Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
Volume 2015, Article ID 905421, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/905421
Research Article

A Computational Approach towards Visual Object Recognition at Taxonomic Levels of Concepts

1Cognitive Robotics Lab, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran 14395-515, Iran
2School of Cognitive Sciences, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran 19395-5746, Iran

Received 14 February 2015; Revised 2 June 2015; Accepted 4 June 2015

Academic Editor: Thomas DeMarse

Copyright © 2015 Zahra Sadeghi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. T. Frey, M. Gelhausen, and G. Saake, “Categorization of concerns: a categorical program comprehension model,” in Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGPLAN Workshop on Evaluation and Usability of Programming Languages and Tools, pp. 73–82, October 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. P. Nguyen and G. L. Murphy, “An apple is more than just a fruit: cross-classification in children's concepts,” Child Development, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 1783–1806, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. Liu, R. M. Golinkoff, and K. Sak, “One cow does not an animal make: young children can extend novel words at the superordinate level,” Child Development, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 1674–1694, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. E. Ellis and L. M. Oakes, “Infants flexibly use different dimensions to categorize objects,” Developmental Psychology, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1000–1011, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. H. Bornstein and M. E. Arterberry, “The development of object categorization in young children: hierarchical inclusiveness, age, perceptual attribute, and group versus individual analyses,” Developmental Psychology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 350–365, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. B. Mervis and E. Rosch, “Categorization of natural objects,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 89–115, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. E. H. Rosch, “Natural categories,” Cognitive Psychology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 328–350, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. E. Rosch, C. B. Mervis, W. D. Gray, D. M. Johnson, and P. Boyes-Braem, “Basic objects in natural categories,” Cognitive Psychology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 382–439, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Praß, C. Grimsen, M. König, and M. Fahle, “Ultra rapid object categorization: effects of level, animacy and context,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 6, Article ID e68051, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. R. Greene and A. Oliva, “The briefest of glances: the time course of natural scene understanding,” Psychological Science, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 464–472, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. L. C. Loschky and A. M. Larson, “The natural/man-made distinction is made before basic-level distinctions in scene gist processing,” Visual Cognition, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 513–536, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. Bar, “A cortical mechanism for triggering top-down facilitation in visual object recognition,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 600–609, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Oliva and A. Torralba, “Modeling the shape of the scene: a holistic representation of the spatial envelope,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 145–175, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Atran, “Folk biology and the anthropology of science: cognitive universals and cultural particulars,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 547–609, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. Kemp and J. B. Tenenbaum, “Structured statistical models of inductive reasoning,” Psychological Review, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 20–58, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. C. Kemp and J. B. Tenenbaum, “The discovery of structural form,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 31, pp. 10687–10692, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. T. Konkle, T. F. Brady, G. A. Alvarez, and A. Oliva, “Conceptual distinctiveness supports detailed visual long-term memory for real-world objects,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol. 139, no. 3, pp. 558–578, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Z. Sadeghi, M. N. Ahmadabadi, and B. N. Araabi, “Unsupervised categorization of objects into artificial and natural superordinate classes using features from low-level vision,” International Journal of Image Processing, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 314–429, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  19. M. Kim, C. Park, and K. Koo, “Natural/man-made object classification based on gabor characteristics,” in Image and Video Retrieval, vol. 3568 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 550–559, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. M. Riesenhuber and T. Poggio, “Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 1019–1025, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. N. Dalal and B. Triggs, “Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '05), vol. 1, pp. 886–893, June 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. T. Serre, L. Wolf, S. Bileschi, M. Riesenhuber, and T. Poggio, “Robust object recognition with cortex-like mechanisms,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 411–426, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. G. Lowe, “Object recognition from local scale-invariant features,” in Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV '99), vol. 2, pp. 1150–1157, September 1999. View at Scopus
  24. T. Ojala, M. Pietikäinen, and T. Mäenpää, “Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 971–987, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. Khotanzad and Y. H. Hong, “Invariant image recognition by Zernike moments,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 489–497, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. Y. Ying, J. Gui, and X. Rao, “Fruit shape classification based on Zernike moments,” Journal of Jiangsu University (Natural Science Edition), vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1–3, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  27. T. Arif, Z. Shaaban, L. Krekor, and S. Baba, “Object classification via geometrical, zernike and legendre moments,” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 31–37, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  28. J. F. Marques, “The general/specific breakdown of semantic memory and the nature of superordinate knowledge: insights from superordinate and basic-level feature norms,” Cognitive Neuropsychology, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 879–903, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. E. K. Warrington, “The selective impairment of semantic memory,” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 635–657, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. K. Grill-Spector, Z. Kourtzi, and N. Kanwisher, “The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition,” Vision Research, vol. 41, no. 10-11, pp. 1409–1422, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. Z. Kourtzi and N. Kanwisher, “Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex,” Science, vol. 293, no. 5534, pp. 1506–1509, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. D. Marr, Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information, Henry Holt Company, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 1982.
  33. P. G. Schyns and A. Oliva, “From blobs to boundary edges: evidence for time-and spatial-scale-dependent scene recognition,” Psychological Science, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 195–200, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. R. Kimchi, “Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: a critical review,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 24–38, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. D. Navon, “Forest before trees: the precedence of global features in visual perception,” Cognitive Psychology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 353–383, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. B. C. Love, J. N. Rouder, and E. J. Wisniewski, “A structural account of global and local processing,” Cognitive Psychology, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 291–316, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. M. Turk and A. Pentland, “Eigenfaces for recognition,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 71–86, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus