Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology / 2019 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 3562492 |

Sérgio Britto Garcia, Stefânia Bovo Minto, Isabela de Souza Marques, Vinicius Kannen, "Myenteric Denervation of the Gut with Benzalkonium Chloride: A Review of Forty Years of an Experimental Model", Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 2019, Article ID 3562492, 7 pages, 2019.

Myenteric Denervation of the Gut with Benzalkonium Chloride: A Review of Forty Years of an Experimental Model

Academic Editor: Maikel P. Peppelenbosch
Received10 May 2018
Revised28 Nov 2018
Accepted02 Jan 2019
Published03 Feb 2019


Experimental denervation of organs plays a key role in understanding the functional aspects of the normal innervation as well as the diseases related to them. In 1978 the experimental model of myenteric denervation of the rat gut by serosal application of benzalkonium chloride (BAC) was proposed. BAC is a positively charged surface-active alkylamine and is a powerful cationic detergent, which destroys bacteria after ionic attraction and for this reason is largely used as a surgical antiseptic. Since its initial report, the BAC-induced myenteric denervation model has been used to study many functional and pathological aspects of the enteric nervous system. So far this is the only pure method of myenteric denervation available for research in this area. Promising reports in the literature have shed light on the possibilities for the development of new uses of the BAC-denervation experimental model as a therapeutic tool in some pathological situations. This review aims to shed light on the main historical and recent findings provided by this experimental model.

1. Innervation and Pathology of the Gut

The gut is extrinsically innervated by the sympathetic and parasympathetic divisions of the autonomic nervous system and intrinsically innervated by the enteric nervous system (ENS). The ENS is a collection of millions of neurons that controls or is involved in virtually all the gut functions [1]. It acts largely independently from the central nervous system, as for example the well documented presence of the intestinal peristalsis “in vitro” [2]. The ENS has sensorial receptors and afferents, as well as motor and integrative neurons. Such complexity and independent functions have led to the proposal to classify the ENS as a third division of the autonomic nervous system, along with the sympathetic and parasympathetic divisions [3]. The ENS comprises the myenteric plexus (also known as the Auerbach plexus), located between the longitudinal and circular muscle layers of the gut wall, and the submucosal plexus (also known as the Meissner plexus).

Changes in the ENS, due to illness or age, culminate in loss of gastrointestinal functions. In the primary enteric neuropathies the ENS is considered to be the primary target of the disease process. On the other hand, in the secondary neuropathies the ENS is affected as part or consequence of a gut or a systemic disease. A review has discussed the main clinical primary enteric neuropathies: achalasia, gastroparesis, intestinal pseudoobstruction, and chronic constipation [4]. Interestingly, these neuropathies can be experimentally simulated by the BAC-induced myenteric denervation, as we will further discuss in the next sections of this text.

2. Experimental Models of Gut Denervation

Experimental denervation of organs plays a key role in much, if not most of the understanding of the functional aspects of the normal innervation as well as the diseases related to it. Since the fifties surgical experimental models of gut extrinsic denervation have been developed and validated to study intestinal physiology and pathology, as for example, the studies with vagotomy and splanchnicectomy [5]. Pharmacological blockade has also been used to achieve either the sympathetic or the parasympathetic denervation of the autonomic nervous system [6]. Nevertheless, despite their usefulness for various scientific purposes, both surgical and pharmacological approaches for the gut denervation present important limitations. First, apart from some minor reactive changes, the extrinsic surgical denervation of the gut does not abolish the main functions of the ENS [7] and reinnervation or adaptation frequently occurs after the surgical procedure [8]. Second, the pharmacological blockades not only are nonspecific for the ENS or myenteric plexus, but also cause profound systemic consequences that may cause significant bias in the studies of the ENS, as observed after either sympathetic or parasympathetic blockade with guanethidine or atropine, respectively [9, 10].

3. Intrinsic Denervation of the Gut with Benzalkonium Chloride: Historical and Mechanistic Backgrounds

Benzalkonium salts comprise a group of positively charged surface-active alkylamine biocides with the general formula alkyldimethylbenzylammonium chloride (BAC) or bromide [11]. For decades BAC has been largely used as an ophthalmic and nasal antiseptic and as a skin disinfectant in surgery [12]. BAC is a powerful cationic detergent that destroys bacteria and also mammal tissues due to its ability to disrupt cell membranes in general, as confirmed with the observation by scanning electron microscope, of extensive cell membranes lesions in the corneas of rabbits treated with BAC [13].

Interestingly, in 1978, Sato and colleagues [14] found that the administration of BAC topically applied on the intestinal serous layer leads to a specific and irreversible injury of the myenteric (intramural) nerve cells. In fact, these authors had observed that the BAC serosal application also resulted in degenerative lesions of the other cells of the intestinal wall, but these lesions disappeared in a few weeks after the application of this surfactant, with total recovery of the intestinal wall, apart from the myenteric neurons [14]. In sequence, Sakata et al. (1979) studied electron-microscopically the effects of the BAC serosal application on the intestinal wall and proposed that a lower recovering ability of the nerve elements might be responsible for the specificity of neural lesions in this experimental model [15].

Nevertheless, so far, the mechanisms for the specificity of the neuron lesions after BAC exposure remain not well known. It was further observed that higher concentrations of BAC caused a generalized tissue damage including disruption of the smooth muscle, lymphocytic infiltration, intestinal perforation and death [16]. The time sequence of the BAC-induced effects on the muscle layers was also determined. Within 24 h the total destruction of the longitudinal muscle and partial destruction of the circular muscle were evident and the myenteric plexus was necrotic. By 5 days after treatment, both muscle layers had regenerated to their original states and the myenteric plexus was totally absent [17]. Possibly the submucous neurons are not affected by BAC application because they are more distant than the myenteric neurons from the serosa. This hypothesis is supported by the observation that BAC only causes minimal lesions on the internal (circular) muscle layer of the intestinal wall [17].

Another mechanistic study showed widespread apoptosis in the myenteric plexus 3 days after the BAC treatment and a loss of more than 90% of myenteric neurons one week after the treatment. A marked increase in populations of T cells, B cells, and macrophage-like cells was also observed. Cyclosporine partially reversed the inflammatory cells infiltration and delayed the neuronal loss, suggesting that the immune response may actively contribute to tissue destruction in this experimental model [18]. It has been observed in conjunctival cells that the mode of BAC-induced cell death is dose- dependent. BAC treatment leads to necrosis at high concentrations and apoptosis at low concentrations [19]. Possibly similar situation occurs in the gut, but more studies are necessary to clarify the detailed mechanisms of BAC neuronal destruction. Finally, a recent study has shown in the rat corneas that the levels of total β-catenin were significantly upregulated 8 h after the topical administration of BAC, suggesting that the cytotoxicity of BAC may be also mediated through the modulation of the Wnt pathway [20].

4. Effects of Myenteric Denervation by BAC on the Organs of the Digestive Tract

4.1. Esophagus

In humans, achalasia of the esophagus is associated with abnormalities of the myenteric plexus. The application of BAC on the lower esophagus of rats provided an experimental model of achalasia, with distal narrowing, proximal dilatation and decreased food intake [21]. Other study further characterized this achalasia experimental model through an injection of BAC circumferentially into the lower esophagus and the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) in opossums, resulting in manometrically higher pressures and loss of nitric oxide expressing inhibitory myenteric neurons with failure of relaxation of the sphincter by electrical stimulation [22]. We have obtained similar findings in rats with the lower esophagus denervated by BAC, which was associated with the formation of megaesophagus with a considerable increase in thickness of the muscle layers [23].

It must be mentioned that EGJ distensibility is an important factor in the management of human achalasia [24] and a subgroup of patients presents manometrically normal EGJ relaxation but has an impaired EGJ distensibility [25]. Unfortunately, the available experimental studies did not evaluate specifically the denervation of the EGJ. All of them included the denervation of the lower esophagus as well, which is a confounding factor in the interpretation of the results. Thus, experimental studies with injection of BAC circumferentially only into the EGJ are warrant. Interestingly, the denervation with botulinum toxin has also been used for the treatment of human achalasia with reasonable but only transient responses [26]. It may be hypothesized that reinnervation of the lower esophageal sphincter could be related to the transitory results of this procedure, since the botulinum toxin is degraded along time [27]. Thus, it is possible to hypothesize that the application of BAC could eventually be more successful than the botulinum toxin for the treatment of achalasia in the long term, since it causes a permanent loss of neurons. Nevertheless, limitations of human studies with BAC will be further discussed in this review

4.2. Stomach

The first study of the BAC serosal application in the stomach, performed on domestic turkeys, showed that this procedure resulted in the loss of motility with hypertrophy of the caudoventral muscle of the stomach and a decrease in the number and size of myenteric neurons [28]. In another study in turkeys, the denervation of the isthmus between the glandular (GS) and muscular stomach (MS) abolished the GS contractions and reduced the frequency of the MS and duodenal contractions by 50%. Pyloric denervation did not affect the frequency of the GS or MS contractions but abolished the duodenal contractions, suggesting that a driving pacemaker for the gastroduodenal cycle is located in the isthmus and that the myenteric plexus is essential for the conduction from the pacemaker to the GS and to the duodenum [29]. Ablation of the nerves beneath the medial or lateral side of the gastric isthmus by BAC indicated that initiation and regulation of the muscle involved in motility acts via nerves encircling the isthmus [30].

Studies in rats showed that duodenal contractions occurred spontaneously in the coordination with antral contractions in normal stomach preparations. Interestingly, when the antroduodenal junctional zone was pretreated with BAC, the augmented duodenal contractions did not occur spontaneously, suggesting that myenteric neurons mediate antroduodenal coordinated contractions [31]. The serosal BAC application on the rat antrum or corpus caused a disturbance in the emptying of both liquids and solids, as well as a dose-related specific loss of gastrin releasing peptide, substance P, and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide immunoreactivities [32]. The antral denervation with BAC suggested that luminal nutrient releases gastrin in the rat via activation of the antral neurons secreting gastrin-releasing peptide and that the antral innervation normally inhibits G-cell responses to nonnutrient distension of the stomach [33].

The BAC experimental model also showed that not only are functional aspects of the stomach affected by myenteric denervation, but also they exert profound effects on the epithelial sheet, with an increase in the mucosal area of all gastric portions (hyperplasia), as well as an increase in the gastrin-G cell and somatostatin-D cell populations. Interestingly, these changes did not occur when denervation was combined with pyloroplasty, indicating that, after denervation, gastric distension and stasis are the major stimuli for hyperplasia [34]. The role of gastric food stasis as a major factor triggering morphological alterations of the gastric epithelium has been reinforced by the observation that the BAC-denervation of the rat stomach increases gastric emptying time, acid, and the gastrin secretion together with the increase of the size of the mucosa [35].

4.3. Small Intestine

Five years after the publication of the BAC-induced colonic denervation, the effects of BAC application in the small intestine of rats were well described by Fox et al. (1983). These authors have observed a significant reduction in the number of ganglion cells in the myenteric plexus “as early as 5 days after BAC treatment”, which persisted over time [16]. The most important findings made with BAC application in the small intestine are related to discoveries of a variety of myenteric plexus functions. Initially, it has been observed that the BAC-induced ablation of the myenteric neurons in the rat jejunum disrupts the basic electric rhythm but not the migrating myoelectric complex propagation, suggesting that the myenteric neurons play a modulatory role in the generation and propagation of this rhythm, whereas humoral factors or the submucosal neurons may be more important in the control of the migrating myoelectric complex [36]. The BAC experimental model also showed that the motor neurons innervating the rat jejunal longitudinal muscle are located in the myenteric plexus, because the muscle responses are lost despite the presence of an intact submucosal plexus [37]. Furthermore, a set of experiments with pharmacological blockers of the autonomic system in rats showed that adrenergic receptor agonists produced a concentration-dependent relaxation of longitudinal muscle of the rat jejunum, but myenteric denervation with BAC caused an impairment of the relaxation, indicating that myenteric neurons play a role in the sympathetic modulation of the intestinal wall [37]. The myenteric neurons were also observed to influence the mechanical responses of isolated rat jejunal longitudinal muscles produced by acetylcholine, 5-hydroxytryptamine, cholecystokinin octapeptide, norepinephrine, and vasoactive intestinal peptide [38]. Other studies have confirmed that the myenteric denervation importantly reduced the cholinergic responsiveness of intestinal smooth muscle [39], impaired the intestinal motility [40], and influenced the neurotransmitter levels and myoelectrical activity [41].

The loss of myenteric neurons is associated with marked alternations in intestinal morphology, leading not only to visceral dilation but also to the thickening of the smooth muscle layers, as seen in the jejunum and ileum [16, 4244]. This increase in thickness of both the longitudinal and circular smooth muscle layers is thought to be primarily due to an increase in the number of smooth muscle cells (hyperplasia), since little cellular hypertrophy was previously observed [16]. Myenteric denervation leads to the replacement of the loosely arranged reticulin fibers surrounding the smooth muscle cells by fibrous tissue (with typical collagen fiber), which may alter the biomechanical function resulting in the impairment of muscular contraction [45]. It has been proposed that the muscles may thicken because motility is abnormal in the myenteric denervated segment [36, 40] or in response to the abnormal innervations of the tissue, since changes in the levels of various neurotransmitter occur in response to chemical ablation of myenteric neurons [41]. We consider that it is likely that both mechanisms are responsible for the thickening of the muscle and mucosa intestinal layers.

Myenteric plexus also regulates mucosal morphology and functions. The BAC-induced denervation caused increased villus height and crypt depth [43, 44, 46], as well as increased crypt cell proliferation rates [47, 48]. In suckling and weanling rats, the myenteric ablation was followed by a sharp increase on cell proliferation and migration in the ileal epithelium in the first 15 days of treatment with a subsequent recovery of the intestinal mucosa homeostasis later on [49]. The BAC myenteric denervation provided information relating myenteric neurons with secretion and absorption functions of the intestinal mucosa. The BAC treatment eliminated the ability of cholera toxin to induce intestinal secretion, which suggests that the secretory reflexes activated by cholera toxin are probably conveyed via the myenteric plexus [50] and ablation of the jejunal myenteric plexuses by treatment with BAC reduces alanine absorption [51].

Finally, the BAC experimental model has also provided new insights on the intestinal physiology. In a study of rats surgically prepared with Thiry-Vella intestinal loop, the “in vivo” distension of the normal loops reduced fluid intake and produced signs of food aversivity whereas these effects were absent in the BAC-treated animals, showing that this experimental model can be used to study the mechanisms underlying the effects of the enteral stimuli on the feeding behavior [52]. This experimental model also showed a role played by the myenteric plexus on intestinal inflammation. Interestingly, the BAC-denervation abolished the protective effects provided by both the ketamine and the vagal nerve stimulation against ischemia/reperfusion injury [53, 54].

4.4. Colon

The first experiment with the myenteric denervation by BAC was performed in the colon of rats (Sato et al., 1978) and the authors observed that viscerae become “dilated as in megacolon” [14]. Other studies reported a close resemblance between the BAC-induced aganglionic colon and the more proximal segments of Hirschsprung's disease megacolon [5559]. Recently, a new method has been described to achieve an even more accurate animal model of the Hirschsprung disease, by using colonoscopy to inject BAC, and to produce ablation of the myenteric nervous system in the distal colon and rectum in mice [60].

The main morphological alteration described in the BAC- induced experimental megacolon is an increased thickness of the colon wall, which is due to muscle hypertrophy and mucosal hyperplasia [56]. The denervated colonic mucosa presents an increase in the crypt cell population, crypt cell production per crypt, and a decrease in cell cycle time [56]. A functional study with anorectal manometry in mice with aganglionic rectums showed the absence of slow waves and high resting pressure similar to the congenital aganglionic rectums. This finding suggests that hypertrophic nerves usually found in human congenital aganglionosis may not be necessary to produce the anorectal spasticity [57].

5. New Research Directions and the Potential Use of Myenteric Denervation with BAC as a Therapeutic Tool for Some Gut Diseases

The BAC experimental model can be used as a tool to develop innovative approaches for the treatment of diseases related to myenteric neurons absence or damage. Interestingly, the transplantation of enteric neural stem cells into the mice aganglionic colon induced by BAC was performed. After this procedure it has been observed that the expression of the neural and glial markers was increased and the colonic motility was improved, which may provide a potential novel therapy for the treatment of Hirschsprung's disease [61]. Other study has shown that the treatment with a selective agonist of the estrogen receptor β increased the recovery of neurons after damage by BAC application [62]. Both studies demonstrate the potential of the BAC experimental model for neuroplasticity research and the testing of new treatment strategies for ENS diseases.

On the other hand, scattered reports in the literature for decades have been suggesting that denervation with BAC could provide new therapeutic approaches in some gut diseases. In the first of these reports, the denervation with BAC improved survival and weight gain and increased transit time and d-xylose absorption in rats following 80% small bowel resection [63]. These findings were confirmed by other studies that have shown that BAC-denervation improved clinical conditions of the animals and produced a marked increase of the remaining intestinal absorptive surface in the short-bowel syndrome [6466].

In the stomach, the BAC-denervation procedure has been proposed as a new method to perform parietal cell vagotomy in substitution of the traditional operative procedure, which is an accepted therapy for peptic ulcers that are refractory to medical management [67]. Furthermore, a comparative study of efficacy of several techniques in regard to long-term effects on acid secretion, ulcer prophylaxis, and permanent vagal denervation in a rat model has shown that the BAC chemoneurolytic and laser methods were most effective for decreasing the size of acid-secreting areas [68, 69].

Another field of investigation has been provided by the evidence that myenteric denervation with BAC exerts a protective role against colon cancer [70, 71] and stomach cancer [72]. This research line, despite being incipient, may be useful on the investigation of the poorly known relationship between cancer and the autonomic nervous system.

Nevertheless, there are significant limitations for the potential therapeutic use of BAC in clinical situations. First, the application of BAC in the gut serosa causes transitory peritonitis that is well tolerated in rodents, but certainly could not be acceptable in humans. Second, even if the BAC could be applied in the intestinal wall trough an endoscopic route, as it has been used in some experimental studies mentioned in this text, it probably would be very difficult to achieve a precise amount of denervation in one given clinical situation. In that case, it is reasonable to hypothesize that an insufficient or an excessive degree of neuron loss could cause insufficient results or undesirable side effects, respectively. Third, considering that the BAC-denervation impairs the visceral peristaltism, possible problems associated with pseudoobstruction of the viscera in the long term may be expected. In view of these considerations, despite being promising, the future directions for the research towards the use of BAC as a therapeutic tool must take into account the fact that major technical improvements must be achieved related to the efficacy, precision, and safety of the procedure prior any eventual use in clinical settings.

It should be mentioned that all the above limitations regarding the clinical use of BAC are present when it is used as a compound for disease modelling in experimental settings as well. Thus, both side effects and a lack of precision on the amount of denervation must be taken into account in the design of experiments. Finally, the possibility of partial recovery of innervation along time due to neuroplasticity phenomena should not be ruled out.

6. Conclusions

The gut myenteric denervation with BAC has been shown to be a simple, nonexpensive, and reliable experimental model. It has been providing interesting information about the functional and pathological aspects of the enteric nervous system during the last forty years. New research lines are likely to emerge from the use of this experimental model, including some potential therapeutic applications. Nevertheless, important technical limitations must be taken into account in experimental settings and must necessarily be overcome before any clinical use.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.


  1. J. Furness, L. Rivera, M. Thacker, L. Pontell, and T. Frugier, “Effects of ischemia/reperfusion on the enteric nervous system and intestine,” Neurogastroenterology and Motility, vol. 24, pp. 8–8, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  2. P. Trendelenburg, “Physiological and pharmacological investigations of small intestinal peristalsis,” Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, vol. 373, no. 2, pp. 101–133, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. C. Kalcheim, K. Langley, and K. Unsicker, “From the neural crest to chromaffin cells: Introduction to a session on chromaffin cell development,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 971, pp. 544–546, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. R. De Giorgio, V. Stanghellini, G. Barbara et al., “Primary enteric neuropathies underlying gastrointestinal motor dysfunction,” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 114–122, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. W. W. Shingleton, W. G. Anlyan, and D. Hart, “Effects of vagotomy, splanchnicectomy and celiac ganglionectomy on experimentally produced spasm of sphincter of Oddi in animals,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 135, no. 5, pp. 721–729, 1952. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. D. K. Nelson, J. E. Service, D. R. Studelska, S. Brimijoin, and V. L. W. Go, “Gastrointestinal neuropeptide concentrations following guanethidine sympathectomy,” Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 203–210, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. W. M. Bayliss and E. H. Starling, “The movements and innervation of the small intestine,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 99–143, 1899. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. E. A. Davis, M. C. Washington, E. R. Yaniz, H. Phillips, A. I. Sayegh, and M. J. Dailey, “Long-term effect of parasympathetic or sympathetic denervation on intestinal epithelial cell proliferation and apoptosis,” Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 242, no. 15, pp. 1499–1507, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. Holeček, M. Bielavská, and L. Šprongl, “Protein metabolism in guanethidine-treated rats,” International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 257–264, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. G. Lauriti, V. Cascini, P. L. Chiesa, A. Pierro, and A. Zani, “Atropine Treatment for Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis,” European Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 28, pp. 393–399, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  11. R. Patarca, J. A. Rosenzweig, A. A. Zuniga, and M. A. Fletcher, “Benzalkonium salts: Effects on G protein-mediated processes and surface membranes,” Critical Reviews in Oncogenesis, vol. 11, no. 3-4, pp. 255–305, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  12. P. B. Price, “Benzalkonium chloride (zephiran chloride) as a skin disinfectant,” JAMA Surgery, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 23–33, 1950. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. M. Tønjum, “Effects of benzalkonium chloride upon the corneal epithelium studied with scanning electron microscopy,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 358–366, 1975. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A. Sato, M. Yamamoto, K. Imamura, Y. Kashiki, T. Kunieda, and K. Sakata, “Pathophysiology of aganglionic colon and anorectum: An experimental study on aganglionosis produced by a new method in the rat,” Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 399–405, 1978. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. K. Sakata, T. Kunieda, T. Furuta, and A. Sato, “Selective destruction of intestinal nervous elements by local application of benzalkonium solution in the rat,” Experientia, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 1611–1613, 1979. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. D. A. Fox, M. L. Epstein, and P. Bass, “Surfactants selectively ablate enteric neurons of the rat jejunum,” The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 227, no. 2, pp. 538–544, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  17. N. A. See, M. Epstein, E. Schultz, T. P. Pienkowski, and P. Bass, “Hyperplasia of jejunal smooth muscle in the myenterically denervated rat,” Cell and Tissue Research, vol. 253, no. 3, pp. 609–617, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. E. J. Parr and K. A. Sharkey, “Multiple mechanisms contribute to myenteric plexus ablation induced by benzalkonium chloride in the guinea-pig ileum,” Cell and Tissue Research, vol. 289, no. 2, pp. 253–264, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. De Saint Jean, F. Brignole, A.-F. Bringuier, A. Bauchet, G. Feldmann, and C. Baudouin, “Effects of benzalkonium chloride on growth and survival of Chang conjunctival cells,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 619–630, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  20. Y. Zhou, Q. Liu, T. Zhou et al., “Modulation of the canonical Wnt pathway by Benzalkonium Chloride in corneal epithelium,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 355–362, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. Goto and J. L. Grosfeld, “The effect of a neurotoxin (benzalkonium chloride) on the lower esophagus,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 117–119, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. E. A. Gaumnitz, P. Bass, M. A. Osinski, M. A. Sweet, and C. Singaram, “Electrophysiological and pharmacological responses of chronically denervated lower esophageal sphincter of the opossum,” Gastroenterology, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 789–799, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. L. H. P. Febrönio, S. Britto-Garcia, J. S. M. De Oliveira, and S. Zucoloto, “Megaesophagus in rats,” Research in Experimental Medicine, vol. 197, no. 2, pp. 109–115, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. F. G. M. Smeets, A. A. M. Masclee, D. Keszthelyi, E. T. T. L. Tjwa, and J. M. Conchillo, “Esophagogastric junction distensibility in the management of achalasia patients: Relation to treatment outcome,” Neurogastroenterology & Motility, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 1495–1503, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. F. A. Ponds, A. J. Bredenoord, B. F. Kessing, and A. J. P. M. Smout, “Esophagogastric junction distensibility identifies achalasia subgroup with manometrically normal esophagogastric junction relaxation,” Neurogastroenterology & Motility, vol. 29, no. 1, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  26. J. L. Sterling, R. Schey, and