Review Article
Intravenous Fluid of Choice in Major Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review
Table 4
Overview of randomized control trials related to microcirculation categorized by primary outcome.
| Author, year | Fluid compared | N | Operation | Conclusion |
| Primary outcome: Gastric pH and Pg-aCO2 | Marik [35], 1997 | LRS HES 670/0.75 (hetastarch) | 30 | Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair | HES 670/0.75 improved splanchnic mucosal blood flow (gastric pH) | Rittoo [46], 2002 | 6% HES 200/0.62 (Elohes) 4% gelatin (Gelofusine) | 22 | Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair | HES 200/0.5 improved splanchnic mucosal blood flow (gastric pH) | Mahmood [34], 2009 | 6% HES 200/0.62 (Elohes) 6% HES 130/0.4 (Voluven) 4% gelatin (Gelofusine) | 62 | Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair | HES is better than gelatin but HES 200/0.62 was the best in decreasing gastric pH after clamp off | Deng [21], 2017 | LRS 4% gelatin (Gelofusine) 4.5% NaCl in 7.6% HES40 | 36 | Laparoscopic colonic surgery | No significant splanchnic mucosal blood flow (Pg-aCO2) | Zhu [57], 2018 | LRS 4% gelatin (Gelofusine) 4.5% NaCl in 7.6% HES 40 | 71 | Laparoscopic colonic surgery | 4% gelatin was the best in maintaining gastric pH > 7.32 for more than 60 minutes of operation |
|
|
HES = hydroxyethyl starch, NaCl = sodium chloride, and LRS = lactated Ringer’s solution.
|