Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
Volume 2016, Article ID 5104907, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5104907
Research Article

Prediction of the Fundamental Period of Infilled RC Frame Structures Using Artificial Neural Networks

1Computational Mechanics Laboratory, School of Pedagogical and Technological Education, Heraklion, 14121 Athens, Greece
2Department of Civil, Environmental, Aerospace and Materials Engineering (DICAM), University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy
3Department of Civil Engineering, Piraeus University of Applied Sciences, 250 Thivon and Petrou Ralli Street, Aigaleo, 122 44 Athens, Greece
4Department of Civil Engineering, Technological Educational Institute of Western Greece, 26334 Patra, Greece

Received 29 June 2015; Accepted 29 September 2015

Academic Editor: Christian W. Dawson

Copyright © 2016 Panagiotis G. Asteris et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. S. Smith, “Behavior of square infilled frames,” Journal of the Structural Division, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 381–404, 1966. View at Google Scholar
  2. B. S. Smith and C. Carter, “A method of analysis for infilled frames,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 31–48, 1969. View at Google Scholar
  3. A. B. Mehrabi, P. B. Shing, M. P. Schuller, and J. L. Noland, “Experimental evaluation of masonry-infilled RC frames,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 228–237, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. G. Buonopane and R. N. White, “Pseudodynamic testing of masonry infilled reinforced concrete frame,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 125, no. 6, pp. 578–589, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. L. Cavaleri, M. Fossetti, and M. Papia, “Infilled frames: developments in the evaluation of cyclic behaviour under lateral loads,” Structural Engineering and Mechanics, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 469–494, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. L. Te-Chang and K. Kwok-Hung, “Nonlinear behaviour of non-integral infilled frames,” Computers and Structures, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 551–560, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. Z. Chrysostomou, Effects of degrading infill walls on the nonlinear seismic response of two-dimensional steel frames [Ph.D. dissertation], Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA, 1991.
  8. A. Saneinejad and B. Hobbs, “Inelastic design of infilled frames,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 121, no. 4, pp. 634–650, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. Z. Chrysostomou, P. Gergely, and J. F. Abel, “A six-strut model for nonlinear dynamic analysis of steel infilled frames,” International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 335–353, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. P. G. Asteris, “Lateral stiffness of brick masonry infilled plane frames,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 129, no. 8, pp. 1071–1079, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. P. G. Asteris, “Closure to ‘lateral stiffness of brick masonry infilled plane frames’ by P.G. Asteris,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 131, no. 3, pp. 523–524, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  12. P. G. Asteris, “Finite element micro-modeling of infilled frames,” Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 8, pp. 1–11, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. A. Moghaddam, “Lateral load behavior of masonry infilled steel frames with repair and retrofit,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 56–63, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. J. Kakaletsis and C. G. Karayannis, “Experimental investigation of infilled reinforced concrete frames with openings,” ACI Structural Journal, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 132–141, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. L. Cavaleri and M. Papia, “A new dynamic identification technique: application to the evaluation of the equivalent strut for infilled frames,” Engineering Structures, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 889–901, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. L. Cavaleri and M. Papia, “An output-only stochastic parametric approach for the identification of linear and nonlinear structures under random base excitations: advances and comparisons,” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, vol. 35, pp. 11–21, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. H. A. Moghaddam and P. J. Dowling, “The state of the art in infilled frames,” ESEE Research Report 87-2, Civil Engineering Department, Imperial College of Science and Technology, London, UK, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  18. P. G. Asteris, S. T. Antoniou, D. S. Sophianopoulos, and C. Z. Chrysostomou, “Mathematical macromodeling of infilled frames: state of the art,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 137, no. 12, pp. 1508–1517, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. P. G. Asteris, D. M. Cotsovos, C. Z. Chrysostomou, A. Mohebkhah, and G. K. Al-Chaar, “Mathematical micromodeling of infilled frames: state of the art,” Engineering Structures, vol. 56, pp. 1905–1921, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. Z. Chrysostomou and P. G. Asteris, “On the in-plane properties and capacities of infilled frames,” Engineering Structures, vol. 41, pp. 385–402, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. Ghaboussi, J. H. Garrett, and X. Wu, “Knowledge-based modeling of material behavior with neural networks,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 132–153, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. H. Adeli, “Knowledge engineering,” Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 51–68, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. W. Graf, S. Freitag, M. Kaliske, and J.-U. Sickert, “Recurrent neural networks for uncertain time-dependent structural behavior,” Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 322–323, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. V. Plevris and P. G. Asteris, “Modeling of masonry failure surface under biaxial compressive stress using Neural Networks,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 55, pp. 447–461, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. M. Kose, “Parameters affecting the fundamental period of RC buildings with infill walls,” Engineering Structures, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 93–102, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. Applied Technology Council (ATC), “Tentative provision for the development of seismic regulations for buildings,” Tech. Rep. ATC3-06, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, Calif, USA, 1978. View at Google Scholar
  27. European Committee for Standardization CEN, “Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings,” EuropeanStandard EN 1998-1:2004, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  28. Internal Conference of Building Officials, Uniform Building Code, ICBO, Whittier, Calif, USA, 1997.
  29. FEMA, “NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. Part 1: provisions,” FEMA 450, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, USA, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  30. R. K. Goel and A. K. Chopra, “Period formulas for moment-resisting frame buildings,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 123, no. 11, pp. 1454–1461, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. National Research Council, The National Building Code (NBC), National Research Council, Ottawa, Canada, 1995.
  32. Bureau of Indian Standards, “Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures—part 1: general provisions and buildings,” Tech. Rep. IS-1893, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India, 2002, Fifth Revision. View at Google Scholar
  33. Egyptian Seismic Code, Regulations for Earthquake Resistant Design of Buildings in Egypt, Egyptian Society for Earthquake Engineering, Cairo, Egypt, 1988.
  34. Venezuelan Seismic Code, Regulations for Earthquake Resistant Buildings, Comision De Normas Industriales, Covenin, Caracas, Venezuela, 1988.
  35. AFPS, “Recommendations for the redaction of rules relative to the structures and installation built in regions prone to earthquakes,” Tech. Rep. AFPS-90, France Association of Earthquake Engineering, Paris, France, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  36. M. D. Morales, Fundamental period of vibration for reinforced concrete buildings [M.S. thesis], Department of Civil Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada, 2000.
  37. H. B. Kaushik, D. C. Rai, and S. K. Jain, “Code approaches to seismic design of masonry-infilled reinforced concrete frames: a state-of-the-art review,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 961–983, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. Dorji, Seismic performance of brick infilled RC frame structures in low and medium rise buildings in Bhutan [M.S. thesis], Queensland University of Technology, 2009.
  39. L.-L. Hong and W.-L. Hwang, “Empirical formula for fundamental vibration periods of reinforced concrete buildings in Taiwan,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 327–337, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. A. K. Chopra and R. K. Goel, “Building period formulas for estimating seismic displacements,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 533–536, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. H. Crowley and R. Pinho, “Period-height relationship for existing European reinforced concrete buildings,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 93–119, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. H. Crowley and R. Pinho, “Simplified equations for estimating the period of vibration of existing buildings,” in Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Paper Number 1122, Geneva, Switzerland, September 2006.
  43. K. Guler, E. Yuksel, and A. Kocak, “Estimation of the fundamental vibration period of existing RC buildings in Turkey utilizing ambient vibration records,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 12, supplement 2, pp. 140–150, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. LH Logismiki, FESPA 10 for Windows, V.5.4.0.100, LH Logismiki, Athens, Greece, 2013.
  45. R. J. Mainstone and G. A. Weeks, “The influence of bounding frame on the racking stiffness and strength of brick walls,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Brick Masonry Conference, pp. 165–171, Building Research Establishment, Stoke-on-Trent, UK, April 1970.
  46. R. J. Mainstone, “Supplementary note on the stiffness and strengths of infilled frames,” Current Paper CP 13/74, Building Research Station, Garston, UK, 1974. View at Google Scholar
  47. FEMA, “NEHRP commentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings,” Tech. Rep. FEMA-274, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, USA, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  48. FEMA-306, Evaluation of Earthquake Damaged Concrete and Masonry Wall Buildings: Basic Procedures Manual, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, USA, 1998.
  49. SeismoSoft, SeismoStruct—A Computer Program for Static and Dynamic Nonlinear Analysis of Framed Structures, v.6.5.200, SeismoSoft, Pavia, Italy, 2013, http://www.seismosoft.com.
  50. F. J. Crisafulli, Seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete structures with masonry infills [Ph.D. dissertation], University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 1997.
  51. P. G. Asteris, C. C. Repapis, L. Cavaleri, V. Sarhosis, and A. Athanasopoulou, “On the fundamental period of infilled RC frame buildings,” Structural Engineering and Mechanics, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1175–1200, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. K. Hornik, M. Stinchcombe, and H. White, “Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators,” Neural Networks, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 359–366, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. H. Adeli, “Neural networks in civil engineering: 1989–2000,” Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 126–142, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. D. G. Giovanis and V. Papadopoulos, “Spectral representation-based neural network assisted stochastic structural mechanics,” Engineering Structures, vol. 84, pp. 382–394, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. P. L. Bartlett, “The sample complexity of pattern classification with neural networks: the size of the weights is more important than the size of the network,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 525–536, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. B. Karlik and A. V. Olgac, “Performance analysis of various activation functions in generalized MLP architectures of neural networks,” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 111–122, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  57. V. Papadopoulos, D. G. Giovanis, N. D. Lagaros, and M. Papadrakakis, “Accelerated subset simulation with neural networks for reliability analysis,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 223-224, pp. 70–80, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  58. J. Lamanna, A. Malgaroli, S. Cerutti, and M. G. Signorini, “Detection of fractal behavior in temporal series of synaptic quantal release events: a feasibility study,” Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, vol. 2012, Article ID 704673, 9 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. Z. Chen, “An overview of bayesian methods for neural spike train analysis,” Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, vol. 2013, Article ID 251905, 17 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. A. Blum, Neural Networks in C++, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 1992.
  61. M. J. A. Berry and G. Linoff, Data Mining Techniques, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1997.
  62. Z. Boger and H. Guterman, “Knowledge extraction from artificial neural network models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 3030–3035, Orlando, Fla, USA, October 1997.
  63. F. J. Anscombe, “Graphs in Statistical Analysis,” The American Statistician, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 17–21, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar