Research Article

Building a Discourse-Argument Hybrid System for Vietnamese Why-Question Answering

Table 2

Research works on why-question answering.

AuthorYearMethodologyDatasetResult

Verberne2006–2010IR + RST relation classificationSelected 186 English why-questions on INEX corpusMRR@150 = 0.34
Higashinaka and Isozaki2008IR + causal relation classification using SVMDataset developed in JapaneseMRR@20 = 0.339
Oh et. al.2013IR + causal extraction using CRFWhySet, dataset developed in JapaneseP@1 = 41.8%
2016IR + causal extraction using CRF, augmented by adding more training dataWhySetP@1 = 50%
2017IR + causal extraction using CRF, answer selection using CNN networkWhySetP@1 = 54%
2019IR + GAN-like network (GAN–generative adversarial network)WhySetP@1 = 54.8%
Quasar-T (https://github.com/bdhingra/quasar)EM = 43.2%
F1 = 49.7%
SearchQAEM = 59.6%
F1 = 65.3%
TriviaQAEM = 49.6%
F1 = 54.8%