Research Article
Adaptive Online Sequential ELM for Concept Drift Tackling
Table 8
Average testing accuracy in % for RD experiment. For SEA, we started from
to
. For MNIST, we started from
to
.
(a) Sudden drift effect caused by split training composition with hidden nodes increase |
| Data | AOS-ELM | | Concept | Testing accuracy |
| SEA | | 0 | | 90.00 ± 0.59 | | 90.24 ± 0.6 | 500 | | 66.29 ± 1.12 | | 90.12 ± 0.52 |
| MNIST | | 0 | | 96.42 ± 0.21 | | 93.68 ± 0.23 | 500 | | 17.59 ± 0.98 | | 97.08 ± 0.15 |
|
|
(b) MNIST RD simulation: the effect of hidden nodes increase for split and shuffled training composition () |
| Data | | Composition | | |
| MNIST | 0 | Split | 96.42 ± 0.21 | 93.68 ± 0.23 | Shuffled | 96.09 ± 0.12 | 94.34 ± 0.16 | 500 | Split | 17.59 ± 0.98 | 97.08 ± 0.15 | Shuffled | 96.53 ± 0.12 | 94.29 ± 0.25 | 1000 | Split | 8.65 ± 1.13 | 97.64 ± 0.18 | Shuffled | 96.74 ± 0.14 | 94.78 ± 0.10 |
|
|