Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 6215917, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6215917
Research Article

Age-Friendliness and Life Satisfaction of Young-Old and Old-Old in Hong Kong

Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong

Correspondence should be addressed to Stephen C. Y. Chan; kh.uylop.tcennoc@nahc.yccs

Received 2 November 2016; Accepted 12 February 2017; Published 24 February 2017

Academic Editor: Fulvio Lauretani

Copyright © 2017 Alma M. L. Au et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Census and Statistics Department, 2015, http://www.statistics.gov.hk/.
  2. “Life expectancy at birth, total (years),” 2014 http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?year_high_desc=true.
  3. Social Welfare Department, http://www.swd.gov.hk/en/index/site_pubsvc/page_elderly/.
  4. 2016 Policy Address, 2016, http://www.policyaddress.gov.hk/2016/eng/.
  5. World Health Organization, Active Ageing: A Policy Framework, World Health Organization, Non-communicable Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Department, Geneva, Switzerland, 2002.
  6. World Health Organization, Global Age-Friendly Cities: A guide, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2007.
  7. World Health Organization, Measuring the Age-Friendliness of Cities: A Guide to Using Core Indicators, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2015.
  8. C.-W. Lui, J.-A. Everingham, J. Warburton, M. Cuthill, and H. Bartlett, “What makes a community age-friendly: a review of international literature,” Australasian Journal on Ageing, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 116–121, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Liddle, T. Scharf, B. Bartlam, M. Bernard, and J. Sim, “Exploring the age-friendliness of purpose-built retirement communities: evidence from England,” Ageing and Society, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 1601–1629, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K. Broome, L. Worrall, K. McKenna, and D. Boldy, “Priorities for an age-friendly bus system,” Canadian Journal on Aging, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 435–444, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Chiou and L. Chen, “Towards age-friendly hospitals and health services,” Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, vol. 49, supplement 2, pp. S3–S6, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. M. Wong, P. H. Chau, F. Cheung, D. R. Phillips, and J. Woo, “Comparing the age-friendliness of different neighbourhoods using district surveys: an example from Hong Kong,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 7, Article ID e0131526, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Building Hong Kong into an Age-Friendly City—Elderly Services—Community & Charities—The Hong Kong Jockey Club, http://charities.hkjc.com/charities/english/community-contributions/hkjc-130-story-elderly-building.aspx.
  14. C. D. Ryff, “Beyond Ponce de Leon and life satisfaction: new directions in quest of successful ageing,” International Journal of Behavioral Development, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 35–55, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. W. Rowe and R. L. Kahn, “Successful aging,” Gerontologist, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 433–440, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. P. B. Baltes and M. M. Baltes, “Psychological Perspectives on Successful Ageing: The Model of Selective Optimization with Compensation,” in Successful Ageing, pp. 1–34, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  17. L. L. Carstensen, “Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: support for socioemotional selectivity theory,” Psychology and aging, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 331–338, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S.-T. Cheng, “Defining successful aging: the need to distinguish pathways from outcomes,” International Psychogeriatrics, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 527–531, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. B. L. Neugarten, J. W. Moore, and J. C. Lowe, “Age norms, age constraints, and adult socialization,” AJS; American journal of sociology, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 710–717, 1965. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. B. L. Neugarten, “Age groups in American Society and the rise of the young-old,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 415, no. 1, pp. 187–198, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. B. L. Neugarten, “The future and the young-old,” Gerontologist, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 4–9, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. Au, T. Tsien, A. Tsui et al., “A study on evaluating the effectiveness of elderly centre services of Tung Wah Group of hospitals to fulfil the needs of young old: a report jointly prepared by the Hong Kong Polytechnic University and Tung Wah Group of Hospitals Community Services Division (Elderly Services) for the Social Welfare Department,” 2013.
  23. W. Pavot, E. Diener, and J. N. Butcher, “Review of the satisfaction with life scale,” Psychological Assessment, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 164–172, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. K. B. Adams, S. Leibbrandt, and H. Moon, “A critical review of the literature on social and leisure activity and wellbeing in later life,” Ageing & Society, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 683–712, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. D. V. Jeste, G. N. Savla, W. K. Thompson et al., “Association between older age and more successful aging: critical role of resilience and depression,” American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 170, no. 2, pp. 188–196, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. T. D. Windsor, K. J. Anstey, and B. Rodgers, “Volunteering and psychological well-being among young-old adults: how much is too much?” Gerontologist, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 59–70, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. Smith, M. Borchelt, H. Maier, and D. Jopp, “Health and well-being in the young old and oldest old,” Journal of Social Issues, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 715–732, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. A. S. Martin, B. W. Palmer, D. Rock, C. V. Gelston, and D. V. Jeste, “Associations of self-perceived successful aging in young-old versus old-old adults,” International Psychogeriatrics, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 601–609, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. Yu, J. Li, P. Cuijpers, S. Wu, and Z. Wu, “Prevalence and correlates of depressive symptoms in Chinese older adults: A Population-based Study,” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 305–312, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. K. Yoshimura, M. Yamada, Y. Kajiwara, S. Nishiguchi, and T. Aoyama, “Relationship between depression and risk of malnutrition among community-dwelling young-old and old-old elderly people,” Aging and Mental Health, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 456–460, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. A. Au, E. Ng, S. Lai et al., “Goals and Life satisfaction of Hong Kong Chinese older adults,” Clinical Gerontologist, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 224–234, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. World Health Organization, Checklist of Essential Features of Age-Friendly Cities, World Health Organization, 2007, http://www.who.int/ageing/publications/Age_friendly_cities_checklist.pdf.
  33. E. Diener, R. A. Emmons, R. J. Larsem, and S. Griffin, “The satisfaction with life scale,” Journal of Personality Assessment, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 71–75, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. E. Macia, P. Duboz, J. M. Montepare, and L. Gueye, “Exploring life satisfaction among older adults in dakar,” Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 377–391, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. D. K. Mroczek and C. M. Kolarz, “The effect of age on positive and negative affect: a developmental perspective on happiness,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 1333–1349, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. L. L. Carstensen, J. A. Mikels, and M. Mather, “Aging and the intersection of cognition, motivation, and emotion,” Handbook of the Psychology of Aging, pp. 343–362, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. D. V. Jeste and A. J. Oswald, “Individual and societal wisdom: explaining the paradox of human ageing and high well-being,” Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 317–330, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. D. M. Almeida, “Resilience and vulnerability to daily stressors assessed via diary methods,” Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 64–68, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. S. Kim, K. A. Sargent-Cox, D. J. French, H. Kendig, and K. J. Anstey, “Cross-national insights into the relationship between wealth and wellbeing: a comparison between Australia, the United States of America and South Korea,” Ageing and Society, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 41–59, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. C. G. Dumitrache, L. Rubio, and R. Rubio-Herrera, “Perceived health status and life satisfaction in old age, and the moderating role of social support,” Aging & Mental Health, pp. 1–7, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. T. R. Adams, L. A. Rabin, V. G. Da Silva, M. J. Katz, J. Fogel, and R. B. Lipton, “Social support buffers the impact of depressive symptoms on life satisfaction in old age,” Clinical Gerontologist, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 139–157, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. P. J. Rentfrow, C. Mellander, and R. Florida, “Happy States of America: a state-level analysis of psychological, economic, and social well-being,” Journal of Research in Personality, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1073–1082, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. M. Pinquart and S. Sörensen, “Gender differences in self-concept and psychological well-being in old age: a meta-analysis,” Journals of Gerontology—Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. P195–P213, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. E. L. Waddell and J. M. Jacobs-Lawson, “Predicting positive well-being in older men and women,” The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 181–197, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. S. C. Webber, M. M. Porter, and V. H. Menec, “Mobility in older adults: a comprehensive framework,” The Gerontologist, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 443–450, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. M. Levasseur, M. Généreux, J.-F. Bruneau et al., “Importance of proximity to resources, social support, transportation and neighborhood security for mobility and social participation in older adults: Results from A Scoping Study,” BMC Public Health, vol. 15, Article ID 503, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. Labour and Welfare Bureau, 2016 http://www.lwb.gov.hk/fare_concession/index_e.html#s2.
  48. A. Au and H. M. Yip, Age-Friendly City: Baseline Assessment Report of Kowlooon City, The Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust, 2016.
  49. A. Au and H. M. Yip, Age-Friendly City: Baseline Assessment Report of Kwun Tong, The Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust, Hong Kong, 2016.
  50. O. Huxhold, K. L. Fiori, and T. D. Windsor, “The dynamic interplay of social network characteristics, subjective well-being, and health: the costs and benefits of socio-emotional selectivity,” Psychology and Aging, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 3–16, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. A. E. Scharlach and A. E. Lehning, Creating Aging-Friendly Communities, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2016.
  52. M. Martinson and J. Halpern, “Ethical implications of the promotion of elder volunteerism: a critical perspective,” Journal of Aging Studies, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 427–435, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. D. V. Jeste and B. W. Palmer, “A call for a new positive psychiatry of ageing,” British Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 202, no. 2, pp. 81–83, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. J. Rozanova, N. Keating, and J. Eales, “Unequal social engagement for older adults: constraints on choice,” Canadian Journal on Aging, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 25–36, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. E. H. Erikson, J. M. Erikson, and H. Q. Kivnick, Vital Involvement in Old Age, Norton, New York, NY, USA, 1986.
  56. N. Morrow-Howell, J. Hinterlong, P. A. Rozario, and F. Tang, “Effects of volunteering on the well-being of older adults,” Journals of Gerontology—Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. S137–S145, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. S.-T. Cheng, “Age and subjective well-being revisited: a discrepancy perspective,” Psychology and Aging, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 409–415, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. R. Wuthnow, Acts of Compassion: Caring for Others and Helping Ourselves, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1991.
  59. M. Levasseur, D. St-Cyr Tribble, and J. Desrosiers, “Meaning of quality of life for older adults: importance of human functioning components,” Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. e91–e100, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. Y. Li, Y. Lee, M. Tsui, and M. C. Pak, “The panel study of social support for middle-aged and elderly adults in Taiwan—Latent growth model,” International Social Work.: 0020872816651696, 2016.