Cost Control of Mining Personnel Based on Wireless Communication Network from the Perspective of Operations Research

Table 5

Mining test results of different explosive unit consumption.

Unit consumption/kg/m3	Row spacing (m)	Hole bottom distance (m)	Mining effect	Open wiring condition	Top board situation	Two side-wall situation	Rear blast hole situation
091–095	16	20	Overgrind of ore	Damaged severely	Lots of falling lumps and pumice	More slanting side-wall	Serious blocking of holes and dislocation
086–091	16	20	Small lumpiness, partly fine ore	Small damage	More pumice	Less slanting side-wall	More plugged holes, less dislocation
082–086	16	20	Uniform lumpiness, less fine ore	Less damage	Partial pumice and falling lumps	Less slanting side-wall	Less plugged holes and dislocation
075–082	16	20	Uneven lumpiness, high lump rate	Less damage	Less pumice and falling lumps	Rarely slanting side-wall	Occasionally plugged or misplaced