Research Article
Memetic Differential Evolution with an Improved Contraction Criterion
Table 2
Comparison of Mean Error and standard deviation between MDE and other six EAs over 25 independent runs on twenty-one 30-dimensional test functions.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
indicates that when six algorithms obtain the global optimum, the intermediate results are reported at . “−,” “+,” and “=” denote that the performance of this algorithm is, respectively, worse than, better than, and similar to MDE according to the Wilcoxon signed-rank test at . |