Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 1068434, 22 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1068434
Research Article

Evaluation of Second-Level Inference in fMRI Analysis

Department of Data Analysis, Ghent University, H. Dunantlaan 1, 9000 Ghent, Belgium

Received 9 July 2015; Revised 21 August 2015; Accepted 4 October 2015

Academic Editor: Pierre L. Bellec

Copyright © 2016 Sanne P. Roels et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. J. Friston, “Functional integration,” in Statistical Parametric Mapping: The Analysis of Functional Brain Images, K. J. Friston, J. Ashburner, S. Kiebel, T. Nichols, and W. Penny, Eds., chapter 36, Academic Press, Elsevier Science, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  2. S. Vahdat, M. Maneshi, C. Grova, J. Gotman, and T. E. Milner, “Shared and specific independent components analysis for between-group comparison,” Neural Computation, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 3052–3090, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. A. Lindquist, “The statistical analysis of fMRI data,” Statistical Science, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 439–464, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. P. Roels, H. Bossier, T. Loeys, and B. Moerkerke, “Data-analytical stability of cluster-wise and peak-wise inference in fMRI data analysis,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 240, pp. 37–47, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Carp, “The secret lives of experiments: methods reporting in the fMRI literature,” NeuroImage, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 289–300, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. F. Beckmann, M. Jenkinson, and S. M. Smith, “General multilevel linear modeling for group analysis in FMRI,” NeuroImage, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1052–1063, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. A. Mumford and T. Nichols, “Modeling and inference of multisubject fMRI data,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 42–51, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. Nichols and S. Hayasaka, “Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review,” Statistical Methods in Medical Research, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 419–446, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. T. E. Nichols, “Multiple testing corrections, nonparametric methods, and random field theory,” NeuroImage, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 811–815, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. P. Holmes, R. C. Blair, J. D. G. Watson, and I. Ford, “Nonparametric analysis of statistic images from functional mapping experiments,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 7–22, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. T. E. Nichols and A. P. Holmes, “Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–25, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. M. Bennett, G. L. Wolford, and M. B. Miller, “The principled control of false positives in neuroimaging,” Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, vol. 4, no. 4, Article ID nsp053, pp. 417–422, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. D. Lieberman and W. A. Cunningham, “Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: re-balancing the scale,” Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, vol. 4, no. 4, Article ID nsp052, pp. 423–428, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Y. Benjamini and Y. Hochberg, “Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 289–300, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  15. C. R. Genovese, N. A. Lazar, and T. Nichols, “Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate,” NeuroImage, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 870–878, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. C.-W. Woo, A. Krishnan, and T. D. Wager, “Cluster-extent based thresholding in fMRI analyses: pitfalls and recommendations,” NeuroImage, vol. 91, pp. 412–419, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Holmes and K. Friston, “Generalisability, random effects and population inference,” NeuroImage, vol. 7, p. S754, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  18. J. A. Mumford and T. Nichols, “Simple group fMRI modeling and inference,” NeuroImage, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 1469–1475, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Wilke, “An iterative jackknife approach for assessing reliability and power of fMRI group analyses,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 4, Article ID e35578, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. K. J. Gorgolewski, A. J. Storkey, M. E. Bastin, I. Whittle, and C. Pernet, “Single subject fMRI test-retest reliability metrics and confounding factors,” NeuroImage, vol. 69, pp. 231–243, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. X. Qiu, Y. Xiao, A. Gordon, and A. Yakovlev, “Assessing stability of gene selection in microarray data analysis,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 7, article 50, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. Kiebel and A. P. Holmes, “The general linear model,” in Statistical Parametric Mapping: The Analysis of Functional Brain Images, K. J. Friston, J. Ashburner, S. Kiebel, T. Nichols, and W. Penny, Eds., chapter 8, Academic Press, Elsevier Science, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  23. J.-B. Poline and M. Brett, “The general linear model and fMRI: does love last forever?” NeuroImage, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 871–880, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. K. J. Friston, A. P. Holmes, K. J. Worsley, J.-P. Poline, C. D. Frith, and R. S. J. Frackowiak, “Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 189–210, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. K. J. Worsley, C. H. Liao, J. Aston et al., “A general statistical analysis for fMRI data,” NeuroImage, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. R. Henson and K. Friston, “Convolution models for FMRI,” in Statistical Parametric Mapping: The Analysis of Functional Brain Images, K. Friston, J. Ashburner, S. Kiebel, T. Nichols, and W. Penny, Eds., pp. 193–210, Academic Press, London, UK, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  27. D. Cochrane and G. H. Orcutt, “Application of least squares regression to relationships containing auto-correlated error terms,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 44, no. 245, pp. 32–61, 1949. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. M. Kutner, C. Nachtsheim, J. Neter, and W. Li, Applied Linear Models, McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York, NY, USA, 2005.
  29. M. Jenkinson, C. F. Beckmann, T. E. J. Behrens, M. W. Woolrich, and S. M. Smith, “FSL,” NeuroImage, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 782–790, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging U.C.L, Spm8, 2010, http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/.
  31. R. W. Cox, “AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages,” Computers and Biomedical Research, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 162–173, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. G. Chen, Z. S. Saad, A. R. Nath, M. S. Beauchamp, and R. W. Cox, “FMRI group analysis combining effect estimates and their variances,” NeuroImage, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 747–765, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. G. Chen, Z. S. Saad, J. C. Britton, D. S. Pine, and R. W. Cox, “Linear mixed-effects modeling approach to FMRI group analysis,” NeuroImage, vol. 73, pp. 176–190, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. Brett, W. Penny, and S. Kiebel, “Parametric procedures,” in Statistical Parametric Mapping: The Analysis of Functional Brain Images, K. J. Friston, J. Ashburner, S. Kiebel, T. Nichols, and W. Penny, Eds., chapter 8, Academic Press Inc, Elsevier Science, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  35. K. J. Friston, A. Holmes, J.-B. Poline, C. J. Price, and C. D. Frith, “Detecting activations in pet and fMRI: levels of inference and power,” NeuroImage, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 223–235, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. S. Hayasaka and T. E. Nichols, “Validating cluster size inference: random field and permutation methods,” NeuroImage, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 2343–2356, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. K. J. Worsley, A. C. Evans, S. Marrett, and P. Neelin, “A three-dimensional statistical analysis for CBF activation studies in human brain,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 900–918, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. W.-L. Luo and T. E. Nichols, “Diagnosis and exploration of massively univariate neuroimaging models,” NeuroImage, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1014–1032, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. M. M. Monti, “Statistical analysis of fMRI time-series: a critical review of the GLM approach,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 5, article 28, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. O. Friman and C.-F. Westin, “Resampling fMRI time series,” NeuroImage, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 859–867, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. P. Bellec, P. Rosa-Neto, O. C. Lyttelton, H. Benali, and A. C. Evans, “Multi-level bootstrap analysis of stable clusters in resting-state fMRI,” NeuroImage, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 1126–1139, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. S. P. Roels, B. Moerkerke, and T. Loeys, “Bootstrapping fmri data: dealing with misspecification,” Neuroinformatics, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 337–352, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. B. Thirion, P. Pinel, S. Mériaux, A. Roche, S. Dehaene, and J.-B. Poline, “Analysis of a large fMRI cohort: statistical and methodological issues for group analyses,” NeuroImage, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 105–120, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. D. Adolf, S. Weston, S. Baecke, M. Luchtmann, J. Bernarding, and S. Kropf, “Increasing the reliability of data analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging by applying a new blockwise permutation method,” Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, vol. 8, article 72, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. A. M. Winkler, G. R. Ridgway, M. A. Webster, S. M. Smith, and T. E. Nichols, “Permutation inference for the general linear model,” NeuroImage, vol. 92, pp. 381–397, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. B. Lenoski, L. C. Baxter, L. J. Karam, J. Maisog, and J. Debbins, “On the performance of autocorrelation estimation algorithms for fMRI analysis,” IEEE Journal on Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 828–838, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. M. Welvaert and Y. Rosseel, “How ignoring physiological noise can bias the conclusions from fMRI simulation results,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 211, no. 1, pp. 125–132, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. B. W. Matthews, “Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Protein Structure, vol. 405, no. 2, pp. 442–451, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. M. Vihinen, “How to evaluate performance of prediction methods? Measures and their interpretation in variation effect analysis,” BMC genomics, vol. 13, supplement 4, article S2, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. D. C. Van Essen, K. Ugurbil, E. Auerbach et al., “The human connectome project: a data acquisition perspective,” NeuroImage, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 2222–2231, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. M. F. Glasser, S. N. Sotiropoulos, J. A. Wilson et al., “The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the human connectome project,” NeuroImage, vol. 80, pp. 105–124, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. J. Durnez, S. P. Roels, and B. Moerkerke, “Multiple testing in fMRI: an empirical case study on the balance between sensitivity, specificity, and stability,” Biometrical Journal, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 649–661, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. S. C. Strother, J. Anderson, L. K. Hansen et al., “The quantitative evaluation of functional neuroimaging experiments: the NPAIRS data analysis framework,” NeuroImage, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 747–771, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. S. Strother, S. La Conte, L. Kai Hansen et al., “Optimizing the fMRI data-processing pipeline using prediction and reproducibility performance metrics. I. A preliminary group analysis,” NeuroImage, vol. 23, supplement 1, pp. S196–S207, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. A. Eklund, M. Andersson, C. Josephson, M. Johannesson, and H. Knutsson, “Does parametric fMRI analysis with SPM yield valid results? An empirical study of 1484 rest datasets,” NeuroImage, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 565–578, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus