Verbal Episodic Memory and Endogenous  Estradiol: An  Association in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease

Bittner, D. M.; Bittner, V.; Riepe, M. W.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/673012

Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References Copyright Related Articles

Clinical Study | Open Access

Volume 2011 | Article ID 673012 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/673012

Verbal Episodic Memory and Endogenous Estradiol: An Association in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease

D. M. Bittner,^1,2V. Bittner,^1,2and M. W. Riepe^1,3

Academic Editor: Fulvio Lauretani

Received03 May 2011

Revised05 Sept 2011

Accepted19 Sept 2011

Published19 Dec 2011

Abstract

In the continuum of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and normal controls, a possible association of verbal memory and endogenous estradiol (E₂) levels was investigated. Verbal episodic memory was measured with a german version of the California verbal memory test (CVLT). Results were controlled for apolipoprotein E (ApoE) phenotype. We studied 37 controls, 32 MCIs and 117 ADs. Groups differed in all trials of the CVLT and in E₂ levels . E2 levels differed significantly between groups only among females . In females correcting for age and ApoE, there was an overall correlation between CVLT delayed recall and level of E₂ . Stepwise regression analyses found E₂ level to be a significant predictor for CVLT delayed recall . It may be concluded that lower E₂ levels occur more in the course of the disease than may be considered as a risk factor per se.

1. Introduction

Alzheimer’s dementia is the most frequent dementia. Clinically, well-established criteria have proven their overall accuracy and usefulness [1]. Besides a characteristic neuropsychological course of the disease [2], several biological markers have been proposed including characteristic patterns of blood flow and glucose utilization [3–6], an increase of tau protein levels in cerebrospinal fluid, and a decrease of amyloid beta (1–42) protein [7, 8]. Also, in patients with Alzheimer disease, an increase of endogenous glucocorticoids was found [9]. Increased cortisol levels affect hippocampal neuron survival and potentiate beta-amyloid toxicity. Similarly, under experimental conditions, neuroprotection was found upon exogenous application of estradiol [10], most likely through a reductive effect of the amyloid-beta-induced toxicity [11].

Estradiol experimental studies have shown that estradiol may be neuroprotective in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and reduces amyloid toxicity [12]. Epidemiological evidence suggested that hormone replacement therapy might be beneficial in aged women [13, 14] but the results are still under dispute [15]. However, in a more recent large placebo-controlled, double-blind study including 4532 postmenopausal women not only no positive effect of a combination of estrogen and progestin [16] or estrogen alone on cognition but even a higher incidence of, AD was observed. Contrary in another but only small placebo-controlled, double-blind trial in manifest AD women estradiol demonstrated a significant effect on verbal and visual memory and attention compared with placebo [17]. Even less is known about endogenous estrogen levels in aging and dementia. In a recent study, lower E₂ levels were correlated with poor cognition, behavioral and functional status in older individuals and AD patients [18]. A controversially result was reported by Cunningham et al. [19] in a cross-sectional study where neither a difference in estradiol levels between AD women and controls nor a correlation to cognitive tests was observed. However, estradiol may decline in women that develop AD [20].

With higher age, estradiol levels decrease in females and males [21, 22]. It was thus a goal of the current study to investigate whether endogenous estradiol in Alzheimer’s disease is similar to aged controls and mild cognitive impairment as defined by Petersen et al. [23] and whether there is an association to verbal memory, the hallmark of AD’s neuropsychological deficit.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Subjects and Patients

Subjects were recruited from the Memory Clinic, Department of Neurology, University of Ulm. Of 190 consecutive subjects, 4 were excluded because of current estrogen replacement therapy. The remaining 186 were aged 35 to 89 years, 83 were men (age 35 to 88 years, median ± SD: 66.9 ± 10.27 y), and 103 were women (age 44 to 89 years, median ± SD: 70.2 ± 9.6 y). Medical histories were obtained and physical examinations performed. Alzheimer’s disease was diagnosed using the NINCDS-ADRDA [1]. Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) was diagnosed according to the criteria by Petersen et al. [23]. 32 were classified as MCI (age 65.5 ± 6.9 y, 9 females and 23 males, MMST 28.1 ± 1.7) and 117 as AD (age 72.0 ± 8.3 y, 77 females and 40 males, MMST 21.9 ± 5.6), while there were 37 controls (age 60.7 ± 11.3 y, MD ± SD, 17 females and 20 males, MMST 29.2 ± 1.2). Controls were recruited from the memory clinic as well, admitted for subjective memory complaints or because of a positive family history where a cognitive impairment could be ruled out.

2.2. Neuropsychological Testing

The Mini-Mental State Examination [24] was used to assess cognitive functioning. In the verbal episodic memory task (California verbal memory test (CVLT)), five consecutive trials of the same list have to be remembered followed by a short (CVLT SD) and a long delayed recall (CVLT LD) as well as a recognition condition (CVLT rec) [25].

2.3. Clinical Chemistry

Blood samples were collected via venipuncture. Analysis of samples was conducted within 1 month of blood being drawn. Levels of E₂ were measured by radioimmunoassay (double antibody technique) using a commercial kit.

2.4. Statistics

Statistical analysis was performed using a software program (SPSS 11.0; SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill). Analysis of variance was used to test for heterogeneity with Tukey-B post hoc analysis for significant group differences followed by an ANCOVA where variables significantly different between groups were included. Spearman correlation coefficients were used where applicable to assess an association among measures. A stepwise regression was applied to assess the main contributing factors for verbal memory functioning.

3. Results

190 subjects were investigated, and 4 were excluded because of current estrogen replacement therapy. The remaining 37 control subjects, 32 MCIs and 117 patients with Alzheimer’s disease were different in sex distribution, apolipoprotein E (ApoE) carriers, age, and general intelligence (Table 1), thus, in further analyses, data were controlled for age, ApoE , and gender.

To assess for group differences of E₂ levels, analyses of variance (ANOVA) were applied that revealed a significant, difference (F(2, 183) = 12.6, ) indicating an impaired cognitive status to be associated with a decreased E₂. Tukey post hoc analyses revealed only significant differences between the controls and AD (mean difference: 18.3 ± 3.8 pg/mL, , 95%-CI: 9.5–27.3 pg/mL), but not MCI (). Between AD and MCI difference was almost significant (mean difference: 8.8 ± 4.0 pg/mL, , 95%-CI: 18.2–0.6 pg/mL). Additionally, group differences in the CVLT were observed (Table 1).

When the group comparison was stratified for gender, there were no differences of E₂ for men (F(2, 80) =.2, ) but for women (F(2, 99) = 20.9, ). In Tukey post hoc, AD (mean difference: 36.2 ± 5.6 pg/mL, , 95%-CI: 49.6–22.8 pg/mL) and MCI (mean difference: 23.9 ± 8.7 pg/mL, , 95%-CI: 44.5–3.2 pg/mL) had lower E₂ level than controls. There were no differences in the E₂ level between MCI and AD (Figure 1).

To find out if lower E2 is independently associated to AD and MCI diagnosis in further analyses, an ANCOVA comparison of E₂ between groups adjusted for significant noncognitive variables was performed. After including age, gender, and ApoE status, the model remained significant (F(7, 162) = 8.2, ) with group () and age () as significant independent variables. Also, the interaction group age was significant ().

Spearman correlation showed a relation between estrogen and MMSE (), CVLT short delay (SD) (), and CVLT delayed recall (LD) (). There was no association of CVLT recognition and estrogen (). When analyses was stratified for gender, there was no association of E₂ with MMSE (), CVLT SD (), CVLT LD (), and CVLT rec () in men. In women, a lower E₂ was associated with a worse MMSE (), CVLT SD (), and CVLT LD (; Figure 2). There was a tendency for a lower E2 to be associated with an impaired CVLT rec ().

In univariate analysis with CVLT scores and MMSE as dependent variables, MMSE (F(1, 171) = 14.6, ), CVLT SD (F(1, 171) = 9.4, ), CVLT LD (F(1, 171) = 11.7, ), and CVLT rec (F(1, 171) = 4.8, ) were significantly associated with E₂. In a linear stepwise regression analyses, correcting for age, gender and, ApoE E₂ turned out to be a significant predictor of CVLT SD (F(1, 171) = 9.8, ) and CVLT LD (F(1, 171) = 9.7, ). Stratified for gender, there was no association in men for MMSE (), CVLT SD (), CVLT LD (), and CLT rec (). In women, regression analysis revealed CVLT LD only to be a significant predictor of E2 level (F(1, 79) = 17.9, ), while there was no significant association for CVLT SD (), CVLT rec (), and MMSE ().

4. Discussion

We found an association between endogenous estrogen levels and memory functioning. This preliminary study showed that in, AD, as well as in MCI, E₂ levels were reduced compared to healthy controls. Moreover, this finding was accompanied with a correlation of E₂ and verbal episodic memory delayed recall. So far, our results support formerly published results [18] where in a group of dementia and controls an association between E₂ and a thai version of the MMSE was reported. However, our results differed from those of Senanarong et al. [18] since they found their results to be valid in men and women while our data could find an association in women only. This might be due to their smaller sample size of AD patients. On the other hand, we were able to, detect group differences in E₂ level: in Alzheimer’s disease and MCI, estrogen level was significantly reduced compared with controls, a finding that confirms a lower E2 level in AD compared to healthy controls [26]. In another cross-sectional study, a higher E₂ level was associated with a smaller risk to have cognitive impairment [27].

For postmenopausal estrogen users, a lower estimated risk to develop Alzheimer’s disease could be found in previous epidemiologic studies [13, 14, 28–32]. However, in a large and well-controlled study, the WHIMS, the combination of estrogen and progesteron failed to prove a beneficial effect, indeed mortality even rose under hormone substitution [16]. More recently, it was shown that E₂ replacement may be beneficial in ApoE carriers although it did not significantly prevent from dementia for the whole sample [33].

Limitation of our data is the confounding effect of the different age distribution of the three groups although there were no age differences between controls and MCI as our major point of interest. Furthermore, particularly the association of episodic memory and estrogen level was stable to age effects. Episodic memory is regarded as the very early neuropsychological impairment in AD and is considered as the decisive hall-mark in MCI. In previous studies, verbal memory seemed to be the most sensitive cognitive domain to estrogen replacement therapy [17, 34], respectively, the most preserved domain after hysterectomy and eventual E₂ treatment compared to placebo [35]. In a large review, it was stated from randomized controlled trials that ERT preferentially prevents verbal memory decline in postmenopausal women [36]. Treatment effects in older healthy women are possibly only present in subjects with preserved delayed verbal recall [31]. In summary our findings of a decreased estrogen level in the course of AD as early as in the stage of MCI as well as the findings in the literature of a preponderant positive effect of ERT on verbal memory provide evidence that a reduction of the estrogen level contributes to AD pathogenesis. From neurophysiological studies, several possible biological effects have been described, among others a diminished amyloid-beta toxicity [11, 12], promotion of cholinergic activity in the brain [37], stimulation of axonal spouting and dendritic spine formation [38, 39], and slowing of cerebral atherosclerosis [40].

The advantage of this study was a comparison of E₂ levels in healthy controls and a group with AD under consideration of MCI patients that are thought to be a group at risk to develop AD. Therefor, early changes that might be relevant for or precede AD might be detectable in MCI. Although there is quite a body of evidence that estrogen is reduced in AD, so far there is a lack of studies in MCI. This is the first study to provide data on E₂ levels in MCI. Results of our study suggest that E₂ level is indeed decreased in MCI compared to controls. This reduction may reflect a higher vulnerability to develop AD. Very recently, in men with MCI, a tentative positive effect of hormone replacement therapy could be observed [41].

Finally, a limitation of our study has to be mentioned that it is cross-sectional in design that weakens the conclusions to be drawn from the results.

References

G. McKhann, D. Drachman, M. Folstein et al., “Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's disease,” Neurology, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 939–944, 1984.
View at: Google Scholar
R. J. Perry and J. R. Hodges, “Fate of patients with questionable (very mild) Alzheimer's disease: longitudinal profiles of individual subjects' decline,” Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 342–349, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
N. R. Cutler, J. V. Haxby, R. Duara et al., “Brain metabolism as measured with positron emission tomography: serial assessment in a patient with familial Alzheimer's disease,” Neurology, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 1556–1561, 1985.
View at: Google Scholar
F. J. Bonte, E. D. Ross, H. H. Chehabi, and M. D. Devous, “SPECT study of regional cerebral blood flow in Alzheimer disease,” Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 579–583, 1986.
View at: Google Scholar
K. A. Johnson, S. T. Mueller, T. M. Walshe, R. J. English, and B. L. Holman, “Cerebral perfusion imaging in Alzheimer's disease. Use of single photon emission computed tomography and iofetamine hydrochloride I 123,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 165–168, 1987.
View at: Google Scholar
D. H. S. Silverman, G. W. Small, C. Y. Chang et al., “Positron emission tomography in evaluation of dementia: regional brain metabolism and long-term outcome,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 286, no. 17, pp. 2120–2127, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Andreasen and K. Blennow, “β-Amyloid (Aβ) protein in cerebrospinal fluid as a biomarker for Alzheimer's disease,” Peptides, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 1205–1214, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Andreasen, L. Minthon, P. Davidsson et al., “Evaluation of CSF-tau and CSF-Aβ42 as diagnostic markers for Alzheimer disease in clinical practice,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 373–379, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Rasmuson, R. Andrew, B. Näsman, J. R. Seckl, B. R. Walker, and T. Olsson, “Increased glucocorticoid production and altered cortisol metabolism in women with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 547–552, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. C. Inestrosa, M. P. Marzolo, and A. B. Bonnefont, “Cellular and molecular basis of estrogen's neuroprotection: potential relevance for Alzheimer's disease,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 17, no. 1–3, pp. 73–86, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Marin, B. Guerra, J. G. Hernández-Jiménez et al., “Estradiol prevents amyloid-β peptide-induced cell death in a cholinergic cell line via modulation of a classical estrogen receptor,” Neuroscience, vol. 121, no. 4, pp. 917–926, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Xu, S. Chen, S. H. Ahmed et al., “Amyloid-beta peptides are cytotoxic to oligodendrocytes,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 1, p. RC118, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Kawas, S. Resnick, A. Morrison et al., “A prospective study of estrogen replacement therapy and the risk of developing Alzheimer's disease: the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging,” Neurology, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1517–1521, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Paganini-Hill and V. W. Henderson, “Estrogen replacement therapy and risk of Alzheimer disease,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 156, no. 19, pp. 2213–2217, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. F. Zec and M. A. Trivedi, “The effects of estrogen replacement therapy on neuropsychological functioning in postmenopausal women with and without dementia: a critical and theoretical review,” Neuropsychology Review, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 65–109, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Shumaker, C. Legault, S. R. Rapp et al., “Estrogen plus progestin and the incidence of dementia and mild cognitive impairment in postmenopausal women,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 289, no. 20, pp. 2651–2662, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Asthana, L. D. Baker, S. Craft et al., “High-dose estradiol improves cognition for women with AD results of a randomized study,” Neurology, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 605–612, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
V. Senanarong, S. Vannasaeng, N. Poungvarin et al., “Endogenous estradiol in elderly individuals: cognitive and noncognitive associations,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 385–389, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
C. J. Cunningham, M. Sinnott, A. Denihan et al., “Endogenous sex hormone levels in postmenopausal women with Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 1099–1103, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. J. Manly, C. A. Merchant, D. M. Jacobs et al., “Endogenous estrogen levels and Alzheimer's disease among postmenopausal women,” Neurology, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 833–837, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
H. A. Feldman, C. Longcope, C. A. Derby et al., “Age trends in the level of serum testosterone and other hormones in middle-aged men: longitudinal results from the Massachusetts Male Aging Study,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 589–598, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Gray, H. A. Feldman, J. B. McKinlay, and C. Longcope, “Age, disease, and changing sex hormone levels in middle-aged men: results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 1016–1025, 1991.
View at: Google Scholar
R. C. Petersen, G. E. Smith, S. C. Waring, R. J. Ivnik, E. G. Tangalos, and E. Kokmen, “Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 303–308, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
M. F. Folstein, S. E. Folstein, and P. R. McHugh, ““Mini mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician,” Journal of Psychiatric Research, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 189–198, 1975.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. L. Delis, J. Kramer, E. Kaplan, and D. Ober, The California Verbal Learning Test, Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, Tex, USA, 1986.
E. K. Hoskin, M. X. Tang, J. J. Manly, and R. Mayeux, “Elevated sex-hormone binding globulin in elderly women with Alzheimer's disease,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 141–147, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. E. I. Lebrun, Y. T. van der Schouw, F. H. de Jong, H. A. P. Pols, D. E. Grobbee, and S. W. J. Lamberts, “Endogenous oestrogens are related to cognition in healthy elderly women,” Clinical Endocrinology, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 50–55, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Paganini-Hill and V. W. Henderson, “Estrogen deficiency and risk of Alzheimer's disease in women,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 140, no. 3, pp. 256–261, 1994.
View at: Google Scholar
S. M. Phillips and B. B. Sherwin, “Effects of estrogen on memory function in surgically menopausal women,” Psychoneuroendocrinology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 485–495, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. X. Tang, D. Jacobs, Y. Stern et al., “Effect of oestrogen during menopause on risk and age at onset of Alzheimer's disease,” The Lancet, vol. 348, no. 9025, pp. 429–432, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Tierney, P. Oh, R. Moineddin et al., “A randomized double-blind trial of the effects of hormone therapy on delayed verbal recall in older women,” Psychoneuroendocrinology, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1065–1074, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Morrison, S. Resnick, M. Corrado, A. Zonderman, and C. Kawas, “A prospective study of estrogen replacement therapy and the risk of developing Alzheimer's disease in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging,” Neurology, vol. 46, supplement 2, pp. A435–A436, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Ryan, I. Carrière, J. Scali et al., “Characteristics of hormone therapy, cognitive function, and dementia: the prospective 3C study,” Neurology, vol. 73, no. 21, pp. 1729–1737, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Honjo, Y. Ogino, K. Tanaka et al., “An effect of conjugated estrogen to cognitive impairment in women with senile dementia-Alzheimer's type: a placebo-controlled, double-blind study,” Journal of Japanese Men Society, vol. 1, pp. 167–171, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
B. B. Sherwin, “Estrogen and/or androgen replacement therapy and cognitive functioning in surgically menopausal women,” Psychoneuroendocrinology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 345–357, 1988.
View at: Google Scholar
B. B. Sherwin and J. McGill, “Estrogen and cognitive functioning in women,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 133–151, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. D. Toran-Allerand, R. C. Miranda, W. D. L. Bentham et al., “Estrogen receptors colocalize with low-affinity nerve growth factor receptors in cholinergic neurons of the basal forebrain,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 89, no. 10, pp. 4668–4672, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Liu, M. Day, L. C. Muñiz et al., “Activation of estrogen receptor-β regulates hippocampal synaptic plasticity and improves memory,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 334–343, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. S. McEwen and C. S. Woolley, “Estradiol and progesterone regulate neuronal structure and synaptic connectivity in adult as well as developing brain,” Experimental Gerontology, vol. 29, no. 3-4, pp. 431–436, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Applebaum-Bowden, P. McLean, A. Steinmetz et al., “Lipoprotein, apolipoprotein, and lipolytic enzyme changes following estrogen administration in postmenopausal women,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 1895–1906, 1989.
View at: Google Scholar
B. B. Sherwin, H. Chertkow, H. Schipper, and Z. Nasreddine, “A randomized controlled trial of estrogen treatment in men with mild cognitive impairment,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1808–1817, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2011 D. M. Bittner et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1121

Downloads

1442

Citations