Review Article

Mesalazine for People with Diverticular Disease: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Table 2

Summary of findings: mesalazine versus control interventions by subtype of diverticular disease.

OutcomeSubtype of diverticular diseaseNo. of participants (no. of studies)Absolute effect (per 100 patients treated)Relative effect (95 CI)Certainty of the evidence (GRADE)Conclusion

Achievement of disease remissionSymptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease123 (1)3 more per 100
(95% CI: 14 fewer to 19 more)
1.04 (0.81 to 1.34)Very Low
●○○○
It is uncertain whether mesalazine may lead to no difference in the achievement of disease remission.
Acute uncomplicated diverticulitis81 (1)20 more per 100
(95% CI: 3 fewer to 38 more)
2.67 (1.05 to 6.79)Very Low
●○○○
It is uncertain whether mesalazine may lead to the achievement of disease remission.
Disease recurrenceSymptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease216 (2)13 fewer per 100
(95% CI: 23 to 2 fewer)
0.52 (0.28 to 0.97)Low
●●○○
Mesalazine may decrease disease recurrence.
Acute uncomplicated diverticulitis2196 (7)3 fewer per 100
(95% CI: 12 fewer to 6 more)
0.90 (0.61 to 1.33)Low
●●○○
Mesalazine may lead to no difference in disease recurrence.
Acute diverticulitis onset in symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular diseaseSymptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease484 (3)3 fewer per 100
(95% CI: 7 fewer to 0)
0.26 (0.06 to 1.20)Low
●●○○
Mesalazine may lead to no difference in the development of acute diverticulitis in patients with symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease.
Need for surgerySymptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease424 (2)No effect per 100
(95% CI: 1 fewer to 1 more)
0.68 (0.03 to 16.39)Very Low
●○○○
It is uncertain whether mesalazine may lead to no difference in the need for surgery.
Acute uncomplicated diverticulitis1263 (3)1 more per 100
(95% CI: 0 to 2 more)
1.41 (0.51 to 3.90)Low
●●○○
Mesalazine may lead to no difference in the need for surgery.
Any adverse eventsSymptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease391 (2)1 fewer per 100
(95% CI: 5 fewer to 3 more)
1.04 (0.55 to 1.98)Low
●●○○
Mesalazine may lead to no difference in any adverse events.
Acute uncomplicated diverticulitis2196 (7)3 more per 100
(95% CI: 2 fewer to 7 more)
1.03 (0.96 to 1.11)Moderate
●●●○
Mesalazine probably results in no difference in any adverse events.
All-cause mortalitySymptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease607 (4)No effect per 100
(95% CI: 1 fewer to 1 more)
No event in included studiesVery Low
●○○○
It is uncertain whether mesalazine may lead to no difference in all-cause mortality.
Acute uncomplicated diverticulitis1512 (5)No effect per 100
(95% CI: 1 fewer to 1 more)
0.52 (0.05 to 5.68)Very Low
●○○○
It is uncertain whether mesalazine may lead to no difference in all-cause mortality.
Diverticular disease related mortalitySymptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease607 (4)No effect per 100
(95% CI: 1 fewer to 1 more)
No event in included studiesVery Low
●○○○
It is uncertain whether mesalazine may lead to no difference in diverticular disease related mortality.
Acute uncomplicated diverticulitis1512 (5)No effect per 100
(95% CI: 1 fewer to 1 more)
No event in included studiesVery Low
●○○○
It is uncertain whether mesalazine may lead to no difference in diverticular disease related mortality.
Global symptoms Symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease326 (2)Standardized mean difference: 1.01 lower
(95% CI: 1.51 to 0.52 lower)
-Low
●●○○
Mesalazine may improve the global symptoms score.
Acute uncomplicated diverticulitis153 (2)Standardized mean difference: 0.56 lower
(95% CI: 0.88 to 0.24 lower)
-Low
●●○○
Mesalazine may slightly improve the global symptoms score.
Time to recurrence (days)Symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease- (-)No studies-AbsentNo studies were found that evaluated the impact of mesalazine on time to disease recurrence of disease.
Acute uncomplicated diverticulitis91 (3)Average difference in days: 30 lower (95% CI: 55 to 5 lower)-Very Low
●○○○
It is uncertain whether mesalazine may lead to a decrease in time to disease recurrence.

standardized mean difference was used because global symptoms were assessed using different scales across included studies: 0 to 33 [24], 0 to 36 [25], 0 to 60 [29], and 4 to 40 [28].