Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Child Development Research
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 216367, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/216367
Research Article

It Works Both Ways: Transfer Difficulties between Manipulatives and Written Subtraction Solutions

1Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, IL 60208, USA
2University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, IA 52242, USA
3Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, TN 37240, USA
4University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, VA 22904, USA

Received 31 March 2013; Accepted 22 August 2013

Academic Editor: Jeffrey W. Fagen

Copyright © 2013 David H. Uttal et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. G. Lakoff and R. E. Núñez, Where Mathematics Comes from: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being, Basic Books, New York, NY, USA, 2000.
  2. R. Gelman and C. R. Gallistel, “Language and the origin of numerical concepts,” Science, vol. 306, no. 5695, pp. 441–443, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. Landy and R. L. Goldstone, “How abstract is symbolic thought?” Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 720–733, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. S. Bruner, Toward a Theory of Instruction, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1966.
  5. A. S. Lillard, Montessori: The Science Behind the Genius, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2005.
  6. M. Montessori, The Advanced Montessori Method, Frederick A. Stokes, New York, NY, USA, 1917.
  7. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Principles and Standards for School Mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, Va, USA, 2000.
  8. J. Piaget, Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child, Orion Press, New York, NY, USA, 1970.
  9. H. Werner and B. Kaplan, Symbol Formation: An Organismic-Developmental Approach to Language and the Expression of Thought, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 1963.
  10. N. M. McNeil, D. H. Uttal, L. Jarvin, and R. J. Sternberg, “Should you show me the money? Concrete objects both hurt and help performance on mathematics problems,” Learning and Instruction, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 171–184, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S.-J. Chao, J. W. Stigler, and J. A. Woodward, “The effects of physical materials on kindergartners' learning of number concepts,” Cognition and Instruction, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 285–316, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. Fuson and D. Briars, “Using a base-ten blocks learning/teaching approach for first-and second-grade place-value and multidigit addition and subtraction,” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 180–206, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  13. T. Martin and D. L. Schwartz, “Physically distributed learning: adapting and reinterpreting physical environments in the development of fraction concepts,” Cognitive Science, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 587–625, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. L. B. Resnick and S. F. Omanson, “Learning to understand arithmetic,” in Advances in Instructional Psychology, R. Glaser, Ed., vol. 3, pp. 41–95, L. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  15. E. L. Thorndike, Animal Intelligence: Experimental Studies, Norwood Press, Norwood, Mass, USA, 1911.
  16. E. Tulving and D. M. Thomson, “Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory,” Psychological Review, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 352–373, 1973. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. S. DeLoache, “Dual representation and young children's use of scale models,” Child Development, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 329–338, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. H. Uttal, K. V. Scudder, and J. S. DeLoache, “Manipulatives as symbols: a new perspective on the use of concrete objects to teach mathematics,” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 37–54, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. H. W. Stevenson, S.-Y. Lee, and J. W. Stigler, “Mathematics achievement of Chinese, Japanese, and American children,” Science, vol. 231, no. 4739, pp. 693–699, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. Hiebert and D. Wearne, “Procedures over concepts: the acquisition of decimal number knowledge,” in Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: the Case of Mathematics, J. Hiebert, Ed., pp. 199–223, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  21. M. Hughes, Children and Number: Difficulties in Learning Mathematics, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 1986.
  22. D. H. Uttal, L. L. Liu, and J. S. Deloache, “Concreteness and symbolic development,” in Child Psychology: A Handbook of Contemporary Issues, L. Balter and C. S. Tamis-LeMonda, Eds., pp. 167–184, Psychology Press, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2nd edition, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  23. J. S. DeLoache, “Rapid change in the symbolic functioning of very young children,” Science, vol. 238, no. 4833, pp. 1556–1557, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. S. DeLoache, “Young children's understanding of the correspondence between a scale model and a larger space,” Cognitive Development, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 121–139, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. S. Deloache, “Early symbol understanding and use,” in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, D. L. Medin, Ed., vol. 33, pp. 65–114, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  26. A. S. Dick, W. F. Overton, and S. L. Kovacs, “The development of symbolic coordination: representation of imagined objects, executive function, and theory of mind,” Journal of Cognition and Development, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 133–161, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. A. Kaminski and V. M. Sloutsky, “Extraneous perceptual information interferes with children's acquisition of mathematical knowledge,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 105, no. 2, p. 351, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  28. J. A. Kaminski, V. M. Sloutsky, and A. F. Heckler, “The advantage of abstract examples in learning math,” Science, vol. 320, no. 5875, pp. 454–455, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. D. Corbiere, Digi-Block Companion to Everyday Mathematics: Grade 1, Digi-Blocks, Watertown, Mass, USA, 2003.
  30. P. Noble, Digi-Block Companion to Everyday Mathematics: Grade 2, Digi-Blocks, Watertown, Mass, USA, 2003.
  31. J. Davidson, Using the Cuisenaire Rods: A Photo/Text Guide for Teachers, Cuisenaire Company of America, New Rochelle, NY, USA, 1983.
  32. M. Bell, J. Bell, J. Bretzlauf et al., Everyday Mathematics: Second Grade Teacher's lesson Guide, vol. 1, Everyday Learning Corporation, Chicago, Ill, USA, 2001.
  33. P. Dugard and J. Todman, “Analysis of pretest posttest control group designs in educational research,” Educational Psychology, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 181, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  34. E. J. Sowell, “Effects of manipulative materials in mathematics instruction,” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, vol. 20, pp. 498–505, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  35. D. L. Ball, “Magical hopes: manipulatives and the reform of math education,” American Educator, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 14–18, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  36. D. H. Clements and S. McMillen, “Rethinking, “concrete” manipulatives,” Teaching Children Mathematics, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 270–279, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  37. M. L. Gick and K. J. Holyoak, “Analogical problem solving,” Cognitive Psychology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 306–355, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  38. J. R. Star and B. Rittle-Johnson, “Flexibility in problem solving: the case of equation solving,” Learning and Instruction, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 565–579, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. L. E. Richland, O. Zur, and K. J. Holyoak, “Cognitive supports for analogies in the mathematics classroom,” Science, vol. 316, no. 5828, pp. 1128–1129, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus