme TpmD to decolorize triphenylmethane dyes which indicated that the enzyme is an NADH/NADPH-dependent oxygenase. Textile industrial wastewaters usually contain sizing agents such as starch, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and carboxymethyl cellulose added during sizing to provide strength to the fibers and minimize breakage [1], and these substances may serve as cosubstrates for bacteria during effluent treatment for the generation of NADH molecules.

3.3. Effect of Initial Dye Concentration on Decolorization

The decolorization of dyes was studied at various increasing initial concentrations of each dye (1–100 mg/L). Results obtained show complete decolorization of dyes at initial concentrations between 1 and 20 mg/L within 24 h (Figure 2). However, decrease in % decolorization with increase in dye concentration was obtained at concentrations above 20 mg/L. Decolorization percentages of 90, 78, and 65 were obtained for Basic violet 14, Basic violet 3, and Acid blue 90, respectively, at 50 mg/L initial dye concentration, and this indicates that an acceptable high color removal can be achieved with A. hydrophila in culture broths with dye concentrations below 50 mg/L. For industrial applications, it is important to know whether the microorganisms that decolorize dyes can bear high concentrations of the compound since the dye concentration in a typical industrial effluent can vary between 10 and 50 mg/L [35]. A. hydrophila could decolorize the dyes at concentrations higher than those reported in waste waters and thus, it can be successfully exploited for treatment of dye bearing industrial waste waters. Zablocka-Godlewska et al. [28] had reported that Chryseomonas luteola (42% removal) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (40.5% removal) had the ability to decolorize 50 mg/L concentration of triphenylmethane dyes within 7 days. In comparison, our test isolate A. hydrophila showed 65%–90% decolorization of 50 mg/L of the triarylmethane dyes tested within 24 h (Figure 2). These results show that A. hydrophila has a higher decolorization potential compared to the other bacteria reported previously. Decreased % decolorization of dyes obtained at higher concentrations suggests increasing dye toxicity with increase in dosage. Toxic effect was probably due to inhibition of cellular metabolic activities and cell growth. Several authors have also reported decreasing color removal with increasing dye concentration during decolorization of other dyes by bacteria [22, 36, 37].

3.4. Effects of Temperature and pH

In the experiments carried out at different temperatures, the initial dye concentration and pH were fixed at 50 mg/L and 7 respectively, and the temperature effect was investigated at the range of 15°C–45°C. Results show that the temperature effect on decolorization was significant over the examined range (Figure 3) as dye decolorization increased as the temperature was elevated to 40°C. On further incubation, the same % dye decolorization was eventually reached in all flasks incubated at different temperatures suggesting the test isolate could acclimatize to a broad range of temperatures (15°C–40°C). The optimal temperature for bacterial activity was 35°C (Figure 3) and further increase in temperature beyond that resulted in marginal reduction in dye decolorization but essentially, thermal deactivation of decolorization activity under operational temperatures did not occur. Decline in bacterial activity at higher temperatures (>45°C) may be attributed to loss of cell viability or denaturation of the catabolic enzyme [37, 38]. Determination of temperature requirements of microorganisms used for biotechnological applications is paramount, since temperature requirements above-ambient ranges may require an energy input and hence not cost effective.

Effect of initial pH on the biodegradation efficiency of the isolate was analyzed over a pH range of 4 to 11 (Figure 4). To confirm if pH had any effect on decolorization of the dyes at the pH range studied, the absorbance signature of each dye was monitored at the different pH and no change in the visible spectra was obtained at this pH range. The degree of color removal observed varied with pH as increase in pH from 4 to 7 led to a threefold increase in % decolorization. Differences in biodegradation efficiency were insignificant between pH 7 and 9. Below pH 4 and above pH 10, negligible decolorization by this bacterium was observed. Though neutral pH (7) was best for degradation of the dyes, pH 9 appeared to be well tolerated and significant amount of dye could be degraded at that pH, thus indicating the potential of this organism to degrade dyes over a range of pH. Tolerance to varying pH by dye-decolorizing bacteria is quite important, as it makes them suitable for practical biotreatment of dyeing mill effluents [39, 40]. However, to achieve the best rate of degradation, it is suggested that the pH of textile effluents be neutralized to 7. This trend of decolorization dependence on pH has been reported elsewhere [41, 42]. They found that pH between 7 and 9 was optimum for decolorization of triphenylmethane dyes by Pseudomonas otitidis WL-13. The effect of pH may be related to the transport of dye molecules across the cell membrane, which is considered a rate limiting step for dye decolorization [38]. At pH below 4, H+ ions compete effectively with dye cations, causing a decrease in color removal efficiency, while at higher pH above this point charge, the surface of biomass gets negatively charged, which attracts the positively charged dye cations through electrostatic force of attraction [15].

3.5. UV-Visible Spectral Analysis

UV-visible spectral analysis was used to confirm that the decolorization process of the triarylmethane dyes was due to biodegradation. If dye removal is attributed to biodegradation, either the major visible light absorbance peak would completely disappear or a new peak will appear [33]. In adsorption examination, the absorption spectrum will reveal that all peaks decrease approximately in proportion to each other. Examination of spectral signatures of dyes indicated a decrease in the absorbance of samples withdrawn after decolorization using A. hydrophila (Figure 5). The absorbance peaks (at 0 h) of the dyes drastically reduced albeit at different rates within 24 h of incubation. No new absorbance peak appeared in samples after scanning following decolorization which indicates the breakdown of the dyes to nonabsorbing metabolites. The time courses of growth and dye decolorization by A. hydrophila when cultured in SWM containing triarylmethane dyes are presented in Figure 6. Increase in cell number was obtained with a concomitant decrease in dye concentration suggesting the utilization of the dyes by the bacterial cells for growth. Results obtained generally reveal color removal by the test isolate was largely due to the biodegradation of the dyes rather than adsorption.

The optimal operational conditions for degradation of dyes by A. hydrophila were at pH 7-8 and incubation temperature of 35°C. Effective decolorization was obtained in medium containing initial dye concentration of 50 mg/L or less. Similar results have been obtained as optimal conditions for degradation of azo and triphenylmethane dyes by other researchers [37, 41, 43].

The effectiveness of dye decolorization was connected with dye chemical structure, molecular weight and the presence of functional groups. Higher % decolorization was obtained with Basic violet 14 and Basic violet 3 which had lower molecular weights and simpler structures (Table 1). In the case of Acid blue 90, the relatively higher molecular weight (854.02), its complex structure and the presence of sulphonic groups may be responsible for its lower biodegradability. Dyes with sulphonic groups are usually highly polar compounds [44], and this makes it difficult for them to penetrate into the cells through the cell membrane. The influence of dye structure on decolorization effectiveness had been demonstrated in a previous report [41]. The bacterial strain tested (Citrobacter sp.), removed faster and more effectively structurally simpler Crystal violet and Methyl red than more complicated Gentian violet, Malachite green and Brilliant green. Similar dependence has been reported elsewhere [31, 45]. In our study, A. hydrophila showed some advantages during dye decolorization such as robust growth property and simple growth requirements, which make it a potential strain for biotreatment of textile industrial effluent. Moreover, A. hydrophila had previously been shown to produce polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) and poly-3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) (PHBHHx) [4, 46, 47]. PHA and PHBHHx are biopolymers which are accumulated by microorganisms as carbon and energy reserves [48, 49]. These biopolymers have material properties similar to petrochemical plastics such as enhanced flexibility and improved impact strength, and yet, they are biodegradable and can be produced from carbon sources. The ability of A. hydrophila to produce PHA and PHBHHx during dye degradation should be explored as this may offer more advantages in the use of A. hydrophila as a biotechnological agent for generation of useful bioproducts during treatment of wastewater.

3.6. Phytotoxicity Study

The disposal of untreated and treated textile dye wastewater on land may have a direct impact on soil fertility and by extension agricultural productivity. Thus, it was pertinent to assess the phytotoxicity of the dyes before and after degradation as environmental safety demands both pollutant removal and their detoxification. Phytotoxicity studies were carried out by evaluating the relative sensitivities of Triticum aestivum, Hordeum vulgare, and Lens esculenta toward the dyes and their degradation products using seed germination and plant growth assays. Germination (%) of plant seeds was less with the raw dye treatment when compared to the treatment with degradation metabolites and SWM. The lengths of shoot, root, and seedling were also significantly affected (Tables 5, 6 and 7) by the three dyes than by their degradation metabolites, indicating less toxic nature of degradation metabolites as compared to dyes. Amongst the dyes, treatment with Basic violet 14 showed the most toxic effect on seed germination and plant growth parameters whereas, treatment with Acid blue 90 exhibited the least toxic effect. However, for the dye metabolites, treatment with Basic violet 3 showed the most toxic effect while Acid blue 90 exhibited the least toxic effect. Results indicate that effective dye decolorization does not always result in reduction of dye toxicity since Basic violet 3 was better decolorized than Acid blue 90. However, toxicity exerted by the treated samples was generally lower than that obtained for the untreated samples. Before now, most of the decolorization projects have concentrated mainly on color removal while neglecting the fact that sometimes biological processes are connected with formation of toxic intermediates. Hence, it is required that the evaluation of decolorization effect be carried out with relation to ecotoxicity assessment. In this study, phytotoxicity studies have revealed that the biodegradation of triarylmethane dyes by A. hydrophila resulted in their detoxification and generation of nontoxic metabolites thus suggesting biotreated dye wastewater can be used for irrigation.

Test parametersControlBasic violet 14Basic violet 3Acid blue 90
(50 mg/L)(50 mg/L)(50 mg/L)(50 mg/L)(50 mg/L)(50 mg/L)

Germination (%)100a58b90a65b87a71b95a
Shoot length (cm)12.4 ± 1.3a7.5 ± 0.5b10.5 ± 0.7a7.0 ± 0.3b11.1 ± 0.5a8.3 ± 0.3b11.4 ± 0.4a
Root length (cm)10.8 ± 0.8a6.1 ± 0.2b 9.2 ± 0.5a5.8 ± 1.1b 9.6 ± 0.3a7.9 ± 0.7a 9.5 ± 0.8a
Seedling length (cm) 23.3 ± 1.2a 13.8 ± 0.6b 19.9 ± 0.8a 12.6 ± 0.9b 20.8 ± 0.5a 16.4 ± 1.1b 20.9 ± 0.7a

Values are means of triplicate determinations, standard deviation (±), values followed by the same letter are not significantly different from the control (seeds germinated in SWM) at according to the Dunett test.

Test parametersControlBasic violet 14Basic violet 3Acid blue 90
(50 mg/L)(50 mg/L)(50 mg/L)(50 mg/L)(50 mg/L)(50 mg/L)

Germination (%)100a60b95a 63b90a70b100a
Shoot length (cm)13.8 ± 0.4a6.7 ± 0.5b 10.8 ± 1.1a7.4 ± 0.4b 11.5 ± 0.5a7.9 ± 0.4b13.2 ± 0.4a
Root length (cm) 8.0 ± 0.3a3.5 ± 0.2b7.3 ± 0.7a4.1 ± 0.6b7.5 ± 0.7a3.7 ± 0.6b 8.2 ± 0.8a
Seedling length (cm) 22.2 ± 0.5a 10.8 ± 0.6b 18.2 ± 0.4a 11.6 ± 0.4b 18.8 ± 0.8a 11.6 ± 1.2b21.4 ± 0.8a

Values are means of triplicate determinations, standard deviation (±), values followed by the same letter are not significantly different from the control (seeds germinated in SWM) at according to the Dunett test.

Test parametersControlBasic violet 14Basic violet 3Acid blue 90
(50 mg/L)(50 mg/L)(50 mg/L)(50 mg/L)(50 mg/L)(50 mg/L)

Germination (%)100a50b90a40b75b62b95a
Shoot length (cm)13.6 ± 0.5a5.6 ± 0.7b10.7 ± 0.7a7.5 ± 0.3b12.0 ± 0.5a8.2 ± 0.3b13.0 ± 0.7a
Root length (cm)11.2 ± 0.2a5.7 ± 0.3b 9.5 ± 0.6a6.5 ± 0.7b10.2 ± 0.6a7.2 ± 0.8b10.8 ± 1.2a
Seedling length (cm) 24.9 ± 0.6a 11.5 ± 0.5b 20.2 ± 0.5a 14.3 ± 1.1b 22.6 ± 1.3a 15.7 ± 0.8b 23.7 ± 0.7a

Values are means of triplicate determinations, standard deviation (±), values followed by the same letter are not significantly different from the control (seeds germinated in SWM) at according to the Dunett test.

4. Conclusions

There are very few reports on the biodegradation and detoxification of textile and dye-stuff industrial wastes containing triarylmethane dyes. In this study, we describe the isolation and characterization of a strain of Aeromonas hydrophila capable of efficiently degrading triarylmethane dyes. The identity of the strain was confirmed using morphological, physiological, and biochemical assays. Degradation of dyes by the isolate was found to be dependent on dye concentration, aeration, pH, as well as temperature and presence of a cosubstrate. Phytotoxicity tests carried out on three plant species also indicated detoxification of the dyes after degradation as decolorized samples exhibited lower toxic effects than the raw dyes. Effective dye wastewater treatment using this isolate will demand the optimization of medium components and physicochemical conditions for maximum decolorization and detoxification. The advantages of this biological process are low cost, rapid degradation, and simple handling and, hence, could be applied to treat wastewater from dyeing and printing operations and in bioremediation of dye contaminated environments. The next focus should be the design and scaling up of efficient tailor-made bioreactors with immobilized bacteria for the treatment of dye wastewater and to explore the potentials of producing useful biopolymer products from A. hydrophila during dye degradation.


The authors gratefully acknowledge the Coimbra Group, Europe, and the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki for funding this study in which C. J. Ogugbue worked as a Research Fellow.


  1. A. B. dos Santos, F. J. Cervantes, and J. B. van Lier, “Review paper on current technologies for decolourisation of textile wastewaters: perspectives for anaerobic biotechnology,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 98, no. 12, pp. 2369–2385, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. T. Robinson, G. McMullan, R. Marchant, and P. Nigam, “Remediation of dyes in textile effluent: a critical review on current treatment technologies with a proposed alternative,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 247–255, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. H. Zollinger, “Synthesis, properties and applications of organic dyes and pigments,” in Color Chemistry, VCH, New York, NY, USA, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  4. Y. Ji, X. T. Li, and G. Q. Chen, “Interactions between a poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) terpolyester and human keratinocytes,” Biomaterials, vol. 29, no. 28, pp. 3807–3814, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. R. Couto, “Dye removal by immobilised fungi,” Biotechnology Advances, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 227–235, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. C. O'Neill, F. R. Hawkes, D. L. Hawkes, N. D. Lourenço, H. M. Pinheiro, and W. Delée, “Colour in textile effluents - Sources, measurement, discharge consents and simulation: a review,” Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, vol. 74, no. 11, pp. 1009–1018, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. C. M. Carliell, S. J. Barclay, C. Shaw, A. D. Wheatley, and C. A. Buckley, “The effect of salts used in textile dyeing on microbial decolourisation of a reactive azo dye,” Environmental Technology, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1133–1137, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  8. P. Gregory, “Dyes and dyes intermediates,” in Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, J. I. Kroschwitz, Ed., vol. 8, pp. 544–545, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  9. V. K. Gupta, I. Ali, Suhas, and D. Mohan, “Equilibrium uptake and sorption dynamics for the removal of a basic dye (basic red) using low-cost adsorbents,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 265, no. 2, pp. 257–264, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. I. M. Banat, P. Nigam, D. Singh, and R. Marchant, “Microbial decolorization of textile-dye-containing effluents: a review,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 217–227, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. R. Nilsson, R. Nordlinder, U. Wass, B. Meding, and L. Belin, “Asthma, rhinitis, and dermatitis in workers exposed to reactive dyes,” British Journal of Industrial Medicine, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 65–70, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  12. G. Parshetti, S. Kalme, G. Saratale, and S. Govindwar, “Biodegradation of malachite green by Kocuria rosea MTCC 1532,” Acta Chimica Slovenica, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 492–498, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  13. G. S. Ghodake, A. A. Talke, J. P. Jadhav, and S. P. Govindwar, “Potential of Brassica juncea in order to treat textile-effluent- contaminated sites,” International Journal of Phytoremediation, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 297–312, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. V. K. Gupta, A. Mittal, L. Krishnan, and V. Gajbe, “Adsorption kinetics and column operations for the removal and recovery of malachite green from wastewater using bottom ash,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 87–96, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. N. Daneshvar, M. Ayazloo, A. R. Khataee, and M. Pourhassan, “Biological decolorization of dye solution containing Malachite Green by microalgae Cosmarium sp,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 1176–1182, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. H. Ali, W. Ahmad, and T. Haq, “Decolorization and degradation of malachite green by Aspergillus flavus and Alternaria solani,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 1574–1576, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  17. W. Zhou and W. Zimmermann, “Decolorization of industrial effluents containing reactive dyes by actinomycetes,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 107, no. 2-3, pp. 157–161, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  18. V. K. Gupta and A. Rastogi, “Biosorption of lead from aqueous solutions by green algae Spirogyra species: kinetics and equilibrium studies,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 152, no. 1, pp. 407–414, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. V. K. Gupta and A. Rastogi, “Biosorption of hexavalent chromium by raw and acid-treated green alga Oedogonium hatei from aqueous solutions,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 163, no. 1, pp. 396–402, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. W. Won, S. B. Choi, and Y. S. Yun, “Interaction between protonated waste biomass of Corynebacterium glutamicum and anionic dye Reactive Red 4,” Colloids and Surfaces A, vol. 262, no. 1–3, pp. 175–180, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. K. Singh and S. Arora, “Removal of synthetic textile dyes from wastewaters: a critical review on present treatment technologies,” Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 41, pp. 807–878, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  22. B. D. Tony, D. Goyal, and S. Khanna, “Decolorization of Direct Red 28 by mixed bacterial culture in an up-flow immobilized bioreactor,” Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 955–960, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. Gou, Y. Qu, J. Zhou, F. Ma, and L. Tan, “Azo dye decolorization by a new fungal isolate, Penicillium sp. QQ and fungal-bacterial cocultures,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 170, no. 1, pp. 314–319, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. A. Telke, D. Kalyani, J. Jadhav, and S. Govindwar, “Kinetics and mechanism of reactive red 141 degradation by a bacterial isolate Rhizobium radiobacter MTCC 8161,” Acta Chimica Slovenica, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 320–329, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  25. C. Vanderzannt and D. F. Splittstoesser, Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods, American public health association, Washington, DC, USA, 3rd edition, 1997.
  26. M. Cheesbrough, District Laboratory Practice in Tropical Countries, Part 2, Cambridge University Press, London, UK, 2000.
  27. J. G. Holt, N. R. Krieg, P. H. A. Sneath, J. T. Staley, and S. T. Williams, Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, Md, USA, 9th edition, 1994.
  28. E. Zablocka-Godlewska, W. Przystas, and E. Grabinska-Sota, “Decolourization of triphenylmethane dyes and ecotoxicity of their end products,” Environmental Protection Engineering, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 61–169, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  29. H. Wu, J. Pratley, D. Lemerle, M. An, and D. L. Liu, “Autotoxicity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L) as determined by laboratory bioassays,” Plant and Soil, vol. 296, no. 1-2, pp. 85–93, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. A. Fuentes, M. Llorens, M. J. Saez et al., “Ecotoxicity, phytotoxicity, and extractability of heavy metals from different stabilised sewage sludges,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 1432, pp. 355–360, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  31. M. S. Jang, Y. M. Lee, C. H. Kim et al., “Triphenylmethane reductase from Citrobacter sp. strain KCTC 18061P: purification, characterization, gene cloning, and overexpression of a functional protein in Escherichia coli,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 71, no. 12, pp. 7955–7960, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. Tekere, A. Y. Mswaka, R. Zvauya, and J. S. Read, “Growth, dye degradation and ligninolytic activity studies on Zimbabwean white rot fungi,” Enzyme and Microbial Technology, vol. 28, no. 4-5, pp. 420–426, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. K. C. Chen, J. Y. Wu, D. J. Liou, and S. C. J. Hwang, “Decolorization of the textile dyes by newly isolated bacterial strains,” Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 57–68, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. S. Z. Ren, J. Guo, Y. L. Wang, Y. H. Cen, and G. P. Sun, “Properties of a triphenylmethane dyes decolorization enzyme TpmD from Aeromonas hydrophila strain DN322,” Acta Microbiologica Sinica, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 385–389, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  35. S. Padamavathy, S. Sandhya, K. Swaminathan, Y. V. Subrahmanyam, and S. N. Kaul, “Comparison of decolorization of reactive azo dyes by microorganisms isolated from various sources,” Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 628–632, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  36. S. U. Jadhav, M. U. Jadhav, A. N. Kagalkar, and S. P. Govindwar, “Decolorization of brilliant blue G dye mediated by degradation of the microbial consortium of Galactomyces geotrichum and Bacillus sp,” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Chemical Engineers, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 563–570, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. R. G. Saratale, G. D. Saratale, J. S. Chang, and S. P. Govindwar, “Ecofriendly degradation of sulfonated diazo dye C.I. Reactive Green 19A using Micrococcus glutamicus NCIM-2168,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 100, no. 17, pp. 3897–3905, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. J. S. Chang and C. Y. Lin, “Decolorization kinetics of a recombinant Escherichia coli strain harboring azo-dye-decolorizing determinants from Rhodococcus sp,” Biotechnology Letters, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 631–636, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. Z. Aksu and G. Donmez, “A comparative study on the biosorption characteristics of some yeasts for Remazol Blue reactive dye,” Chemosphere, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 1075–1083, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. R. C. Wang, K. S. Fan, and J. S. Chang, “Removal of acid dye by ZnFe2O4/TiO2-immobilized granular activated carbon under visible light irradiation in a recycle liquid-solid fluidized bed,” Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 533–540, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. S. Y. An, S. K. Min, I. H. Cha et al., “Decolorization of triphenylmethane and azo dyes by Citrobacter sp,” Biotechnology Letters, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1037–1040, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. J. Wu, B. G. Jung, K. S. Kim, Y. C. Lee, and N. C. Sung, “Isolation and characterization of Pseudomonas otitidis WL-13 and its capacity to decolorize triphenylmethane dyes,” Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 960–964, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. N. Junnarkar, D. S. Murty, N. S. Bhatt, and D. Madamwar, “Decolorization of diazo dye Direct Red 81 by a novel bacterial consortium,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 163–168, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. M. A. Amoozegar, M. Hajighasemi, J. Hamedi, S. Asad, and A. Ventosa, “Azo dye decolorization by halophilic and halotolerant microorganisms,” Annals of Microbiology, vol. 61, pp. 217–230, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  45. D. K. Sharma, H. S. Saini, M. Singh, S. S. Chimni, and B. S. Chadha, “Isolation and characterization of microorganisms capable of decolorizing various triphenylmethane dyes,” Journal of Basic Microbiology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 59–65, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. G. Q. Chen, G. Zhang, S. J. Park, and S. Y. Lee, “Industrial scale production of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate),” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 57, no. 1-2, pp. 50–55, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. S. H. Lee, D. H. Oh, W. S. Ahn, Y. Lee, J. I. Choi, and S. Y. Lee, “Production of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) by high- cell-density cultivation of Aeromonas hydrophila,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 240–244, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. B. Hazer and A. Steinbuchel, “Increased diversification of polyhydroxyalkanoates by modification reactions for industrial and medical applications,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. A. Steinbuchel, “Perspectives for biotechnological production and utilization of biopolymers: metabolic engineering of polyhydroxyalkanoate Bbiosynthesis pathways as a successful example,” Macromolecular Bioscience, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2001. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2011 Chimezie Jason Ogugbue and Thomas Sawidis. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.