Detecting Happiness Using Hyperspectral Imaging Technology

Table 5

Correlation analysis and effect size.

		value	Cohen’s d
L1	C vs S1	0.752	0.727
	C vs S2	0.742	0.960
	S1 vs S2	0.887	0.148
L2	C vs S1	0.713	0.758
	C vs S2	0.723	0.679
	S1 vs S2	0.827	0.049
L3	C vs S1	0.445^a	0.589
	C vs S2	0.595^a	0.467
	S1 vs S2	0.855	0.132
L4	C vs S1	0.782	0.465
	C vs S2	0.793	0.565
	S1 vs S2	0.918	0.124
L5	C vs S1	0.605^a	0.381
	C vs S2	0.574^a	0.411
	S1 vs S2	0.810	0.010
L6	C vs S1	0.587	0.812
	C vs S2	0.606	0.843
	S1 vs S2	0.797	0.083
L7	C vs S1	0.655^a	0.921
	C vs S2	0.505^a	1.119
	S1 vs S2	0.832	0.209
R1	C vs S1	0.595^a	0.628
	C vs S2	0.632^a	0.622
	S1 vs S2	0.829	0.041
R2	C vs S1	0.572^a	0.684
	C vs S2	0.610^a	0.574
	S1 vs S2	0.738	0.003
R3	C vs S1	0.675	0.472
	C vs S2	0.748	0.484
	S1 vs S2	0.890	0.008
R4	C vs S1	0.718	0.491
	C vs S2	0.805	0.533
	S1 vs S2	0.852	0.068
R5	C vs S1	0.486^a	0.540
	C vs S2	0.510^a	0.418
	S1 vs S2	0.712	0.175
R6	C vs S1	0.738	0.690
	C vs S2	0.858	0.622
	S1 vs S2	0.822	0.047
R7	C vs S1	0.762	0.619
	C vs S2	0.736	0.623
	S1 vs S2	0.776	0.046
M1	C vs S1	0.516^a	0.945
	C vs S2	0.560^a	0.841
	S1 vs S2	0.897	0.113
M2	C vs S1	0.630^a	0.793
	C vs S2	0.727	0.698
	S1 vs S2	0.842	0.115
M3	C vs S1	0.638^a	0.615
	C vs S2	0.743	0.407
	S1 vs S2	0.764	0.180
M4	C vs S1	0.677	0.809
	C vs S2	0.466^a	0.536
	S1 vs S2	0.555	0.240
M5	C vs S1	0.595^a	0.998
	C vs S2	0.686	0.886
	S1 vs S2	0.797	0.083

C = calm; S1 = Session 1; S2 = Session 2. The coefficient is statistically significant at the α_A level by correlation analysis. α_A = 0.05/(3 ∗ 19) = 0.00088 (Bonferroni). ^aThe coefficient is statistically significant at the 0.05 level.