Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
Volume 2015, Article ID 345160, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/345160
Research Article

An Opinion Interactive Model Based on Individual Persuasiveness

School of Information System and Management, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China

Received 3 February 2015; Revised 13 April 2015; Accepted 15 April 2015

Academic Editor: Ye-Sho Chen

Copyright © 2015 Xin Zhou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. W. Weidlich, “Sociodynamics—a systematic approach to mathematical modelling in the social sciences,” Nonlinear Phenomena in Complex Systems, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 479–487, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  2. C. Castellano, S. Fortunato, and V. Loreto, “Statistical physics of social dynamics,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 591–646, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. T. Brenner, “Agent learning representation: advice on modelling economic learning,” in Handbook of Computational Economics, vol. 2, pp. 895–947, North Holland, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  4. W. B. Arthur, “Designing economic agents that act like human agents: a behavioral approach to bounded rationality,” The American Economic Review, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 353–359, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  5. A. E. Roth and I. Erev, “Learning in extensive-form games: experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term,” Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 164–212, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  6. C. M. Anderson and C. F. Camerer, “Experience-weighted attraction learning in sender-receiver signaling games,” Economic Theory, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 689–718, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. S. Jordan, “Bayesian learning in normal form games,” Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 60–81, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  8. B. Edmonds, “Modelling bounded rationality in agent-based simulations using the evolution of mental models,” in Computational Techniques for Modelling Learning in Economics, vol. 11 of Advances in Computational Economics, pp. 305–332, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. Y. Liu, F. Ding, and Z. Zhang, “A survey of models of consensus formation and evolution,” Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 83–88, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. F. Jia, “Rational inference based opinion formation model,” Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 60–65, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. X. Hao-Xiang, W. Hui-Li, and X. Zhao-Guo, “Opinion dynamics: a multidisciplinary review and perspective on future research,” International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Science, vol. 2, pp. 72–91, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. Y.-L. Lu, G.-P. Jiang, and Y.-R. Song, “Epidemic spreading on a scale-free network with awareness,” Chinese Physics B, vol. 21, no. 10, Article ID 100207, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Y.-W. Gong, Y.-R. Song, and G.-P. Jiang, “Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks including the effect of individual vigilance,” Chinese Physics B, vol. 21, no. 1, Article ID 010205, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Z. Fang, S. Guang-Ya, and L. Pi, “A survey for rumor propagation models,” Complex System and Complexity Science, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1–11, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  15. Y.-R. Gu and L.-L. Xia, “The propagation and inhibition of rumors in online social network,” Acta Physica Sinica, vol. 61, no. 23, Article ID 238701, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. Lorenz, “Continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence: a survey,” International Journal of Modern Physics C, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1819–1838, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. V. Sood and S. Redner, “Voter model on heterogeneous graphs,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 94, no. 17, Article ID 178701, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. K. Sznajd-Weron and J. Sznajd, “Opinion evolution in closed community,” International Journal of Modern Physics C, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1157–1165, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. Galam, “Minority opinion spreading in random geometry,” European Physical Journal B, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 403–406, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. G. Deffuant, D. Neau, F. Amblard, and G. Weisbuch, “Mixing beliefs among interacting agents,” Advances in Complex Systems, vol. 3, pp. 87–98, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. R. Hegselmann and U. Krause, “Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation,” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 5, no. 3, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. Jiong-Ming, L. Bao-Hong, L. Qi, and M. Hong-Xu, “Trust, evolution, and consensus of opinions in a social group,” Acta Physica Sinica, vol. 63, no. 5, Article ID 050501, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. P. P. Li, D. F. Zheng, and P. M. Hui, “Dynamics of opinion formation in a small-world network,” Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, vol. 73, no. 5, Article ID 056128, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. C.-F. Feng, J.-Y. Guan, Z.-X. Wu, and Y.-H. Wang, “Effects of average degree of network on an order-disorder transition in opinion dynamics,” Chinese Physics B, vol. 19, no. 6, Article ID 060203, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M.-H. He, D.-M. Zhang, H.-Y. Wang, X.-G. Li, and P.-J. Fang, “Public opinion evolution model with the variable topology structure based on scale free network,” Acta Physica Sinica, vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 5175–5181, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. B. Kozma and A. Barrat, “Consensus formation on adaptive networks,” Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, vol. 77, no. 1, Article ID 016102, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. Lorenz, “Heterogeneous bounds of confidence: meet, discuss and find consensus!,” Complexity, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 43–52, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  28. G. Weisbuch, G. Deffuant, and F. Amblard, “Persuasion dynamics,” Physica A, vol. 353, no. 1–4, pp. 555–575, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. R. Hegselmann and U. Krause, “Truth and cognitive division of labour: first steps towards a computer aided social epistemology,” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 9, no. 3, article 10, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. K. Malarz, “Truth seekers in opinion dynamics models,” International Journal of Modern Physics C, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1521–1524, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus