Study Study objective Year Location Study population Age, mean ± SD Population, according to sex percentile (ng/L) [95% CI]Comments Males (%) Females (%) Males Females hs-cTnI (Abbott Diagnostics) Apple et al. [61 ] To systematically assess percentiles of cTn concentrations in a single population for a large number of assays 2012 US 524 18-64 272 (52) 252 (48) 36 15 Reference population selection based only on health questionnaire interviews Koerbin et al. [63 ] To assess analytical characteristics and to apply the assay to a population of apparently cardiovascular disease-free people 2012 Australia 497 20-84 231 (46.5) 266 (53.5) 14 11 Reference population selection based on medical history and biomarkers Aw et al. [85 ] To determine percentile reference values in a large Asian cohort 2013 Asia 1120 50.4 ± 8.2 597 (53.3) 523 (46.7) 32.7 17.9 Reference population selection based on: medical history Krintus et al. [27 ] To assess percentile for hs-cTnI in a large multicenter European cohort 2015 Europe 1769 49 776 (43.9) 993 (56.1) 27 11.4 Reference population selection based on blood donors, health questionnaires and no overt cardiovascular disease Omland et al. [86 ] To assess sex-related differences in hs-cTnI distribution across sexes 2015 Norway 8099 Males: 50.2 ± 17.1 3670 (45.3) 4429 (54.7) 34.8 [26.3-49.4] 18.7 [14.8-23.1] Reference intervals are reported for women and men without history of major cardiovascular disease or risk factor Females: 49.7 ± 16.4 Zeller et al. [87 ] To assess sex-specific percentile reference values in a large German-based cohort 2015 Germany 4138 50 2098 (50.7) 2040 (49.3) 33.1 [28.3-45.8] 19.9 [16.1-23.9] Reference population selection based on different criteria with several subgroups reported (here the overall) 1535 (whole cohort) 57 ± 8 733 (47.6) 807 (52.4) 20 [ ] 11 [ ] Reference population selection based on: medical history and biomarkers; population stratified by age Kimenai et al. [78 ] To assess sex-specific and age-specific percentile upper reference limits of hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI in a single reference cohort 2016 Netherlands 283 40-49 120 (42.4) 163 (57.6) 13 [ ] 12 [ ] 944 50-64 441 (46.7) 503 (53.3) 22 [ ] 9 [ ] 308 65-75 168 (54.5) 140 (45.6) 20 [ ] 13 [ ] Mueller et al. [80 ] To assess percentile in a blood donors population 2016 Austria 402 35 259 (64.4) 143 (35.6) 39.0 23.5 Reference population selection based on: no overt cardiovascular disease, eGFR > 90 ml/min Ji et al. [88 ] To assess percentile values in a Korean cohort 2016 South Korea 854 49.8 ± 10.2 426 (49.9) 428 (50.1) 20 19 Reference population selection based on clinical history and laboratory tests (eGFR, HbA1c, BNP) Li et al. [89 ] To assess percentile for hs-cTnI in a Chinese-based population 2017 China 1485 36 ± 13 731 (49.2) 754 (50.8) 31.1 22.7 Reference population selection based on: clinical history, BMI, renal function Welsh et al. [108 ] Evaluating the influence of several variables, including sex, on the percentile levels of hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI 2018 Scotland 19501 35-65 8126 (41.7) 11375 (58.3) Several according to age Several according to age Reference population selection based on general population; health questionnaire; lab tests hs-cTnI (Beckman Coulter) Apple et al. [61 ] To systematically assess percentiles of cTn concentrations in a single population for a large number of assays 2012 US 524 18-64 272 (52) 252 (48) 52 23 Reference population selection based only on health questionnaire interviews hs-cTnI (Singulex) Apple et al. [41 ] To determine percentile reference value for hs-cTnI assay 2010 US 348 18-76 147 (42.2) 201 (57.8) 16.6 9.4 Reference population selection based only on health questionnaire interviews Bossard et al. [90 ] To assess factors related to hs-cTnI levels in a healthy young population without overt cardiovascular diseases 2016 Liechtenstein 2077 36.7 975 (46.9) 1102 (53.1) 15.8 5.1 Reference population selection based on: clinical records and absence of comorbidities hs-cTnI (Siemens) Apple et al. [61 ] To systematically assess percentiles of cTn troponin concentrations in a single population for a large number of assays 2012 US 524 18-64 272 (52) 252 (48) 81 42 Reference population selection based only on health questionnaire interviews McKie et al. [42 ] To define hs-cTnI reference values and determinants in the general community, in a healthy reference cohort, and in subsets with diseases 2013 US 565 54 [50-61 260 (45) 305 (54) 55 [ ] 33 [ ] Reference population selection based on medical history, biomarkers and cardiac imaging