Research Article

Performance of a Self-Paced Brain Computer Interface on Data Contaminated with Eye-Movement Artifacts and on Data Recorded in a Subsequent Session

Table 1

Comparison of the TPR and FAR rates achieved in different SBCI studies.

StudyBibliographyFrequency (number of classifier’s decisions per second)TPR(%)FPR(%)FAR(%)

Study 1LF-ASD16 20%233
[6]OPM 10%
Mu-ASD 10%
Study 2[7]25 225
Study 3 [8] 20%2
Study 4[9]1667.8233
Study 5[10]1654.0116
Study 6[3]856.20.11.2