Research Article

Are Dementia Patient's Engagement Using Tailored Stimuli the Same? The Apathy Dilemma in Nursing Home Residents

Table 4

Observational Measurement of Engagement (OME) scores in guided and unguided conditions in apathetic and non apathetic participants.

Stimulation based on participant’s stimulus choice for each category in Apathetic ( 𝑛 = 1 4 ) and nonapathetic ( 𝑛 = 2 6 ) participantsEngagement duration, s 𝑍 𝑃 valueAttention 𝑍 𝑃 valueAttitude 𝑍 𝑃 value

Category β€œWork”         
ApathyGuidance
Without guidance
Mean difference, 95% CI
364
332
33 [βˆ’134–182]
βˆ’.8.42.7
2.4
0.4 [0.6–2.3]
βˆ’2.0464.6*
4.3
0.3 [βˆ’0.4–0.9]
βˆ’.7.4
Non ApathyGuidance
Without guidance
Mean difference, 95% CI
527
415
111 [22–202]
βˆ’2.6.013
2.7
0.3 [0.03–0.6]
βˆ’2.1.0355.7
4.9
0.8 [0.2–1.4]
βˆ’2.4.016

Category β€œFamily”         
ApathyGuidance
Without guidance
Mean difference, 95% CI
424
360
72 [βˆ’55–221]
βˆ’.5.52.6
2.4
0.3 [βˆ’0.08–0.8]
βˆ’1.3.24.5*
4.5
βˆ’0.08 [βˆ’0.8–0.5]
βˆ’.07.9
Non ApathyGuidance
Without guidanceMean difference, 95% CI
448
365
83 [βˆ’24–194]
βˆ’1.8.082.8
2.7
0.08 [βˆ’0.3–0.4]
βˆ’.5.65.6
4.9
0.7 [0.2–1.2]
βˆ’2.4.01

Category β€œLeisure”         
ApathyGuidance
Without guidance
Mean difference, 95% CI
500
311*
197 [79–332]
βˆ’2.4.013
2.7
0.2 [βˆ’0.08–0.5]
βˆ’1.7.095.1**
4.7*0.4 [0–0.7]
βˆ’1.3.2
Non ApathyGuidance
Without guidance
Mean difference, 95% CI
583
418
165 [62–256]
βˆ’3.0023.1
2.9
0.4 [0–0.8]
βˆ’1.3.25.8
5.5
0.4 [βˆ’0.2–0.8]
βˆ’1.8.08

Category β€œPersonal”         
ApathyGuidance
Without guidance
Mean difference, 95% CI
426
237*200 [84–323]
βˆ’2.9.0042.7
2.5*0.3 [βˆ’0.08–0.8]
βˆ’1.3.24.8*
4.6*0.2 [βˆ’0.4–0.8]
βˆ’.6.5
Non ApathyGuidance
Without guidance
Mean difference, 95% CI
557
444
112 [βˆ’2.9–223]
βˆ’2.0463.1
3.1
0.08 [βˆ’0.3–0.4]
βˆ’.4.65.7
5.6
0.1 [βˆ’0.3–0.5]
βˆ’.6.5

Category β€œNot Interested”        
ApathyGuidance
Without guidanceMean difference, 95% CI
240
181*66 [8–154]
βˆ’1.8.072*
2**0 [βˆ’0.3–0.3]
013.7
3.70 [βˆ’0.5–0.5]
βˆ’.07.9
Non ApathyGuidance
Without guidanceMean difference, 95% CI
237
252
βˆ’10 [βˆ’56–32]
βˆ’.3.72.5
2.60 [βˆ’0.5–0.5]
βˆ’1.34.2
4.20 [βˆ’0.4–0.4]
βˆ’.08.9

Note: Apathy cut off score was based on AI score above 3 out of 12.
*Group with the lowest value compared to their counterpart without apathy, 𝑃 < . 0 2 ,
**Group with lowest value compared to their counterpart without apathy, 𝑃 < . 0 5 .