Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
Volume 2015, Article ID 191745, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/191745
Research Article

Memory Dynamics in Attractor Networks

1Centre for Brain Inspired Computing Research (CBICR), Department of Precision Instrument, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
2Department of Advanced Concepts and Nanotechnology (ACN), Data Storage Institute, A*STAR, 5 Engineer Drive 1, Singapore 117608
3School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798

Received 25 November 2014; Revised 30 January 2015; Accepted 30 January 2015

Academic Editor: Klaus Obermayer

Copyright © 2015 Guoqi Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. P. Shi, K. J. Yi, K. Ramanathan et al., “Artificial cognitive memory-changing from density driven to functionality driven,” Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 865–875, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. Li, N. Ning, K. Ramanathan, W. He, L. Pan, and L. Shi, “Behind the magical numbers: hierarchical chunking and the human working memory capacity,” International Journal of Neural Systems, vol. 23, no. 4, Article ID 1350019, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. J. Amit, H. Gutfreund, and H. Sompolinsky, “Spin-glass models of neural networks,” Physical Review, A: Third Series, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 1007–1018, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  4. D. J. Amit and G. Mongillo, “Spike-driven synaptic dynamics generating working memory states,” Neural Computation, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 565–596, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. B. Poucet and E. Save, “Attractors in memory,” Science, vol. 308, no. 5723, pp. 799–800, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Tsodyks, “Attractor neural networks and spatial maps in hippocampus,” Neuron, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 168–169, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. H. Tang, H. Li, and R. Yan, “Memory dynamics in attractor networks with saliency weights,” Neural Computation, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1899–1926, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  8. Y. Miyashita, “Neuronal correlate of visual associative long-term memory in the primate temporal cortex,” Nature, vol. 335, no. 6193, pp. 817–820, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Bakker, C. B. Kirwan, M. Miller, and C. E. L. Stark, “Pattern separation in the human hippocampal CA3 and dentate gyrus,” Science, vol. 319, no. 5870, pp. 1640–1642, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  10. J. J. Hopfield, “Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 79, no. 8, pp. 2554–2558, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  11. J. Conklin and C. Eliasmith, “A controlled attractor network model of path integration in the rat,” Journal of Computational Neuroscience, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 183–203, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  12. H. Sompolinsky, A. Crisanti, and H.-J. Sommers, “Chaos in random neural networks,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 259–262, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  13. T. J. Wills, C. Lever, F. Cacucci, N. Burgess, and J. O'Keefe, “Attractor dynamics in the hippocampal representation of the local environment,” Science, vol. 308, no. 5723, pp. 873–876, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. K. Müezzinoglu, C. Güzeliş, and J. M. Zurada, “An energy function-based design method for discrete Hopfield associative memory with attractive fixed points,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 370–378, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Hurley, “Lyapunov functions and attractors in arbitrary metric spaces,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 245–256, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  16. S. Hélie, “Energy minimization in the nonlinear dynamic recurrent associative memory,” Neural Networks, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 1041–1044, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. Koch and I. Segev, “The role of single neurons in information processing,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 3, pp. 1171–1177, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. V. Robins and S. J. R. McCallum, “A robust method for distinguishing between learned and spurious attractors,” Neural Networks, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 313–326, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. W. Senn and S. Fusi, “Learning only when necessary: better memories of correlated patterns in networks with bounded synapses,” Neural Computation, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 2106–2138, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  20. R. S. Zemel and M. C. Mozer, “Localist attractor networks,” Neural Computation, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1045–1064, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. G. Li, C. Wen, W. X. Zheng, and Y. Chen, “Identification of a class of nonlinear autoregressive models with exogenous inputs based on kernel machines,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 2146–2159, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus