Production and Multiplication of Native Compost Fungal Activator by Using Different Substrates and Its Influence on Growth and Development of <i>Capsicum chinensis</i> Jacq. “Bhut Jolokia”

Parkash, Vipin; Saikia, Ankur Jyoti

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/481363

Biotechnology Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results and Discussion References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 | Article ID 481363 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/481363

Production and Multiplication of Native Compost Fungal Activator by Using Different Substrates and Its Influence on Growth and Development of Capsicum chinensis Jacq. “Bhut Jolokia”

Vipin Parkash¹and Ankur Jyoti Saikia¹

Academic Editor: Manuel Canovas

Received10 Jul 2014

Revised12 Dec 2014

Accepted12 Dec 2014

Published06 Jan 2015

Abstract

In vitro experiment was carried out to see the effect of saw dusts of Pinus kesiya, Shorea robusta, and Callicarpa arborea on Trichoderma harzianum, isolate TH-13 mass production, along with its biotization effect on Capsicum chinensis Jacq. “Bhut Jolokia.” Early mycelium initiation (2 days) occurred in S. robusta followed by P. kesiya and C. arborea (3.5 days). The sporulation was observed earlier in S. robusta (100% after 6 days) than P. kesiya (33.4% after 8 days) and C. arborea (16.7% after 9 days) but no sporulation was observed in control. The complete sporulation was also earlier in S. robusta (100% after 10 days) than P. kesiya (33.4% after 15 days) and C. arborea (16.4% after 18 days). Higher conidial yield was also in S. robusta than P. kesiya and C. arborea , respectively. The increase in height (60–70 cm), number of leaves (600–650), and yield of chili (120–150 fruits) were also more in inoculated C. chinensis seedlings than control. It is concluded that S. robusta saw dust is the best substrate for mass production of compost fungal activator and can be used in nursery practices for quality stock production of various crops/plantations.

1. Introduction

Compost is a mixture of decayed organic material decomposed by microorganisms in a warm, moist, and aerobic environment that release nutrients into readily available forms for plant use. Among these microorganisms, fungi like Trichoderma spp. Pers. are important microbes that help in decomposition of organic material and are known as “compost fungal activator” (CFA). Trichoderma spp. produce hyphae which are branched, creeping, forming a tuft or cushion on natural substrate, septate; conidiophores are erect, indefinite, arising from short branched side branches, bearing phialides laterally and terminally; phialides are surrounded by heads, rarely by short chains of slime spores; conidia are hyaline or bright coloured, one celled and chlamydospores are terminal or intercalary [1].

Mass production of Trichoderma spp. has become a focus of research in the search for alternatives to polluting pesticides and chemical fertilizers for control of plant diseases and growth promoter of plants. The majority of commercially available biocontrol fungi available in the world are of T. harzianum Rifai origin only and their efficiency is well established. Techniques for large-scale biomass generation of this fungus are still in infancy. Consequently any media used for mass production of Trichoderma spp. must be economical and able to support production of large quantities of biomass and available propagules. A variety of media have been used by various researchers for production of Trichoderma spp. in stationary flasks [2], shakers [3, 4], and liquid fermenters [5]. Molasses-brewer’s yeast medium is being used widely for commercial production of Trichoderma spp. by fermentation process [6]. In India, many commercial Trichoderma producers are using molasses-yeast medium for mass production. Brewer’s yeast which serves as nitrogen source is expensive and there is a need to identify inexpensive and more commonly available alternative to yeast fungi.

Jin et al. [7] developed a medium from modified Richard’s medium + V-8 Juice (RM8) to produce high level of desiccation tolerant conidia of T. harzianum strain 1295-22. The addition of 9 percent (v/v) glycerol to RM8 medium improved both biomass production and desiccation tolerance of conidia. Several commercial formulations of species of Trichoderma have been made [8]. For commercial production, it is essential that the product should possess certain qualities. The dose requirement should be minimum, must have large shelf life, is easy to apply, is free from contamination, and has economic feasibility with positive monetary return.

Trichoderma spp. are mostly lignocellulose decomposer. Lignin protects cellulose, hemicelluloses, and carbohydrate in lignocellulosic materials. Lignocellulolytic microorganisms are the key agents in depolymerizing the lignin barrier in organic materials. Therefore, the selection of effective lignocellulolytic microbe/s is a crucial step leading to the success in accelerating composting of lignocellulosic materials. Trichoderma spp. are widely known as a lignocellulose decomposer as already explained above because they are filamentous and have the ability to produce prolific spores which can invade substrates quickly [9]. Various studies have shown that composting of lignocellulosic materials preinoculated with potential Trichoderma spp. can reduce the time of biodegradation [10]. T. harzianum was used as inoculant to enhance composting of rice straw and weeds [11]. However, there is no or a little work that has been done on composting of different saw dusts using Trichoderma spp. (CFA) isolated from the related ecological habitats. Hence, a study is carried out to analyze the different substrates (saw dusts) suitability for mass production of CFA along with its effect on growth and development of Capsicum chinensis Jacq. “Bhut Jolokia”. C. chinensis Jacq. “Bhut Jolokia” is being cultivated and consumed in different states of Northeast India including Assam, Nagaland, Manipur, and Mizoram since antiquity. It is either used as a spice in food or eaten raw along with the staple food. On account of its refreshing aroma, palatability, and medicinal properties, the populace has been using it for pickle preparation, flavouring curries, apart from its usage for home remedies of ailments like gastritis, arthritis, and chronic indigestion problems. It is also used as a remedy to summer heat, presumably by inducing perspiration [12]. To analyze the influence of CFA on growth and development, “Bhut Jolokia” was selected as it is cultivated by the local people in their homestead gardens as a spice and CFA technology is extended to Demo village of the Institute at Meleng Grant, Jorhat, Assam, as cited below in nursery trials in Material and Methods.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Collection of Soil Samples and Isolation of Compost Fungal Activator

The soil samples were collected from Nongkhyllem Reserve Forest, Nongpoh, Meghalaya, India. Fungal species Trichoderma harzianum was isolated from the soil samples by using serial soil dilution method [13] on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium. The inoculated plates were incubated at 30°C for 4 days. The pure fungal colonies were picked up and purified by streaking on agar slants and incubated at 30°C for 7-8 days. Green conidia forming fungal bodies were selected and microscopic observation was done and the fungus was identified to be Trichoderma harzianum (isolate/accession number TH-13). The preserved fungal isolate/culture maintained on PDA slants is retained with Mycology and Soil Microbiology Laboratory, Rain Forest Research Institute, Jorhat, Assam, India, for further study (Figures 1(a)–1(d)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

(i)

(j)

(k)

(l)

(m)

(n)

(o)

(p)

(q)

Figure 1

(a) Culture of Trichoderma harzianum (isolate TH-13); (b) mycelial mat of T. harzianum; (c) spores of T. harzianum; (d) hyphae/mycelia of T. harzianum; ((e), (f)) preparation of substrates and filling of flasks; (g) incubation of flasks at 27^°C in BOD incubator for 6–8 days; ((h), (i), (j)) mass production trends of T. harzianum on different substrates; (k) mass production of T. harzianum in a tray; (l) variation in treatments on Capsicum chinense “Bhut Jolokia” after 7 DAI; ((m), (n), (o)) variation in treatments on C. chinense “Bhut Jolokia” after 30 DAI; (p) a control plant after 150 DAI; (q) a CFA treated plant after 150 DAI.

2.2. Preparation of Solid Substrate Media

In this experiment, different saw dusts like Pinus kesiya Royle ex. Gordon, Shorea robusta Gaertn., and Callicarpa arborea Roxb. were taken for evaluation. The different saw dusts were shade dried. The dried saw dusts were mixed with wheat bran by adding sterilized water in the ratio (wheat bran : saw-dust : water; 3 : 1 : 4 w/w) as explained above. The moisture level of the mixture was maintained up to 50–60%. The substrate was sterilized through Autoclave (Labotech, BDI-81 make, India) at 120°C and 15 lbsi (Figure 1(e)).

2.3. Mass Multiplication of Trichoderma Inoculum

The inoculum of Trichoderma harzianum was grown on synthetic PDA (Potato Dextrose Agar) medium (SRL, India) for 7-8 days and incubated at 27–30° ± 1°C (Figures 1(f)-1(g)). The inoculum was kept in B.O.D. incubator (Labotech, BDI-55 make, India) for 10–12 days for maximum growth and sporulation. Then the inoculum containing medium was cut into small discs and was put in flasks containing wheat bran and different saw-dust medium in the ratio (3 : 1 : 4 w/w) for mass production of Trichoderma harzianum. Approximately 50 g of substrate was taken in 500 mL conical flasks and inoculated with 5 mm mycelial mat incubated at 28°C incubator for 7–10 days earlier. In control set, no saw dust component was added to the substrate. Six replicates of each treatment were taken. The colony forming units were calculated with help of the following formula through serial dilution of one gram of substrate and the results are expressed as cfu g⁻¹ mL⁻¹ of suspension of each substrate:

2.4. Nursery Experiments/Trials

The substrate supplemented with saw dust of Shorea robusta which proved to be efficient in production of more cfu g⁻¹ mL⁻¹ was selected for inoculation experiment. The target bioagent in the form of substrate inoculum was applied at the time of sowing of seedlings in the nursery of Rain Forest Research Institute’s Demo village at Meleng Grant, Jorhat, Assam, located at a distance of 10 km east of Jorhat city on NH-37 (on Jorhat-Tinsukia Highway, Assam, India (26°46′53′′N 94°17′29′′E, 107 m asl)). The annual average precipitation is 500 mm and the annual average temperature is 26°C. The experiment was conducted using field soil supplemented with substrate containing the target bioagent in the field condition. In control rows, no bioagent (i.e., inocula/substrate) was added. The experiment was designed in a single inoculation treatment. Ten replications of each treatment were taken. The following design of the experiment was adopted: = control (no inoculation), = treatment/inoculation of Trichoderma harzianum (isolate TH-13 supplemented substrate).Data on plant growth like increase in height (in cm), number of leaves, and total fruit yield (in number) per plant were observed after 150 DAI (days after inoculation) and analyzed to evaluate the efficacy of the preferred bioagent on the growth and development of target seedlings. The data were analyzed statistically for calculating standard error of mean and coefficient of variance (CV) percent by using MS Excel version 2003 and Gupta [14].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Mycelial Growth and Conidial Yield

Different saw dusts (forestry/industry byproduct) were tested as a substrate constituent along with wheat bran for the mass production of Trichoderma harzianum (isolate TH-13) micropropagules as shown in Table 1. After 2 days of incubation at 27°C ± 1, the mycelial growth initiation was seen in substrate supplemented with saw dust of Shorea robusta while in substrates with Pinus kesiya and Callicarpa arborea, mycelial growth appeared after 3.5 days.

In control set, mycelia appeared after 5 days. The initiation of sporulation of bioagent was observed earlier in substrate of S. robusta (after 6 days) than P. kesiya (after 8 days) and C. arborea (after 9 days). The completion of sporulation of fungal activator was also observed earlier in substrates of S. robusta after 10 days (100%) than P. kesiya after 15 days (33.4%) and C. arborea after 18 days (16.7%) (Figures 1(h)–1(j)).

No sporulation was observed in control set. The enhanced conidial yield was also higher in S. robusta (86 × 10⁶) than P. kesiya (70 × 10⁶) and C. arborea (45 × 10⁶) substrates in terms of colony forming units (cfu g⁻¹mL⁻¹), respectively. The screening of various substrates for their potential to support T. harzianum (as CFA) mass production indicated that, among the tested saw dusts, S. robusta saw dust was found suitable in terms of production of high conidial yield and early conversion of substrate into compost. This substrate supplemented with CFA was taken for further inoculation experiment (Figure 1).

Fungi are one of the major agents of decomposition. Estimating fungal biomass in waste is important for understanding quantitatively their parts in the decomposition processes and the nutrient cycling in terrestrial ecosystems. Trichoderma and Gliocladium spp. are the mostly worked out antagonists, so far the production and delivery system is concerned [15, 16]. So their mass production is essential requisite for bioinoculating the crops.

The substrata used for mass production of inoculum of Trichoderma spp. are wheat straw, sorghum grains, lignite and stillage, molasses and brewer’s yeast, and wheat bran medium [15–19]. Studies have been carried out to evaluate various agroindustrial wastes including wheat straw, paddy straw, shelled maize cob, paper waste, and sugarcane baggase for mass multiplication of T. harzianum through solid state fermentation technology. In order to enhance growth rate and sporulation, various cellulosic residues were also supplemented with chickpea flour as organic nitrogen supplement at 2 and 4 percent. Supplementation of all the substrates with chickpea flour enhanced growth and sporulation. However, 4% chickpea flour supplementation gave maximum response in all the cases. Paddy straw followed by sugarcane baggase and wheat straw, each supplemented with 4% chickpea flour, were found to be promising substrates for mass multiplication of T. harzianum [20]. Sterilized oat seeds were found effective for large-scale production of T. harzianum [21]. Dhingra and Sinclair [22] also reported that dehulled broken rice grains were found to be an excellent growth and delivery substrate for T. harzianum and T. koningii.

In this investigation, Trichoderma harzianum is cultured only on wheat bran and different saw dusts which are waste materials by saw mills for mass production. It is reported that the sporulation of fungal activator was observed earlier and more in numbers in substrates consisted of saw dust of Shorea robusta than Pinus kesiya and Callicarpa arborea. However, the production of spores of CFA is more in these substrates than control set where no saw dust was added. Noteworthy is the fact that lignin content of test saw dusts which was observed to be directly proportional to the conidial yield of CFA. Maximum sporulation (86 × 10⁶ cfu g⁻¹mL⁻¹) was observed in the media fortified by S. robusta, where saw dust contained maximum ( mg g⁻¹ dry weight of wood) lignin content [23], which was followed by P. kesiya (70 × 10⁶ cfu g⁻¹ mL⁻¹) with comparatively less ( mg g⁻¹ dry weight of wood) lignin composition [24]. On the other hand, least conidial yield (45 × 10⁶ cfu g⁻¹ mL⁻¹) was observed in C. arborea, in which lignin content was 25.5% of cortical dry weight [25].

Addition of T. harzianum into organic media like neem cake, coir pith, farmyard manure, and decomposed coffee pulp caused an immediate increase in the population up to three days. Soil amendment with organic materials like neem cake, coir compost, farmyard manure, and Gliricidia leaves showed better growth and survival of antagonist than soil alone [26]. Previous reports suggested that addition of inorganic forms of nitrogen increases the production of fungal biomass [27]. Serrano-Carreon et al. [28] had been able to prove that Trichoderma spp. prefer the ammonium form of nitrogen.

According to Elad et al. [29], biocontrol by Trichoderma viride is dependent on the type of inocula or substrate. Different substrate treatments based on combination of substrate like wheat bran, pulse bran, sugarcane baggase, rice straw, wheat straw, cow dung, poultry manure, groundnut shell, and saw dust with tap water are evaluated for mass multiplication of T. harzianum and Gliocladium virens. Many workers used wheat bran as substrate for mass production of Gliocladium spp. and Trichoderma spp. [29–33]. Sorghum grains were also used for mass production of T. harzianum. These infected sorghum grains served as bait for growth and multiplication of T. harzianum in soil [16].

A standard preparation of T. harzianum and T. koningii by Mehrotra [34] was in wheat bran saw-dust medium which can be very easily grown in autoclavable plastic bags of different sizes. The preparation is ready for commercial use within fifteen days and is stored at room temperature. In the present investigation also, media prepared by combining wheat bran and saw dust/s resulted in maximum yield of biomass, viable propagules, and spores. However, saw dust as a constituent of substrate was used by previous workers, but through this study it is revealed that the saw dust that has more lignin content is preferable for mass production of CFA (Trichoderma spp.). In this experiment wheat bran acted as carbohydrate source and saw dust served as medium for moisture for mass production of Trichoderma species.

3.2. Biotization Effect on Growth Parameters

The influence of in vitro mass produced native compost fungal activator (substrate supplemented with CFA) was also observed on growth parameters of Capsicum chinensis Jacq. “Bhut Jolokia” in open field experiments, consequent to 150 days after inoculation.

The datum, as depicted in Table 2, obviously explains the significant increase in the growth parameters. The increase in height (60–70 cm), number of leaves (600–650), and total fruit yield (in numbers) (120–150 chili fruits) was also reported more in inoculated plants with bioagent than noninoculated control plants (height, 20–30 cm, leaves, 400–500, and chili fruits, 50–60), respectively (Figures 1(l)–1(q)).

Trichoderma harzianum has been reported to promote plant growth [35]. Various strains of Trichoderma have been founded to be effective in plant growth characteristics and enhance biomass production [36]. These fungi inhabit plant roots and promote plant growth characteristics by increasing evolution and production of some organic acids in the rhizosphere such as gluconic, citric, and/or fumaric acids by Trichoderma which decrease soil pH and lead to increased solubility of the insoluble compound and an availability of micronutrient, as well as an increase in plant nutrient uptake [37, 38]. Improvement of plant nutrient uptake and its transport from root to aerial parts, together with the produced plant stimulators, might result in higher photosynthetic rates [39] required for producing enough energy used to derive the enhanced growth response [38]. The CFA inoculation is observed to increase shoot height, number of leaves, and total fruit yield (in number) per plant in the present study in accordance with the results which were obtained by previous workers on various plants [38, 40].

It would be beneficial to prepare a composted wheat bran and saw dust (that must contain high lignin content) substrate that may serve as a nutritionally rich biodegradable product to be effective in improving the growth and development of chili plants possibly by improving the organic content of soil. The composting of organic wastes with the help of microbial inoculant/s not only helps in recycling of waste but also results in the preparation of economic and environmental friendly organic biofertilizer that could provide benefits to agriculture/horticulture/forestry crops. This technology of bioinoculants should also be extended to other economically and medicinally important plant/s to check their potential to increase the bioactive constituents and metabolites which is a future prospective.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

The senior author, Vipin Parkash, is thankful to the Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education, Dehradun, for the financial assistance in the Project no. RFRI-42/2008-09/SFM to carry out this research work.

References

M. N. Khare and H. K. Jharia, “Trichoderma: a potential biocontrol agent against seed and soil borne pathogens for sustainable crop production,” in Plant Pest Management, P. C. Tiwari, Ed., pp. 263–276, Aavishkar Publishers & Distributers, Jaipur, India, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
S. T. Patel and A. Mishra, “Production of Trichoderma in stationary flasks,” Gujarat Agricultural University Research Journal, vol. 19, pp. 53–56, 1994.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Jin, G. E. Harman, and A. G. Taylor, “Conidial biomass and desiccation tolerance of Trichoderma harzianum produced at different medium water potentials,” Biological Control, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 237–243, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. E. Harman, X. Jin, T. E. Stasz, G. Peruzzotti, A. C. Leopold, and A. G. Taylor, “Production of conidial biomass of Trichoderma harzianum for biological control,” Biological Control, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 23–28, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. C. Papavizas, M. T. Dunn, J. A. Lewis, and J. Beagle-Ristaino, “Liquid fermentation technology for experimental production of biocontrol fungi,” Phytopathology, vol. 74, no. 10, pp. 1171–1175, 1984.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. D. Lumsden, J. A. Lewis, and R. D. Fravel, “Bioradiational pest control agents: formulations and delivery,” in ACS Symposium series 595, R. Franklin, W. Hall, A. John, and C. S. Barry, Eds., p. 306, American Chemicals Society, Washington, DC, USA, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Jin, A. G. Taylor, and G. E. Harman, “Development of media and automated liquid fermentation methods to produce desiccation-tolerant propagules of Trichoderma harzianum,” Biological Control, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 267–274, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Whipps, “Status of biological disease control in horticulture,” Biocontrol Science and Technology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 3–24, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. P. Tengerdy and G. Szakacs, “Bioconversion of lignocellulose in solid substrate fermentation,” Biochemical Engineering Journal, vol. 13, no. 2-3, pp. 169–179, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Mohammad, M. Z. Alam, N. A. Kabbashi, and A. Ahsan, “Effective composting of oil palm industrial waste by filamentous fungi: a review,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 58, pp. 69–78, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. C. Cuevas, S. N. Samulde, and P. G. Pajaro, “Trichoderma harzianum Rifai as activator for rapid composting of agricultural wastes,” The Philippine Agriculturist, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 461–469, 1988.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Purkayastha, S. I. Alam, H. K. Gogoi, L. Singh, and V. Veer, “Molecular characterization of “Bhut Jolokia” the hottest chilli,” Journal of Biosciences, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 757–768, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Waksman, Principle of Soil Microbiology, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, Md, USA, 1927.
B. N. Gupta, Statistics (Theory & Practice), Sahitya Bhawan Publishers & Distributors, Agra, India, 2001.
G. C. Papavizas, “Trichoderma and Gliocladium: biology, ecology, and potential for biocontrol,” Annual Review of Phytopathology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 23–54, 1985.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. Upadhyay and A. N. Mukhopadhyay, “Biological control of Sclerotium rolfsii by Trichoderma harzianum in sugar beet,” Tropical Pest Management, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 215–220, 1986.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Kumar, Studies on root-rot of sunflower with special reference to rhizosphere including mycorrhizae [Ph.D. thesis], Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, Haryana, India, 1997.
R. D. Prasad and R. Rangeshwarn, “An improved medium for mass production of the biocontrol fungus Trichoderma harzianum,” Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 233–235, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Tewari and C. Bhanu, “Screening of various substrates for sporulation and mass multiplication of biocontrol agent Trichoderma harzianum through solid state fermentation,” Indian Phytopathology, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 476–478, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Tewari and C. Bhanu, “Evaluation of agro industrial wastes for mass production of Trichoderma harzianum—a biofungicide for sustainable agriculture,” Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 138–139, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Mirkova, “In vitro study of antagonistic activity of Trichoderma sp. towards some soil pathogens,” Gardinarrkai hozarrka Nauka, vol. 19, pp. 75–81, 1982.
View at: Google Scholar
O. D. Dhingra and J. B. Sinclair, Basic Plant Pathology Methods, CRC Press, Florida, Fla, USA, 1985.
S. Mukhopadhyay, S. N. Roy, and V. C. Joy, “Enhancement of soil enzyme activities by the feeding impact of detritivore arthropods on tropical forest leaf litters,” Tropical Ecology, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 93–108, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Jelonek, W. Pazdrowski, M. Arasimowicz-Jelonek, J. Gzyl, A. Tomczak, and J. Floryszak-Wieczorek, “The relationship between the form of dead bark and lignin content in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.),” Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 455–462, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Wu, K. Fukazawa, and J. Ohtani, “Lignin analysis in some tropical hardwoods using ultraviolet microscopy,” Research Bulletins of the College Experiment Forests, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 353–366, 1990.
View at: Google Scholar
K. A. Saju, M. Anandraj, and Y. R. Sarma, “On farm production of Trichoderma harzianum using organic matter,” Indian Phytopathology, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 277–281, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Jayaraj and R. Ramabadran, “Effect of certain nitrogenous sources on the in vitro growth, sporulation and production of antifungal substances by Trichoderma harzianum,” Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology, vol. 28, pp. 23–25, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Serrano-Carreon, Y. Hathout, M. Bensoussan, and J.-M. Belin, “Lipid accumulation in Trichoderma species,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 181–187, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Elad, I. Chat, and J. Katan, “Trichoderma harzianum a biocontrol agent effective against Sclerotium rolfsii and Rhizoctonia solani,” Phytopathology, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 119–121, 1980.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Sivan, Y. Elad, and I. Chat, “Biological control of plant pathogens,” in Microbiology of Aerial Plant Surfaces, C. H. Dickinson and T. F. Preece, Eds., Academic Press, London, UK, 1984.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Maiti and C. Sen, “Integrated biocontrol of Sclerotium rolfsii with nitrogenous fertilizers and Trichoderma harzianum,” Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55, pp. 464–468, 1985.
View at: Google Scholar
M. G. Parkash, K. Vinayagopal, M. Anandraj, and Y. R. Sarma, “Evaluation of substrates for mass multiplication of fungal biocontrol agents Trichoderma harzianum and T. virens,” Journal of Spices and Aromatic Crops, vol. 8, pp. 207–210, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
S. C. Dubey and B. Patel, “Mass multiplication of antagonists and standardization of effective dose for management of web blight of urd and mung bean,” Indian Phytopathology, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 338–341, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
R. S. Mehrotra, “On certain aspects of Trichoderm—taxonomy, ecology, biology and biocontrol,” Kavaka, vol. 25, pp. 1–10, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Shoresh, G. E. Harman, and F. Mastouri, “Induced systemic resistance and plant responses to fungal biocontrol agents,” Annual Review of Phytopathology, vol. 48, pp. 21–43, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Yedidia, N. Benhamou, and I. Chet, “Induction of defense responses in cucumber plants (Cucumis sativus L.) by the Biocontrol agent Trichoderma harzianum,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 1061–1070, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Entesari, F. Sharifzadeh, M. Ahmadzadeh, and M. Farhangfar, “Seed biopriming with Trichoderma species and Pseudomonas fluorescent on growth parameters, enzymes activity and nutritional status of soybean,” International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 610–619, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
G. E. Harman, “Myths and dogmas of biocontrol—changes in perceptions derived from research on Trichoderma harzianum T-22,” Plant Disease, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 377–393, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Azarmi, B. Hajieghrari, and A. Giglou, “Effect of trichoderma isolates on tomato seedling growth response and nutrient uptake,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 10, no. 31, pp. 5850–5855, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
U. Bal and S. Altintas, “Effects of Trichoderma harzianum on lettuce in protected cultivation,” Journal of Central European Agriculture, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 63–70, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2015 Vipin Parkash and Ankur Jyoti Saikia. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

10261

Downloads

1447

Citations