Clinical Study

Electrical Muscle Stimulation: An Effective Form of Exercise and Early Mobilization to Preserve Muscle Strength in Critically Ill Patients

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the patients finally evaluated in the EMS group and the control group (mean ± SD; in medication variables: median (25th–75th percentiles)).

EMS groupControl group

2428
Age, years 0.49
Gender, male/female19/522/6>0.99
SOFA score on admission 0.52
APACHE II score on admission 0.03
SAPS III score on admission 0.34
Diagnostic category at admission
 Brain injury, (%) 9 (38%) 5 (18%)
 Postsurgical, (%) 7 (29%) 5 (18%)
 Respiratory failure, (%)0 (0%)2 (6%)0.05
 Sepsis/septic shock, (%)1 (4%)10 (36%)
  Trauma, (%) 5 (21%) 5 (18%)
 Other, (%)2 (8%)1 (4%)
Comorbidities
 Cardiovascular disease, (%) 8 (33%) 13 (46%)0.50
 Diabetes mellitus, (%) 3 (13%) 5 (18%)0.71
 GI disease, (%) 3 (13%) 1 (4%)0.32
 Haematologic disease, (%)1 (4%) 1 (4%)>0.99
 Hepatic disease, (%)2 (8%) 0 (0%)0.21
 Renal disease, (%)0 (0%)6 (21%)0.03
 Respiratory disease, (%) 3 (13%)9 (32%)0.18
 Other, (%)2 (8%) 1 (4%)0.59
 None reported, (%) 8 (33%) 8 (29%)0.95
Sepsis during ICU stay, (%) 16 (67%)21 (75%)0.72
Medication
 Sedation, days5 (2–10)4 (2–9)0.85
 Aminoglycoside administration, days 0 (0–4) 1 (0–4)0.18
 Corticosteroid administration, days0 (0–2)0 (0–2)0.96
 NMBA administration, days 0 (0-0)0 (0-0)0.48

EMS: electrical muscle stimulation; SOFA: sequential organ failure assessment; APACHE: acute physiology and chronic health evaluation; SAPS: simplified acute physiology; GI: gastrointestinal; NMBA: neuromuscular blocking agents.