Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Letter to the Editor
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume 2017, Article ID 5127178, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5127178
Research Article

Establishing a Porcine Model of Small for Size Syndrome following Liver Resection

1Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
2Department of General Pathology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Correspondence should be addressed to Arianeb Mehrabi; ed.grebledieh-inu.dem@ibarhem.benaira

Received 20 June 2017; Accepted 15 August 2017; Published 29 August 2017

Academic Editor: Pierluigi Toniutto

Copyright © 2017 Mohammad Golriz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. T. Poon, S. T. Fan, C. M. Lo et al., “Improving perioperative outcome expands the role of hepatectomy in management of benign and malignant hepatobiliary diseases: Analysis of 1222 consecutive patients from a prospective database,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 240, no. 4, pp. 698–710, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. Dimitroulis, P. Tsaparas, S. Valsami et al., “Indications, limitations and maneuvers to enable extended hepatectomy: Current trends,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 20, no. 24, pp. 7887–7893, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. M. Asencio, J. L. García Sabrido, and L. Olmedilla, “How to expand the safe limits in hepatic resections?” Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 399–404, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. N. N. Rahbari, O. J. Garden, R. Padbury et al., “Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS),” Surgery, vol. 149, no. 5, pp. 713–724, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. F. Dahm, P. Georgiev, and P.-A. Clavien, “Small-for-size syndrome after partial liver transplantation: definition, mechanisms of disease and clinical implications,” American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 2605–2610, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. K. Man, S.-T. Fan, C.-M. Lo et al., “Graft Injury in Relation to Graft Size in Right Lobe Live Donor Liver Transplantation: A Study of Hepatic Sinusoidal Injury in Correlation with Portal Hemodynamics and Intragraft Gene Expression,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 237, no. 2, pp. 256–264, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. O. N. Tucker and N. Heaton, “The 'small for size' liver syndrome,” Current Opinion in Critical Care, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 150–155, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. N. Golse, P. O. Bucur, R. Adam, D. Castaing, A. Sa Cunha, and E. Vibert, “New Paradigms in Post-hepatectomy Liver Failure,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 593–605, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. F. G. Court, S. A. Wemyss-Holden, C. P. Morrison et al., “Segmental nature of the porcine liver and its potential as a model for experimental partial hepatectomy,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 440–444, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Golriz, H. Fonouni, A. Nickkholgh, M. Hafezi, C. Garoussi, and A. Mehrabi, “Pig kidney transplantation: An up-to-date guideline,” European Surgical Research, vol. 49, no. 3-4, pp. 121–129, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Golriz, S. El Sakka, A. Majlesara et al., “Hepatic Hemodynamic Changes Following Stepwise Liver Resection,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 587–594, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Leng, H. Xing, J. Tan, K. Chen, and J. Dong, “The safe minimally ischemic liver remnant for small-for-size syndrome in porcine hepatectomy,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 2419–2424, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. M. Asencio, J. Vaquero, L. Olmedilla, and J. L. García Sabrido, “"Small-for-flow" syndrome: Shifting the "size" paradigm,” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 573–577, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. Pagano, F. Di Francesco, G. J. Echeverri et al., “Development of a standardized model for liver failure in pigs: Anatomopathophysiologic findings after extended liver resection,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 2029–2032, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. B. Darnis, K. Mohkam, Z. Schmitt et al., “Splenectomy and splenic artery ligation in swine: No impact on portal vein and hepatic artery flow,” HPB, vol. 18, p. e694, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. M. Golriz, S. Abbasi, P. Fathi, A. Majlesara, T. Brenner, and A. Mehrabi, “Does acid-base equilibrium correlate with remnant liver volume during stepwise liver resection?” American Journal of Physiology - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. P. Schemmer, H. Friess, U. Hinz et al., “Stapler hepatectomy is a safe dissection technique: Analysis of 300 patients,” World Journal of Surgery, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 419–430, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. M. Kelly, A. J. Demetris, J. J. Fung et al., “Porcine partial liver transplantaion: A novel model of the "small-for-size" liver graft,” Liver Transplantation, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 253–263, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. D. M. Kelly, X. Zhu, H. Shiba et al., “Adenosine restores the hepatic artery buffer response and improves survival in a porcine model of small-for-size syndrome,” Liver Transplantation, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 1448–1457, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. J. Demetris, D. M. Kelly, B. Eghtesad et al., “Pathophysiologic observations and histopathologic recognition of the portal hyperperfusion or small-for-size syndrome,” American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 986–993, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. N. Arkadopoulos, G. Kostopanagiotou, C. Nastos et al., “Reversal of Experimental Posthepatectomy Liver Failure in Pigs: A New Application of Hepatocyte Bioreactors,” Artificial Organs, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 29–36, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. Y. Fu, H.-B. Zhang, N. Yang et al., “Porcine partial liver transplantation without veno-venous bypass: An effective model for small-for-size liver graft injury,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1953–1961, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Q. Xia, T. F. Lu, Z. H. Zhou et al., “Extended hepatectomy with segments I and VII as resection remnant: a simple model for small-for-size injuries in pigs,” Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 601–607, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  24. A. Guglielmi, A. Ruzzenente, S. Conci, A. Valdegamberi, and C. Iacono, “How much remnant is enough in liver resection?” Digestive Surgery, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 6–17, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. Athanasiou, M. Kontos, E. Pikoulis et al., “Extended hepatectomy using the bipolar tissue sealer: An experimental model of small-for-size syndrome in pigs,” Journal of B.U.ON., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1403–1409, 2016. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. K. Mohkam, B. Darnis, and J.-Y. Mabrut, “Porcine models for the study of small-for-size syndrome and portal inflow modulation: literature review and proposal for a standardized nomenclature,” Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 668–680, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. F. G. Court, P. E. Laws, C. P. Morrison et al., “Subtotal hepatectomy: A porcine model for the study of liver regeneration,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 181–186, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. K. Mohkam, B. Darnis, Z. Schmitt, S. Duperret, C. Ducerf, and J.-Y. Mabrut, “Successful modulation of portal inflow by somatostatin in a porcine model of small-for-size syndrome,” American Journal of Surgery, vol. 212, no. 2, pp. 321–326, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. R. Troisi, G. Cammu, G. Militerno et al., “Modulation of Portal Graft Inflow: A Necessity in Adult Living-Donor Liver Transplantation?” Annals of Surgery, vol. 237, no. 3, pp. 429–436, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. R. Troisi and B. de Hemptinne, “Clinical relevance of adapting portal vein flow in living donor liver transplantation in adult patients,” Liver Transplantation, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. S36–S41, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. Golriz, A. Majlesara, E. Khajeh, and A. Mehrabi, “Reply: Hepatic Hemodynamic Changes Following Stepwise Liver Resection (Golriz et al. J Gastrointest Surg (2016) 20:587-594),” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 2109-2110, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. R. Troisi, M. Praet, and B. de Hemptinne, “Small-for-size syndrome: What is the problem?” Liver Transplantation, vol. 9, no. 9, p. S1, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. M. Golriz, M. Hafezi, C. Garoussi et al., “Do we need animal hands-on courses for transplantation surgery?” Clinical Transplantation, vol. 27, no. s25, pp. 6–15, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. C. D. A. Martins, M. A. C. Machado, and Á. A. B. Ferraz, “Porcine liver: Experimental model for the intra-hepatic glissonian approach,” Acta Cirurgica Brasileira, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 204–207, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. D. Kahn, R. Hickman, J. Terblanche, and S. von Sommoggy, “Partial hepatectomy and liver regeneration in pigs-The response to different resection sizes,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 176–180, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. Y. Panis, D. M. McMullan, and J. C. Emond, “Progressive necrosis after hepatectomy and the pathophysiology of liver failure after massive resection,” Surgery, vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 142–149, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. B. Hochleitner, P. Hengster, H. Bucher et al., “Significant survival prolongation in pigs with fulminant hepatic failure treated with a novel microgravity-based bioartificial liver,” Artificial Organs, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 906–914, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. H. Wang, N. Ohkohchi, Y. Enomoto et al., “Effect of portocaval shunt on residual extreme small liver after extended hepatectomy in porcine,” World Journal of Surgery, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 2014–2022, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. M. Golriz, A. Majlesara, S. El Sakka et al., “Small for Size and Flow (SFSF) syndrome: An alternative description for posthepatectomy liver failure,” Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 267–275, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus