Research Article
Automated Text Analysis Based on Skip-Gram Model for Food Evaluation in Predicting Consumer Acceptance
Table 2
Smell evaluation result of each jjampong ramen type.
| Words | Flavor description | Similarity of jjampong ramen A | Similarity of jjampong ramen B |
| Bul-mat | Burnt | 0.69 | 0.7 | Bul-hyang | Burning vegetables flavor cooked with wok | 0.67 | 0.56 | Bi-lin-mat | Off-fishy flavor | 0.37 | 0.41 | Bi-lin-nae | Off-fishy smell | 0.40 | 0.62 | Mae-kom | Spicy smell with short duration | 0.38 | 0.37 | Mae-un-mat | Extended spicy smell | 0.36 | 0.40 | Gip-eun-mat | Mixed (balanced) flavor | 0.40 | 0.42 | Hae-mul-mat | Sea food flavor | 0.50 | 0.43 | Gam-chil-mat | Rich flavor (umami) | 0.46 | 0.38 | Jin-han-mat | Complexed rich flavor | 0.42 | 0.38 | Dan-mat | Sweet flavor | 0.41 | 0.39 |
|
|