Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology / 2012 / Article

Review | Open Access

Volume 26 |Article ID 862905 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/862905

Vipul Jairath, Myriam Martel, Richard FA Logan, Alan N Barkun, "Why Do Mortality Rates for Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Differ around the World? A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies", Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 26, Article ID 862905, 7 pages, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/862905

Why Do Mortality Rates for Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Differ around the World? A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies

Received20 Sep 2011
Accepted20 Dec 2011

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Discrepancies exist in reported mortality rates of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB).OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review assessing possible reasons for these disparate findings and to more reliably compare them.METHODS: The MEDLINE, EMBASE and ISI Web of Knowledge databases were searched for studies reporting mortality rates in NVUGIB involving adults and published in English. To ensure robust and contemporary estimates, studies spanning 1996 to January 2011 that included more than 1000 patients were selected.RESULTS: Eighteen of 3077 studies were selected. Ten studies used administrative databases and the remaining eight used registries. The mortality rates reported in these studies ranged from 1.1% in Japan to 11% in Denmark. There were variations in reported mortality rates among countries and also within countries. Reasons for these disparities included a spectrum of quality in reporting as well as heterogeneous definitions of case ascertainment, differing patient populations with regard to severity of presentation and associated comorbidities, varying durations of follow-up and different health care system-related practices.CONCLUSIONS: Wide differences in reported NVUGIB mortality rates are attributable to differences in adopted methodologies and populations studied. More uniform standards in reporting are needed; only then can true observed variations enable a better understanding of causes of death and pave the way to improved patient outcomes.

Copyright © 2012 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views338
Downloads495
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.