Table of Contents
Computational Biology Journal
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 389018, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/389018
Research Article

Asymmetric Behavior of Thymidylate Synthase Dimer Subunits in Denaturating Solvent Observed with Molecular Dynamics

1Quantum Chemistry Laboratory, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland
2Centre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland

Received 15 December 2014; Revised 22 February 2015; Accepted 1 March 2015

Academic Editor: Mihaly Mezei

Copyright © 2015 Filip Leonarski et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. R. Sotelo-Mundo, J. Ciesla, J. M. Dzik et al., “Crystal structures of rat thymidylate synthase inhibited by tomudex, a potent anticancer drug,” Biochemistry, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1087–1094, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. P. V. Danenberg, “Thymidylate synthetase: a target enzyme in cancer chemotherapy,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 473, no. 2, pp. 73–92, 1977. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. L. W. Hardy, J. S. Finer-Moore, W. R. Montfort, M. O. Jones, D. V. Santi, and R. M. Stroud, “Atomic structure of thymidylate synthase: target for rational drug design,” Science, vol. 235, no. 4787, pp. 448–455, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. B. K. Shoichet, R. M. Stroud, D. V. Santi, I. D. Kuntz, and K. M. Perry, “Structure-based discovery of inhibitors of thymidylate synthase,” Science, vol. 259, no. 5100, pp. 1445–1450, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. F. Maley, J. Pedersen-Lane, and L. Changchien, “Complete restoration of activity to inactive mutants of Escherichia coli thymidylate synthase: evidence that E. coli thymidylate synthase is a half-the-sites activity enzyme,” Biochemistry, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1469–1474, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Levitzki, W. B. Stallcup, and D. E. Koshland Jr., “Half-of-the-sites reactivity and the conformational states of cytidine triphosphate synthetase,” Biochemistry, vol. 10, no. 18, pp. 3371–3378, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. S. Gokhale, S. Agarwalla, D. V. Santi, and P. Balaram, “Covalent reinforcement of a fragile region in the dimeric enzyme thymidylate synthase stabilizes the protein against chaotrope-induced unfolding,” Biochemistry, vol. 35, no. 22, pp. 7150–7158, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. A. May, H. C. Cheung, J. L. Aull, and J. D. Glickson, “Fluorescence study of guanidine hydrochloride denaturation of thymidylate synthetase,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 653–658, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. W. Reinsch, L. L. Smith, and R. B. Dunlap, “Denaturation of thymidylate synthetase from amethopterin-resistant Lactobacillus casei,” Cancer Biochemistry Biophysics, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 57–64, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Tirado-Rives, M. Orozco, and W. L. Jorgensen, “Molecular dynamics simulations of the unfolding of barnase in water and 8 M aqueous urea,” Biochemistry, vol. 36, no. 24, pp. 7313–7329, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Caflisch and M. Karplus, “Structural details of urea binding to barnase: a molecular dynamics analysis,” Structure, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 477–488, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Z. Zhang, Y. Zhu, and Y. Shi, “Molecular dynamics simulations of urea and thermal-induced denaturation of S-peptide analogue,” Biophysical Chemistry, vol. 89, no. 2-3, pp. 145–162, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. Tobi, R. Elber, and D. Thirumalai, “The dominant interaction between peptide and urea is electrostatic in nature: a molecular dynamics simulation study,” Biopolymers, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 359–369, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. B. J. Bennion and V. Daggett, “The molecular basis for the chemical denaturation of proteins by urea,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 9, pp. 5142–5147, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. B. J. Bennion and V. Daggett, “Counteraction of urea-induced protein denaturation by trimethylamine N-oxide: a chemical chaperone at atomic resolution,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 17, pp. 6433–6438, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. K. Klimov, J. E. Straub, and D. Thirumalai, “Aqueous urea solution destabilizers Aβ16−22 oligomers,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 41, pp. 14760–14765, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Caballero-Herrera, K. Nordstrand, K. D. Berndt, and L. Nilsson, “Effect of urea on peptide conformation in water: molecular dynamics and experimental characterization,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 842–857, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. V. Daggett, “Protein folding-simulation,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 106, no. 5, pp. 1898–1916, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. L. Hua, R. Zhou, D. Thirumalai C, and B. J. Berne, “Urea denaturation by stronger dispersion interactions with proteins than water implies a 2-stage unfolding,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 44, pp. 16928–16933, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. Meloni, C. Camilloni, and G. Tiana, “Sampling the denatured state of polypeptides in water, urea, and guanidine chloride to strict equilibrium conditions with the help of massively parallel computers,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 846–854, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. H. M. Berman, T. Battistuz, T. N. Bhat et al., “The protein data bank,” Acta Crystallographica Section D: Biological Crystallography, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 899–907, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. L. Martínez, R. Andrade, E. G. Birgin, and J. M. Martínez, “Packmol: a package for building initial configurations for molecular dynamics simulations,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 30, no. 13, pp. 2157–2164, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. K. Kawahara and C. Tanford, “Viscosity and density of aqueous solutions of urea and guanidine hydrochloride,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 241, no. 13, pp. 3228–3232, 1966. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. C. N. Pace and J. M. Scholtz, “Measuring the conformational stability of a protein,” Protein Structure: A practical Approach, vol. 2, pp. 299–321, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  25. J. C. Phillips, R. Braun, W. Wang et al., “Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 26, no. 16, pp. 1781–1802, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. D. MacKerell Jr., D. Bashford, M. Bellott et al., “All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 102, no. 18, pp. 3586–3616, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. D. Mackerell Jr., M. Feig, and C. L. Brooks III, “Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulation,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1400–1415, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. W. L. Jorgensen, “Transferable intermolecular potential functions for water, alcohols, and ethers. Application to liquid water,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 335–340, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. Caflisch and M. Karplus, “Acid and thermal denaturation of barnase investigated by molecular dynamics simulations,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 252, no. 5, pp. 672–708, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. T. Darden, L. Perera, L. Li, and P. Lee, “New tricks for modelers from the crystallography toolkit: the particle mesh Ewald algorithm and its use in nucleic acid simulations,” Structure, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. R55–R60, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. G. J. Martyna, D. J. Tobias, and M. L. Klein, “Constant pressure molecular dynamics algorithms,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 4177–4189, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. S. E. Feller, Y. Zhang, R. W. Pastor, and B. R. Brooks, “Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: the Langevin piston method,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 103, no. 11, pp. 4613–4621, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. P. Auffinger, S. Louise-May, and E. Westhof, “Multiple molecular dynamics simulations of the anticodon loop of trnaasp in aqueous solution with counterions,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 117, no. 25, pp. 6720–6726, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. D. R. Roe and T. E. Cheatham, “PTRAJ and CPPTRAJ: Software for processing and analysis of molecular dynamics trajectory data,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 3084–3095, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. D. Case, T. Darden, I. Cheatham et al., AMBER 12, University of California, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 2013.
  36. W. Kabsch, “A solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors,” Acta Crystallographica Section A: Crystal Physics, Diffraction, Theoretical and General Crystallography, vol. 32, part 5, pp. 922–923, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. W. R. Montfort, K. M. Perry, E. B. Fauman et al., “Structure, multiple site binding, and segmental accommodation in thymidylate synthase on binding dUMP and an anti-folate,” Biochemistry, vol. 29, no. 30, pp. 6964–6977, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. W. Kabsch and C. Sander, “Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features,” Biopolymers, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 2577–2637, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus