Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Small Bowel in Crohn’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 3

Results (of nonpooled studies).

Name	Year	Number of patients; (number of patients included in analysis)	Results
Rieber et al. [13]	2000	194 (84)	Sensitivity and specificity of 95.2% and 92.6% in terminal ileum
Koh et al. [12]	2001	30 (21)	Sensitivity and specificity of 89% and 67% in terminal ileum
Pascu et al. [15]	2004	61 (37)	Per-segment sensitivity and specificity of 56% and 73% in terminal ileum
Negaard et al. [19]	2007	48 (35)	Sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 89% for MRI with OS, and 88% and 84% for MR enteroclysis
Parisinos et al. [25]	2010	342 (68)	Sensitivity and specificity of 85.1% and 85.71% in ileum
Fiorino et al. [26]	2011	44 (44)	Sensitivity and specificity of 93% and 81% in ileum
Friedrich et al. [32]	2012	79 (39)	Sensitivity and specificity of 72% and 87% in terminal ileum without rectal enema; 100% and 74% in terminal ileum with rectal enema
Grand et al. [33]	2012	310 (310)	Sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 79% in distal ileum