Z. Malik, “The Role of Botulinum Toxin Injections for Esophageal Motility Disorders,” Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 528–540, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. R. Kroupa, A. Hep, J. Dolina et al., “Combined treatment of achalasia -botulinum toxin injection followed by pneumatic dilatation: Long-term results,” Diseases of the Esophagus, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 100–105, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. S. B. Chaplin, G. E. Duke, H. Hunt, and L. A. Degernes, “Chemical denervation of the myenteric plexus of the muscular stomach of turkeys,” Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. Part C, Comparative, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 201–207, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S. B. Chaplin and G. E. Duke, “Effect of denervation of the myenteric plexus on gastroduodenal motility in turkeys,” American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 259, no. 3, pp. G481–G489, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. A. J. Hall and G. E. Duke, “Effect of Selective Gastric Intrinsic Denervation on Gastric Motility in Turkeys,” Poultry Science, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 240–244, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. Matsuo, T. Neya, and T. Yamasato, “Antroduodenal coordinated contractions as studied by chemical ablation of myenteric neurons in the gastroduodenal junctional zone,” Acta Medica Okayama, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 21–27, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  32. A. Higham, P. Noble, D. G. Thompson, and G. J. Dockray, “Increased sensitivity of gastrin cells to gastric distension following antral denervation in the rat,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 503, no. 1, pp. 169–175, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. A. Higham, C. Vaillant, B. Yegen, D. G. Thompson, and G. J. Dockray, “Relation between cholecystokinin and antral innervation in the control of gastric emptying in the rat,” Gut, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 24–32, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. L. F. R. Sobreira, S. Zucoloto, S. B. Garcia, and L. E. A. Troncon, “Effects of myenteric denervation on gastric epithelial cells and gastric emptying,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 2493–2499, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. S. Zucoloto, L. M. F. Romanello, S. B. Garcia, L. F. R. Sobreira, A. J. A. Barbosa, and L. E. A. Troncon, “Topical application of benzalkonium chloride to the stomach serosa increases gastric emptying time, acid secretion, serum gastrin and size of the mucosa,” APMIS-Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica, vol. 110, no. 11, pp. 795–801, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. D. A. Fox and P. Bass, “Selective myenteric neuronal denervation of the rat jejunum. Differential control of the propagation of migrating myoelectric complex and basic electric rhythm,” Gastroenterology, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 572–577, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  37. D. A. Fox and P. Bass, “Pharmacological characterization of rat jejunal contractility after chronic ablation of the myenteric plexus,” The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 238, no. 1, pp. 372–377, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  38. D. A. Fox, J. R. Herman, and P. Bass, “Differentiation between myenteric plexus and longitudinal muscle of the rat jejunum as the site of action of putative enteric neurotransmitters,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 39–47, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. J. R. Herman and P. Bass, “Altered carbachol-induced contractile responses of rat jejunal smooth muscle following local myenteric plexus ablation,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 1146–1152, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. G. E. Holle and W. Forth, “Myoelectric activity of small intestine after chemical ablation of myenteric neurons,” American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 258, no. 4, pp. G519–G526, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. J. L. Dahl, D. D. Bloom, M. L. Epstein, D. A. Fox, and P. Bass, “Effect of chemical ablation of myenteric neurons on neurotransmitter levels in the rat jejunum,” Gastroenterology, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 338–344, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. M. S. Luck, J. L. Dahl, M. G. Boyeson, and P. Bass, “Neuroplasticity in the smooth muscle of the myenterically and extrinsically denervated rat jejunum,” Cell and Tissue Research, vol. 271, no. 2, pp. 363–374, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. S. B. Garcia, L. Z. Pinto, S. Zucoloto, and J. S. M. Oliveira, “Experimental megaileum,” Research in Experimental Medicine, vol. 195, no. 1, pp. 249–253, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. M. Deniz, M. Kilinç, and E. S. Hatipoǧlu, “Morphological alterations in small intestine of rats with myenteric plexus denervation,” European Surgical Research, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 152–158, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. L. F. Borges, E. G. Caldini, C. N. Battlhener et al., “Differential distribution of some extracellular matrix fibers in an experimentally denervated rat megaileum,” Micron, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 397–404, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. N. Hadzijahic, W. E. Renehan, C. K. Ma, X. Zhang, and R. Fogel, “Myenteric plexus destruction alters morphology of rat intestine,” Gastroenterology, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 1017–1028, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. S. Zucoloto, J. A. Diaz, J. S. M. Oliveira, G. Muccilo, V. N. Sales Neto, and J. K. Kajiwara, “Effect of chemical ablation of myenteric neurones on intestinal cell proliferation,” Cell Proliferation, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 213–219, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  48. G. E. Holle, “Changes in the structure and regeneration mode of the rat small intestinal mucosa following benzalkonium chloride treatment,” Gastroenterology, vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 1264–1273, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. L. Hernandes, S. Zucoloto, and E. P. Alvares, “Effect of myenteric denervation on intestinal epithelium proliferation and migration of suckling and weanling rats,” Cell Proliferation, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 127–138, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. M. Jodal, S. Holmgren, O. Lundgren, and A. Sjöqvist, “Involvement of the myenteric plexus in the cholera toxin-induced net fluid secretion in the rat small intestine,” Gastroenterology, vol. 105, no. 5, pp. 1286–1293, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. K. A. Barada, N. E. Saadé, S. F. Atweh, and C. F. Nassar, “Neural mediation of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide inhibitory effect on jejunal alanine absorption,” American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 275, no. 4, pp. G822–G828, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. K. Móricz, B. Gyetvai, and G. Bárdos, “Morphological and functional changes after benzalkonium chloride treatment of the small intestinal Thiry-Vella loop in rats,” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 519–528, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. F. J. Guzmán-De La Garza, C. R. Cámara-Lemarroy, R. G. Ballesteros-Elizondo, G. Alarcón-Galván, P. Cordero-Pérez, and N. E. Fernández-Garza, “Ketamine and the myenteric plexus in intestinal ischemia/reperfusion injury,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 1878–1885, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. S. Langness, M. Kojima, R. Coimbra, B. P. Eliceiri, and T. W. Costantini, “Enteric glia cells are critical to limiting the intestinal inflammatory response after injury,” American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 312, no. 3, pp. G274–G282, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. T. Furuta, K. Sakata, T. Kunieda, and Y. Kishimoto, “On the pathogenesis of intestinal aganglionosis. A consideration based on electron microscopic observations of experimental and clinical aganglionoses,” Experientia, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 1073-1074, 1980. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. J. S. M. Oliveira, M. A. S. Llorach-Velludo, and V. N. Sales-Neto, “Megacolon in rats,” Digestion, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 166–171, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. H. H. Qin, N. Lei, J. Mendoza, and J. C. Y. Dunn, “Benzalkonium chloride-treated anorectums mimicked endothelin-3-deficient aganglionic anorectums on manometry,” Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 2408–2411, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. J. P. Wagner, V. F. Sullins, H. A. Khalil, and J. C. Y. Dunn, “A durable model of Hirschsprung's colon,” Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 1804–1808, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. A. Yoneda, H. Shima, L. Nemeth, T. Oue, and P. Puri, “Selective chemical ablation of the enteric plexus in mice,” Pediatric Surgery International, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 234–237, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. H. A. Khalil, M. Kobayashi, P. Rana et al., “Mouse model of endoscopically ablated enteric nervous system,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 200, no. 1, pp. 117–121, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. W. Liu, L. Zhang, and R. Wu, “Enteric Neural Stem Cells Expressing Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1: A Novel Cellular Therapy for Hirschsprung's Disease in Mouse Model,” DNA and Cell Biology, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 642–648, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. F. D’Errico, G. Goverse, Y. Dai et al., “Estrogen receptor β controls proliferation of enteric glia and differentiation of neurons in the myenteric plexus after damage,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 115, no. 22, pp. 5798–5803, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. A. Sawchuk, S. Goto, J. Yount et al., “Chemically induced bowel denervation improves survival in short bowel syndrome,” Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 492–496, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. S. B. Garcia, M. C. Kawasaky, J. C. F. Silva et al., “Intrinsic myenteric denervation. A new model to increase the intestinal absorptive surface in short-bowel syndrome,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 200–203, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. C. E. V. De Carvalho, F. V. D. Basile, M. V. O. Vespúcio, A. C. G. Iglesias, N. F. Gava, and S. B. Garcia, “Effects of intrinsic denervation of the jejunum after extensive enterectomy in the rat bowel syndrome,” Acta Cirurgica Brasileira, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 43–46, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. A. Michopoulou, B. Triggas, E. Hra et al., “Early intestinal morphological changes following Benzalkonium Chloride treatment in a rat model of short bowel syndrome,” Annali Italiani Di Chirurgia, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 135–140, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  67. T. A. Schneider, C. M. Wittgen, C. H. Andrus, and D. L. Kaminski, “Comparison of minimally invasive methods of parietal cell vagotomy in a porcine model,” Surgery, vol. 112, pp. 649–654, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  68. T. J. Neuberger, C. M. Wittgen, T. A. Schneider, C. H. Andrus, W. M. Panneton, and D. L. Kaminski, “Evaluation of alternative proximal gastric vagotomy techniques after a 9-month interval in a rat model,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 316–320, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. A. G. El-Ghazzawy, N. Gupta, T. J. Swope et al., “Evaluation of benzalkonium chloride chemoneurolytic proximal gastric vagotomy,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 207–211, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. S. B. Garcia, J. S. M. Oliveira, L. Z. Pinto, G. Muccillo, and S. Zucoloto, “The relationship between megacolon and carcinoma of the colon: An experimental approach,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1777–1779, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. M. V. O. Vespúcio, A. Turatti, P. Modiano et al., “Intrinsic denervation of the colon is associated with a decrease of some colonic preneoplastic markers in rats treated with a chemical carcinogen,” Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 311–317, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. A. C. Polli-Lopes, S. Zucoloto, F. De Queirós Cunha, L. Alves Da Silva Figueiredo, and S. B. Garcia, “Myenteric denervation reduces the incidence of gastric tumors in rats,” Cancer Letters, vol. 190, no. 1, pp. 45–50, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Sérgio Britto Garcia et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.