Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume 2019, Article ID 9367868, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9367868
Research Article

Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy (LSPDP) versus Open Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy (OSPDP): A Comparative Study

1Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Ningbo Medical Center, Medical School of Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315041 Zhejiang, China
2Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Eastern Hospital, Affiliated to Taipei Medical University, Ningbo, 315041 Zhejiang, China
3Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Dipesh Kumar Yadav; moc.qq@3957058332

Received 24 January 2019; Accepted 1 April 2019; Published 1 July 2019

Academic Editor: Maikel P. Peppelenbosch

Copyright © 2019 Jing Huang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Gagner and A. Pomp, “Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 408–410, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Mehrabi, M. Hafezi, J. Arvin et al., “A systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas: it's time to randomize,” Surgery, vol. 157, no. 1, pp. 45–55, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. G. Melotti, G. Butturini, M. Piccoli et al., “Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: Results on a consecutive series of 58 patients,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 246, no. 1, pp. 77–82, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. D. Angelis, R. F. Brizzi, and R. Pellicano, “Endoscopic ultrasonography for pancreatic cancer: current and future perspectives,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 220–230, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. L. Mellemkjoer, J. R. H. Olsen, M. S. Linet, G. Gridley, and J. K. McLaughlin, “Cancer risk after splenectomy,” Cancer, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 577–583, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Benoist, L. Dugué, A. Sauvanet et al., “Is there a role of preservation of the spleen in distal pancreatectomy?” Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 188, no. 3, pp. 255–260, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. C. Aldridge and R. C. N. Williamson, “Distal pancreatectomy with and without splenectomy,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 78, no. 8, pp. 976–979, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. K. Yamaguchi, H. Noshiro, K. Yokohata et al., “Is there any benefit of preservation of the spleen in distal pancreatectomy?” International Surgery, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 162–168, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Y. F. Hua, D. K. Yadav, X. Bai, and T. Liang, “Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) with preservation of splenic vessels: an inferior-posterior approach,” Gastroenterology Research and Practice, vol. 2018, Article ID 1683719, 7 pages, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. G. R. Joliat, I. Labgaa, D. Petermann et al., “Cost-benefit analysis of an enhanced recovery protocol for pancreaticoduodenectomy,” The British journal of surgery, vol. 102, no. 13, pp. 1676–1683, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  11. A. A. Duarte Garcés, S. Andrianello, G. Marchegiani et al., “Reappraisal of post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) classifications: do we need to redefine grades A and B?” HPB, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 702–707, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. Bassi, G. Marchegiani, C. Dervenis et al., “The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years After,” Surgery, vol. 161, no. 3, pp. 584–591, 2017. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. G. Malleo, S. Crippa, and G. Butturini, “Delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: validation of international study group of pancreatic surgery classification and analysis of risk factors,” HPB, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 610–618, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. P. Jacobs, C. Mavroudis, M. L. Jacobs et al., “What is operative mortality? Defining death in a surgical registry database: a report of the STS congenital database taskforce and the joint EACTS-STS congenital database committee,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 1937–1941, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Y. Zhang, X.-M. Chen, and D.-L. Sun, “Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: A single-institution comparative study,” World Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 327, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. F. Ü. Malya, H. K. Bektaşoǧlu, M. Hasbahçeci et al., “Laparoscopic surgery in distal pancreatic tumors,” Turkish Journal of Surgery, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 288–291, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. A. Gumbs and E. K. Chouillard, “Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy for malignant tumors,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 83–86, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. Y. Kristinsson, G. Gridley, R. N. Hoover, D. Check, and O. Landgren, “Long-term risks after splenectomy among 8,149 cancer-free American veterans: a cohort study with up to 27 years follow-up,” Haematologica, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 392–398, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. L. McGory, D. S. Zingmond, E. Sekeris, and C. Y. Ko, “The significance of inadvertent splenectomy during colorectal cancer resection,” Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill : 1960), vol. 142, no. 7, pp. 668–674, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. V. Ottermo, M. Ovstedal, T. Lango et al., “The role of tactile feedback in laparoscopic surgery,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 390–400, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  21. K. Inoko, Y. Ebihara, K. Sakamoto et al., “Strategic approach to the splenic artery in laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy,” Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. e122–e125, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Nakamura, Y. Nagayoshi, H. Kono et al., “Lateral approach for laparoscopic splenic vessel-preserving distal pancreatectomy,” Surgery, vol. 150, no. 2, pp. 326–331, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. V. Pannegeon, P. Pessaux, A. Sauvanet, M.-P. Vullierme, R. Kianmanesh, and J. Belghiti, “Pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: predictive risk factors and value of conservative treatment,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 141, no. 11, pp. 1071–1076, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. C. R. Ferrone, A. L. Warshaw, D. W. Rattner et al., “Pancreatic fistula rates after 462 distal pancreatectomies: staplers do not decrease fistula rates,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1691–1698, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C. B. Nahm, S. J. Connor, J. S. Samra, and A. Mittal, “Postoperative pancreatic fistula: A review of traditional and emerging concepts,” Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology, vol. 11, pp. 105–118, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. C. Bassi, C. Dervenis, G. Butturini et al., “Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition,” Surgery, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 8–13, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus