Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 920892, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/920892
Research Article

Mental Mechanisms for Topics Identification

Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Royal Military College, Kingston, ON, Canada K7K 7B4

Received 19 November 2013; Accepted 4 February 2014; Published 13 March 2014

Academic Editor: Jianwei Shuai

Copyright © 2014 Louis Massey. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan, “Latent Dirichlet allocation,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 3, no. 4-5, pp. 993–1022, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. K. Landauer and S. T. Dumais, “A Solution to plato's problem: the latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge,” Psychological Review, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 211–240, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. S. McNamara, “Computational methods to extract meaning from text and advance theories of human cognition,” Topics in Cognitive Science, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 3–17, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. Feldman and J. Sanger, The Text Mining Handbook: Advanced Approaches in Analyzing Unstructured Data, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2006.
  5. L. Massey, “On the quality of ART1 text clustering,” Neural Networks, vol. 16, no. 5-6, pp. 771–778, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. X. Qi and B. D. Davison, “Web page classification: features and algorithms,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 41, no. 2, article 12, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. F. Sebastiani, “Machine Learning in Automated Text Categorization,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1–47, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. D. Turney, “Learning algorithms for keyphrase extraction,” Information Retrieval, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 303–336, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. P. Velardi, R. Navigli, and P. D'Amadio, “Mining the web to create specialized glossaries,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 18–25, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. W. Wong, W. Liu, and M. Bennamoun, “A probabilistic framework for automatic term recognition,” Intelligent Data Analysis, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 499–539, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. B. T. Johns and M. N. Jones, “Perceptual inference through global lexical similarity,” Topics in Cognitive Science, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 103–120, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. P. J. Kwantes, “Using context to build semantics,” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 703–710, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. T. L. Griffiths, M. Steyvers, and J. B. Tenenbaum, “Topics in semantic representation,” Psychological Review, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 211–244, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. N. Jones and D. J. K. Mewhort, “Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon,” Psychological Review, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 1–37, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. B. Lenat, “CYC: a large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 32–38, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. L. Verhoeven and C. Perfetti, “Introduction: advances in text comprehension: model, process and development,” Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 293–301, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. A. Just, V. L. Cherkassky, S. Aryal, and T. M. Mitchell, “A neurosemantic theory of concrete noun representation based on the underlying brain codes,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 1, Article ID e8622, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. M. Lamb, Pathways of the Brain: The Neurocognitive Basis of Language, John Benjamins, 1999.
  19. C. Conrad, “Context effects in sentence comprehension: a study of the subjective lexicon,” Memory & Cognition, vol. 2, pp. 130–138, 1974. View at Google Scholar
  20. W. Kintsch and E. F. Mross, “Context effects in word identification,” Journal of Memory and Language, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 336–349, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. A. K. Halliday and R. Hasan, Cohesion in English, Longman, New York, NY, USA, 1976.
  22. G. A. Miller, “The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information,” Psychological Review, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 81–97, 1956. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. R. Quillian, “The teachable language comprehender: a simulation program and theory of language,” Assn Computing Machy-Communications, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 459–476, 1969. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. M. Collins and E. F. Loftus, “A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing,” Psychological Review, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 407–428, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. M. Lamb, “Neurolinguistics and general linguistics: the importance of the microscopic level,” Logos and Language, vol. 4, pp. 1–16, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  26. V. B. Mountcastle, Perceptual Neuroscience: The Cerebral Cortex, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1998.
  27. A. D. Friederici, “The cortical language circuit: from auditory perception to sentence comprehension,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 262–268, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. C. Fellbaum, WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1998.
  29. L. Massey, “Evaluating and comparing text clustering results,” in Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Computational Intelligence, pp. 85–90, July 2005. View at Scopus
  30. S. Zhong and J. Ghosh, “A comparative study of generative models for document clustering,” in Proceedings of the SIAM International Conference on Data Mining Workshop on Clustering High Dimensional Data and Its Applications, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 2003.