Research Article

Speculation of the Time-Dependent Change of FIB4 Index in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Retrospective Study

Table 4

All 14 new main correlations analyzed for the period newly set.

Case number of the patientSlopeAbsolute value of slopeAbsolute value of

Case  10.4150.4156 × 10−100.925
Case  20.42960.42969 × 10−80.9713
Case  30.62450.62450.0010.899
Case  60.11860.11860.0450.826
Case  7−0.10150.10150.0350.95
Case  80.34610.34614 × 10−110.9913
Case  90.43830.43831 × 10−120.9916
Case  100.09210.09213 × 10−90.8925
Case  110.11920.11921 × 10−100.9619
Case  120.10620.10625 × 10−160.9531
Case  14−0.04580.04580.0040.917
Case  15−0.10940.10948 × 10−60.9610
Case  170.13040.13040.0040.888
Case  230.37070.37070.0040.859

The mean ± SD0.2462 ± 0.17660.92 ± 0.05

Continuous variables were shown as mean ± standard deviation. In all the 23 patients the period was newly set from the closest date after half the total clinical period to that date after three-quarters. Of 23 patients, seven whose analyzed period remained less than two years were excluded. In the remaining 16 patients, the new main correlations were analyzed. In two of these 16, the correlations were not recognized. In case the correlation could not be analyzed because of only two data and in case number of data was three and the correlation was not recognized by and . Slope, the slope of the correlation; , a value; , correlation coefficient; , number of data to analyze the correlation.