Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 8571265, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8571265
Review Article

Developmental and Evolutionary Lexicon Acquisition in Cognitive Agents/Robots with Grounding Principle: A Short Review

1Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor, Malaysia
2University College of Engineering and Technology, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan
3Centre for Artificial Intelligence & Robotics (CAIRO), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 54100 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Received 30 December 2015; Revised 15 February 2016; Accepted 18 February 2016

Academic Editor: Ricardo Aler

Copyright © 2016 Nadia Rasheed and Shamsudin H. M. Amin. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Harnad, “The symbol grounding problem,” Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, vol. 42, no. 1–3, pp. 335–346, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. Roy, “Semiotic schemas: a framework for grounding language in action and perception,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 167, no. 1-2, pp. 170–205, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. F. Stramandinoli, D. Marocco, and A. Cangelosi, “Grounding abstract action words through the hierarchical organization of motor primitives,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 3rd Joint International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL '13), pp. 1–2, Osaka, Japan, August 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. L. Steels, “Evolving grounded communication for robots,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 308–312, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. K. Gold, M. Doniec, C. Crick, and B. Scassellati, “Robotic vocabulary building using extension inference and implicit contrast,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 173, no. 1, pp. 145–166, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. Yu, L. B. Smith, and A. F. Pereira, “Grounding word learning in multimodal sensorimotor interaction,” in Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1017–1022, 2008.
  7. N. Mavridis, “A review of verbal and non-verbal human-robot interactive communication,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 22–35, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. Lobato, Y. Sandamirskaya, M. Richter, and G. Schöner, “Parsing of action sequences: a neural dynamics approach,” Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, vol. 6, no. 1, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. T. Kollar, S. Tellex, D. Roy, and N. Roy, “Grounding verbs of motion in natural language commands to robots,” in Experimental Robotics, pp. 31–47, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. M. Forbes, R. P. N. Rao, L. Zettlemoyer, and M. Cakmak, “Robot programming by demonstration with situated spatial language understanding,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA '15), pp. 2014–2020, Seattle, Wash, USA, May 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. Roy, “Grounding words in perception and action: computational insights,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 389–396, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Harnad, S. J. Hanson, and J. Lubin, “Learned categorical perception in neural nets: implications for symbol grounding,” in Symbol Processors and Connectionist Network Models in Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Modelling: Steps Toward Principled Integration, pp. 191–206, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  13. D. Roy and N. Mukherjee, “Towards situated speech understanding: visual context priming of language models,” Computer Speech & Language, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 227–248, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. Roy, “Learning visually grounded words and syntax of natural spoken language,” Evolution of Communication, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 33–56, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. A. Plebe, “A neural model of object naming,” World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 20, pp. 232–237, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  16. D. K. Roy and A. P. Pentland, “Learning words from sights and sounds: a computational model,” Cognitive Science, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 113–146, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. Yu, D. H. Ballard, and R. N. Aslin, “The role of embodied intention in early lexical acquisition,” Cognitive Science, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 961–1005, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. P.-Y. Oudeyer and F. Kaplan, “Discovering communication,” Connection Science, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 189–206, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. P.-Y. Oudeyer, F. Kaplan, and V. V. Hafner, “Intrinsic motivation systems for autonomous mental development,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 265–286, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. E. Pastra, Vision-Language Integration: A Double-Grounding Case, University of Sheffield, 2004.
  21. K. Pastra, “Viewing vision-language integration as a double-grounding case,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Achieving Human-Level Intelligence through Integrated Systems and Research, pp. 62–67, 2004.
  22. S. Coradeschi, A. Loutfi, and B. Wrede, “A short review of symbol grounding in robotic and intelligent systems,” KI-Künstliche Intelligenz, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 129–136, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. K. Pastra, From Lexicon to Praxicon: Language-Action-Image Semantic Relations, Edited by K. Potagas and I. Evdokimidis, 2010.
  24. K. Pastra and Y. Aloimonos, “The minimalist grammar of action,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 367, no. 1585, pp. 103–117, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. N. Mavridis and D. Roy, “Grounded situation models for robots: where words and percepts meet,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS '06), pp. 4690–4697, Beijing, China, October 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. D. Roy, “A computational model of word learning from multimodal sensory input,” in Proceedings of the International Conference of Cognitive Modeling (ICCM '00), Groningen, The Netherlands, March 2000.
