Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
Volume 2007, Article ID 93968, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2007/93968
Research Article

The P300 as a Marker of Waning Attention and Error Propensity

1Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge CB2 7EF, UK
2Hull York Medical School, York Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, York YO31 8HE, UK
3Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
4Department of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

Received 17 February 2007; Accepted 9 October 2007

Academic Editor: Saied Sanei

Copyright © 2007 Avijit Datta et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Reason, “Lapses of attention in everyday life,” in Varieties of Attention, R. Parasuraman and D. R. Davies, Eds., Academic Press, Orlando, Fla, USA, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  2. G. E. Larson, D. L. Alderton, M. Neideffer, and E. Underhill, “Further evidence on dimensionality and correlates of the cognitive failures questionnaire,” British Journal of Psychology, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 29–38, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  3. R. A. Barkley, “Is there an attention deficit in ADHD? ” The ADHD report, pp. 3–11, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  4. R. A. Barkley, “Response inhibition in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder,” Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 177–184, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. P. W. Burgess and T. Shallice, “Bizarre responses, rule detection and frontal lobe lesions,” Cortex, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 241–259, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  6. P. W. Burgess and T. Shallice, “Response suppression, initiation and strategy use following frontal lobe lesions,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 263–272, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. F. Lhermitte, “Human autonomy and the frontal lobes—part II: patient behavior in complex and social situations: the environmental dependency syndrome,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 335–343, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. A. R. Luria, Higher Cortical Functions in Man, Tavistock, London, UK, 1966.
  9. I. H. Robertson, T. Manly, J. Andrade, B. T. Baddeley, and J. Yiend, “‘Oops!’: performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 747–758, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. T. Shallice, From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1988.
  11. T. Shallice and P. W. Burgess, “Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man,” Brain, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 727–741, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. D. T. Stuss and C. A. Gow, “‘Frontal dysfunction’ after traumatic brain injury,” Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 272–282, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  13. D. A. Norman and T. Shallice, “Attention to Action: Willed and automatic control of behaviour,” 1980, Centre for Human Information Processing. View at Google Scholar
  14. S. Dehaene and L. Naccache, “Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework,” Cognition, vol. 79, no. 1-2, pp. 1–37, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. T. Manly and I. H. Robertson, “Sustained attention and the frontal lobes,” in Methodology of Frontal and Executive Function, P. Rabbitt, Ed., pp. 135–150, Psychology Press, Hove, UK, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  16. D. T. Stuss, T. Shallice, M. P. Alexander, and T. W. Picton, “A multidisciplinary approach to anterior attentional functions,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 769, no. 1, pp. 191–211, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. A. J. Wilkins, T. Shallice, and R. McCarthy, “Frontal lesions and sustained attention,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 359–365, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. T. Manly, I. H. Robertson, M. Galloway, and K. Hawkins, “The absent mind: further investigations of sustained attention to response,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 661–670, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. M. Eimer, “Effects of attention and stimulus probability on ERPs in a Go/Nogo task,” Biological Psychology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 123–138, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. S. R. Jackson, G. M. Jackson, and M. Roberts, “The selection and suppression of action: ERP correlates of executive control in humans,” NeuroReport, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 861–865, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. L. Karlin, M. J. Martz, and A. M. Mordkoff, “Motor performance and sensory-evoked potentials,” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 307–313, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. A. Kok, “Effects of degradation of visual stimuli on components of the event-related potential (ERP) in go/nogo reaction tasks,” Biological Psychology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 21–38, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. S. Mäntysalo, “N2 and P3 of the ERP to Go and Nogo stimuli: a stimulus-response association and dissociation,” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. Supplement, vol. 40, pp. 227–234, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  24. L. Karlin, M. J. Martz, E. Brauth, and A. M. Mordkoff, “Auditory evoked potentials, motor potentials and reaction time,” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 129–136, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. T. W. Picton, “The P300 wave of the human event-related potential,” Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 456–479, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. W. Ritter, R. Simson, and H. G. Vaughan Jr., “Association cortex potentials and reaction time in auditory discrimination,” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 547–555, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. E. Donchin, G. Gratton, D. Dupree, and M. Coles, “After a rash action: latency and amplitude of the P300 following fast guesses,” in Neurophysiology and Psychophysiology: Experimental and Clinical Applications, G. C. Galbraith, M. L. Kietzman, and E. Donchin, Eds., pp. 173–188, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  28. M. Falkenstein, N. A. Koshlykova, V. N. Kiroj, J. Hoormann, and J. Hohnsbein, “Late ERP components in visual and auditory Go/Nogo tasks,” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 36–43, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. K. B. Campbell, S. Houle, D. Lorrain, D. Deacon-Elliott, and G. Proulx, “Event-Related Potentials as an index of cognitive functioning in head-injured outpatients,” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 38, pp. 486–488, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  30. M. D. Rugg, C. P. Cowan, M. E. Nagy, A. D. Milner, I. Jacobson, and D. N. Brooks, “Event related potentials from closed head injury patients in an auditory ‘Oddball’ task: evidence of dysfunction in stimulus categorisation,” Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 691–698, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  31. S. J. Segalowitz, J. Dywan, and A. Unsal, “Attentional factors in response time variability after traumatic brain injury: an ERP study,” Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 95–107, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  32. I. H. Robertson, T. Ward, V. Ridgeway, and I. Nimmo-Smith, “The structure of normal human attention: the test of everyday attention,” Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 525–534, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  33. M. Falkenstein, J. Hohnsbein, J. Hoormann, and L. Blanke, “Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components—II: error processing in choice reaction tasks,” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 447–455, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. W. J. Gehring and R. T. Knight, “Prefrontal-cingulate interactions in action monitoring,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 516–520, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. S. Nieuwenhuis, K. R. Ridderinkhof, J. Blom, G. P. H. Band, and A. Kok, “Error-related brain potentials are differentially related to awareness of response errors: evidence from an antisaccade task,” Psychophysiology, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 752–760, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. M. Ullsperger, D. Y. von Cramon, and N. G. Müller, “Interactions of focal cortical lesions with error processing: evidence from event-related brain potentials,” Neuropsychology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 548–561, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. J. V. Pardo, P. T. Fox, and M. E. Raichle, “Localization of a human system for sustained attention by positron emission tomography,” Nature, vol. 349, no. 6304, pp. 61–64, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. R. M. Cohen, W. E. Semple, M. Gross, H. H. Holcomb, M. S. Dowling, and T. E. Nordahl, “Functional localization of sustained attention: comparison to sensory stimulation in the absence of instruction,” Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–20, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  39. J. S. Lewin, L. Friedman, D. Wu et al., “Cortical localization of human sustained attention: detection with functional MR using a visual vigilance paradigm,” Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 695–701, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. T. Manly, A. M. Owen, L. McAvinue et al., “Enhancing the sensitivity of a sustained attention task to frontal damage: convergent clinical and functional imaging evidence,” Neurocase, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 340–349, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. J. Smallwood, J. B. Davies, D. Heim et al., “Subjective experience and the attentional lapse: task engagement and disengagement during sustained attention,” Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 657–690, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. G. D. Logan, R. J. Schachar, and R. Tannock, “Impulsivity and inhibitory control,” Psychological Science, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 60–64, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar