Review Article

Intravenous Fluid of Choice in Major Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review

Table 4

Overview of randomized control trials related to microcirculation categorized by primary outcome.

Author, yearFluid comparedNOperationConclusion

Primary outcome: Gastric pH and Pg-aCO2
Marik [35], 1997LRS
HES 670/0.75 (hetastarch)
30Abdominal aortic aneurysm repairHES 670/0.75 improved splanchnic mucosal blood flow (gastric pH)
Rittoo [46], 20026% HES 200/0.62 (Elohes)
4% gelatin (Gelofusine)
22Abdominal aortic aneurysm repairHES 200/0.5 improved splanchnic mucosal blood flow (gastric pH)
Mahmood [34], 20096% HES 200/0.62 (Elohes)
6% HES 130/0.4 (Voluven)
4% gelatin (Gelofusine)
62Abdominal aortic aneurysm repairHES is better than gelatin but HES 200/0.62 was the best in decreasing gastric pH after clamp off
Deng [21], 2017LRS
4% gelatin (Gelofusine)
4.5% NaCl in 7.6% HES40
36Laparoscopic colonic surgeryNo significant splanchnic mucosal blood flow (Pg-aCO2)
Zhu [57], 2018LRS
4% gelatin (Gelofusine)
4.5% NaCl in 7.6% HES 40
71Laparoscopic colonic surgery4% gelatin was the best in maintaining gastric pH > 7.32 for more than 60 minutes of operation

HES = hydroxyethyl starch, NaCl = sodium chloride, and LRS = lactated Ringer’s solution.