  27. J. M. Siskind, “Grounding the lexical semantics of verbs in visual perception using force dynamics and event logic,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 15, pp. 31–90, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. L. Talmy, “Force dynamics in language and cognition,” Cognitive Science, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 49–100, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. E. N. Cannon and P. R. Cohen, “Talk about motion: the semantic representation of verbs by motion dynamics,” in The Spatial Foundations of Cognition and Language: Thinking Through Space, pp. 235–258, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  30. M. C. Oladell and M. Huber, “Symbol generation and grounding for reinforcement learning agents using affordances and dictionary compression,” in Proceedings of the 25th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (FLAIRS '12), pp. 132–135, May 2012. View at Scopus
  31. D. Marocco, A. Cangelosi, K. Fischer, and T. Belpaeme, “Grounding action words in the sensorimotor interaction with the world: experiments with a simulated iCub humanoid robot,” Frontiers in Neurorobotics, vol. 4, article 7, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. F. Stramandinoli, D. Marocco, and A. Cangelosi, “The grounding of higher order concepts in action and language: a cognitive robotics model,” Neural Networks, vol. 32, pp. 165–173, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. F. Stramandinoli, A. Cangelosi, and D. Marocco, “Towards the grounding of abstract words: a neural network model for cognitive robots,” in Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN '11), pp. 467–474, San Jose, Calif, USA, August 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. A. Cangelosi, “Grounding language in action and perception: from cognitive agents to humanoid robots,” Physics of Life Reviews, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 139–151, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. J. L. Elman, “Finding structure in time,” Cognitive Science, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 179–211, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. L. Steels, The Symbol Grounding Problem Has been Solved. So What's Next? Symbols, Embodiment and Meaning, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2007.
  37. A. Cangelosi and T. Riga, “An embodied model for sensorimotor grounding and grounding transfer: experiments with epigenetic robots,” Cognitive Science, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 673–689, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. L. Steels and F. Kaplan, “AIBO's first words: the social learning of language and meaning,” Evolution of Communication, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 3–32, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  39. L. Steels, “A self-organizing spatial vocabulary,” Artificial Life, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 319–332, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. L. Steels, “How to do experiments in artificial language evolution and why,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the Evolution of Language (EVOLANG '06), pp. 323–332, Rome, Italy, April 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. L. Steels and M. Loetzsch, “The grounded naming game,” in Experiments in Cultural Language Evolution, L. Steels, Ed., vol. 3, pp. 41–59, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. P. A. Vogt and F. Divina, “Social symbol grounding and language evolution,” Interaction Studies, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 31–52, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. P. Vogt, “Language evolution and robotics: issues on symbol grounding,” in Artificial Cognition Systems, vol. 176, pp. 176–209, Idea Group, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  44. M. Spranger, M. Loetzsch, and L. Steels, “A perceptual system for language game experiments,” in Language Grounding in Robots, pp. 89–110, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. P. Vogt, “Thsim v3.2: the talking heads simulation tool,” in Advances in Artificial Life, W. Banzhaf, J. Ziegler, T. Christaller, P. Dittrich, and J. T. Kim, Eds., vol. 2801 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 535–544, Springer, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. L. Steels, “Perceptually grounded meaning creation,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 338–344, 1996.
  47. P. Vogt, “Minimum cost and the emergence of the Zipf-Mandelbrot law,” in Artificial Life IX: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems, MIT Press, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  48. P. Vogt, “Grounding language about actions: mobile robots playing follow me games,” in SAB2000 Proceedings Supplement Book, MIT Press, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  49. L. Steels and M. Spranger, “The robot in the mirror,” Connection Science, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 337–358, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. K. Beuls and L. Steels, “Agent-based models of strategies for the emergence and evolution of grammatical agreement,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 3, Article ID e58960, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. L. Steels, Design Patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar, vol. 11, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2011.
  52. L. Steels, “Self-organization and selection in cultural language evolution,” in Experiments in Cultural Language Evolution, vol. 3, pp. 1–37, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. L. Steels, M. Spranger, R. Van Trijp, S. Höfer, and M. Hild, “Emergent action language on real robots,” in Language Grounding in Robots, pp. 255–276, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. J. Bleys, Language Strategies for the Domain of Colour, vol. 3, Language Science Press, 2015.
  55. J.-S. Gutmann, M. Fukuchi, and M. Fujita, “Real-time path planning for humanoid robot navigation,” in Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI '05), vol. 19, pp. 1232–1237, 2005.