Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 761047, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/761047
Research Article

New Algorithms for Computing the Time-to-Collision in Freeway Traffic Simulation Models

1School of Transportation, Southeast University, No. 2 Sipailou, Nanjing 210096, China
2Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, NCSU, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA

Received 3 October 2014; Accepted 4 December 2014; Published 31 December 2014

Academic Editor: Yongjun Shen

Copyright © 2014 Jia Hou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. C. Hayward, “Near-miss determination through use of a scale of danger,” Highway Research Record, no. 384, pp. 24–34, 1972. View at Google Scholar
  2. C. Hydén, The Development of a Method for Traffic Safety Evaluation: The Swedish Traffic Conflicts Technique, vol. 70 of Bulletin (University of Lund, Lund Institute of Technology, Department of Traffic Planning and Engeneering), 1987.
  3. H. W. Kruysse, “The subjective evaluation of traffic conflicts based on an internal concept of dangerousness,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 53–65, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. Tiwari, D. Mohan, and J. Fazio, “Conflict analysis for prediction of fatal crash locations in mixed traffic streams,” in Annual Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, 1995.
  5. D. Gettman and L. Head, “Surrogate safety measures from traffic simulation models,” Transportation Research Record, no. 1, pp. 104–115, 1840. View at Google Scholar
  6. L. Pu and R. Joshi, Surrogate Safety Assessment Model (SSAM): Software User Manual, 2008.
  7. R. Horst, Time-to-Collision as a Cue for Decision-Making in Braking, Vision in Vehicles—III, 1991.
  8. R. J. Kiefer, D. J. Leblanc, and C. A. Flannagan, “Developing an inverse time-to-collision crash alert timing approach based on drivers' last-second braking and steering judgments,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 295–303, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. K. Vogel, “A comparison of headway and time to collision as safety indicators,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 427–433, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. M. Minderhoud and P. H. L. Bovy, “Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 89–97, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Laureshyn, Å. Svensson, and C. Hydén, “Evaluation of traffic safety, based on micro-level behavioural data: theoretical framework and first implementation,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1637–1646, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus