Potential Roles of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in Nondiabetic Populations

Xu, Dan; Nair, Ankith; Sigston, Charlie; Ho, Chau; Li, Jia; Yang, Daya; Liao, Xinxue; Chen, Wei; Kuang, Ming; Li, Yanbing; Reid, Christopher; Xiao, Haipeng

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6820377

Cardiovascular Therapeutics

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 6820377 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6820377

Potential Roles of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in Nondiabetic Populations

Dan Xu,^1,2,3Ankith Nair,²Charlie Sigston,⁴Chau Ho,¹Jia Li,⁵Daya Yang,^3,6Xinxue Liao,^3,6Wei Chen,^3,7Ming Kuang,^3,8Yanbing Li,^3,9Christopher Reid,¹and Haipeng Xiao^3,9

Academic Editor: Nicholas B. Norgard

Received12 Jun 2022

Revised29 Oct 2022

Accepted01 Nov 2022

Published16 Nov 2022

Abstract

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have been observed in several large cardiovascular outcome trials to significantly reduce the incidence of major cardiovascular event (MACE) with type 2 diabetic patients. The clinical trials of GLP-1 RAs, including lixisenatide, exenatide, liraglutide, semaglutide, albiglutide, and dulaglutide, are associated with a significantly 14% lower risk of MACE in patients with T2DM and a history of CV disease, and with a nonsignificantly 6% lower risk in patients without history of CV disease. Some of the interpretation with GLP-1 RA trials suggested the possible role of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in nondiabetic individual, echoed by a recent editorial redefining the role of GLP-1 RAs being beyond glycaemic control. The narrative review provides an in-depth insight into GLP-1 RA use guideline in different countries and regions of the world and examines the safety and concern of GLP-1 RA use. The narrative review draws the comparison of GLP-1 RA use between diabetic and nondiabetic individual in terms of cardiovascular and metabolic benefits and points out the direction of future clinical trials of GLP-1 RAs in nondiabetic individuals. The focus of the review is on GLP-1 RAs’ preventive roles in nondiabetic individuals with cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney diseases, obesity, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, nonalcoholic fatty liver diseases, polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), and perioperative complications of bariatric surgery, albeit in small studies and subset analysis of clinical trials of diabetic patients.

1. Introduction

Glucagon-like peptide (GLP) was first discovered through research demonstrating a sustained insulin release in response to oral glucose load when compared with the intravenous glucose load [1]. GLPs’ enhanced release of insulin in response to glucose ingestion became known as the ‘incretin effect’ [2]. Further, study showed that patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) had an impaired incretin effect after glucose load [3]. Subsequently, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) was found to be specifically effective in stimulating insulin and reducing peak plasma glucose concentrations [4]. GLP-1 is released from the distal bowel within minutes of a meal and does enhance glucose-dependent insulin production and secretion, decrease glucagon secretion, increase glucose uptake and glycogen synthesis in peripheral tissues, delay gastric emptying, and increase satiety [5], making it an ideal target for diabetes therapy. The first GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) was exenatide, which was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2005 for the treatment of T2DM [6]. Since then, several GLP-1 RAs have been recommended for treatment of diabetes as a second line therapy in view of their clinical efficacies including improved weight loss, low risk for hypoglycaemia, and reduction in glycated haemoglobin (HgA1c). GLP-1 RAs have its unique mechanism of action of simultaneously increasing insulin secretion and inhibiting glucagon only in response to increased glucose levels [7, 8] and can potentially be used in obese and nondiabetic individuals without the risk of hypoglycaemia [9]. In addition, GLP-1 RAs have some potential roles other than glycaemic control that was echoed by a recent editorial by Chowdhury and Goswami [10]. This study reviewed the roles of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) beyond diabetes treatment based on available evidence in human studies.

2. Methods

The authors performed an extensive literature review in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycINFO (Ovid) by using the following Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms including GLP-1 RA, guideline, safety, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney diseases, obesity, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, nonalcoholic fatty liver diseases, polycystic ovarian syndrome, and perioperative complications of bariatric surgery. The review has identified 4594 publications related to GLP-1 RAs’ safety, guidelines in different countries, and potential preventive roles. After scanning the titles and the abstracts to remove duplication, case reports, and editorial comments, we have included 75 publications for full text screening to identify the relevant discussion points regarding GLP-1 RA’s potential roles in nondiabetic population in this review. The authors have applied the Oxford Equator PRISMA checklist [11] to satisfy an evidence-based narrative review. The Oxford Equator PRISMA checklist is an updated internationally-recognised guideline for reporting narrative and systemic reviews to ensure the transparency and integrity of the search source as well as the validity of the search methodology [11].

2.1. Current Recommendations for the Use of GLP-1 RAs in Clinical Practice

GLP-1 RAs have high efficacy on controlling blood glucose with low risk of hypoglycaemia like metformin. They have beneficial effects on CVD prevention, albuminuria, and weight loss similar to Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors [12]. GLP-1 RAs’ guidelines of use in clinical practice varied in different countries, which is shown in Table 1. GLP-1 RAs can be indicated with or without metformin and are recommended in T2DM patients with CVD risk or CKD without albuminuria or those who need assistance for weight loss in the USA [12], in Australia [13], in European Union [14], in United Kingdom [15], and in China [16]. GLP-1 RAs are also recommended for obesity and overweight management in nondiabetic patients except in Chinese guideline [17]. Four common GLP-1 RAs that have been approved in Australia, the US, and in China are exenatide, dulaglutide, liraglutide, and semaglutide, which are administered subcutaneously except for oral semaglutide described in the US guideline [12]. The convenience of once-weekly semaglutide and dulaglutide may improve the adherence to treatment and reduce the burden of the daily administration as other hypoglycaemics.

2.2. GLP-1 RAs’ Roles beyond Diabetes Treatment

Table 2 summarised the current evidence of GLP-1 RAs’ role in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients.

2.3. Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Both Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients

GLP-1 RAs have been suggested in several major cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) as potential treatment not only for T2DM and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease but also in T2DM patients with manifest HF. In the LEADER trial in T2DM patients, liraglutide against placebo decreased the risks of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke with no significant effects on HF hospitalizations [18]; similar outcomes were also observed in the SUSTAIN-6 semaglutide against placebo control trial [19]. In contrast, the ELIXA [20], EXSCEL [21], REWIND [22], and the HARMONY Outcomes trial [23] showed no significant effect on a composite outcome of HF hospitalization and cardiovascular death. However, the HARMONY trial [24] did show lower risk of HF hospitalization with GLP-1 RAs versus placebo with a hazard ratio [HR] of 0.71 (95% CI). The PIONEER 6 trial [25] also found no difference between GLP-1 RAs and placebo in HF hospitalizations. A meta-analysis of seven trials [25] including >56 000 T2DM patients, GLP-1 RAs showed modest but statistically significant reductions in MACE by 12%, all-cause mortality by 12%, a broad kidney composite outcome by 17%, and a slightly lower risk of hospitalization for HF by 9%, in contrast to observations and conclusions from individual randomized trials suggesting no clear benefit on HF-related outcomes and even uncertainty regarding the safety in those with HF with reduced ejection fraction. In the subset of diabetic patients with baseline HF, the EXSCEL trial [26] recruiting T2DM patients with and without HF showed GLP-1 RA was not associated with a significant reduction of all-cause mortality, whereas the association was significant in the subgroup without HF. In the post hoc analyses of individual patient-level data combined from SUSTAIN-6 and PIONEER 6, semaglutide showed no difference on MACE in patients with baseline HF [27]. Similar results were observed in the post hoc analysis of LEADER trial with the treatment effect of liraglutide on MACE [28]. In patients of chronic HF with reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF), two liraglutide against placebo trials [29, 30] showed no differences in HF-related outcomes or functional capacity in HFrEF patients with and without diabetes.

Further exploration of GLP-1 RAs in nondiabetic patients, a mild improvement of left ventricular function has recently been demonstrated in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated acutely with the GLP-1 analogue liraglutide for 7 days [31]. Similar results were shown in patients with non-STEMI irrespective of diabetic status [32]. It raised the possible preventive role of GLP-1 RAs on cardiovascular events in nondiabetic population that needs to be confirmed in future studies. Taking together, there is no convincing trial evidence with GLP-1 RA for prevention of cardiovascular events in nondiabetic population.

2.4. Prevention of CKD in DM and Non-DM Patients

In placebo control trial with diabetic patients, GLP-1 RAs reduced the risk of the broad composite kidney outcome significantly by 17%, in particular with a 26% reduction in macroalbuminuria [33]. To date, there are no human trials studying renal outcomes of GLP-1 receptor agonists in nondiabetic patients.

The analysis of renal endpoints in large placebo-controlled CVOTs of GLP-1 RAs in patients with T2DM either with cardiovascular comorbidities or at high risk of cardiovascular disease suggests that GLP-1 RAs may be renoprotective even when corrected for glycaemic control [33]. GLP-1 RA is thought to inhibit sodium-hydrogen exchange in the proximal-convoluted tubules, thus increasing urinary sodium excretion [34]. In ELIXA, lixisenatide reduced urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio; although correction for glycaemic control decreased significance, diminished the incidence of macroalbuminuria, remaining unattenuated when corrected for HbA1c, and did not affect eGFR decline [20]. In LEADER, liraglutide decreased poor renal outcomes by 22% and in SUSTAIN-6, semaglutide reduced poor renal outcomes by 36%, while post hoc analyses showed that their antialbuminuric effects were independent of their glucose-lowering effects. Both drugs also induced a slower rate of eGFR decline [18, 19]. In EXSCEL and REWIND, exenatide and dulaglutide, respectively, lowered the incidence of macroalbuminuria after adjusting for HbA1c, without affecting eGFR [21, 22]. HARMONY and PIONEER 6 reported no change in eGFR with albiglutide and semaglutide, respectively [23, 24]. GLP-1 RAs reduced blood pressure after prolonged treatment, specifically lowering systolic blood pressure by 3-4 mmHg, which is renoprotective. Similarly, weight loss in obese patients up to 2 kg associated with lowering blood pressure suggests GLP-1 RAs’ benefit in patients with CKD even without T2DM [35]. No evidence on the effect of GLP-1 RAs on CKD has been reported. In summary, there is no direct trial evidence of GLP-1 RAs’ effects on prevention of CKD in nondiabetic population (Table 2).

2.5. Prevention of Obesity/Overweight in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients

Obesity is on the rise and has now been defined as a chronic disease with serious health consequences and associated with increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes [36, 37]. A systematic review [38] has summarised the evidence that weight loss of 5 to 10% reduce obesity-related complications and improve quality of life. Maintaining weight loss with lifestyle intervention alone has proven to be difficult [39].

While changes in diet, behavioural modifications, and physical activity have typically been the foundation of weight management, weight loss achieved by these interventions alone is often limited and unsatisfactory [40]. Bariatric surgery has been proven effective but carry associated surgical risks and typically used as a last resort [41].

Pharmacotherapy may be considered in obese patients with a BMI of 30 and above or in patients with lower BMIs with weight-related complications [40]. The development of GLP-1 RAs have created a new avenue for the management of obesity in patients with and without T2DM [40]. Current research with GLP-1 RAs has provided significant evidence, especially liraglutide accounting for up to 56% of the global pharmacological approach to obesity management. Long-acting analogues of GLP-1 RAs showed good weight loss activity [42]. Recent review has shown clear evidence of GLP-1 RAs to reduce body weight by 5.8-9.6% in obese adults with T2DM [43]. Liraglutide has been shown to result in weight loss that is dose-dependent, up to 3.0 mg daily [44]. A 56-week RCT of liraglutide 3.0 mg daily, used as an adjunct with a reduced calorie diet and increased physical activity in nondiabetic overweight or obese adults demonstrated a significant averaged weight reduction by [44], corresponded to an averaged reduced BMI of [44]. This study also found that liraglutide is associated with reduced cardiometabolic risk factors including waist circumference, blood pressure, and inflammatory markers [44].

Another RCT comparing semaglutide with liraglutide and placebo in nondiabetic patients demonstrated a 7.8% weight loss in the liraglutide 3.0 mg group [45]. Interestingly, however, the study found a higher average weight loss in the semaglutide group of 11-14% at doses of 0.2 mg daily or more [45]. The average weight loss was found to be dose-dependent with reduction of both fat mass and lean mass at a rate of 3 : 1 on 1.0 mg daily [45]. A meta-analysis of 574 children and adolescents with obesity but nondiabetic in 9 RCTs highlighted the impacts of GLP-1 RAs including liraglutide and exenatide in modestly reducing weight, BMI, glycated haemoglobin A1c, and systolic blood pressure [46].

In summary, GLP-1 RAs have been well placed as the forerunner of pharmacological intervention for obesity in both diabetic and nondiabetic population (Table 2).

2.6. Prevention of Dyslipidaemia and Hypertension

There are no direct clinical trial examining GLP-1 RA effects on cardiometabolic variables including blood pressure and dyslipidaemia. In the recent liraglutide trial with obese nondiabetic patients, both changes between baseline and week 56 of systolic and diastolic blood pressure were significantly different between the liraglutide group and the placebo group with a risk difference of -2.8 mmHg (95%Cl -3.56 to -2.09) and -0.9 (95%Cl -1.41 to -0.37), respectively [44]. ,Similarly, the reduction of total cholesterol from baseline to week 56 was significantly higher in the liraglutide group with a risk difference -2.3% (95%Cl -3.3 to -1.3) [44]. In summary, there is no direct trial evidence of GLP-1 RAs’ effects on prevention of CKD in nondiabetic population (Table 2). A dedicated trial should be carefully designed to examine cardiometabolic endpoints including blood pressure, lipid, and other metabolic variables with GLP-1 RAs in nondiabetic population.

2.7. Prevention of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is highly prevalent in diabetic patients associated with ASCVD, diastolic dysfunction, and HFpEF. More than one-third of patients with NAFLD have diastolic dysfunction, coronary microvascular dysfunction, and myocardial fibrosis [47, 48]. In obese patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (32% having diabetes), the LEAN trial using liraglutide or placebo in small group of patients showed more frequent resolution of NAFLD and less progression of fibrosis [49]. However, there was no subgroup analysis with the LEAN trial [49] for this effect of liraglutide in nondiabetic population. Another small study [50] randomly assigned diabetic patients to liraglutide, metformin, or gliclazide for 6 months, with patients in the liraglutide arm showing the greatest reduction in intrahepatic fat. Similar results have been reported with exenatide [51]. A meta-analysis including 6 studies showed that GLP-1 RAs reduce circulating ALT levels and improve NAFLD [52]. Another meta-analysis found significant improvements in hepatic fat content, liver biochemistry, body composition, glucose parameters, lipid parameters, insulin sensitivity, and inflammatory markers following GLP-1 RA treatment [53].

In summary, there is no direct trial evidence of GLP-1 RAs’ effects of improving and preventing NAFLD in nondiabetic population.

2.8. Prevention of PCOS in Nondiabetic Patients

GLP-1 RAs have been studied in the treatment of PCOS because of their effectiveness in reducing weight and the associated improvement in hyperandrogenism and metabolic parameters [54]. GLP-1 RAs have also provided beneficial effects on insulin sensitivity, thus addressing many manifestations of PCOS as approximately 70% of women are insulin resistant and 80% are overweight or obese [54]. GLP-1 RAs demonstrated significant improvements in fasting blood glucose, triglycerides, total cholesterol, and homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance in a systematic review [54]. This trial featured by exenatide and metformin effects on the remission of prediabetes, a prevalent comorbidity of PCOS [54]. The trial of 150 women with PCOS with impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance demonstrated a prediabetes remission rate of 64% with combined treatment, 56% with exenatide only and 32% with metformin only [54]. Similarly, a meta-analysis of six randomised-controlled trials concluded that GLP-1 RAs were significantly associated with lower BMI and HOMA-IR when compared to metformin [55].

Open-label clinical trials exploring the effect of exenatide on body mass in overweight or obese women with PCOS showed a significant reduction in body weight, ranging from -3.1 to -6 kg and a corresponding decrease in BMI between -1 and -3.1 kg/m² [54]. In addition, a meta-analysis of RCTs also identified a significant improvement in reducing BMI and abdominal girth of women with PCOS, when compared to metformin [56].

The systematic review examined the effects of GLP-1 RAs on PCOS-related subfertility and irregular periods. Exenatide compared with metformin demonstrated a significantly greater number of spontaneous pregnancies in the exenatide group, after 24 weeks of treatment [54]. Another 12-week trial demonstrated a significantly increased frequency and regularity of menstrual cycles with exenatide [54]. Similar findings were demonstrated in a trial of overweight, oligogovulatory women with PCOS, with an increase in the regularity of menses and a higher rate of ovulation in the single-agent exenatide and metformin groups [54]. Interestingly, the combination of exenatide and metformin resulted in a higher rate of ovulation and menstruation than the single-agent groups in this trial [54].

In summary, there is some trial evidence of GLP-1 RAs’ effects on prevention of PCOS through weight reduction in nondiabetic population (Table 2).

2.9. Potential Roles of GLP-1 RA on Prevention of Perioperative and Postoperative Complications of Bariatric Surgical Individual

Bariatric surgery is the most commonly performed procedures and the most effective intervention for obesity with BMI over 30 kg/m² [57]. GLP-1 rises sharply after bariatric surgery, accelerating nutrient transit to the distal gastrointestinal tract and increases secretion of incretin and satiety peptides with tenfold higher postprandial GLP-1 levels [58]. GLP-1 is proposed to decrease appetite, decrease fasting insulin, increase postprandial insulin, and decrease hepatic glucose production, even in patients without T2DM after bariatric surgery. GLP-1 receptors in the CNS are also thought to regulate body weight; in rats, GLP-1 antagonists infused into the CNS induced weight gain [59]. A recent randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial [60] “GLP-1 Receptor Agonist interVentIon for poor responders afTer bariAtric Surgery (GRAVITAS)” investigated the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous injections of the liraglutide on glycaemic control in patients with persistent or recurrent T2DM after bariatric Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or vertical sleeve gastrectomy. The conclusion drawn from the study stated that irrespective of the type of surgery, liraglutide can treat the persistent or recurrent postbariatric surgery complication of T2DM by optimising glycaemic control along with a needful weight loss. The GRAVITAS trial raised the questions of GLP-1 RA’s role especially preoperatively to aid on reducing perioperative complication beyond diabetes and other associated cardiovascular complications in nondiabetic patients as there is currently no direct trial evidence of GLP-1 RAs’ effects on prevention of perioperative and postoperative complications of bariatric surgical individual, especially in nondiabetic population (Table 2). Further, properly-designed clinical trials may answer these questions in nondiabetic bariatric-surgical patients for the prevention of perioperative complications and consolidation of GLP-1 RA’s weight loss benefit postbariatric surgery.

2.10. GLP-1 RAs Safety and Adverse Events

There are numerous reports and reviews of potential safety issues associated with the use of GLP-1 RAs including gastrointestinal symptoms, hypoglycaemia, pancreatitis, injection site reaction, and allergy/angioedema.

2.10.1. Gastrointestinal Symptoms

The most frequently reported adverse effects of GLP-1 RA therapy were gastrointestinal symptoms [61]. Of these symptoms, nausea was the most common and earliest complaint, occurring in up to 50% of patients [62, 63], and others included vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, dyspepsia, and abdominal pain [64].

Second commonly reported adverse effect of GLP-1 RA was gastroparesis. GLP-1 RA have been shown to delay gastric emptying that may increase the risk of nausea, and longer duration of action may have a lesser effect on gastric motility, thus leading to less nausea [65]. Long-acting GLP-1 RAs such as weekly regimen or XR form was less likely to associate with nausea as compared to short-acting and frequent daily regimen [66, 67]. In another study, gastric half-time emptying was delayed in most diabetic patients without preexisting gastroparesis after commencing GLP-1 RAs, while those with preexisting gastroparesis were minimally affected [68].

2.11. Hypoglycaemia

Generally, the risk of hypoglycaemia in patients taking GLP-1 RAs alone was low, and similar across all GLP-1 RAs [66, 69]. The combination of GLP-1 RAs and metformin has not been associated with increased rate or severity of clinically relevant hypoglycaemic events [70, 71]. In clinical trials examining the use of GLP -1 RAs and sulfonylureas, the incidence of hypoglycaemia was increased, when compared to the placebo group [72]. This hypoglycaemic effect has been attributed to the effect of SU uncoupling the action of GLP-1 RA from its glucose dependence. GLP-1 RAs do not treat hypoglycaemia; however, they may be used as an alternative to other antidiabetic drugs that do pose a risk of hypoglycaemia, as GLP-1 RAs do not generally cause hypoglycaemia [72].

2.11.1. Pancreatitis, Pancreatic Hyperplasia, and Neoplasia

There has been conflicting evidence on GLP-1 RAs use and risks of pancreatitis including some studies suggesting a slightly increased risks [73], while others evidence showed no significant risks [74, 75].

Overall, there has not been a clear cause and effect relationship described between GLP-1 RAs and pancreatitis [76, 77]. There is no long-term safety data for the administration of GLP-1 RAs in nondiabetic patients; however, all major CVOTs in diabetic patients support the safety of GLP-1 RAs in the long-term, with no increase in severe hypoglycaemia, pancreatitis, or pancreatic neoplasms [78].

2.11.2. Injection Site Side Effects

Symptoms that may occur include pruritis, rash, or erythema, with pruritis being the most frequently reported injection site symptom [72]. Generally, these symptoms are common and transient in nature. Additionally, injection site reactions are reported more frequently with long acting than short-acting GLP-1 RAs [67]. In phase II and III trials, these reactions occurred in 5.1% of patients receiving exenatide twice daily and 16% in patients receiving exenatide once weekly [72]. In patients receiving lixisenatide, 3.9% of patients experienced injection site reactions [72].

2.11.3. Allergy/Angioedema

GLP-1 RAs are synthetic peptides, which may lead to antibody formation, like other subcutaneously administered peptides [72]. Antibody formation was seen in 69.8% of patients receiving lixisenatide, 44% with exenatide, 8.6% with liraglutide, and 1.6% with dualglutide [72]. Adverse event rates were similar between patients who were antibody positive and antibody negative, with the exception of injection site reactions; these occurred more commonly in patients who were antibody positive [72]. Additionally, a significant decrease in the efficacy of exenatide was noted in patients with high antibody titres [72]. Severe anaphylactic reactions are rare in patients receiving GLP-1 RAs; however, rare postmarketing reports of urticaria, pruritis, and angioneurotic edema were made with exenatide, lixisenatide, and liraglutide [72].

3. Conclusion

As summarised in Table 2, GLP-1 RAs showed modest but statistically significant reductions in MACE, all-cause mortality, a broad kidney composite outcome of reduced macroalbuminuria, and a slightly lower risk of hospitalization for HF in diabetic population, while observations and conclusions from randomized trials suggested no clear benefit on HF-related outcomes. However, GLP-1 RAs have only very limited and suggested evidence in terms of cardiovascular and renal outcomes in nondiabetic population. Furthermore, GLP-1 RAs have only been shown in several small studies and subset analysis of clinical trials in both diabetic and nondiabetic population to contribute to the management of blood pressure lowering, lipid reduction, prevention of PCOS complications, and contribution of assisting weight management in bariatric surgical patients. The gaps with the majority of these evidence lie in the fact of most studied population being diabetic patients or obesity patients with only small numbers of low-risk/non-CVD individuals. Taking all the evidence together, there is a need for consideration of GLP-1 RA as a potential agent for primary prevention clinical trial in low risk of cardiovascular, renal diseases, overweight, or even healthy population with research design focusing on both cardiovascular outcomes and cardiovascular risk reduction. A carefully-designed protocol for this GLP-1 RA double-blind randomised-controlled primary prevention trial should address the ultimate goal of exploring its effect on nondiabetic and non-CVD population in preventing cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, obesity, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, NAFLD, PCOS, and perioperative complications of bariatric surgery.

Data Availability

Literature review using the following Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms including GLP-1 RA, guideline, safety, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney diseases, obesity, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, nonalcoholic fatty liver diseases, polycystic ovarian syndrome, and perioperative complications of bariatric surgery has identified 4594 publications related to GLP-1 RAs’ safety, guidelines in different countries, and potential preventive roles. These 4594 publications have been stored in research drive, password protected, and will be available on request from corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

H. Elrick, L. Stimmler, C. J. Hlad Jr., and Y. Arai, “Plasma insulin response to oral and intravenous glucose administration1,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 1076–1082, 1964.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Creutzfeldt, “The incretin concept today,” Diabetologia, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 75–85, 1979.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Nauck, F. Stöckmann, R. Ebert, and W. Creutzfeldt, “Reduced incretin effect in type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes,” Diabetologia, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 46–52, 1986.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Kreymann, G. Williams, M. A. Ghatei, and S. R. Bloom, “Glucagon-like peptide-1 7-36: a physiological incretin in man,” Lancet, vol. 2, no. 8571, pp. 1300–1304, 1987.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. J. Drucker and M. A. Nauck, “The incretin system: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes,” Lancet, vol. 368, no. 9548, pp. 1696–1705, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. A. DeFronzo, R. E. Ratner, J. Han, D. D. Kim, M. S. Fineman, and A. D. Baron, “Effects of exenatide (exendin-4) on glycemic control and weight over 30 weeks in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes,” Diabetes Care, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1092–1100, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. L. Baggio and D. J. Drucker, “Biology of incretins: GLP-1 and GIP,” Gastroenterology, vol. 132, no. 6, pp. 2131–2157, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Nauck, N. Kleine, C. Orskov, J. J. Holst, B. Willms, and W. Creutzfeldt, “Normalization of fasting hyperglycaemia by exogenous glucagon-like peptide 1 (7-36 amide) in type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients,” Diabetologia, vol. 36, pp. 741–744, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Gillani and B. M. Singh, “The use of GLP-1 agonist therapy, liraglutide, is associated with significant weight loss in morbidly obese people without diabetes,” British Journal of Diabetes, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 61–64, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Chowdhury and S. Goswami, “GLP1 agonists beyond glycemic control—redefining their role,” International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 461–463, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Page, J. E. McKenzie, P. M. Bossuyt et al., “The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 18, no. 3, article e1003583, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, “9. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2022,” Diabetes Care, vol. 45, pp. S125–SS43, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Australian Medicine Handbook (AMH), Glucagon -like peptide analogues Australian Medicines Handbook, AMH Pty Ltd, 2022.
ESC Scientific Document Group, “2019 ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD: the task force for diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD),” European Heart Journal, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 255–323, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Nice, Type 2 diabetes in adults: management, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2015.
Chinese Society of Endocrinology, Chinese Diabetes Society, “Consensus recommendations on utilizing glucagon-like peptide-1(GLP-1) receptor agonists in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus,” China Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 836–846, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Jia, J. Weng, D. Zhu et al. et al., “Standards of medical care for type 2 diabetes in China 2019,” Diabetes Metabolism Research and Reviews, vol. 35, e3158, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. P. Marso, G. H. Daniels, K. Brown-Frandsen et al., “Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 375, no. 4, pp. 311–322, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. P. Marso, S. C. Bain, A. Consoli et al., “Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 375, no. 19, pp. 1834–1844, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Pfeffer, B. Claggett, R. Diaz et al., “Lixisenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes and acute coronary syndrome,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 373, no. 23, pp. 2247–2257, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. R. Holman, M. A. Bethel, R. J. Mentz et al., “Effects of once-weekly exenatide on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 377, no. 13, pp. 1228–1239, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
The REWIND Investigators, “Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): a double- blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial,” The Lancet, vol. 394, no. 10193, pp. 121–130, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
The Harmony Outcomes Committees and Investigators, “Albiglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (Harmony Outcomes): a double-blind, randomised placebo- controlled trial,” Lancet, vol. 392, no. 10157, pp. 1519–1529, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Husain, A. L. Birkenfeld, M. Donsmark et al., “Oral semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 381, no. 9, pp. 841–851, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. L. Kristensen, R. Rørth, P. S. Jhund et al., “Cardiovascular, mortality, and kidney outcomes with GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials,” The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 776–785, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Fudim, J. White, N. J. Pagidipati et al., “Effect of once-weekly exenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with and without heart failure and heart failure-related outcomes: insights from the EXSCEL trial,” Circulation, vol. 140, no. 20, pp. 1613–1622, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Husain, S. C. Bain, O. K. Jeppesen et al., “Semaglutide (SUSTAIN and PIONEER) reduces cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes across varying cardiovascular risk,” Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 442–451, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Husain, S. C. Bain, J. F. Mann et al., “No increased risk of heart failure hospitalization or major cardiovascular events observed with liraglutide in patients with or without a history of New York heart association class II-III heart failure: results from the leader trial,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 71, no. 11, p. A673, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Jorsal, C. Kistorp, P. Holmager et al., “Effect of liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue, on left ventricular function in stable chronic heart failure patients with and without diabetes (LIVE)—a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial,” European Journal of Heart Failure, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 69–77, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. B. Margulies, A. F. Hernandez, M. M. Redfield et al., “Effects of liraglutide on clinical stability among patients with advanced heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: a randomized clinical trial,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 316, no. 5, pp. 500–508, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. R. Chen, S. Y. Hu, Y. D. Chen et al., “Effects of liraglutide on left ventricular function in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention,” American Heart Journal, vol. 170, no. 5, pp. 845–854, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. R. Chen, X. Q. Shen, Y. Zhang et al., “Effects of liraglutide on left ventricular function in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction,” Endocrine, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 516–526, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. C. Palmer, B. Tendal, R. A. Mustafa et al., “Sodium-glucose cotransporter protein-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials,” BMJ, vol. 372, no. 372, article m4573, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. M. Mosterd, P. Bjornstad, and D. H. van Raalte, “Nephroprotective effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists: where do we stand?” Journal of Nephrology, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 965–975, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. H. A. Muskiet, L. Tonneijck, M. M. Smits et al., “GLP-1 and the kidney: from physiology to pharmacology and outcomes in diabetes,” Nature Reviews. Nephrology, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 605–628, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. H. Eckel, S. E. Kahn, E. Ferrannini et al., “Obesity and type 2 diabetes: what can be unified and what needs to be individualized?” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. 1654–1663, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Selvin, C. M. Parrinello, D. B. Sacks, and J. Coresh, “Trends in prevalence and control of diabetes in the United States, 1988-1994 and 1999-2010,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 160, no. 8, pp. 517–525, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. M. Warkentin, D. Das, S. R. Majumdar, J. A. Johnson, and R. S. Padwal, “The effect of weight loss on health-related quality of life: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials,” Obesity Reviews, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 169–182, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. U. Dombrowski, K. Knittle, A. Avenell, V. Araújo-Soares, and F. F. Sniehotta, “Long term maintenance of weight loss with non-surgical interventions in obese adults: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials,” BMJ, vol. 348, no. may14 6, pp. g2646–g2646, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-H. Lin, L. Shao, Y.-M. Zhang et al., “An evaluation of liraglutide including its efficacy and safety for the treatment of obesity,” Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 275–285, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. E. Ladenheim, “Liraglutide and obesity: a review of the data so far,” Drug Design, Development and Therapy, vol. 9, pp. 1867–1875, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Liu, Y. Zou, and H. Qian, “GLP-1R agonists for the treatment of obesity: a patent review (2015-present),” Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 781–794, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Jensterle and A. Janež, “Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in the treatment of obesity,” Hormone Research in Pædiatrics, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Pi-Sunyer, A. Astrup, K. Fujioka et al., “A randomized, controlled trial of 3.0 mg of liraglutide in weight management,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 373, no. 1, pp. 11–22, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. M. O'Neil, A. L. Birkenfeld, B. McGowan et al., “Efficacy and safety of semaglutide compared with liraglutide and placebo for weight loss in patients with obesity: a randomised, double-blind, placebo and active controlled, dose-ranging, phase 2 trial,” The Lancet, vol. 392, no. 10148, pp. 637–649, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. M. Ryan, S. Seltzer, N. E. Hayward, D. A. Rodriguez, R. T. Sless, and C. P. Hawkes, “Safety and efficacy of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in children and adolescents with obesity: a meta-analysis,” The Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 236, pp. 137–147.e13, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. E. Chung, J. H. Lee, H. Lee et al., “Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and advanced fibrosis are associated with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 272, pp. 137–144, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Mantovani, M. Pernigo, C. Bergamini et al., “Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is independently associated with early left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 8, article e0135329, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Armstrong, P. Gaunt, G. P. Aithal et al., “Liraglutide safety and efficacy in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (LEAN): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study,” Lancet, vol. 387, pp. 679–690, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Feng, C. Gao, Y. Bi et al., “Randomized trial comparing the effects of gliclazide, liraglutide, and metformin on diabetes with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease,” Journal of Diabetes, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 800–809, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Shao, H. Y. Kuang, M. Hao, X. Y. Gao, W. J. Lin, and W. Zou, “Benefits of exenatide on obesity and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with elevated liver enzymes in patients with type 2 diabetes,” Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 521–529, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. L. Gluud, F. K. Knop, and T. Vilsbøll, “Effects of lixisenatide on elevated liver transaminases: systematic review with individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials on patients with type 2 diabetes,” BMJ Open, vol. 4, no. 12, article e005325, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Wong, M. H. Lee, C. Y. L. Yaow et al., “Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis,” Frontiers in Endocrinology, vol. 12, article 609110, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Siamashvili and S. N. Davis, “Update on the effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists for the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome,” Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 1081–1089, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Ma, X. Ding, Y. Wang, Y. Deng, and A. Sun, “The therapeutic effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and metformin on polycystic ovary syndrome: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis,” Medicine, vol. 100, no. 23, article e26295, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Han, Y. Li, and B. He, “GLP-1 receptor agonists versus metformin in PCOS: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Reproductive Biomedicine Online, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 332–342, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H. Kang and Q. A. Le, “Effectiveness of bariatric surgical procedures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials,” Medicine, vol. 96, no. 46, article e8632, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. P. Smith, G. Polanco, A. Yaqub, and M. Salehi, “Altered glucose metabolism after bariatric surgery: what's GLP-1 got to do with it?” Metabolism, vol. 83, pp. 159–166, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. R. Hutch and D. Sandoval, “The role of GLP-1 in the metabolic success of bariatric surgery,” Endocrinology, vol. 158, no. 12, pp. 4139–4151, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. D. Miras, B. Pérez-Pevida, M. Aldhwayan et al., “Adjunctive liraglutide treatment in patients with persistent or recurrent type 2 diabetes after metabolic surgery (GRAVITAS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial,” The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 549–559, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Sun, S. Chai, K. Yu et al., “Gastrointestinal adverse events of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis,” Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 35–42, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. E. Ratner, D. Maggs, L. L. Nielsen et al., “Long-term effects of exenatide therapy over 82 weeks on glycaemic control and weight in over-weight metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus,” Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 419–428, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. B. Buse, D. C. Klonoff, L. L. Nielsen et al., “Metabolic effects of two years of exenatide treatment on diabetes, obesity, and hepatic biomarkers in patients with type 2 diabetes: an interim analysis of data from the open-label, uncontrolled extension of three double-blind, placebo-controlled trials,” Clinical Therapeutics, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 139–153, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Wysham, T. Blevins, R. Arakaki et al., “Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide added onto pioglitazone and metformin versus exenatide in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-1),” Diabetes Care, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 2159–2167, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. J. Drucker, J. B. Buse, K. Taylor et al., “Exenatide once weekly versus twice daily for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority study,” Lancet, vol. 372, no. 9645, pp. 1240–1250, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Ja’arah, M. S. Al Zoubi, G. Abdelhady, F. Rabi, and M. M. Tambuwala, “Role of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists in hypoglycemia,” Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes, vol. 14, article 11795514211051697, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Trujillo, W. Nuffer, and B. A. Smith, “GLP-1 receptor agonists: an updated review of head-to-head clinical studies,” Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 12, p. 204201882199732, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Beti, B. Stratmann, G. Bokman et al., “Exenatide delays gastric emptying in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus but not in those with gastroparetic conditions,” Hormone and Metabolic Research, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 267–273, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Hinnen, “Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes,” Diabetes Spectrum: A Publication of the American Diabetes Association, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 202–210, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. E. Ratner, J. Rosenstock, G. Boka, and on behalf of the DRI6012 Study Investigators, “Dose-dependent effects of the once-daily GLP-1 receptor agonist lixisenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial,” Diabetic Medicine, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1024–1032, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. D. Home, P. Shamanna, M. Stewart et al., “Efficacy and tolerability of albiglutide versus placebo or pioglitazone over 1 year in people with type 2 diabetes currently taking metformin and glimepiride: HARMONY 5,” Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 179–187, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. D. Filippatos, T. V. Panagiotopoulou, and M. S. Elisaf, “Adverse effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists,” The Review of Diabetic Studies, vol. 11, no. 3-4, pp. 202–230, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. J. Meier and M. A. Nauck, “Risk of pancreatitis in patients treated with incretin-based therapies,” Diabetologia, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 1320–1324, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Li, J. Shen, M. M. Bala et al., “Incretin treatment and risk of pancreatitis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised studies,” BMJ, vol. 348, no. apr15 2, article g2366, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Wang, F. Wang, Z. Gou et al., “Using real-world data to evaluate the association of incretin-based therapies with risk of acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis of 1 324 515 patients from observational studies,” Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 32–41, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. G. Egan, E. Blind, K. Dunder et al., “Pancreatic safety of incretin-based drugs — FDA and EMA assessment,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 370, no. 9, pp. 794–797, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. B. Giorda, E. Nada, B. Tartaglino, L. Marafetti, and R. Gnavi, “A systematic review of acute pancreatitis as an adverse event of type 2 diabetes drugs: from hard facts to a balanced position,” Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 1041–1047, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. H. Sheahan, E. A. Wahlberg, and M. P. Gilbert, “An overview of GLP-1 agonists and recent cardiovascular outcomes trials,” Postgraduate Medical Journal, vol. 96, no. 1133, pp. 156–161, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Dan Xu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

776

Downloads

1550

Citations